Professional Documents
Culture Documents
361
Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at Apollo Group - UOP on February 11, 2015 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
362 Kurita et al. J Dent Res 77(2) 1998
Table 1. Classification of TMJ dysfunction Table 2. Changes in TMJ dysfunction over a 2.5-year period
Degree of TMJ Maximal Mouth Maximum Value on Any Initial Registration 2.5-year Follow-up
Dysfunctiona Opening (mm) of Four Visual Analog Scalesb Degree of TMJ Number of Number of Assessment
Dysfunction Patients (%) Patients (%)
No . 40 0
Slight 35 - 39 1 - 33 No 0 ( 0) 17(42.5) improved
Moderate 30 - 34 34 - 66 Slight 0 ( 0) 13 (32.5) improved
Severe < 29 67 - 100 14 (35) 4 (10) not improved
Moderate
Severe 26 (65) 6 (15)a not improved
a Degree of TMJ dysfunction was based on the worst value of
maximal mouth opening and any of four visual analog scales.
b Four visual analog scales were used to evaluate pain at rest, Total 40 (100) 40 (100)
pain with mandibular motion, pain on chewing, and inter-
ference with daily life (Price et al., 1983). a Four patients had required treatment.
other 105 patients had slight or no dysfunction. The 175 patients Imaging
with severe or moderate TMJ dysfunction were referred for Bilateral magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained on a
bilateral MR imaging. Fifty-two of the 175 patients had 1.0 Tesla MR Imager with bilateral 10 x 10 cm surface coils (SMF
symptomatic unilateral disc displacement without reduction, Shimadzu Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Images were obtained in the
and these 52 patients were requested to participate in the study. oblique sagittal plane at the closed and opened mouth
Five patients refused because they wanted to be treated. Two positions. The degree of angulation of the imaging plane was
other patients were excluded because their symptoms had determined on an axial scout image. Time of repetition was
improved when they came back for a complete enrollment 1000 msec, time of echo was 20 msec, slice thickness 4 mm, and
examination for the study, and they were no longer in the field-of-view 20 cm. Two excitations were used. The scanning
moderate or severe dysfunctional category. Thus, 45 patients time was 4 min and 28 sec, with a matrix of 256 x 256.
with disc displacement without reduction, who had moderate
or severe TMJ dysfunction, were enrolled in the study. This
study was approved by the Committee on Human Research in Classification
the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Aichi- The intent of the study was to follow each patient's natural
Gakuin University. Informed consent was obtained from all the course without intervening treatment. Therefore, all patients
participants. No patient incentives were used. Nineteen of the were reassured about the benign nature and favorable
45 patients were referred to our clinic by general dentists or prognosis of their condition. The patients in this study were not
physicians, and the remaining 26 came directly to the clinic. treated. They did not receive physical therapy, behavioral
During the 2.5-year follow-up period, four patients therapy, splints, or surgery, with the exception of four patients
developed symptoms on the contralateral side, which made it who requested treatment during the study. We did not control
difficult for changes in the symptoms on the original side to be the use of over-the-counter analgesics. In these four patients, the
assessed. These four patients were therefore excluded from the symptoms were such that the requested treatment was
statistical analysis. One other patient had requested treatment reasonable, and the treatment was delivered. All of these four
for symptoms from the other side during the 2.5-year patients had persistent and severe dysfunction when treatment
observation period. Treatment included an occlusal splint and was initiated at 2, 4, 15, and 21 months into the study. The
may have affected the side under investigation, so this patient treatment consisted of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs,
was excluded. Thus, the final material for analysis consisted of physical therapy, a bite splint, and arthroscopic surgery,
40 patients of whom 14 had moderate and 26 had severe TMJ respectively.
dysfunction at the initiation of the study The degree of TMJ dysfunction was classified into four
groups as described in Table 1. Four visual analog scales were
used for assessment of (1) pain at rest, (2) pain with mandibular
Methods motion, (3) pain on chewing, and (4) the interference with daily
life. The highest value on any of these four scales, together with
Clinical evaluation the amount of limitation of mouth opening, was used to classify
Physical examination was performed as previously described the patient's degree of TMJ dysfunction into: no dysfunction,
(Eriksson and Westesson, 1983). Maximal mouth opening was slight dysfunction, moderate dysfunction, or severe
measured to the nearest millimeter. Pain at rest, pain with dysfunction, as described in Table 1. If the maximum mouth
mandibular motion, as well as pain on chewing were evaluated opening and the visual analog scales resulted in a different
by the patient, who placed marks on 100-mm visual analog degree of TMJ dysfunction, the most severe classification was
scales. Interference with daily life was recorded by the patients noted. The same classification was used both at the initial and at
on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The worst rating on any of the follow-up examinations at 2.5 years. At the end of the 2.5-
these four visual analog scales was used in determining the year period, the natural course of the condition was classified as
degree of TMJ dysfunction as described below and in Table 1. complete resolution, decreased symptoms, or no improvement.
Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at Apollo Group - UOP on February 11, 2015 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
J Dent Res 77(2) 1998 Natural Course of Symptomatic TMJ Disc Displacement 363
no 5 (36) improved
Moderate 14 slight 5 (36) improved
moderate 3 (21) not improved
severe 1 ( 7) not improved
subtotal 14 (100)
no 12 (46) improved
Severe 26 slight 8 (31) improved
moderate 1 ( 4) not improved
severe 5 ( 19)a not improved
subtotal 26 (100)
Total 40
a Four patients had required treatment.
The patients remaining in the moderate or severe TMJ test, the Mann-Whitney U-test for comparison of medians, Chi-
dysfunctional group at the follow-up were classified as no square tests for assessing observed frequency in 2 x 2 and 2 x 3
improvement. Those who had gone down to slight or no TMJ contingency tables, and Fisher's exact probability test
dysfunction were classified as improved. The Wilkes staging (SAS/STAT). A probability value of less than 0.05 was
system (Wilkes, 1989, 1991) was also used to classify the considered statistically significant.
patients at the beginning of the study.
Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at Apollo Group - UOP on February 11, 2015 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.