Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric Phase 3 - Identify and
evaluate a wind project in the world

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Agrícolas, Pecuarias y del Medio Ambiente

Academic Unit
Academic Level Profesional

Academic Field Formación complementaria

Course Name Energía Eólica

Course Code 358052
Course Type Theoretical Can be ye ☒ N ☐
enable s o
d
Number of Credits 3

2. Description of the activity

Number
Type of the Individua
☐ Collaborative ☒ of 2
activity: l
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation: Intermediate:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and evaluation
activity: 100
of learning
Starting date of the activity:
Deadline of the activity:
Thursday, 25 of
Sunday, 05 of july of 2020
June of 2020
Competence to develop:
As a group they should explore and develop ideas regarding the
evolution of alternative energies, explaining examples and generating
discussion about the incidence of wind projects in the world.
Topics to develop:
History of Alternative Energies in the World.
Wind energy projects.
Valuation of wind energy projects.
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop
1. Presentation of each of the participants in the collaborative group.
2. Reading of contents of unit 2.
3. Choice in group of project to evaluate.
4. Project evaluation.
5. Consolidation of final document in group.
Describe how you are going to develop the learning strategy
Activities to develop
1. Each one of the students must present themselves in the forum
that is in the Collaborative Learning Environment.
2. Then, through a concerted decision, the group will choose one of
the proposed readings:
 Juárez-Hernández, S., & León, G. (2014). Energía eólica en el
istmo de Tehuantepec: desarrollo, actores y oposición social.
 Maya Ochoa, C., Hernández Betancur, J. D., & Gallego Múnera,
Ó. M. (2012). La Valoración De Proyectos De Energía Eólica en
Colombia Bajo El Enfoque De Opciones Reales. Cuadernos de
Administración (01203592), 25(44), 193–231.
 Otero, F. ( 1 ), Cerne, B. ( 2 ), & Campetella, C. ( 2,3 ). (2016),
Preliminary wind speed study in San Julian in reference to wind
power generation. Meteorologica, 59–79.
(Which are in the knowledge environment Unit 2).
3. In Group they will evaluate the chosen project based on the Wind
Project Evaluation format (see Annex Wind Project Evaluation)
4. In the environment of monitoring and evaluation of learning, they
will deliver one document per group.
Collaborative Learning Environment: Presentation
Environment
and development of the activity.
for the
Learning monitoring and evaluation environment:
development
Delivery of the requested document.
Products to Individual:
deliver by In this activity individually each member of the
student group must review the knowledge environment and
perform the readings of unit 2.

After reading, each student should propose one of

the proposed readings and argue the reasons why it
should be chosen. For this, everyone must know the
content of the 3 proposals.
Each student must propose a region in which they
will develop the Wind Energy project, specifying
Georeference of the place, environmental conditions
and explain how the wind influences in said selected
region, justify why I select said site according to the
main topics. This activity is very important since it
is the base of the following activities of the course.

Collaborative:
Develop the evaluation of the project with the
attached format.
Present proposals for a defined region. All group
proposals must be related.

Structure of work

• Project evaluation (3 pages).

• Compiled region proposals (3 pages).
• References (1 page).

Work format

Sheet size: letter

Margins: top, bottom, left and right of 2.54 cm
Line spacing: simple
Text: Time new roman 12 points
Delivery format: PDF

File name

Group number - Name of the activity and phase.

Publication
The work must be loaded in the corresponding
monitoring and evaluation environment.

NOTE: ALL DOCUMENT MUST BE PRESENTED

IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
 General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of
 Collaborative work planning.
activities for
 Design of collaborative work.
the
 Development of collaborative work.
development
 Analysis of results obtained by students in
of
collaborative work.
collaborative
 Production of deliverables in collaborative work.
work
Compiler: Consolidate the document that is
constituted as the final product of the debate, taking
into account that the contributions of all the
participants have been included and that only the
participants who participated in the process are
included
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
rules for submission of work required by the teacher
Roles to Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
perform by criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the
the student person in charge of the alerts so that you inform the
in the other members of the team in case there is an
collaborative adjustment to be made on the subject.
group Deliveries: Alert about the delivery times of the
products and send the document in the stipulated
times, using the resources destined for the shipment,
and indicate to the other colleagues that the delivery
has been made.
Alerts: Ensure that the members of the group are
notified of the novelties in the work and inform the
teacher through the working forum and the messaging
of the course, that the document has been sent.
Roles and Compiler: Consolidate the document that is
responsibilit constituted as the final product of the debate, taking
y for the into account that the contributions of all the
delivery of participants have been included and that only the
products by participants who participated in the process are
students included
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
 rules for submission of work required by the teacher
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the
person in charge of the alerts so that you inform the
other members of the team in case there is an
adjustment to be made on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert about the delivery times of the
products and send the document in the stipulated
times, using the resources destined for the shipment,
and indicate to the other colleagues that the delivery
has been made
Alerts: Ensure that the members of the group are
notified of the novelties in the work and inform the
teacher through the working forum and the messaging
of the course, that the document has been sent
The APA Standards is the style of organization and
presentation of information most used in the area of
social sciences. These are published under a Manual
that allows you to have access to the ways in which a
scientific article should be presented. Here you can
Use of
find the most relevant aspects of the sixth edition of
references
the APA Standards Manual, such as references,
citations, preparation and presentation of tables and
figures, headings and seriation, among others. You
can check how to implement them by going to
http://normasapa.com/
Plagiarism In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article
policy 99, are considered as faults that undermine the
academic order, among others, the following: literal e)
"Plagiarism, that is, present as its own authorship the
whole or part of a work, work, document or invention
made by another person. It also implies the use of
citations or missing references, or propose where
there is no coincidence between it and the reference
"and liberal f)" The reproduction, or copy for profit,
educational materials or results of research products,
which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University.

The academic sanctions that the student will face are

the following:
a) In the cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the
academic work or respective evaluation, the
qualification that will be imposed will be zero point
zero (0.0) without prejudice of the corresponding
disciplinary sanction.
b) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the
academic work whatever their nature, the qualification
that will be imposed will be zero point zero (0.0),
without prejudice of the corresponding disciplinary
sanction.
4. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric

Individual Collaborativ
Activity type: ☐ ☒
Activity e Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Intermediat ☒ Final ☐
evaluation e:
Performance levels of the individual
Assessed Score
activity
Aspects
High score Media score Low score
The student
made the The student
Participations made some
in the Forum, Participation,
The student
they are but did not
did not
Individual quality and deliver it as
participate in
Participation deliver them requested in 10
the Forum
in the Forum as requested the
in the integrated
integrated guide
guide
(up to 10 (up to 5 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Individual
The student
Individual participation
did not
participation in the
N/A present the
in the presentation
region
presentation of the region
proposal 15
of the region proposal
proposal (up to 15 (up to 0
points) points)
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed Score
activity
Aspect
High score Media score Low score
Evaluation Did the Did the The evaluation
35
of the Energy selection and selection and was not
 evaluation of evaluation of
the energy the energy performed
project
project project
selected
(Up to 35 (Up to 20 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
They made They made
The selection
the region the region
of the region
The region selection and selection and
was not
for project a description a description 25
performed
selection of the same of the same
(Up to 25 (Up to 15 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The
information Information
presented an is presented, The requested
excellent but its information is
structure, content is not displayed
justification not in the body of
Body, and consistent the work. It
writing and presentation, with the has spelling 5
spelling spelling and agreed in the errors and
writing, group. It shortcomings
complying presents of writing
with the writing flaws
request
(Up to 5 (Up to 3 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
It presents
The
the
literature
bibliography,
presents an There is no
but it lacks
excellent bibliography
Bibliography the structure 10
structure and
requested in
presentation
the Guide
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 100