3.1. Horizontal Axis and Vertical Axis Wind Turbines
The HAWT is the most common turbine configuration. The propellers and turbine mechanisms are mounted high above the ground on a huge pedestal. It is a matter of taste as to whether they enhance the landscape. However, there is no denying that the height at which their mechanisms are located is a disadvantage when servicing is required. Also, they require a mechanical yaw system to orient them such that their horizontal axis is perpendicular to and facing the wind. As potential power generation is related to the swept area (diameter) of the rotor, more power requires a larger diameter. The blades experience large thrust and torque forces, so size is limited by blade strength. Several typical vertical-axis wind turbines are shown in Figure. The blades of the vertical-axis wind turbines rotate with respect to their vertical axes that are perpendicular to the ground. A significant advantage of vertical-axis wind turbine is that the turbine can accept wind from any direction and thus no yaw control is needed. Since the wind generator, gearbox, and other main turbine components can be set up on the ground, it greatly simplifies the wind tower design and construction, and consequently reduces the turbine cost. However, the vertical-axis wind turbines must use an external energy source to rotate the blades during initialization. Because the axis of the wind turbine is supported only on one end at the ground, its maximum practical height is thus limited. Due to the lower wind power efficiency, vertical-axis wind turbines today make up only a small percentage of wind turbines. 3.2. Vertical axis wind turbines – VAWTs Vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) come in a wide and interesting variety of physical configurations and they involve a range of complex aerodynamic characteristics. Not only were VAWTs the first wind turbines to be developed but they have also been built and operated at a scale matching some of the biggest wind turbines ever made. VAWTs in principle can attain coefficients of performance, Cp max, that are comparable to those for horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) and they have several potentially significant advantages over the HAWTs. These advantages include the fact that VAWTs are cross-flow devices and therefore accept wind from any direction. Thus, in principle, they do not need a yaw mechanism to ensure that they are aligned to the wind as is the case with all horizontal axis machines. Another key advantage is that the mechanical load may be connected directly to the VAWT rotor shaft and located at ground level. This removes the need for a substantial tower to support the weight of equipment such as the gearbox, generator and yaw mechanism. There is also no need for slip rings or flexible cables to connect the generator to the load, which can be an important point for small-scale turbines. From the 1970s to the 1990s a number of research groups and companies developed and built hundreds of VAWTs and a great deal has been learnt from that experience. But despite the inherent advantages of VAWTs they have fallen significantly behind HAWTs in recent years in terms of technical development and in the size and number of units manufactured. This has occurred for a number of reasons, not least because of some inherent disadvantages of VAWTs. As the VAWT blades rotate about the main rotor shaft the velocity of the air relative to the blade is constantly changing in respect of both magnitude and direction. In addition, each blade will interact with the wakes of other blades, and possibly its own wake, when it passes through the downstream half of its path about the turbine axis. Both these effects result in fluctuating aerodynamic forces on the blades, which in turn lead to a potentially significant fatigue issue for the design of the blades and overall turbine structure. The fluctuating blade loads also lead to a varying torque transferred to the mechanical load. Many designs of VAWTs produce very low torque when they are stationary and may produce negative torque at low tip speed ratios, so they must be powered up to a speed at which the aerodynamic torque is sufficient to accelerate the rotor to normal operational speeds. A further disadvantage is that parasitic drag losses may be high for a given VAWT design. This situation can arise when the VAWT blades need to be mounted on structures (spars, beams, cables, etc.) that rotate with the blades or are located upstream of the blades. The drag forces on these passive components can lead to significant parasitic losses in respect to rotor torque and power output. This has inhibited the successful development of a number of VAWT designs . Nevertheless there continues to be widespread interest in VAWTs as a means of generating electrical and mechanical energy from the wind. Novel VAWT turbine designs appear relatively frequently at the time of writing and a number of small companies appear to be undertaking development of VAWTs for small-scale application, particularly in respect to domestic dwellings.
3.3. VAWT types
A wide variety of VAWTs have been proposed over the past few decades and a number of excellent bibliographies on VAWTs have been published that summarize research and development of these devices, including the survey by Abramovich (Abramovic, 1987). Some of the more important types of rotor design are highlighted in the following sections.
3.3.1 Savonius turbines
The Savonius turbine has been popular with both professional and amateur wind turbine developers over the years, not least because of its simple and robust construction. Many variations of the Savonius rotor have been developed and tested. However, because of the inherently high solidity and hence high mass of the Savonius turbine it has not been used for large-scale electricity production. The Savonius rotor is primarily a drag device with some inherent augmentation of the rotor performance available due to the air flow across each vane and mutual coupling of the two halves of the rotor. Like all drag machines it has a low operating tip speed ratio. This makes it less suitable for electricity generation than devices with higher tip speeds, since a high shaft speed is generally preferred to minimize the step-up ratio requirement of the gearbox coupling a rotor to a conventional electrical generator.
3.3.2 Darrieus turbines
In 1931 the invention by Darrieus (Darrieus, 1931)of his rotor with a high tip speed ratio opened up new opportunities for VAWTs in regards to electricity generation. The fundamental step forward made by Darrieus was to provide a means of raising the velocity of the VAWT blades significantly above the freestream wind velocity so that lift forces could be used to significantly improve the coefficient of performance of VAWTs over previous designs based primarily on drag. Darrieus also foresaw a number of embodiments of his fundamental idea that would be trialed at large scale many decades later. These included use of both curved-blade shown in figure 1.2 and straight blade versions of his rotor. He also proposed options for active control of the pitch of the blades relative to the rotor as a whole, so as to optimize the angle of attack of the wind on each blade throughout its travel around the rotor circumference. 3.3.3 Straight-blade VAWTs The name Darrieus is usually associated with the curved-blade version of Darrieus’ patent. However, a great deal of work over the past three decades has gone into the development and analysis of the straightblade version of his original invention, which is sometimes known as the H-VAWT from the shape of the blades and supporting spars.
3.4. Design of wind turbine blades
There were two scopes to followed achieving our objectives: Performance analysis: To study the different parameters the effect the performance. Parametric studies were performed using different methods, were we get the overall dimensions and different characteristics of the turbine. Design analysis: To select the materials which the turbine is made of. Stress analysis and vibration analysis were performed to ensure safe operation of the turbine under extreme conditions.
3.5 VAWT design parameters
The wind turbine parameters considered in design process are: 1.Turbine swept area 2.Tip speed ratio 3.Number of blades 4.Turbine aspect ratio 5.Turbine solidity 6.Airfoil type 7.Pitch angle 8.Mass moment of inertia
3.5.1 Turbine swept area
The swept area is the section of air that encloses the turbine in its movement, the shape of the swept area depends on the rotor configuration, this way the swept area of an HAWT is circular shaped while for a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine the swept area has a rectangular shape and is calculated using: 𝐴 = 2𝑅𝐻 (3.1) Where, 𝐴= swept area (m2 ¿ 𝑅= rotor radius (m) 𝐻 = blade length (m) Therefore, the swept area limits the volume of air passing by the turbine. The rotor converts the energy contained in the wind in rotational movement so as bigger the area, bigger power output in the same wind conditions.
3.5.2 Tip speed ratio
The tip speed ratio is an extremely important factor in wind turbine design, which is defined as the ratio of the tangential speed at the blade tip to the actual wind speed. If the blade angular speed ω is too small, most of the wind may pass undisturbed though the blade swept area making little useful work on the blades. On the contrary, if ω is too large, the fast-rotating blades may block the wind flow reducing the power extraction. Each rotor design has an optimal tip speed ratio at which the maximum power extraction is achieved (Castillo, 2011) Where, ωR 𝑇𝑆𝑅 = (3.2) u∞ ꙍ= angular speed of blades (m) R= radius of the hub (m) 3.5.3 Number of blades The number of blades has a direct effect in the smoothness of rotor operation as they can compensate cycled aerodynamic loads. For even number of blades as two blades the fluctuation in rotor torque was higher than odd number of blades as three blades turbine. Such behavior could represent a great advantage for three-bladed small VAWT architectures, for which the increased manufacturer and installation costs are not as important as for large rotors (Battisti L,2016).
3.5.4 Turbine aspect ratio
The ratio between blade height to rotor radius (aspect ratio) is play an important role in design process of VAWT, Basically high aspect ratio means that we get high rotational speed than rotor torque for the same power and vice versa. Aspect ratio influences the Reynolds number and as a consequence the power coefficient.
3.5.5 Turbine solidity
The solidity σ is defined as the ratio between the total blade area and the projected turbine area (Tullis, 2008). It is an important non-dimensional parameter which affects self-starting capabilities and for straight bladed VAWTs is calculated with; B∗c 𝜎= R Where, (3.3) 𝜎=solidity (m) B= number of blades (number) c = blade chord (number) R= radius (m) hence, Solidity determines when the assumptions of the momentum models are applicable, and only when using high σ ≥ 0.4 a self-starting turbine is achieved.
3.5.6 Airfoil type
Airfoil proper selection for your VAWT is important in many ways. The airfoil should be selected based on many factors: 1. Chambered or symmetrical 2. Lift/drag ratio 3. Aerodynamic performance to increase output power 4. Airfoil thickness
3.5.7 Pitch angle
It was clearly seen that proper airfoil selection make great contributions to the improvement of aerodynamic performance, but it was difficult to give consideration to self-staring capability, higher power coefficient and wider operational region.
3.5.8 Mass moment of inertia
The biggish moment of inertia is disadvantage of VAWT’s start, effecting reasonable design (rate of high and radius) and result of brake .Therefore , it is necessary that study the influence of moment of inertia of VAWT. The VAWT of the lesser moment of inertia has good start performance, but the steady of performance is bad with wind velocity increased; it’s because that the process is unsteady when wind turbine is rotated, that is to say, the angular velocity is different at the different azimuth angle, the angular velocity has obvious wave with azimuth angle’s difference for the lesser moment of inertia’s wind turbine. Angular acceleration = Aerodynamic moment / Mass moment of inertia (3.4)
3.6. Theoretical Maximum Efficiency
High rotor efficiency is desirable for increased wind energy extraction and should be maximized within the limits of affordable production. Energy (P) carried by moving air is expressed as a sum of its kinetic energy. 1 P= ρ AV 3 2 Where,ρ = Air Density A = Swept area V = Air Velocity A physical limit exists to the quantity of energy that can be extracted, which is independent of design. The energy is maintained in a flow process through the reduction of kinetic energy and subsequent velocity of the wind. The magnitude of energy harnessed is a function of the reduction in air speed over the turbine. 100% extraction would imply zero final velocity and therefore zero flow. The zero-flow scenario cannot be achieved hence all the winds kinetic energy may not be utilized. This principle is widely accepted and indicates that wind turbine efficiency cannot exceed 59.3%. This parameter is commonly known as the power coefficient C P, where max C P= 0.593 referred to as the Betz limit. The Betz theory assumes constant linear velocity. Therefore, any rotational forces such as weak rotation, turbulence caused by drag or vortex shedding will further reduce the maximum efficiency. Efficiency losses are generally reduced by: Avoiding low tip speed ratios which increase weak rotation Selecting aerofoils which have a high life to drag ratio Specialized tip geometries
3.7. Aerodynamics of Straight Blade Darrieus Type VAWT
As the VAWT have a rotational axis perpendicular to the oncoming airflow, the aerodynamics involved are more complicated than of the more conventional HAWT. The main disadvantages of VAWT are the high local angles of attack involved and the wake coming from the blades in the upwind part and from the axis. Compared to Savonius rotor, Darrieus rotor usually works at relatively high tip speed ratio which makes it attractive for wind electric generators. However, they are not self- starting and require external ‘excitation’ to cut-in. If the straight blade Darrieus type VAWT is represented in a two dimensional way the aerodynamic characteristics are more obvious. Fig- VAWT flow velocities and blade stream