Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Domestic violence
Mohammad Ali Babakhel 18 Jul, 2020
INITIALLY, as many parts of the world went into lockdown, most crime rates fell, while
rates of domestic violence (DV) soared, as victims were forced to quarantine with their
abusers. Domestic or intimate partner violence can take a number of forms including
psychological, financial, physical and/or sexual abuse. The social isolation and economic
stress of having to work from home, home school their children, loss of income, etc, have
exacerbated the crisis.
In Europe, within the first two weeks of lockdown, many countries reported exponential rises in
the number of calls being made to DV helplines. A Spanish women’s rights organisation termed
these reported cases as “just the tip of the iceberg”. The same trend has appeared across the
world. Mexico registered an 80pc surge in emergency calls. By April’s end, Mexico’s national
network of shelters reported that 241 women had been killed due to gender-based violence
(GBV).
The number of women seeking emergency shelter has also skyrocketed during the pandemic.
However, owing to the risk of infection, many countries have suspended admission in shelters.
Meanwhile, the UN Population Fund warns that lockdowns measures lasting six months could
result in an additional 31 million cases of GBV.
Though helplines at the provincial and federal levels are operational, the issue is about awareness
and access. Most rural victims are not aware of what GBV means or how to report it, and hence
the majority accept DV as a part of life. In March 2020, the Ministry of Human Rights helpline
received only 13 GBV-related calls. There is also a lack of connectivity between the many
helpline services operating across the country, many of them with long, difficult-to-recall
numbers. Besides, bans on public transport make it much harder for women to leave abusive
homes.
In our society, however, both state-run (Darul Amans) and NGO-run shelters administered are
confronted with a trust deficit. Making shelters a safe option requires increased state ownership,
financing and community partnership. Initially, Darul Amans were established in eight divisional
headquarters in Punjab, but increased need resulted in their extension to all 36 districts. In
Balochistan only two and in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa six Darul Amans are functional, though the
situation warrants extension of such facilities at least at the divisional level. Moreover, at
present, none of the women’s shelters are equipped to deal with the Covid-19 crisis, lacking in
isolation and testing facilities as well as basic hygiene and protective equipment. The main issue,
however, remains the under-reporting and non-availability of shelters in rural areas.
Without reliable data on DV, no state can respond appropriately, and therefore more
transparency in reporting should be encouraged. In 2018, 15,277 women and children took
refuge in 36 shelters in Punjab, ie each shelter protected over 400 people. Between 2016-17, 994
women sought refuge in six shelters in KP, ie each shelter protected over 150 women.
To address the trust deficit, Darul Amans should be placed under independent public oversight,
with formal linkages with dispute resolution councils, social welfare departments and the
criminal justice system. The post-9/11 trend of international donor investment in women’s
development is likely to wane with diminished strategic interest in the region. However,
increasing state ownership and community engagement can actually counter the propaganda that
shelters are an extension and by-product of ‘Western values’. Adopting women’s rights as an
indigenous issue and adapting interventions to local needs is the only viable option.