You are on page 1of 8

International Association for Ecology

Shrub Clumps of the Chilean Matorral Vegetation: Structure and Possible Maintenance
Mechanisms
Author(s): Eduardo R. Fuentes, Ricardo D. Otaiza, M. Catalina Alliende, Alicia Hoffmann, Aldo
Poiani
Source: Oecologia, Vol. 62, No. 3 (1984), pp. 405-411
Published by: Springer in cooperation with International Association for Ecology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4217336 .
Accessed: 18/06/2011 15:34

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. .

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Springer and International Association for Ecology are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Oecologia.

http://www.jstor.org
Oecologia (Berlin) (1984) 62:405-411 Oeclogla
? Springer-Verlag 1984

Shrubclumpsof the Chileanmatorralvegetation:


structureand possiblemaintenancemechanisms
EduardoR. Fuentes,Ricardo D. Otaiza, M. CatalinaAlliende,Alicia Hoffmann,and Aldo Poiani
Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Casilla 114-D, Santiago, Chile

Summary. Previous studies have claimed that the Chilean different evolutionary responses of the vegetation to nearly
matorral is more open than the Califonia chaparral, and identical environmental conditions (Mooney et al. 1972;
have attributed this dissimilaritylargely to the role of man also Mooney 1977; and referencestherein).This interpreta-
in Chile. In this paper we show that in general the Chilean tion suggests that, in the absence of direct human impact,
matorral has a structure better described as shrub clumps the Chilean matorral would become more similar to the
that merge to form a continuous vegetation matrix only California chaparral.
in very mesic habitats, where it is comparable to the Cali- In this article we will show that the structure of the
fonia chaparral.We also presentevidence that these clumps Chilean matorralcan be better describedas being composed
have been present for at least the last 26 years and that of clumps of shrubs rather than as a continuous shrub ma-
even without human disturbancethey are likely to maintain trix with some man-made gaps. Moreover, we will suggest
themselves. Evidence for the latter pertains to seed dispers- that independently of the natural or man-made origin of
al, seed germination and establishment, seedling survival, the clumps they have the potential for maintaining them-
and the diameter size structure of shrub clumps. Finally, selves through time, even in the absence of human distur-
we propose that differencesbetween the California chapar- bance.
ral and Chilean matorral are more profound than pre-
viously thought and are due not only to different degrees
of human disturbance,but also to the presenceof periodical Materials and methods
natural fires in California and not in Chile, and to different Observationsand experimentstook place in the Andes foot-
shrub recruitmentpatternsand mammalianherbivoreactiv- hills (ca. 1,000 m above sea level), between the Mapocho
ity in the two areas. and Maipo rivers, east of Santiago. Matorral vegetation
in this area (see Hoffmann and Hoffmann 1982) is at ap-
proximately the same altitude and latitude as the site of
previous convergence studies (see Thrower and Bradbury
1977; Mooney 1977) and has the same main species of
Introduction shrubs (see also Mooney et al. 1972).
Studies comparing areas of mediterranean-typeclimate in
Chile and California have shown some remarkableconver- Clumps
gences, particularly in vegetation physiognomy and shrub
species morphology (Throwerand Bradbury1977; Mooney Vegetation clumps were measured on 1: 5000 aerial photo-
1977; Cody and Mooney 1978). However, those studies graphs produced from a 1980 flight by the Chilean Service
also indicated some important differencesbetween the med- of Aerophotogrammetry.The 1980 photographs were com-
iterranean-type shrublands in the two areas. In general, pared with similar 1:5000 photographs produced from a
Chilean sites exhibit higher species diversity of shrubs, 1956 flight by the same service. Measurements of relative
lower total shrub cover, and higher herb cover than compa- clump size were made by the line transect method (Muller-
rable California localities. The overall aspect of the Califor- Dumbois and Ellenberg 1974). A 50-mm ruler, equivalent
nia chaparralis that of an impenetrablescrubbyvegetation, to a 250-m transect, was randomly placed 10 times on each
compared to the more open and structurallydiverse aspect polar-facing slope (moist-cool), and each equatorial-facing
of the Chilean matorral. These comparisons refer only to slope (dry-hot). In valley bottoms this procedure was re-
"'mature" sites since, both in Californiaand in Chile, direct peated 5 times at each site. In total eight equatorial-facing
human disturbance and fires are known to create open slopes, eight polar-facing slopes, and five valley bottoms
spaces, changes in vegetation and thus greater diversity were measured. Our aim was to find out if clumps tend
(Aschman and Bahre 1977; Trabaud 1981; Conrad and to be larger on one or the other type of slope. Only areas
Oechel 1982; Armesto and Gutierrez 1978). that had not previously been cleared were chosen for these
The differences between the mature shrub communities measurements.However, as we will mention later, in some
in Chile and California have been attributed to the dissimi- of these areas old trunksexhibiting signs of previouscutting
lar treatmentsof these vegetation types by man rather than and subsequent resproutingwere found.
In addition, an area of 0.80 ha on a small disturbed
Offprint requests to: E. R. Fuentes valley bottom, just east of Santiago (Los Dominicos), was
406

directly censused in the field and the species and diameter and 15 seeds of Colliguayawere placed either under plants
composition of the shrub clumps sampled during January of Lithraea(n = 5), plants of Colliguaya(n = 5), or an open
(summer) 1982. Special care was taken during these cen- area between shrubs (n = 5). The boxes were periodically
suses to avoid counting as separate individuals what could monitored and the total number of seedlings emergingand
be small ramets of a larger plant. Usually examination of later establishedwas recorded.
the soil up to a depth of 4-5 cm was enough to discriminate
the ramets.
Seedlingsurvival
Experiments were also designed to test if the death rate
Seed and seedlingshadows
of seedlings protected with a small chicken-wiremesh cage,
Throughout the 1981-1982 season, seed shadows for the which excluded mammalian herbivores, would be lower
nine most common shrub species were evaluated by sam- than the death rate of unprotectedseedlings.
pling the relative seedfall on 40 x 40 cm plates smearedwith During October (early spring) 1981, 20 small (3-5 cm)
Tangle-Trap. Twenty such plates were randomly placed in seedlings of each of three species (Quillaja, Lithraea, and
the open areas between clumps and five of them were lo- Maytenus)were planted in each of the following four situa-
cated under five randomly chosen shrub clumps, mostly tions:
composed of Lithraea,Quillaja,Colliguaya,or Azara. These A. Open space between clumps, protected with the wire
plates with Tangle-Trap were examined and replacedevery mesh cages mentioned above. These seedlings were pro-
month. tected from defoliation by large herbivores, but not from
In addition, the seed bank in the top 1 cm of soil be- desiccation.
tween clumps, as well as under clumps, was estimated in B. Open space between clumps, not covered with the
May 1982, at the end of the seed dispersal season. Soil cages.
samples of 40 x 40 x 1 cm were randomly collected from ar- C. Under clumps and protectedwith the wire mesh cage,
eas between clumps and under shrubs of Lithraea, Colli- and therefore protected from herbivores and presumably
guaya, Quillaja, and Azara. These samples (n= 10 in each under less hydric stress than protected seedlings between
case) were dried, sifted with a 1.5-mm2 sieve, and hand shrubs.
sorted for shrub seeds. D. Under clumps unprotectedand thereforepresumably
At Los Dominicos we also tested the hypothesis under lower relative hydric stress and perhaps "hidden"
(McDonnell and Stiles 1983) that large emergent objects by the clumps.
coul attract birds dispersing fruit and thus positively bias The planted seedlings, about 5 cm tall, were of the same
the seed bank around already establishedclumps. We mea- size as the natural seedlings that we found at that time.
sured the relative seed accumulation around 20 poles of All the seedlings were inspected periodically to determine
2.5 m height, placed in open areas between shrubs on an if they were still alive, showed signs of browsing, or were
equatorial-facing slope and on a polar-facing slope (n =10 dead from eitherdesiccationor herbivoreattack. Frequency
in each case). The base of each of these poles was protected distributions of time before death were later analyzed to
from large herbivores with a 1-m2 cage of chicken-wire determine the statistical significance of the various treat-
mesh. We also measured seed accumulations on selected ments. Since these frequencydistributions,even after trans-
large rocks in the same two sites, and the accumulation formations, are still significantly skewed and leptokurtic,
on ground-levelcontrol areas of similar surface area within nonparametric statistics were used in the analyses (Siegel
I m from each rock. 1956).
Seedling shadow were evaluated in two ways. During
the 0.80 ha survey, we recorded the position and identity
of all seedlings. In addition, between October and De- Results
cember 1981 (springand early summer)we searchedsystem-
atically for seedlings on a much wider scale. We set up Clumpstructure
1-m-wide radial transects centred on the periphery of 85 Both in 1956 and in 1980, clumps on the equatorial-facing
randomly chosen shrub clumps and carefully examined the slopes were relatively smaller, on average, than clumps in
herb and grass cover for shrub,seedlings. These 85 clumps the valley bottoms and these in turn were relativelysmaller
were located on the equatorial-facingslope, the polar-facing than clumps on the polar-facingslopes (t-tests on log-trans-
slope, and on the valley bottom between them. These tran- formed data, after correction for multiple t-tests, give a
sects were extended for only 5 m from the periphery of rejection level of 0.001. See Table 1). Our measurements
the clumps because beyond this distance we were either
approaching another clump or the number of seedlings was Table 1. Clumpsizes. Averageclump sizes (in metres)on nine equa-
zero for several consecutive metres. torial-facingslopes, eight polar-facingslopes, and five alluvial fans,
for 1956 and 1980. Standarddeviations are shown in parentheses
Seed germinationand seedling establishment
Year Exposure
We designed the following experimentsto test the null hy-
pothesis that seed germination and later seedling establish- Equatorial-facing Valley bottoms Polar-facing
ment does not differ between clumps and under them. In slopes slopes
May 1982 (fall) seeds of Quillaja and Colliguaya were (n=8) (n=5) (n= 8)
placed in five different shallow wooden boxes containing
1956 7.80 (1.66) 12.79 (9.52) 31.93 (30.32)
soil from a between-clumpsarea. These boxes, covered with 64.75 (6.40)
1980 7.30 (2.40) 18.60(16.60)
a wire mesh and containing in total 100 seeds of Quillaja
407

Table 2. Shrub age-size distributions. Number of seedlings, juveniles and adult plants of each of five species of shrubs found under
the foliage projectionof nurse plants of five species (rows)

Nursed SeedlingsC Juvenilesc Adultsc

Qs. Lc. Ac. Co. Ad. Qs. Lc. Ac. Co. Ad. Qs. Lc Ac. Co. Ad.

Q. saponaria 0 5 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 0 18 15 1 11 5
n= 59
L. caustica 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 9 0 1 22 0
n=21
A. caven 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
n=13
C. odorifera 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
n=10
A. dentata 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2
n=4
Solitary b 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 3 21 71 5

a n is the numberof nurse plants of each species found


b "Solitary" referes to plants not associated with a clump. Notice that most plants belonged to a clump and that there were no
solitary seedlings and just one solitaryjuvenile in the whole survey
c Age-classes were arbitrarilydefined in relation to maximum trunk diameter at ground level in the following way: (1) L. caustica
and Q. saponaria(seedlings ?0.9 cm, juveniles _4 cm, adults >4.1 cm); (2) for all other species (seedlings <0.9 cm, juveniles ?3 cm,
adults >3.1 cm)
d
Qs. = Quillajasaponaria,Lc. = Lithraeacaustica,Ac. = Acacia caven,Co. = Colliguayaodorifera,Ad. = Azara dentata

suggest that this difference between exposure patterns has match in all cases. Chi-square analyses show that Lithraea
been present at least since 1956. Matched comparisons of in association with both Quillajaand Colliguayaoccurs less
our estimates of clump sizes on slopes with the same expo- frequently than expected from its overall abundance in the
sure, in 1956 and 1980, did not show overall statistically 0.80 ha sample (P< 0.001). On the other hand, Colliguaya
significant differences(t-test, P>0.15 in all three cases). alone, and associations of Lithraeaand Quillaja,occur more
frequently than expected by chance (P<0.001). All other
Clumpcomposition associations have expected and observed frequencies that
do not differ significantly. These results suggest that the
Field sampling in the valley bottom of Los Dominicos re- species composition of clumps is the result not only of sto-
vealed that clumps tend to be multispecific and frequently chastic elimination of the plant cover, but at least in part
to have more than one class of trunk diameter (Table 2). the outcome of species interactions.
In fact, the plant with the largest trunk, and thus presum- As we mentioned earlier, at Los Dominicos, as well as
ably the oldest (Kummerow et al. 1981) in each patch, in other valleys, some old trunks showed evidence of old
".nurses"not only other large plants, but also younger indi- cuts. Most of these trunks, however, had resprouted and
viduals, suggesting that the clumps we see today could also belonged to one of the clumps.
persist through the next generation. Inspection of Table 2
indicates that the number of individuals in the various age-
size classes is irregular, suggesting that it is only in some Seed shadows
years that establishment and survival of seedlings is possi- Table 3 shows the relativeseed accumulationon the Tangle-
ble. Trap smeared board and in the soil seed bank. Although
Further examination of Table 2 shows: (i) that solitary seeds of Baccharis spp. were the most abundant seeds in
individuals are infrequent, and (ii) that the smaller size the open areas between clumps, seeds of at least seven other
classes of all five species are never solitary. No shrub seed- species also reach these areas. There is a soil seed bank
lings except for Baccharisspp. (not shown in Table 2) were for Lithraeaand Quillajain open areas. With the exception
found in the areas between clumps. Baccharisspp. are fairly of seeds of Schinus polygamus, seeds of any species were
ubiquitous small "'weedy"matorralshrubs. Thus in general found under clumps that were not also present between
in and around clumps several size classes of shrub can be clumps. Seeds of Lithraea, Quillaja, Colliguaya and Bac-
found together, but in the open spaces between clumps this charis can be found under all clumps as well as between
is never the case. clumps.
Analysis of all clumps in the 0.80 ha sample, including Although the small numbers do not allow quantitative
those shown in Table 2 and others, suggests that species comparisons, they suggest that the seed potential exists for
associations in clumps might not be random. In fact, for three and perhaps for eight species, to be present under
the three most common shrubs - Quillaja, Lithraea, and clumps as well as between clumps.
Colliguaya - the relative abundance in the 0.80 ha sample Table 3 reveals a tendency for higher seed numbers to
and the derived expected frequenciesin clumps of all possi- be present under clumps than in the open spaces between
ble species combinations, of up to six individuals, do not them. In fact, excluding the ubiquitous Baccharisseeds, for
408

Table 3. Seed shadows and seed bank. For each of the nine species (rows) we show the between-clumpas well as under-clump(dominated
by any one of four species of shrubs) number of seeds collected on a standardized per five samples basis. Each sample consisted
of a complete survey of 40 x 40 cm. Each entry consists of two values: the first one is the average number of seeds found on our
Tangle-Trapsmearedplates; the second value in parenthesesis the average number of seeds found in the soil

Seed species Between clumps Under clumps

Lithraea Quillaja Colliguaya Azara Average/Clump

A. dentata 0.25 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 ( 0) 360 (259.5) 90 (64.88)


Baccharisspp. 102.5 (0) 13 (0.50) 25 (0) 21 ( 0) 0 ( 1) 14.75 ( 0.38)
C. odorifera 5 (1.5) 5 (3) 17 (6.5) 31 (15) 1 ( 3) 13.5 ( 6.88)
L. caustica 1.25 (4.5) 5 (17.5) 7 (2.5) 0 ( 1) 0 ( 4.5) 3 ( 6.38)
M. hastulata 0.25 (0) 0 (0) 0 (4.5) 0 ( 0.5) 0 ( 1.5) 0 (1.5)
P. cuneifolia 1.25 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 13 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 3.25)
Q. saponaria 0.25 (0) 0 (0.50) 13 (68.5) 1 ( 0) 2 ( 4.5) 4 (18.38)
S. polygamus 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 (0) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 1.50 (0)
T. trinervis 0.50 (0) 0 (1.5) 2 (0.50) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0) 0 ( 0.50)

five out of eight species in the case of the smeared boards, - 120
a) ~
and for all eight species when the seed bank was measured A
100 o --o
directly, there were more seeds under clumps than between 0~~~~~~
them. For wind-dispersed seeds (Quillaja and Proustia cu- E 80 0
0
neifolia), or for autochorous ones (Colliguaya), this higher E
concentration might be due to interception by, or reduced c: 60
wind speed in, the clumps. For bird-dispersedseeds (Lith- 0)
raea, Azara, Trevoatrinervis,and Muehlenbeckiahastulata),
the greater seed density around clumps requires a different o
explanation. It seemed likely that clumps acted as perching o
DA0 /0

sites for birds carrying shrub seeds and this produced an < 400
0
accumulation of seeds under them. We used the seed accu- 0
mulation rates around rocks and poles to test this hypothe- a) 20
sis. A cumulative count, derived from our weekly records, 100
of seeds found on ten large rocks is shown in Fig. 1a. Only -o B
seeds of Lithraea were found in all three situations. Seeds 80 -
were removed after each count. The number of seeds found
on the rocks at the next visit, i.e. immigration, first increases
and then decreases (Fig. 1b). Control areas of similar size
about 1 m from each of the "experimental" rocks did not
accumulate any seeds. Under the experimental poles the
net number of Lithraea seeds recorded on each visit also
tends to increase and then decrease again as seen around
the rocks (Fig. 1c). Control areas about 1 m away from 2 0-
the poles did not accumulate any seeds at all. The concen- 0
tration of seeds around poles was more pronounced on a) 2 c
the equatorial-facing than on the polar-facing slopes. It is 40
,n
likely that these differences are related to the greater abun- -Q
B) -

dance of other, "competing", perching sites in the more


densely vegetated polar-facing slope. o1 10-
c

Seedlingshadows Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct


Time
Results of the radial transects of our detailed search for Fig. 1A-C. Seed accumulation. A Cumulative count of Lithraea
seedlings are shown in Fig. 2. Seedlings of Quillaja, Lith- seeds arriving between June and October 1981 of 10 large rocks.
raea, Kageneckia,Colliguaya, Muehlenbeckia,and Solanum Light and dark dots are north and south facing slopes respectively.
tomatillo tended to be more numerous under or around Seeds were removed after each count. Comparable control areas
clumps than far from them. Of this group, Kageneckia, nearby did not accumulate any seeds al all. B Net number of Lith-
raea seeds found in each visit to 10 rocks on a north-(dark) and
found only on the wet, lush, polar-facing slopes, was the a south-(light) facing slope. Here seeds were not removed after
species found farthest from clumps. In contrast, seedlings each visit as in A and the shape of histogramindicates seed arrivals
of Baccharis showed no tendency to be aggregated around as well as seed losses. C Net number of seeds under 20 poles.
clumps in any of the three exposure situations. These re- Light and dark columns indicate south- and north-facing slopes
sults, in close agreement with our findings in the detailed respectively. Again, as in A and B, control areas nearby did not
0.80-ha survey and with the predictions from the seed shad- accumulateany seeds at all
409

For seedlings between shrubs, those covered with wire


60 Quillaja 60 Lithraea
-
n=112 n=105 mesh had significantly (P <0.001) longer survival times
-40-
than uncovered ones, suggesting that herbivores and desic-
4
cation are important sources of mortality in the areas be-
20 - 20 -
tween clumps. Of the 60 unprotected seedlings, 37 died at
least in part due to herbivore damage, whereas the remain-
ing 23 exhibited evidence only of desiccation.
-3-2-1 1 2 3 4 5 -3-2-1 1 2 3 4 5 Wire-mesh-protected seedlings under shrubs survived
Distance (m) Distance (m) significantly longer (P< 0.001) than protected seedlings be-
tween shrubs. This suggests that shrubs provided significant
60 - Kageneckia 60 - Baccharis protection against drought. Under clumps the survival time
-
n=116
- n=158 of seedlings did not differ significantly (P>0.18) between
g40 - 40 - protected and unprotected.
These results suggest that shrub clumps protect and en-
20 -20- hance the survival of seedlings. Both herbivory and desicca-
tion appear to be important causes of mortality for seed-
lings in the open spaces between clumps and both of these
-3 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 0-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 5
hazards are amelioratedby the clumps. Thus, independently
Distance (m) Distance (m)
of the seed bank, seed germination, and establishmentrates,
80- seedlings under clumps have significantly higher chances
of surviving throughout the dry summer than seedlings
0 -
60 MuehLenheckia Coltiguaya SoLanum
~n=28 n=21 n4 growing in the open.
~40-
70 A 70- B
20- 50 x=9.7 50 -

0 ?30 1 -30 - x=33.3


-3-2-1 1 2 -2-1 1 2 1 2
Distance (m) Distance (m) Distance (m) 10 11o -j11t ..
Fig. 2. Seedlings and nurses. The seven histograms show the per- 10 30 50 70 90 110 10 30 50 70 90 110
cent number of seedlings of seven shrub species found at various Days Days
distances from the edge of the nurse's canopy. Arrows indicate 70- 70-
the edge and from there negative (towards the trunk) or positive c D
(away from the trunk) distances were taken. Sample size (n) is 50 - 50 - x3
also shown in each case
30 - x=23.0 30-
ow results, suggest that the next generation of shrubs is 10 10
also likely to form clumps.
10 30 50 70 90 110 10 30 50 70 90 110
Days Days
Seed germinationand seedling survival Fig. 3A-D. Seedling Survival Times. Percent seedlings surviving
to various times are shown. In each one of the four cases 60 seed-
A two-way ANOVA on previously transformeddata (arcsin lings were planted on the same day in October 1981. Results of
function) of the percentage of seeds that germinated and experiments with (C, D) and without (A, B) protection against
established on the experimental boxes showed significant herbivores as well as under a nurse plant (B, D) or in the open
differences by the clump versus no clump criterion (P's< (A, C) are shown. Survival time is on the average lowest for sun-
0.01), but no significant difference by the seedling species exposed unprotected seedlings (x = 9.7 days) and highest for seed-
criterion (Quillaja,Lithraea, Colliguaya).There was no sig- lings under a nurse (x = 33.3 and 34.8 days). Notice that seedlings
nificant interaction. Between clumps about 54% of the without a nurse on the average more than double their life expec-
seeds germinated and established whereas under shrubs tancy when protected against herbivores
only 29% did so. These results suggest that not only are
seeds dispersed to the areas between clumps, but also that Discussion and conclusions
here they have higher chances of germination and establish-
ment than under clumps. Our results show that the natural shrubby vegetation on
Since results of the experiments to test survival time the Andes east of Santiago forms clumps that vary in size
under clumps or between them did not show any among- with exposure. In aerial photographs taken in 1956 and
species differences (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P>0.46), in 1980, equatorial-facing slopes tend to have smaller clump
the rest of the analysis we consider all species of seedlings sizes, valley bottoms have patches of intermediate size, and
in a single category. the polar-facing slopes tend to have the largest clumps.
A Mann-Whitney U-test on the survival times (Fig. 3) In spite of the 24-year period between the photographs,
shows a significantly (P<0.001) higher average survival not only was the relationship between slope and clump size
time for unprotected seedlings under shrub clumps com- maintained, but clumps on slopes of the same exposure
pared to those between shrubs, suggesting that vegetation tended to be of similar size in 1956 and in 1980. Our data
clumps provide seedlings with protection against herbi- do not suggest a tendency for clumps to increase or decrease
vores, desiccation, or both. in size.
410

Moreover, the photographs and our more detailed re- our findings regardingthe size-classstructureof individuals
sults from the Los Dominicos valley suggest that clumps in clumps.
have not only been part of the structure of the shrubby In areas like Los Dominicos, where large shrubs were
vegetation for the last 26 years but that they might continue sometimes cut by man, this affected the largest individuals
as part of it in the future. Twenty-six years is a long time and the clump structureof the vegetation was not altered.
relative to the establishment and growth times of shrubs Most matorral shrubs, and certainly Lithraea,Quillajaand
in Chile and in some other areas of mediterraneanclimate Colliguaya,are capable of resproutingafter cutting (Monte-
(Conrad and Oechel 1982; Godron et al. 1981). It is only negro et al. 1982). Hence, when the largest shrubs are cut
on the mesic polar-facing slopes that clumps are very large for fuel or charcoal, the perturbationis compensatedwithin
and seem to merge into one another to form a fairly contin- a few growing seasons and the old aspect of the clump
uous cover. It should be pointed out that the convergence is regained.The structurethat we describeis thereforefairly
studies previously mentioned were made at an even more resilient to wood-cutting and is not expected either to be
mesic site, on the coastal ranges (Thrower and Bradbury eliminated or generatedby wood removal activities.
1977), where the shrubbyvegetation tends to form a contin- Goats, horses, or even cows are other large perturbating
uous matrix, unless disturbed by man. In that situation agents in the matorral,and if kept at relativelylow densities
human disturbance was, correctly, claimed to be the most would probably enhance ratherthan reduce the clump pat-
important factor producing openness in the matorral. tern because of their preferencefor young tissues including
Our results suggest that in additon to direct human dis- seedlings of shrubs. They would thus reinforce the rabbit
turbance (clearing areas for agricultureor opening trails), effect. At high densities, however, they selectively remove
in some areas there may be other reasons for the openness some of the shrubs of each clump and eventually shift the
of the matorral.Our finding that some clumps at Los Domi- vegetation towards Lithraea, Acacia caven, and Trichoce-
nicos have species compositions that depart significantly reus chilensisstands (Fuentes 1984).
from random supports the idea that clumps are not merely A problem which has not yet been completely solved
the results of non-specific human disturbance in the past, relates to the determinants of clump size in the various
but ratherthe outcome of some definite interactionsamong situations. It is likely that once a certain clump size has
species. We still do not know how the clump patterns were been attained, further establishment and survival of seed-
originally established. They might be natural (have an ori- lings around the peripheryof the clump is no longer possi-
gin that is independent of human disturbance) although ble and the clump stops growing. Preliminary evidence
perhaps later modified by man's activities. However, the (Poiani and Fuentes, unpublished)suggests that density of
alternative hypothesis that the pattern is all the product 0. degus and risk of seedling predation increase rapidly
of human influence cannot be completely discardedat pres- with clump size, perhaps enough to account for complete
ent. seedling mortality beyond some threshold clump size. This
At present clumps appear capable of maintainingthem- hypothesis is still being investigated.
selves through time. The fact that the smaller size-classes Our data and the above discussion are consistent with
of most shrubs are strongly associated with "nursing" the hypothesis that the general openness of the matorral
clumps seems to be the result of at least two processes. is related not only to human disturbance in some areas,
First, clumps attract birds that carry shrub seeds, and inter- but also to the general pattern of shrub recruitment.This
cept wind-borne seeds, which accumulate around clumps. pattern, in which new shrubs tend to grow under a nursing
These effects combine to produce the observed seed and clump, is different from that described for the California
seedling shadows around preexisting clumps. The second chaparral. In California the shrub cover is periodically
process that accounts for the restricted distribution of burnedby naturalfiresand immediatelya secondarysucces-
young plants is related to the protection given by clumps sion begins (Hanes 1971; and referencestherein). The new
to seedlings. The risks of death due to herbivore grazing shrub cover arises either from ubiquitous seedlings or from
and to desiccation are significantly less under clumps than the resproutingof old burned plants (Keeley and Johnson
between them. Elsewhere (Fuentes et al. 1983) it has been 1977). Only a few years after a fire, shrub recruitmentbe-
shown that Europeanrabbits(Oryctolaguscuniculus),which comes very scarce indicatingthat shrub reproductionis dis-
in central Chile prefer to graze in open spaces between continuous and fairly synchronous for all species. In Chile,
shrubs (Jaksicet al. 1979), browse and kill even much larger in contrast, there are neither natural fires (Mooney 1977)
seedlings growing in the open spaces. In contrast, native nor any other large-scale natural phenomena generating
defoliating rodents, mostly degus (Octodon degus), forage open spaces for colonization, and the shrub recruitment
most frequently under or around clumps and thus impose pattern seems to be more continuous in time and less syn-
predation risks only on seedlings growing in the dome- chronous for all species.
shaped cavity under these large shrubs (Fuentes and Simon- It seems that the pattern of shrub clumps and the pecu-
etti 1982). liar shrub recruitmentpattern exhibited in the Chilean sites
Although our resultsshow that the survivaltime of seed- denote more profound differencesthan previously thought
lings increases among the low branches of large shrubs, between the Californiachaparraland the Chilean matorral.
none of these seedlings survived throughout the dry season. It is likely that today the Chilean matorral is a partly an-
Perhaps it is only in unusually wet years that seedlings can thropogenic alternative to the California chaparral, and
survive through this stressful period. The dry season in the that herbivores and seed dispersershave a very important
area of Chile with a mediterranean-typeclimate is highly role in shaping its vegetation structure.
variable and in some years it rains I or 2 mm even in the
middle of the summer (Miller et al. 1977; Fuentes and Ha- We are very grateful to Professor J. Harper,
Acknowledgements.
jek, unpublished). Irregularityin rainfall and seedling sur- H. Mooney, W. Schlesingerand 0. Solbrig who read the manu-
vival through the summer could explain, at least in part, script and suggested many ways to improve it. We would also
411

like to acknowledge the support of P. Universidad Cat6lica de phytes and chamaephytes in central Chile. Vegetatio
Chile through project DIUC 75/81. This paper is a contribution 48:151-163
to the MAB project of UNESCO. Jaksic F, Fuentes ER, YaniezJ (1979) Two types of adaptations
of vertebrate predators to their prey. Archivos de Biologia y
References Medicina Experimental(Chile) 12: 143-152
Keeley S, Johnson AW (1977) A comparison of the pattern of
Armesto JH, GutierrezJ (1978) El efecto del fuego en la estructura herb and shrub growths in comparable sites in Chile and Cali-
de la vegetaci6n de Chile central. Anales del Museo de Historia fornia. American Midland Naturalist: 97:120-132
Natural de Valparaiso 11:43-48 Kummerow J, Montenegro G, Krause D (1981) Biomass, pheno-
Aschmann H, Bahre C (1977) Man's impact in the wild landscape. logy and growth. In: Miller P (ed) Resource use by chaparral
In: HA Mooney (ed) Convergent evolution in Chile and Cali- and matorral.SpringerNew York pp 69-96
fornia Mediterraneanclimate ecosystems. Dowden Hutchinson McDonnell MJ, Stiles EW (1983) The structural complexity of
and Ross, Pa. Stroudsbourg,Pa, USA. pp 73-84 old field vegetation and the recruitmentof bird dispersedplant
Cody ML, Mooney HA (1978) Convergence versus non-conver- species. Oecologia (Berlin) 56:109-116
gence in Mediterranean-climateecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst Miller PC, BradburyDE, Hajek E, La Marche V, Thrower NJW
9:265-321 (1977) Past and present environment. In: HA Mooney (ed)
Conrad CE, Oechel WC (eds) (1982) Proceedings of the Sympo- Convergent evolution in Chile and California mediterranean
sium on Dynamics and Management of MediterraneanType climate ecosystems. Dowden Hutchinson and Ross, Strouds-
Ecosystems (1981) San Diego, California. Pacific Southwest bourg. Pa. USA pp 27-72
Forest and Range Experiment Station. Berkeley, California, MontenegroG, Avila G, Schatte P (1981) The significanceof ligno-
USA tubers in shrubs of the Chilean matorral. III Congreso Latino-
Fuentes ER (1984) Human impact and ecosystem resiliencein the americanode Botanica, Lima, Perui
Southern Andes. Mountain Research and Development 4:45- Mooney HA (1977) Convergent evolution in Chile and California
49 mediterraneanclimate ecosystems. Dowden Hutchinson and
Fuentes ER, Simonetti J (1982) Plant patterning in the Chilean Ross, Stroudsbourg.Pa USA
matorral:are the roles of native and exotic mammalsdifferent? Mooney HA, Dunn EL, Shropshile F, Song L (1972) Land-use
In: Conrad CE, Oechel WC (eds) Proceedings of the Sympo- history of California and Chile as related to the structure of
sium on Dynamics and Management of MediterraneanType the sclerophyllscrub vegetations. Madrofio 21:305-319
Ecosystems (1981) San Diego, California. Pacific Southwest Miller-Dumbois D, EllenbergH (1974) Aims and methods of vege-
Forest and Range Experiment Station. Berkeley, California, tation ecology. Wiley and Sons. New York NY USA
USA pp 227-233 Siegel S (1956) Nonparametricstatisticsfor the behavioralsciences.
Fuentes ER, Jaksic F, Simonetti J (1983) European rabbits vs na- McGraw Hill. New York USA
tive mammals: effects on shrub seedlings. Oecologia (Berlin) Thrower N, Bradbury D (1977) (eds) Chile-Californiamediterra-
58:411-414 nean scrub atlas. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross. Strouds-
Godron M, Guillerm JL, Poissonet J, Poissonet P, Thiault M, bourg, Penn USA
Trabaud L (1981) Dynamics and management of vegetation. TrabaudL (1981) Man and fire: Impacts on mediterraneanvegeta-
In: Castri F di, Goodall D, Specht R (eds) Mediterranean-type tion. In: Castri F di, Goodall DW, Specht RL (eds) Mediterra-
shrublands.Ecosystemsof the world 11. ElsevierScientificPub- nean type shrublands. Ecosystems of the World 11. Elsevier
lishing Co. The Hague. Netherlandspp 317-344 ScientificPublishing,The Hague. Netherlandpp 523-538
Hanes TL (1971) Succession after fire in the chaparralof southern
California. Ecological Monographs 41:27-52
Hoffmann J, Hoffmann AE (1982) Altitudinal ranges of phanero- Received October 20, 1983

Note addedin proof

A new experimental series started in October 1982, after one of


the wettest years of this century, has shown that in fact seedlings
planted between clumps, even if protected from rabbits, all desic-
cate before the second month. But, seedlingsplanted under clumps
have survived for 2 dry seasons with an average survival rate of
41% for those protected from mammals and 22% for the unpro-
tected ones!

You might also like