Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • A Collaborative Approach For Research Paper Recommender System

    Uploaded by

    Hi Ra
    8 views3 pages
    The document summarizes the results of evaluating a proposed collaborative approach for a research paper recommender system against baseline methods. It presents 5 graphs that compare the precision, recall, F1, mean average precision, and mean reciprocal rank of the proposed approach to co-citation and CCF baselines using evaluation data from 50 researchers. The graphs demonstrate the proposed approach outperformed the baselines across the different evaluation metrics.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    rm assign.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes the results of evaluating a proposed collaborative approach for a research paper recommender system against baseline methods. It presents 5 graphs that compare the precision, recall, F1, mean average precision, and mean reciprocal rank of the proposed approach to co-citation and CCF baselines using evaluation data from 50 researchers. The graphs demonstrate the proposed approach outperformed the baselines across the different evaluation metrics.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views3 pages

    A Collaborative Approach For Research Paper Recommender System

    Uploaded by

    Hi Ra
    The document summarizes the results of evaluating a proposed collaborative approach for a research paper recommender system against baseline methods. It presents 5 graphs that compare the precision, recall, F1, mean average precision, and mean reciprocal rank of the proposed approach to co-citation and CCF baselines using evaluation data from 50 researchers. The graphs demonstrate the proposed approach outperformed the baselines across the different evaluation metrics.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    A collaborative approach for research paper recommender system

    Experimental evaluation:
    To be specific, the results of each evaluation metric in this section represent the overall averages
    over all the 50 researchers of our dataset. We start the comparison by assessing the general
    performance of our proposed approach in returning relevant research papers with the baseline
    methods based on the three most commonly used information retrieval evaluation metrics.
    Graphs 1–5, demonstrate the comparisons based on precision, recall and F1 evaluation measures
    respectively.

    Graph#1: Precision performance on the dataset.

    4
    Precision

    Co-citation
    3
    CCF
    Proposed
    2

    0
    5 10 15 20 25 30
    Graph#2: Recall performance on the dataset.

    Co-citation
    Recall

    3
    CCF
    Proposed
    2

    0
    5 10 15 20 25 30

    Graph#3: F1 performance on the dataset.

    4
    Co-citation
    F1

    CCF
    3 Proposed

    0
    5 10 15 20 25 30
    Graph#4: Mean Average Precision (MAP) performance on the dataset

    Co-citation
    MAP

    3
    CCF
    Proposed
    2

    0
    5 10 15 20 25 30

    Graph#5: Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) performance on the dataset

    Co-citation
    MRR

    3
    CCF
    Proposed
    2

    0
    5 10 15 20 25 30

    You might also like