Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Authorized licensed use limited to: ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTREAL. Downloaded on May 21,2020 at 02:13:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2.5 3 M.W.
2.6
f1 (GHz)
1.5
2.4
f2/f1
(a) (b) (c)
1 Fig. 3. The current distributions of the first three modes (a) Mode
f1/f1 2.2 1_I. (b) Mode 1_II and (c) Mode 2. “⊙” and “⊕” represent the
points where the electrical fields are strongest, and they are
0.5 2 perpendicular to the paper but in reverse direction. “--” stands for the
0 2 4 6 8 10 M.W. (Magnetic Wall) and “←→” resembles the current flow
Wp (mm)
patterns.
(a)
MS1 1 ML1 Source/Load
Lc=0.6 mm
0 Lc=1.0 mm
1 Mode 1_I (Odd Mode)
Lc=1.4 mm S MS2 2 ML2 L
−10
2 Mode 1_II (Even Mode)
MS3 3 ML3
3 Mode 2 (Odd Mode)
|S21| (dB)
−30 the center of the patch, the slots have little influence on its
resonant frequency as well.
−40
2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5
Frequency (GHz) III. FILTER DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
(b) Fig. 4 shows the transversal coupling scheme of the
Fig. 2. (a) Resonant frequency ratios of Mode 1 (f1), Mode 2 (f2)
and Mode 3 (f3) over f1 and the resonant frequency of f1 versus patch proposed triple-mode filter design. As illustrated in Fig. 3(a-
size (Wp) (Ws=0.4 mm and Ls=27.2 mm). (b) |S21| responses of c), the current distributions of Mode 1_I, Mode 1_II and Mode
varied slot lengths (Lc) (Wc=0.4 mm and Wp=3.0 mm). 2 is odd-, even- and odd-symmetrical with respect to their
vertical symmetrical planes (or the feed ports), respectively.
Mode 3 drops down monotonously, which makes up the Accordingly, their coupling coefficients to source/load satisfy
spurious passband and would be discussed later. with the conditions: MS1 = -ML1, MS2 = ML2 and MS3 = -ML3.
Then, a pair of slots is etched into the patch to split the The coupling matrix of this triple-mode filter can be obtained
resonant frequencies of the degenerate pair of Mode 1. Fig. by [8]:
2(b) illustrates the transmission coefficients as the slots are
⎡ 0 0.681 0.539 0.607 0 ⎤
introduced into the patch. As the slot length increases, the ⎢0.681 0.935 0 0 − 0.681⎥
resonant frequency of Mode 1_I drops to a lower value M = ⎢0.539 0 − 3.83 0 0.539 ⎥. (1)
gradually, while the ones of Mode 1_II and Mode 2 keep ⎢0.607 0 0 −1.476 − 0.607⎥
⎢⎣ 0 − 0.681 0.539 − 0.607 0 ⎥⎦
almost unchanged. Therefore, by changing the patch size and
the slot length, Mode 2 and Mode 1_I can be adjusted,
Based on the characteristics of the transversal coupling
respectively.
scheme, as discussed in [3]-[6], the resonant frequency of a
Fig. 3(a) to (c) show the current distributions for the three
certain mode, fi, is usually different from the center frequency
modes described above. The current distributions of the two
of the filter, fo. These two values are used to determine the
degenerate modes are distorted by the slots, causing them to
diagonal element, Mii, in the coupling matrix by the following
rotate and distribute along both the crossed strips, as shown in
equation:
Fig. 3(a) and (b). For Mode 1_I, the slots block the surface
current, therefore brings down its resonant frequency, as M ii × Δf
f i = f o (1 − ), i = 1, 2, 3. (2)
depicted in Fig. 3(a). Meanwhile, the current distribution of 2 fo
Mode 1_II is hardly affected by the slots, as illustrated in Fig.
3(b). For Mode 2, whose current distribution concentrates in where △f is the absolute bandwidth of the filter.
Authorized licensed use limited to: ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTREAL. Downloaded on May 21,2020 at 02:13:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
0
|S11|
−10
|S21|
−20
Lst −30
S
Port 1 Port 2 −40
Lcl
−50 Measurement
(a) EM simulation
0 Coupling matrix calculation
−60
1 2 3 4 5 6
−10 Frequency (GHz)
−30
lowest degenerate modes and the third lowest mode are
−40
excited by installing a slotted patch in the center of a cross
resonator. Based on the discussion of the proposed patch-
−50 Lst=3.5 mm loaded cross resonator, a prototype bandpass filter fed by the
Lst=5.5 mm stub-loaded coupled lines is analyzed and designed. Measured
Lst=7.5 mm
−60
1 2 3 4 5 6
and simulated results are in good agreement, which verifies
Frequency (GHz) the design principle.
(b)
Fig. 5. (a) The layout and (b) Simulated |S21| responses of the stub-
loaded coupled line filters under different stub lengths (Lst).
REFERENCES
[1] W. C. Tang and S. K. Chaudhuri, “A true elliptic-function filter
using triple-mode degenerate cavities,” IEEE Trans. Microw.
Based on the above discussion on the patch loaded cross Theory Tech., vol.32, no.11, pp. 1449-1454, Nov. 1984.
resonator, the lowest three modes are used for the filter design [2] L. Zhu and W. Menzel, “Compact microstrip bandpass filter
by properly selecting the patch size and the slot length to with two transmission zeros using a stub-tapped half-
quasi-equally distribute them in the passband. The prototype wavelength line resonator,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.
Lett., vol.13, no.1, pp. 16-18, Jan. 2003.
filter uses two stub-loaded coupled lines as feed lines to both [3] W. Shen, X. W. Sun, and W. Y. Yin, “A novel microstrip filter
achieve a desired coupling degree and suppress the lowest using three-mode stepped impedance resonator (TSIR),” IEEE
harmonic passband caused by Mode 3 (seen in Fig. 2(b)). Fig. Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol.19, no.12, pp. 774-776,
5(a) illustrates the layout of the proposed filter, and Fig. 5(b) Dec. 2009.
shows the simulated |S21| responses under different stub [4] A. Torabi and K. Forooraghi, “Miniature harmonic-suppressed
microstrip bandpass filter using a triple-mode stub-loaded
lengths. As the length Lst increases, a transmission zero is resonator and spur lines,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.
moved towards the lower frequency, thus suppressing the Lett., vol.21, no.5, pp.255-257, May 2011.
harmonic passband around 4.2 GHz. [5] C. Lugo and J. Papapolymerou, “Planar realization of a triple-
The final dimension of the filter is Ws=0.4 mm, Ls=27.2 mode bandpass filter using a multilayer configuration,” IEEE
mm, Wp=3.0 mm, Wc=0.4 mm, Lc=1.4 mm, Ws=0.4 mm, Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol.55, no.2, pp.296-301, Feb.
2007.
Lst=7.6 mm, Lcl=6.5 mm and S=0.2 mm. The measured [6] A. L. C. Serrano, F. S. Correra, T. P. Vuong, and P. Ferrari,
results agree well with the EM simulated and the coupling “Analysis of a reconfigurable bandpass circular patch filter,”
matrix derived ones, as depicted in Fig. 6. The measured IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol.8, no.12, pp. 3918-
results show a passband with a center frequency of 2.15 GHz, 3924, Dec. 2010.
3-dB fractional bandwidth of 11.1%, insertion loss less than [7] K. C. Gupta, R. Garg, I. Bahl and P. Bhartia. Microstrip Lines
and Slotlines, Second Edition, Boston: Artech House, 1996.
2.15 dB, and 35 dB rejection around the first harmonic band. [8] S. Amari, U. Rosenberg, and J. Bornemann, “Adaptive synthesis
and design of resonator filters with source/load-multi-resonator
coupling,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol.50, no.8, pp.
IV. CONCLUSION
1969-1978, Aug. 2002.
A new triple-mode microstrip bandpass filter using a slotted
patch-loaded cross resonator has been proposed. The two
Authorized licensed use limited to: ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTREAL. Downloaded on May 21,2020 at 02:13:25 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.