Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reconfiguring Faith, Redefining Agency: Post 9/11 Muslim Women's Diasporic Dilemmas
Reconfiguring Faith, Redefining Agency: Post 9/11 Muslim Women's Diasporic Dilemmas
Abstract
‘And then?’
‘And you stopped being an individual and started being an entire religion.’
anthropological/cultural enquiries like Saba Mahmood and Rosa Vasilaki’s, the agency of the
Agency here is understood as the conscious and continuing reproduction of the terms of one’s
passive victims of conservative, patriarchal Islam preclude enquiries into the question of the
agency of the Muslim woman and the postcolonial and post secular feminist insights are
germane to understanding and conceptualising her agency, inhabiting, as she does, spaces
Enquiries about the Muslim woman’s subjectivity in the post 9/11 years make it imperative a
an enabling space of female self-determination. The Muslim woman’s engagement with faith
becomes a loaded question in the Islam-West dialectics which largely frames such enquiries,
given that religion emerges as the prime determining category in marking the Muslim
diasporic location of the Muslim woman makes her engagement with faith all the more
problematic. This paper examines how Post 9/11 Muslim women’s diasporic narratives go
Fatima Mernissi, the Moroccan Islamic feminist, in her book Sheherazade Goes West (2001:
25). Mernissi’s expounding of the different significations the term harem evokes for the
Westerner and the Muslim1 is germane to the post 9/11 representations/configurations of the
Muslim woman, her dress, sexuality, faith, subjectivity and agency. These carry different
associations and evoke varied significations in the Western gaze and in the Muslim woman’s
self-perception. So do notions of truth, justice and loyalty. Mernissi was writing the book in
the closing year of the 20th century. The dawn of the new millennium witnessed further
polarisation of the Western and Muslim worlds ideologically while bringing them closer on
the lived, experiential plane, making the diasporic Muslim woman’s negotiations with faith,
her multicultural location and her subjectivity deeply fraught and vexatious, at the same time
In her book Writing Islam from a South Asian Muslim Perspective, which examines the
fiction of four contemporary South Asian novelists who enjoy global visibility – Salman
Rushdie, Mohsin Hamid, Nadeem Aslam and Kamila Shamsie – Madeline Clements writes:
“The slew of fictional narratives produced by either Western or Westernised writers, both in
North America (DeLillo 2007; Safran Foer 2005; Updike 2006) and in the UK (Amis 2008;
Faulks 2009; McEwan 2005; Rushdie 2005c) in the wake of 9/11 … have tended to reinforce
binary oppositions between Islam and the West, rather than seeking to understand why they
occur.” (2016: 6). I would argue that we also need to think whether a range of identity
between racism and Islamophobia on the one hand and Islamic radicalization and jihadism on
the other. The Muslim woman’s sartorial preferences, dietary habits and even the saying of
daily prayers cannot remain simple quotidian practices, but become politically loaded
decisions and choices. Given her politicised location, the Muslim woman’s observance of
these practices in diasporic contexts, can assume a variety of forms. I seek to illustrate this
with the hijab choices of the Muslim woman as a case in point. I choose my examples from
Hijab choices of Muslim women range from daily observance (as an affirmation of piety, as
Muslim women may or may not observe the hijab, or may choose to wear it only on public
platforms. Mohja Kahf, the Syrian-American novelist and poet, for instance, covers her hair
for public appearances, but lets it slip off in restaurants and chooses to do without it on hot
days. The Sudanese-born writer Leila Aboulela’s is an instance of the western metropolitan
location enabling the Muslim woman to freely engage with her faith. She believes that there
is more freedom for Muslim women to be religious in Britain, something she was not able to
do back home in Khartoum. 'I grew up in a very westernised environment and went to a
private, American school. But my personality was shy and quiet and I wanted to wear the
hijab but didn't have the courage, as I knew my friends would talk me out of it.' In London,
her anonymity helped: 'I didn't know anybody. It was 1989 and the word "Muslim" wasn't
even really used in Britain at the time; you were either black or Asian. So then I felt very free
to wear the hijab' (Sethi 2005). Here I draw upon Talal Asad’s observations on the
Secularism and the Islamic Veil Affair” to theorise the dilemma of Muslim women like Leila
Aboulela whose secularised environment puts constraints on their desire to wear the hijab.
Talal Asad notes a significant omission in the Stasi Commission’s2 attempt to decipher the
“genuine desires” of the girls in the French schools who wore the headscarf (with the implied
assumption of the possibility of parental and communal pressures behind the choice). Asad
says the Stasi Commission did not feel the need for a similar enquiry among girls who did not
wear the hijab. “Was it possible that some of them secretly wanted to wear a headscarf but
were ashamed to do so because of what their French peers and people in the street might
think and say? Or could it be that they were hesitant for other reasons? However, in their case
surface appearance alone was sufficient for the commission: no headscarf worn means no
desire to wear it. In this way “desire” is not discovered but semiotically constructed (2006:
98 emphasis added)”.
In an Islamophobic western metropolitan location the observance of the hijab can assume a
politically-performative role. In this context it may be worthwhile to note that the hijab-
observing Muslim women were the most vulnerable to physical and verbal assaults on
immigrants in Britain in the post-9/11 years. The hijab, popularly represented and perceived
as a synecdoche for Islam and its oppression of women, evokes feelings of strangeness and
revulsion in the liberal-secular westerner. Many of the diasporic narratives/writings have this
feeling of strangeness of the westerner and the Muslim woman’s embrace of the hijab in a
counter-stereotypical move, as their abiding thematic. Mohja Kahf’s poem “Hijab Scene 1”
tersely illustrates the feeling of strangeness-cum-disgust the hijab evokes in the westerner:
“You dress strange," said a tenth-grade boy with bright blue hair
Big in this? (2005), a book generally categorised under children’s literature, humorously
relates the impact of an Australian Muslim girl Amal’s overnight decision to wear the hijab.
“Too many people look at it as though it (the hijab) has bizarre powers sewn into its
microfibers. Powers that transform Muslim girls into UCOs (Unidentified Covered Objects),
Mohja Kahf’s poem “Hijab Scene 7” reminds the Westerner, who brands every Muslim
The poem assumes potency and salience in the light of the observation that in the post-9/11
context, security issues and representations of Muslim immigrants as potential terrorists tend
European countries and their just claims to difference, recognition and multicultural
citizenship rights (Triandafyllidou 2006: 3-4). The adoption of the hijab in an Islamophobic
context may be perceived as the Muslim woman’s mode of contesting what Tariq Modood
calls “the secular bias of discourses and policies of multiculturalism in Western Europe”
(2006: 37).
Leila Aboulela’s women protagonists in the novels The Translator and Minaret find solace in
an alien land in adopting visible marks of Muslim faith (the hijab, being the most
which he calls “quietist” (qtd in Nash 2012: 46): “The version of Islam propagated in
with Islam, of feminism as a secular and godless ideology, of individual agency in favour of
well” (313).
paradigm, which the post-secular Muslim feminists have problems with. The Orientalist, neo-
patriarchal Islam preclude enquiries into the question of the agency of the Muslim woman,
who inhabits spaces outside the mainstream liberal-secular. Saba Mahmood’s Politics of
Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (2005) was a ground-breaking work that
radically critiqued the premises of liberal western feminism, particularly its conceptualisation
engagement with Islamist movements (earlier reviled by liberal secular feminists for their
gender conservatism and in the post millennium years for their presumed association with
jihadism), Mahmood observes that the vexing relationship between feminism and religion is
most manifest in discussions of Islam (2005: 1). She finds the liberal feminist notion of
human agency which locates it in the political and moral autonomy of the subject inadequate
to study the women involved in “patriarchal religious traditions such as Islam” (7).
Anthropological studies about non-western women such as Janice Boddy and Saba
Mahmood’s show how these women “use perhaps unconsciously, perhaps strategically”,
what the Western world considers “instruments of their oppression as means to assert their
Citing Marnia Larzreg, the Algerian-born US-based sociological researcher, Fauzia Ahmad
argues that the choice between gender and religion, which is integral to the liberal Western
feminist paradigm fails to resonate with the Muslim woman, for whom empowering does not
mean escape from religion. Lazreg “argues that intersubjectivity within the research process
should facilitate attributing agency to ‘other’ women and respecting their right to express
their lives through their own constructs, while recognizing that their definitions of certain
constructs both exist as their own and, at the same time, are subject to different definitions,
without needing definition or validation from the Western researcher or feminist” (Ahmad
2003: 51). For many Muslim women, empowering is something that enables them both to
offer critiques of oppressive practices and ‘patriarchal relations’ within their own
women (55-56). The post-secular turn to feminism “makes manifest the notion that agency,
or political subjectivity, can actually be conveyed through and supported by religious piety,
and may even involve significant amounts of spirituality” [Braidotti 2008: 2). Here I would
like to clarify that my drawing on the post-secular feminist critique of Eurocentric ideological
impositions on and assumptions about the Islamic world should not be taken to mean that I
buy all its premises. I am aware of the responses to Saba Mahmood’s position raised from
within the domain of the secular by those like Stathis Gourgouris and Rosa Vasilaki 3. The
adoption of the hijab can and does carry semiotic meanings and symbolic significance,
obligation. Naturally, the decision not to wear the hijab can also be prompted by an act of re-
engagement with faith as it happens with the African-American Saleema Abdul-Ghafur. She
speaks of her post-divorce phase of re-assessment of her life: “I began to re-evaluate my life
and specifically the rituals I performed. I decided to stop doing things that didn’t make sense
to me, so I stopped wearing hijab – not because I felt oppressed wearing it, but rather because
I realized that I had never chosen hijab for myself. As I read the Quran and secondary texts
on Islam and meditated on hijab, I realized that my spirituality had nothing to do with
whether or not I wore hijab. My access to Islam was not located in my outer appearance”
Geoffrey Nash describes the personalized faith commitment he perceives in the women
diasporic writer of Muslim origin – in which category he places the fiction of Hanif Kureishi
(The Black Album) Monica Alica (Brick Lane) and Nadeem Aslam (Maps for Lost Lovers)
(2012: 44). Nash goes on to argue that “without the secular western environment in which her
work is mainly set, Aboulela would not have been able so effectively to inscribe the impact
of faith” (2012: 45). This would appear a problematic proposition, or at the most, one that
would apply to particular cases like Aboulela’s in the pre-2000 years when discrimination
covered only the one practised on the basis of colour and Muslims were not even regarded as
an ethnic group (unlike the Sikhs or the Jews). However, that the spatio-temporal location of
the post 2000 Muslim diasporic writers, has been crucial in constituting their identity and in
determining their positions cannot be emphasised enough. The findings of Leila Ahmed’s
sociological enquiry into the circumstances behind the resurgence of the hijab in post- 9/11
years, which she records in her 2011 book A Quiet Revolution, would substantiate this point.
Muslim women of established Islamic teachings and practices as regards women” (271).
Novels like Mohja Kahf’s The Girl in the Tangerine Scarf and Kamila Shamsie’s Home Fire
are to be located not merely in the climate of pronounced Islamophobia in the post-9/11
West, but also in the backdrop of the plethora of writings/voices mostly emerging from
secular-western locations that illustrate the Muslim woman’s engagement with faith from
Wadud’s Gender Jihd (2006), Saleemah Abdul-Ghafur edited Living Islam Out Loud:
American Muslim Women Speak (2005), Asra Nomani’s Standing Alone in Mecca: An
American Woman’s Struggle for the Soul of Islam (2005), Laleh Bakhtiar’s The Sublime
Quran (2011) and many more. For these women, some of whom reject the label feminist,
“Islamic identity is typically not merely an ascribed and passively accepted identity, but
rather it is actively embraced. It is the identity they speak from and which they enact and
make visible, sometimes through the adoption of hijab” (Ahmed 2012: 279-80).
The case of Aneeka, the character in Kamila Shamsie’s Home Fire who fights for her right to
see her jihadist brother’s body buried in England, their home country, bears out how agency
can be conveyed through devotion to filial ties. The young generation’s – including his own
son and the two courageous sisters, Aneeka and Isma – embrace of subjectivised
commitments, whether they be to love, truth or justice, not only renders Karamat Lone, the
British Home Secretary’s public championing of these professed British values/ideals hollow,
but also pricks holes in his male British diplomatic pride and smugness, throwing him into
(never verbalised) moments of self-doubt and self-deprecation. Shamsie turns the division
between state/public/men and faith/private/women on its head when she pits Aneeka who
fiercely, fearlessly carries her defence of private, familial loyalties into the public arena,
staking her izzat (honour), (a much-valorised Muslim womanly attribute) against Karamat
Lone who lets his “personal animus” colour his strategic political decision, still managing to
keep his pride in Britishness intact. Shamsie does not fall into the essentialist trap of making
a cliched association of the woman with blind, irrational, uncritical love. As Eamonn puts it,
“they love unconditionally. Unconditionally, but not uncritically. While her brother was alive
that love was turned towards convincing him to return home, now he’s dead it’s turned to
Aneeka is a ‘devout’, hijab-observing Muslim; but her faith does not stop her from pre-
marital sex. She does not pray five times a day; but never misses her morning prayer. The
transgressive (in the vocabulary of the traditional believer) sexual act becomes a variant of
her morning prayer, both acts of personal fulfilment and spiritual consummation. Other
characters in the novel also define their engagement with faith in personalised terms,
Isma’s tutor, says, “the Quran tells us to enjoy sex as one of God’s blessings”. When Isma
clarifies, but “within marriage?”, Hira in a playful, laconic vein remarks: “We all have our
versions of selective reading when it comes to the Holy Book” (2017: 40).
I would like to conclude, drawing attention to the dilemmas, academic enquiries on Muslim
women pose to researchers, invariably belonging to urban, professional classes and located in
elite, metropolitan, western or westernised spaces, some of which I also share. Saba
Mahmood herself had problems doing research on the piety movement in the Cairo of the
1990s, which she admits to in an interview: “I went there with a set of assumptions that I am
now criticizing – that they are conservative and haven’t given much thought to what they are
doing. I was just amazed at how conscious they were and what they were struggling with. It
was an eye-opening experience to me. I also couldn’t be visible as a researcher doing this
stuff. I had to keep a very low profile; it took me two years to gain their trust” (Interview).
Questions of subjectivity which a Muslim woman academic faces while researching other
Muslim women (an earlier example of the fictional engagement with the subject can be seen
in the 1991 Pakistani-London diasporic novel The Red Box by Farhana Sheikh) form the
subject of Fauzia Ahmad’s paper “Still ‘In Progress?’ – Methodological Dilemmas, Tensions
and Contradictions in Theorizing South Asian Muslim Women”. Fauzia Ahmad’s discussion
revolves round the representations of South Asian Muslim women in the British context
within academic discourses. Ahmad writes about how at a personal level her own assertion of
a Muslim identity has elicited interesting responses from both academic colleagues and other
associates:
Since I do not wear the hijab myself, first impressions will classify me as an Asian
woman; but what follows is generally an assumption that my very presence within an
a ‘proper’ drink, a typical reaction would be to request further confirmation before the
issue of ‘why’ enters the conversation. Once the religious basis is established, some
academic colleagues have commented, ‘I didn’t realize you were a proper Muslim!’
The issue, of course, is not my actual abstention from a social drink; it is the cited
reason behind it. Were I to adopt a secular identity as an ‘Asian woman’ or a ‘black
54).
The Muslim woman’s engagement with faith may manifest features perhaps overlapping with
subversive of received religious traditions and their expectations about feminine roles,
paradigms fail to capture the nuances of the Muslim woman’s negotiations with faith.
Saleemah Abdul-Ghafur’s editorial remarks in her introduction to the book Living Islam Out
Loud: American Muslim Women Speak (2005) would serve as a fitting concluding note: “We
are Muslim women who have cleared our own paths and created ourselves both because and
in spite of Islam and other Muslims. Our American Muslim identity is not linear, nor can it be
shed or separated. It just is. We are women who understand that following disempowering
interpretations of sacred texts isn’t for us. We reflect the continuum of American Muslim
women – some of us are still conflicted, while others are more secure with the choices we’ve
Notes
1
Mernissi observes that for the Westerner, the tragic dimension of the Muslim harem – the
2
The Stasi Commission was appointed in 2003 to report on the question of secularity in
French schools
3
In the essay “The Politics of Postsecular Feminism” Vasilaki argues that the post secular
Abdel-Fattah, Randa. Does my Head Look Big in this? 2005. Scholastic, 2008.
Abdul-Ghafur, Saleemah, ed. Living Islam out Loud: American Muslim Women Speak.
Beacon,
2005.
the Diaspora Eds. Nirmal Puwar and Parvati Raghuram, Berg, 2003. 43- 65.
Ahmed, Leila. A Quiet Revolution: The Veil’s Resurgence from Middle East
Asad, Talal. “French Secularism and the Islamic Veil Affair” Hedgehog Review Vol. 8 Issue
Boddy, Janice. Wombs and Alien Spirits: Women, Men and the Zār Cult in Northern Sudan.
of Wisconsin, 1989.
Braidotti, Rosi. “In spite of the Times: The Postsecular Turn in Feminism” Theory, Culture
&
https://relsec.arizona.edu/sites/relsec.arizona.edu/files/The%20Postsecular%20Turn
%20in%20Feminism.pdf.
Clements, Madeline. Writing Islam from a South Asian Muslim Perspective: Rushdie,
Hamid,
Aslam, Shamsie. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Hassan, Wail S. “Leila Aboulela and the Ideology of Muslim Immigrant Fiction” Novel 41
20 Sept. 2017.
Landis, Josh. Interview with Saba Mahmood. The Light in her Eyes
thelightinhereyesmovie.com/resources/interview-saba-mahmood/ accessed on 06
Oct. 2017.
Mahmood, Saba. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton
UP, 2005.
mahmood/
Mernissi, Fatima. Scheherazade Goes West: Different Cultures, Different Harems. Simon and
Schuster, 2001.
Sethi, Anita. “Keep the Faith” Interview with Leila Aboulela. The Observer 5 June 2005.
2017.
Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach, eds. Routledge, 2006. pp. 1-22.
Routledge 2006.
Vasilaki, Rosa. “The Politics of Postsecular Feminism” Theory, Culture and Society. Vol. 33