Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Verbal Reasoning Test Part I: The Principle of Compliance
The Verbal Reasoning Test Part I: The Principle of Compliance
Booklet 3
The situational judgement test
Booklet 4
The verbal reasoning test: Part I: The principle of
compliance
Booklet 5
The verbal reasoning test: Part II: Methodical
approaches
Booklet 6
The numerical reasoning test: Tasks and strategies
Booklet 7
The abstract reasoning test:
Booklet 8
The accuracy and precision test
Booklet 9
The organising and prioritising test
Booklet 10
The assessment centre
A similar effect will happen if you start reading selectively. If you only read every second word or just skim
through the text, you’ll nevertheless get a basic idea about the meaning of the sentence. Your mind is used to
read entire sentences so that it is always looking for a sense. If words are missing it will complete the sentence.
Adverbs Quantities
Many answer options are simply wrong due to a wrong If quantities (like km or l) are part of the answer
emphasis. This is mainly caused by the incongruence of options, it is easy to check whether they are based on
adverbs. If (for example), according to the text, an the text or not, the same applies to adjectives.
incident occurs several times, but an answer option uses Descriptions and characterisations of a person or an
a word which describes a one time situation, it is animal or even definitions of a certain thing or topic
obviously not in accordance with the text. shouldn’t differ.
Keywords
Adverbs Quantities
mainly, km
only, l
especially, m²
always m³
Example
text passage (wrong) answer option
“In addition, the reporting about these tests is “The reporting about genetic data is always of poor
sometimes of poor quality.“ quality.”
Keywords
Example
text passage (wrong) answer option
“When the legendary junker Frans conquered the city “After the legendary junker Frans had conquered
in 1488, Erasmus was already on his way to Rotterdam, Erasmus went to 's-Hertogenbosch, where
's-Hertogenbosch, where he - despite his significant he entered a monastery and became a monk.”
reluctance - should become a monk and was destined to
spend the rest of his life in the monastery.”
Keywords
Cause Effect
Because of, results in,
based on, as a result
due to
Example
“Bear in mind the European Parliament meets 46 “According to MEP X, because so many working
weeks a year. Compare this with the lower house of visits have to be made, the European Parliament is
the Dutch Parliament, which meets no more than 34 barely able to do anything in the member states.”
weeks a year and it’s quite a lot”. Far too much, X be-
lieves. “We can’t do anything in the member states if
we have to be in Brussels so often.”
The distinction between general and individual between a “whole” and a “part” of something.
incidents Whenever formulations in an answer option generalise
Take a special look on the description of incidents. They or individualise a case, please examine carefully whether
might be described as a unique phenomenon or a this is in accordance with the text or not.
general case. Such a general case can’t be derived from
an individual case. It is similar with the distinction
Keywords
„An individual case“ (Keywords in the text) „A general case“ (Keywords in the answer option)
From an individual case a general case cannot be derived
Many all
several the majority
a part of the whole
some each, nothing, nobody
non quantifiable quantifiable
in general always
often, sometimes, rarely never
Table: Examples for the distinction between individual and general cases
Example
“I have been keeping record since the beginning “MEP X claims that all MEPs work 70 to 80 hours a week.”
of November and have come to the conclusion
that I work 70-80 hours a week..”