Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering
FRACTURE
The structural failure on April 28, 1988 of a 19 year old Boeing 737, operated by Aloha airlines, was a defining event in creating awareness of
aging aircraft in both the public domain and in the aviation community. This aircraft lost a major portion of the upper fuselage in full flight at
24,000 feet, near the front of the plane. Miraculously, the pilot managed to land the plane on the island of Maui, Hawaii.
One flight attendant was swept to her death. Multiple fatigue cracks were detected in the remaining aircraft structure, in the holes of the upper
row of rivets in several fuselage skin lap joints.
Lap joints join large panels of skin together and run longitudinally along the fuselage. Fatigue cracking was not anticipated to be a problem,
provided the overlapping panels remained strongly bonded together. Inspection of other similar aircraft revealed disbonding, corrosion and
cracking problems in the lap joints.
Corrosion processes and the subsequent build-up of voluminous corrosion products inside the lap joints lead to so-called "pillowing", whereby
the faying surfaces are separated. Special instrumentation has been developed to detect this dangerous condition [3]. The aging aircraft
"problem" will not "go away", even if airlines were to order unprecedented numbers of new aircraft. Older planes are seldom scrapped, and will
probably end up in service with another operator. Therefore, safety issues regarding aging aircraft need to be well understood and safety
programs need to be applied on a consistent and rigorous basis.
Figures from V.J. Colangelo and F.A. Heiser, Analysis of Metallurgical Failures (2nd ed.), Fig. 4.1(a) and (b), p. 66 John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., 1987. Used with permission.
15
Department of Mechanical Engineering
16
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Brittle vs. Ductile Fracture
Brittle materials Ductile materials
little plastic deformation and low extensive plastic deformation and
energy absorption before fracture energy absorption (“toughness”)
before fracture
17
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Brittle vs. Ductile Fracture
18
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Ductile Fracture
Dislocation Mediated
19
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Moderately Ductile Failure
Evolution to failure
void void growth shearing
necking fracture
nucleation and linkage at surface
Particles serve as
void nucleation
sites.
50 mm 100 mm
From V.J. Colangelo and F.A. Heiser, Analysis of Metallurgical Failures (2nd ed.), Fig. Fracture surface of tire cord wire loaded in tension. Courtesy of F.
11.28, p. 294, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1987. (Orig. source: P. Thornton, J. Roehrig, CC Technologies, Dublin, OH. Used with permission.
Mater. Sci., Vol. 6, 1971, pp. 347-56.)
20
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Ductile Fracture
Cap-and-cone fracture
in Al
21
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Brittle Fracture
(Limited Dislocation Mobility)
No appreciable plastic deformation
Crack propagation is very fast
Crack propagates nearly perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress
Crack often propagates by cleavage – breaking of atomic bonds along specific
crystallographic planes (cleavage planes).
22
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Microstructural Features of
Fracture in Metallic Materials
Transgranular
Meaning across the grains (e.g., a transgranular fracture would
be fracture in which cracks would go through the grains).
Intergranular
Microvoids
Development of small holes in a material.
23
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Brittle Fracture
24
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Transgranular Fracture
25
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Intergranular Fracture
26
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Reprinted w/ permission from R.W. Reprinted w/ permission from "Failure
Hertzberg, "Defor-mation and Fracture Analysis of Brittle Materials", p. 78.
Mechanics of Engineering Materials", Copyright 1990, The American Ceramic
27
(4th ed.) Fig. 7.35(d), p. 303, John Wiley Society, Westerville, OH. (Micrograph by
and Sons, Inc., 1996. R.M. Gruver and H. Kirchner.)
Polypropylene (polymer)
Al Oxide(ceramic)
Brittle Fracture Surfaces
160mm
3mm
(within grains)
Transgranular
Intragranular,
304 S. Steel (metal)
1 mm
Reprinted w/permission from "Metals Handbook", 9th ed, Fig. 633, p. 650. Copyright
1985, ASM International, Materials Park, OH. (Micrograph by J.R. Keiser and A.R.
Olsen, Oak Ridge National Lab.)
28
Department of Mechanical Engineering
29
Department of Mechanical Engineering
30
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fracture Mechanics
Fracture mechanics
The study of a material’s ability to
withstand stress in the presence of a
flaw.
Fracture toughness
The resistance of a material to failure in
the presence of a flaw.
31
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Stress Concentration
Fracture strength of a brittle solid is related
to the cohesive forces between atoms. One
can estimate that the theoretical cohesive
strength of a brittle material should be ~
E/10. But experimental fracture strength is
normally E/100 - E/10,000.
This much lower fracture strength is
explained by the effect of stress
concentration at microscopic flaws. The
applied stress is amplified at the tips of
micro-cracks, voids, notches, surface
scratches, corners, etc. that are called stress
raisers. The magnitude of this amplification
Figure by N. Bernstein & D. Hess, NRL depends on micro-crack orientations,
geometry and dimensions.
32
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Flaws and Fracture
Actual fracture strength in most materials are significantly lower than expected from bond strengths.
Flaw/cracks can amplify or concentrate stress!
m a
Kt 2
o t
i.e. For crack to propagate, enough stress must be applied to overcome energy needed
to create surface and cause plastic deformation.
34
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fracture Toughness
Measure of material’s resistance to brittle fracture.
In the presence of a crack, it’s related to critical stress for crack propagation and depends on
1) material size & geometry, 2) crack dimension & orientation, 3) manner in which the load is applied .
Fracture Toughness: K c Y c a Relates to how the load is applied, crack orientation etc.
35
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Geometry, Load, & Material
Condition for crack propagation:
K ≥ Kc
Stress Intensity Factor: Fracture Toughness:
Depends on load & geometry. Depends on the material, temperature,
environment, & rate of loading.
Values of K for some standard loads & geometries:
K a K 1.1 a
Units of K: a
MPa(m)0.5
or
ksi(in)0.5
Adapted from Fig. 8.8, Callister 6e.
36
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fracture Toughness
increasing
Based on data in Table B5,
Callister 6e.
Composite reinforcement geometry is: f = fibers;
sf = short fibers; w = whiskers; p = particles.
Addition data as noted (vol. fraction of
reinforcement):
1. (55vol%) ASM Handbook, Vol. 21, ASM Int., Materials
Park, OH (2001) p. 606.
2. (55 vol%) Courtesy J. Cornie, MMC, Inc., Waltham, MA.
3. (30 vol%) P.F. Becher et al., Fracture Mechanics of
Ceramics, Vol. 7, Plenum Press (1986). pp. 61-73.
4. Courtesy CoorsTek, Golden, CO.
5. (30 vol%) S.T. Buljan et al., "Development of Ceramic
Matrix Composites for Application in Technology for
Advanced Engines Program", ORNL/Sub/85-22011/2, ORNL,
1992.
6. (20vol%) F.D. Gace et al., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., Vol. 7
(1986) pp. 978-82.
37
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Impact Behavior
Impact test
Measures the ability of a material to absorb the sudden application of a load
without breaking.
Impact energy
The energy required to fracture a standard specimen when the load is applied
suddenly.
Impact toughness
Energy absorbed by a material, usually notched, during fracture, under the
conditions of impact test.
Fracture toughness
The resistance of a material to failure in the presence of a flaw.
38
Department of Mechanical Engineering
The Impact Test
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning ™ is a trademark used herein under
license.
(a) The Charpy and Izod tests (b) dimensions of typical specimens
39
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Impact Fracture Testing
(testing fracture characteristics under high strain rates)
40
Department of Mechanical Engineering
The Impact Test
41
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Properties Obtained from the
Impact Test
Ductile to brittle transition temperature (DBTT)
The temperature below which a material behaves in a
brittle manner in an impact test.
Notch sensitivity
Measures the effect of a notch, scratch, or other
imperfection on a material’s properties, such as toughness
or fatigue life.
42
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Ductile to Brittle Transition
Temperature
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning ™ is a trademark used herein under
super-tough nylon
thermoplastic polymer
43
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Ductile to Brittle Transition
As temperature decreases a ductile material can become
brittle-ductile-to-brittle transition.
44
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Effects of Temperature
Increasing temperature increases %EL and Kc
Adapted from C. Barrett, W. Nix, and A.Tetelman, The Principles of Engineering Materials, Fig. 6-21, p. 220, Prentice-Hall, 1973. Electronically reproduced by
permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
45
15
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Charpy V-Notch Properties
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thom son Learning™ is a tradem ark used herein under
46
Department of Mechanical Engineering
47
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Famous example failures: Liberty ships
USS Esso Manhattan, 3/29/43 John P. Gaines, 11/43 USS Schenectady, 1/16/43
Fracture at entrance to NY harbor. Vessel broke in two off Liberty tanker split in two while
the Aleutians (10 killed). moored in calm water at the
http://www.uh.edu/liberty/photos/liberty_summary.html outfitting dock at Swan Island, OR.
Coast Guard Report: USS Schenectady
Without warning and with a report which was heard for at least a mile, the deck and sides of the
vessel fractured just aft of the bridge superstructure. The fracture extended almost instantaneously to the
turn of the bilge port and starboard. The deck side shell, longitudinal bulkhead and bottom girders fractured. Only the
bottom plating held. The vessel jack-knifed and the center portion rose so that no water entered. The bow and stern
settled into the silt of the river bottom.
The ship was 24 hours old.
Official CG Report attributed fracture to welds in critical seams that “were found to be defective”.
Adapted from D. Johnson
48
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Design Strategy:
Stay above the DBTT!
Pre-WWII: The Titanic WWII: Liberty ships
Reprinted w/ permission from R.W. Hertzberg, Reprinted w/ permission from R.W. Hertzberg,
"Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering "Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering
Materials", (4th ed.) Fig. 7.1(a), p. 262, John Wiley and Materials", (4th ed.) Fig. 7.1(b), p. 262, John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., 1996. (Orig. source: Dr. Robert D. Ballard, The Sons, Inc., 1996. (Orig. source: Earl R. Parker, "Behavior of
Discovery of the Titanic.) Engineering Structures", Nat. Acad. Sci., Nat. Res. Council,
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., NY, 1957.)
Problem: Used a type of steel with a DBTT ~ Room temp.
49
16
Department of Mechanical Engineering
The Importance of Fracture Mechanics
Selection of a Material
Design of a Component
50
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue
(Failure under fluctuating / cyclic stresses)
Under fluctuating / cyclic stresses, failure can occur at loads considerably lower
than tensile or yield strengths of material under a static load: Fatigue
Fatigue failure proceeds in three distinct stages: crack initiation in the areas of
stress concentration (near stress raisers), incremental crack propagation, final
catastrophic failure.
51
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: S-N curves
(stress-number of cycles to failure)
56
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: Cyclic Stresses
Periodic and
symmetrical
about zero
stress
Periodic and
asymmetrical
about zero
stress
Random
stress
fluctuations
57
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: Cyclic Stresses
Cyclic stresses are characterized by maximum, minimum and mean
stress, the range of stress, the stress amplitude, and the stress ratio
Remember the convention that tensile stresses are positive, compressive stresses are
negative
58
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: S—N curves
Fatigue limit (endurance limit) occurs for some materials (some Fe and Ti allows).
In this case, the S—N curve becomes horizontal at large N. The fatigue limit is a
maximum stress amplitude below which the material never fails, no matter how
large the number of cycles is.
59
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: S—N curves
In most alloys, S decreases continuously with N. In these cases the fatigue
properties are described by:
Fatigue strength:
stress at which fracture
occurs after specified
number of cycles (e.g.
107)
Fatigue life:
Number of cycles to fail
at specified stress level
60
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue Design Parameters
Fatigue limit, Sfat:
no fatigue if S < Sfat
61
Department of Mechanical Engineering
S-N Graph
The stress-number of cycles to failure (S-N) curves for a tool steel
and an aluminum alloy
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning ™ is a trademark used herein under license.
62
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue Behavior of BCC versus FCC Metals
fatigue
striations
10 mm
64
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Ni-base ALLOY TURBINE BLADE FATIGUE
FAILURE
y
working
N
220,000N
5
d2 / 4
66
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue Crack Growth
Once a crack is present in a material, it will tend to grow
under the influence of cyclic loading.
67
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: Crack Initiation and
Propagation
Three stages of fatigue failure:
1. Crack initiation in the areas of stress concentration
(near stress raisers)
68
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue: Crack Initiation and
Propagation
Crack initiation
at the sites of stress concentration (micro-
cracks, scratches, indents, interior corners,
dislocation slip steps, etc.). Quality of
surface is important.
Crack propagation
Stage I: initial slow propagation along
crystal planes with high resolved
shear stress. Involves just a few
grains, and has flat facture surface.
Stage II: faster propagation
perpendicular to the applied stress.
Crack grows by repetitive blunting
and sharpening process at crack tip.
Rough fracture surface.
Crack eventually reaches critical
dimension and propagates very
rapidly.
69
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Crack Growth Mechanisms
Load reduced
No Load
Loaded Slip
No Load
Max Load
Loaded again70
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue Fracture Surface
Schematic representation
of a fatigue fracture surface
in a steel shaft, showing the
initiation region, the
propagation of fatigue crack
(with beam markings), and
catastrophic rupture when
the crack length exceeds a
critical value at the applied
stress
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning ™ is a trademark used herein under
license.
71
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Cyclic Stress-Controlled Fatigue
Solutions:
Polishing (removes machining flaws etc.)
Introducing compressive stresses (compensate for applied tensile stresses) into thin
surface layer by “Shot Peening” – firing small shot surface to be treated. High-tech
solution- ion implantation, laser peening.
Case Hardening – create C or N rich outer layer in steels by atomic diffusion from the
surface. Makes harder outer layer and also introduces compressive stresses.
73
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Improving Fatigue Life
Impose a compressive surface stress (to suppress surface cracks from growing)
shot
C-rich gas
put Adapted from
surface Fig. 8.22, Callister 6e.
into
compression
Adapted from
Fig. 8.23, Callister 6e.
bad better
74
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Surface Treatment to Improve Fatigue
Resistance
SHOT–PEENED SURFACE in STEEL
Solutions:
Eliminate restraint by design
Use materials with low thermal expansion coefficients
Corrosion fatigue: Chemical reactions induce pits which act as stress raisers.
Corrosion also enhances crack propagations.
Solutions:
Decrease corrosiveness of medium, if possible
Add protective surface coating
Add residual compressive stresses
79
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Surprising Fatigue Failures
81
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Elevated Temperature Effects on Materials
84
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep Test Data Analysis
Deformation Mechanisms:
Region I: Strain Hardening mechanisms
associated with dislocation-obstacle
interactions. Strain rate decreasing.
86
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep: Strain Time Plot
88
21
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep: Stress and Temperature Effects
With increasing stress or temperature
The instantaneous strain increases
The steady-state creep rate increases
The time to rupture decreases
89
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep
Stress and Temperature Effects
The effect of temperature or applied stress on the creep curve
(c)2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Thomson Learning ™ is a trademark used herein under license.
90
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep
Stress and Temperature Effects
The stress/temperature dependence of the steady-state creep rate can be
described by
91
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Secondary Creep
stress exponent (material parameter)
. n
Q c
s K 2 exp activation energy for creep
strain rate RT (material parameter)
material const. applied stress
131.)
Benjamin (Senior Ed.), American Society for Metals, 1980, p.
Materials, and Special Purpose Metals, Vol. 3, 9th ed., D.
Handbook: Properties and Selection: Stainless Steels, Tool
Adapted from Fig. 8.29, Callister 6e.(Fig. 8.29 is from Metals
Most of component
life spent here. 200 Stress (MPa)
Strain rate is constant 427C
100
at a given T, s 538C
40
strain hardening is
20
balanced by recovery 649C
10
Strain rate increases
for larger T, s 10-2 10-1 1
Steady state creep rate s (%/1000hr)
22
92
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Mechanisms of Creep
Different mechanisms are responsible for creep in different materials and under different
loading and temperature conditions. The mechanisms include
Stress-assisted vacancy diffusion
Grain boundary diffusion Different mechanisms result in
Grain boundary sliding
different values of n, Qc.
Dislocation motion
93
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep Mechanisms
94
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Alloys for High-Temperature Use
(turbines in jet engine, hypersonic airplanes, nuclear reactors, etc.)
Creep is generally minimized in materials with:
High melting temperature
High elastic modulus
Large grain sizes (inhibits grain boundary sliding)
95
Department of Mechanical Engineering
High Temperature Structural Materials
96
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Creep: Engineering Applications
97
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Practical Implications for Engineering Applications
Negative or Limiting Implications:
Time dependent deformation means
component part shapes, sizes, properties vary
over time.
Critical Applications:
• Turbine blades in Jet Engines and Gas
Turbine Engines
• Nuclear Fuel Elements (Both in-service
and Long Term Storage)