You are on page 1of 2

AATCC Test Method 102-2002

Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide by


Potassium Permanganate Titration
Developed in 1957 by AATCC Commit- cartridge and full facepiece should be 7.3.2 Boil the solution for 15 min and
tee RA34; reaffirmed 1962, 1968, 1972, readily available for emergency use. cool.
1975, 1979, 2002; editorially revised 4.4 Exposure to chemicals used in this 7.3.3 Filter the solution through a filter
(with title change) 1983; editorially re- procedure must be controlled at or below funnel (see 5.1) into a 1 L volumetric
vised and reaffirmed 1985, 1992; re- levels set by governmental authorities flask. Dilute to the mark with water.
vised 1987 (with title change), 1997. (e.g., Occupational Safety and Health 7.3.4 Store solutions of potassium per-
Administration’s [OSHA] permissible manganate in brown bottles or otherwise
exposure limits [PEL] as found in 29 protect the solutions from light.
CFR 1910.1000 of January 1, 1989). In 7.4 Standardization of 0.588N potas-
1. Purpose and Scope addition, the American Conference of sium permanganate solution. Make three
1.1 This test method determines the Governmental Industrial Hygienists determinations as follows.
concentration of hydrogen peroxide (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs)
comprised of time weighted averages 7.4.1 Pipette 100 mL 0.100N sodium
(H2O2) in aqueous solutions, particularly oxalate solution into a 250 mL Erlen-
(TLV-TWA), short term exposure limits
those used in textile bleaching. meyer flask and add 10 ± 1 mL 20% sul-
(TLV-STEL) and ceiling limits (TLV-C)
are recommended as a general guide for furic acid.
2. Principle air contaminant exposure which should 7.4.2 Heat to boiling. Remove from
be met (see 11.1). heat and immediately titrate with the po-
2.1 A specimen is acidified with sulfu- tassium permanganate solution being
ric acid and titrated with standardized po- standardized, adding the titrant drop by
tassium permanganate solution. The con- 5. Apparatus drop at the beginning and at the end of
centration of hydrogen peroxide is 5.1 Filter funnel, fritted glass, fine po- the titration. The end-point is a faint but
calculated using the volume and normal- rosity, 250 mL. permanent pink color.
ity of the permanganate solution used. 5.2 Filtration flask, 2000 mL. 7.4.3 Calculate the normality of the po-
tassium permanganate solution to the near-
est 0.001 using the following equation:
3. Terminology 6. Reagents
Nk = (Vo)(No)/(Vk)
3.1 bleaching, n.—elimination of un- 6.1 Sodium oxalate (Na2C2O4), crys-
wanted coloring matter from a textile tals, CP. where:
substrate by oxidative or reductive chem- 6.2 Sulfuric acid (H2SO4), 95-98%. Vo = volume of the sodium oxalate
ical treatment. 6.3 Potassium permanganate (KMnO4), solution used, in mL
crystals. No = normality of the sodium oxalate
4. Safety Precautions solution
NOTE: These safety precautions are
7. Preparation of Reagents Vk = volume of the potassium per-
for information purposes only. The safety manganate solution used, in mL
7.1 Standard 0.100N sodium oxalate
precautions are ancillary to the testing solution. 7.4.4 Average the three normality values
procedures and are not intended to be all 7.1.1 Dry at least 7 g sodium oxalate in and use that average for all calculations.
inclusive. It is the user’s responsibility to an oven at 105 ± 1°C for 4 h and cool in a
use safe and proper techniques in han- desiccator.
dling materials in this test method. Manu- 7.1.2 Weigh 6.7000 ± 0.0002 g sodium 8. Procedure
facturers MUST be consulted for specific oxalate (see 7.1.1) and dissolve in 250-
details such as material safety data sheets 300 mL distilled or deionized water at 70 8.1 Weigh 10 ± 0.1 g of the aqueous
and other manufacturer’s recommenda- ± 10°C. hydrogen peroxide specimen into a
tions. All OSHA standards and rules 7.1.3 Cool and quantitatively transfer 250 mL flask (see 11.3).
must also be consulted and followed. to a 1 L volumetric flask and cover. Al- 8.2 Add 20 ± 1 mL 20% sulfuric acid
4.1 Good laboratory practices should low to stand at least 12 h, then dilute to to the flask (see 7.2). Gently mix by
be followed. Wear safety glasses in all the mark with distilled or deionized swirling or stirring.
laboratory areas. water. 8.3 Titrate the solution with standard-
4.2 All chemicals should be handled 7.2 Sulfuric acid, approximately 20% ized potassium permanganate solution
with care. Sodium oxalate, potassium by volume (see Section 4 for safety pre- (see 7.3 and 7.4) to a faint pink color
permanganate and sulfuric acid are corro- cautions). which lasts at least 30 s. Record the vol-
sive. When preparing the dilute solutions 7.2.1 Slowly add 200 mL 95-98% sul- ume of titrant in milliliters as Vt.
from pure or concentrated reagents, use furic acid to 800 mL water with stirring. 8.3.1 If less than 2 mL of titrant are
chemical goggles or face shield, impervi- Cool to 20 ± 2°C. used, repeat the procedure using either a
ous gloves, and an impervious apron. 7.2.2 Add water to 1 L. standardized potassium permanganate so-
CAUTION: Always add acid to water. 7.3 Potassium permanganate solution lution of known lower normality or a
4.3 An eyewash/safety shower should 0.588N (see 11.2). larger specimen.
be located nearby and a high efficiency 7.3.1 Weigh 18.6 ± 0.1 g potassium 8.4 Titrate a blank, and record the mL
particulate respirator with organic vapor permanganate and add it to 900 mL water. titrant required as Vb.

AATCC Technical Manual /2006 TM 102-2002 155


Copyright © 2005 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
9. Calculations ators each, evaluating two concentra- Table II—Critical Differences for Two
tions of hydrogen peroxide in aqueous Averages, 95% Probability Level
9.1 Calculate the % H2O2 to the nearest solution. Two batches of each concentra-
0.01% using the following equation: tion were prepared. Each operator made Hydrogen Peroxide (Grand Average = 2.88%)
% H2O2 as 100% duplicate determinations on four separate Single Within- Between-
occasions for each of the two batches, a n Operator Laboratory Laboratories
= (Vt – Vb)(Nt)(0.017)(100)/(Ws) total of 16 determinations per operator 1 0.05 0.06 0.11
per concentration (2 × 4 × 2). The data set 2 0.04 0.04 0.11
where: was analyzed using the ASTM Tex-Pac
Vt = volume of titrant in mL 4 0.03 0.04 0.10
program (see 11.4). 8 0.02 0.03 0.10
Vb = volume of titrant in mL for 10.1.2 Analysis showed the residual
blank sample variances of the two concentrations were
Nt = normality of the titrant solution different. Accordingly, critical difference 11. Notes
Ws = specimen mass, in g tables, with the number of determinations 11.1 Available from Publications Office,
per average shown as n, were prepared ACGIH, Kemper Woods Center, 1330 Kem-
9.2 If 0.588N KMnO4 solution is used
for each concentration per Meadow Dr., Cincinnati OH 45240; tel:
as the titrant and the specimen mass is 10
g, the equation reduces to: 10.2 Bias. 513/742-2020.
10.2.1 Concentration of hydrogen per- 11.2 The most widely used standard solu-
% H2O2 as 100% = (0.1)(Vt – Vb) oxide in aqueous solution can be defined tion of potassium permanganate is 0.588N.
only in terms of a test method. Within This concentration and 0.1N solution are
9.3 Using the conditions of 9.2, for this limitation, this method has no known available from laboratory supply companies.
reporting % H2O2 on other bases, such as 11.3 If a volumetric aliquot of the aqueous
bias in the determination of percent hy- hydrogen peroxide solution is used as the
35% or 50%, Vt may be multiplied by the drogen peroxide.
factor 10/B, where B is the basis ex- specimen, the specimen mass may be deter-
mined from the relationship:
pressed as % H2O2. For example, if the
basis is 35%, Table I—Critical Differences for Two Specimen mass
% H2O2 as 35% Averages, 95% Probability Level = volume of aliquot (mL) × density (g/mL)
= (Vt – Vb)(10)/(35) = (Vt – Vb)(0.286) Hydrogen Peroxide (Grand Average = 0.65%) The aliquot must be taken at the temperature
Single Within- Between- at which the density is determined. For mill
n Operator Laboratory Laboratories control purposes the density is often disre-
10. Precision and Bias garded if the bleaching formula remains con-
1 0.03 0.04 0.05 stant from day to day.
10.1 Precision. 2 0.02 0.03 0.05 11.4 Available from ASTM, 100 Barr Har-
10.1.1 In 1993 an interlaboratory study 4 0.01 0.03 0.04 bor Dr., West Conshohocken PA 19428; tel:
included five laboratories, with two oper- 8 0.01 0.02 0.04 610/832-9500; fax: 610/832-9555.

156 TM 102-2002 AATCC Technical Manual/2006


Copyright © 2005 American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists

You might also like