Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Throughout this Elementary Portfolio Project, I will be showcasing the skills, knowledge,
attitudes, and values that I have gained throughout the Masters of Science in Education Degree
from Medaille College. Based on this subject matter and pedagogical evidence, which has been
The portfolio is made up of six sections- teacher candidate portfolio project introduction, teacher
candidate background experiences, teacher candidate artifacts, alignment to the curriculum and
professional standards, teacher candidate reflection, and teacher candidate interview video.
Throughout all these various sections I will be making connections to planning, instruction,
professional development.
Portfolio Development
Each of the six sections that make up the portfolio contains important details and
evidence to support that I will be a knowledgeable and competent teacher. There are also
multiple subsections in each section that I will break down now. Sections one is the teacher
candidate portfolio project introduction, and it contains four subsections- introduction, overview,
and rationale; portfolio development; theories, theorists, and experts in the field of education;
and finally, the conclusion. In this first section of the portfolio, my goal is to introduce the
portfolio, discuss the various parts that are included, and why they are each vital to the portfolio
as a whole. I will make connections to theorists, theories, and educational experts that have
guided my existing philosophies and beliefs as I move forward. This first section of the portfolio
will end off with a conclusion that will summarize my most important points and introduce the
following section.
Section two of the portfolio is about the teacher candidate background experiences and it
contains six subsections- introduction; teacher candidate educational and work experiences;
resume; and conclusion. In this section, the goal is to introduce myself as an educator through
sharing experiences that inspired me to want to teach, how my past work experiences have
contributed to that desire, and the philosophy of education that I personally have developed
Section three of the portfolio is the teacher candidate artifacts and it contains three
subsections- introduction; artifacts and rationales; and conclusion. The goal of this section is to
share the pedagogical evidence that I am prepared to teach in the elementary classroom through
8-10 artifacts. The artifacts may have been requirements for past courses, and each will have a
rationale explaining why it is important in showing that I will make a competent educator
Section four of the portfolio is alignment to the curriculum and professional standards
and it contains four subsections- introduction; curriculum and professional educational standards;
the alignment to the curriculum and professional standards chart; and conclusion. The goal of
this section is to introduce and explain the various standards that I will be discussing and then
Section five of the portfolio is the teacher candidate reflection and it contains four
gathering and creating the portfolio, as well as the various experiences, observations, and lessons
I have collected throughout the teacher education program. This section is also where I will be
classroom teacher.
Section six of the portfolio is the teacher candidate teacher interview video and it
contains three subsections- introduction to the teacher candidate interview video; teacher
candidate interview questions and responses; and conclusion. The goal of this section is to share
a video of myself sharing my artifacts, as well as answering questions that could be asked of me
at a job interview. I will also be utilizing some technology components in this section that will be
useful tools to have when I become a professional teacher, such as Screencast-o-Matic and
Weebly.
The reference list will be at the end of the portfolio and it will contain the references for
the intext quotations and citations that I used throughout all the sections of the portfolio.
There have been countless theories, theorists, and experts in the field of education that I
have been introduced to over the course of my educational journey up until this point; some that
I strongly agreed up and others that I was not as convinced about. One of the first theorists that
really made me stop and think, “wow, that makes so much sense!” was Urie Bronfenbrenner,
specifically his Ecological Systems Theory. This theory postulates that children have the
qualities and characteristics that they do, because of the ways in which all the various
‘ecosystems’ that they are a part of interact and influence each other (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). At
the very centre of all the systems is the child and moving from closest and most intimate to
furthest apart are the microsystem, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macrosystem, and the
chronosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). It is impossible for the child to be removed from any one
of these systems, so as educators we must be mindful and considerate of the fact that the child is
not an independent being, but one that has been shaped and formed by many factors and
influences.
A second theorist whose work I strongly support is Lev Vygotsky, specifically his
Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development. The main point of this theory is that children
benefit greatly from social interactions with others, and particularly from those that are more
skilled than them (Vygotsky, 1978). According to Vygotsky, there are three different zones in
which students can be placed- can do independently, can do with assistance, and cannot do even
with assistance. As educators, we should be striving to give students content that is in that middle
zone, which is their Zone of Proximal Development, and how they are able to learn best
(Vygotsky, 1978). Keeping these pieces of information in mind, this is why I believe that group
work is so vital for students’ learning; when they are able to collaborate and each student brings
Another theory that I employ when designing my lessons is the Gradual Release of
Responsibility, as first presented by Pearson and Gallagher in 1983. The pair had originally
shared three stages for the framework- in the first the teacher exclusively models, in the second
the teacher guides, and in the third the student applies (Pearson & Gallagher, 1983). Since the
introduction and as it became a more practice-based instructional model, a fourth stage was
incorporated in which students were able to collaborate with each other using the new
information learned (Fisher & Frey, 2008). In more layman’s terms we refer to this process as
the ‘I do, we do, you do’ method. I think this method is effective because through watching the
teacher first they are able to visually see what is expected of them, and if the teacher uses the
opportunity to do think-alouds then they are also able to listen to the thought process. From
there, the student is not yet expected to use the new information fully on their own, so they still
have the support of the teacher but they are put into that zone of proximal development that I
mentioned earlier. Next the student will finally attempt the new skill independently, and I
particularly like the addition of the fourth stage in which they are able to collaborate with their
Conclusion
Through this portfolio I will be showing how I am equipped with knowledge and skills
that will make me a ready to be a professional teacher. Each of the six sections will contain
various pieces of evidence to support that I am a multifaceted individual and that I am able to
take theory- such as those I just shared from Bronfenbrenner, Vygotsky, and Pearson and
Gallagher- and apply them in the field. In the next section of this portfolio I will be sharing my