Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stephen E. Doyle
THE ORIGINS OF SPACE LAW
ANDTHE
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW
of the International Astronautical Federation
THE ORIGINS OF SPACE LAW
ANDTHE
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW
of the International Astronautical Federation
by
Ali rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any fonn or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by
any infonnation storage and retrieval system, without pennission in writing from
Stephen E. Doyle at 3431 Bridge! Brae Road, Shingle Springs California 95682.
Published by Univelt, lncorporated with pennission for ali forms of use in the
English language.
iv
Table of Contents Page
Acknowledgements ------------------ Vlll
Foreword ----------------------- IX
ANNEXES
Annex I The Permanent Legal Committee ofthe IAF (1959) -- 113
Annex2 Members ofthe lnstitute (2002)--------- 121
Annex3 Statutes of the lnstitute ----------- 127
Annex4 Recipients ofIISL Awards ----------- 135
TABLES
Table 1: Congresses of the Intemational AstronauticaI Federation ---- 27
Table 2: Congresses ofthe IAF and Colloquia ofthe IISL ---- 98
V
Editorial Board of Advisors and Contributors
Toe following individuals reviewed early drafts of this summary of origins and
supplemented, corrected or expanded the original drafts in different ways, but in
ali cases more accurate and more complete inforrnation than was available to the
author. The author extends his deepest and heartfelt appreciation for their con
tributions, suggestions, and support. The author/editor alone bears ful! respons
ibility for any omissions or errors remaining.
Professor Dr. Karl-Heinz Bockstiegel, (Gerrnany) Forrner Director
Institute ofAir and Space Law, University of Cologne
Professor Emeritus Car! Christol (USA)
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Califonúa
Professor Isabella H. Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor (Holland) President Emerita
International Institute ofSpace Law
Mr. Fred Durant (USA), Forrner President
International Astronautical Federation
Dr. Ernst Fasan (Austria), Director, General Counsel
International Institute of Space Law
Professor Francis Lyall (Scotland) Director
International Institute ofSpace Law
University of Aberdeen
Dr. Eilene Galloway (USA), Honorary Director
International Institute ofSpace Law
Dr. Nandasiri Jasentuliyana, (Sri Lanka) President
International Institute ofSpace Law
Professor Dr. Vladirnir Kopal (Czech Republic), Vice President
International Institute of Space Law
General Counsel, IAF
Mrs. Tanja Masson-Zwaan, (Holland) Secretary
International Institute ofSpace Law
Mr. Leslie R. Shepherd (UK), Forrner President
International Astronautical Federation
Judge Vladlen S. Vereshchetin (Russia), Director
International Institute of Space Law,
International Court of Justice, Toe Hague
Dr. Gennady P. Zhukov, General Counsel
Intersputnik, Moscow, Russia
vi
Dr. Eugene Pépin Prof. Dr. I. H. Ph. Diederiks-Verschoor
President President
International Institute of Space Law International Institute of Space Law
1963-1973 1973-1990
Honorary Presiden! 1973 - 1988 Presiden! Emeritus 1991 - Present
vii
Acknowlegements
Toe work of many people has contributed to completing this modest study. Toe
editorial and review Board has been identified in ful!. In addition to the support
ofthese contributors, the author mus! acknowledge other, less visible, but no less
importan! contributions made. Robert Jacobs, of Univelt, gave support, advice
and assistance throughout the process of bringing this work through production.
Mrs. Glenda D. Heidsick:, of Shingle Springs, CA, provided numerous hours of
formatting and word processing materials for the Annexes of this work. The
photographic studios of Ted Sirlin, in Sacramento CA, contributed to the
unification and standardization of the photographic materials contained in this
work. I deeply appreciated the end-of-the-road text reviews done by Tanja
Masson-Zwaan and Dr. Eilene Galloway to discover errors and provide factually
accurate information concerning the history of the Institute.
In preparation of this work and others related to it, the author has frequently
encountered relevan! works in foreign languages which required translations. In
each case, the appropriate translators have been identified throughout this text. In
addition, members of the board of the IISL have discovered and called to my
attention inadvertent errors in spelling or typing non-English names, places and
titles. To ali ofthose who helped in this regard, I am deeply appreciative.
Finally, I thank my wife, Rosemary, and other members ofmy inunediate family,
who spent weekends, evenings and holidays alone, while I pursued this work. I
appreciate their tolerance and moral support.
Stephen E. Doyle
Shingle Springs, California
July 2002
viii
Foreword
The IISL has expanded its programs and grown significantly since the first
history of the Institute was prepared by the late Dr. Eugene Pépin and published in
1982. Isabella Diederiks-Verschoor served as President of the Institute from 1973
to 1990. The late Judge Manfred Lachs served as President ofthe Institute from
1990 to 1993, and I have had the privilege of serving since 1993.
During the intervening twenty years many new members have been added.
The programs and activities of the Institute have expanded, and cooperative
activities with the United Nations have increased. The annual Colloquia on the
Law of Outer Space have continued to attract outstanding participation by lawyers
and social scientists from space-faring nations and other countries around the
world. The Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition, introduced in
1992, now involves regional competitions in the United States, Europe and the
Asia Pacific Region, with final competitions held before a panel of three sitting
judges of the Intemational Court of Justice, who volunteer to serve as the Court.
Final competitions are held during annual Intemational Astronautical Congresses,
in conjunction with the annual IISL Colloquia. An annual IISL dinner, held in
conjunction with Moot Court finals, honors the judges and the finalists in the
competition. A standing comrnittee of the Institute now provides annual review
and update of the status of intemational agreements and treaties related to
activities in outer space. Since 2000, biennial regional meetings, dealing with
current topics of interest, are organized by the IISL in cooperation with local
organizations in different regions ofthe world.
When the Board ofDirectors of the Institute decided that a revised and up
dated IISL history should be prepared, Dr. Stephen Doyle volunteered to under
take this task. The Institute is fortunate to have in its ranks members with decades
ofmembership dating back to the 1960's. Drawing upon their personal files and
recollections, as well as the personal photo collections of members, a cooperative
effort, headed by Dr. Doyle, has generated this expanded edition ofthe Institute's
origins in the context of the development of the International Astronautical
Federation and factors surrounding the emergence ofSpace Law.
We are pleased to be able to bring this account up to date through the end
of the 20th century. We will make every effort to ensure that the Institute will
continue to serve throughout the corning century as the major intemational forurn
for the discussion and stimulation of the development ofinternational space law.
One can follow plans and events of the Institute at its website, which can be
accessed at http://www.iafastro-iisl.com.
ix
THE ORIGINS OF SPACE LAW
ANDTHE
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SPACE LAW
of the International Astronautical Federation
I. Background and the International Astronautical Federation
Students of Space Law are often introduced to the subject by a refer ence to the
first orbiting ofa man-made spacecraft, the USSR's Sputnik-1, orbited October 4,
1957. By that date, however, a substantial body of commentary aiready existe<!
on the substance and rationale of space law. The first writing of the twentieth
century on space law was done by a Belgian lawyer, published in France in 1910.
Emile Laude 1 was writing a brief commentary on the onomastics of air law. He
ended that discussion with the comment:
Not until 1926, sixteen years and a world war after the observations on space
law of Emile Laude, would another legal commentator take up the notion offlight
in space and comment, if only in passing, on the need for space law. Atan air law
conference held in Moscow in December 1926, 3 a paper was presented by a senior
1 Emile Laude was born on May 15, 1878 in Bruges, Belgium. Having earned a law de
gree (JD) from the University ofBrussels on October 13, 1904, he was named to the Bar
in Brussels on October 29, 1904, under the patronage of Schoenfeld, a well-known Bel
gian Jawyer ofthe day. Laude eventually attained independent status at the Bar and was
admitted to practice befare the Court of Appeals of Brussels on September 18, 1907.
2 Translation of"QUESTIONS PRATIQUES," in Vol. 1, Revue Juridique Internationale
de Locomotion Arienne 16-18, Paris (1910). The comment was translated from the
French in NASA Technical Memorandum NASA TM -77513, Wash., DC, August 1984.
3 Zarzar, .V. A., "Mezhdunarodnoye Publichnoye Vozdushnoye Pravo" (Public Intema
tional Air Law); in Voprosy Vozdushnogo Prava, Sbornik Trudov Sektsii Vozdushnogo
2 Origins o/Space Law and the lnternational lnstitute o/Space Law
official of the Soviet Aviation Ministry, V. A. Zarzar. The paper focused pri
marily on principies and practices in the history of intemational air law but, Zar
zar saw well beyond the historical debates about the nature and the extent of na
tional sovereignty in airspace.
For reasons that are not entirely clear, either in his paper or historically con
sid-ered, Zarzar decided to introduce the topic of interplanetary flight. Zarzar may
have been aware of sorne of the earliest organizational activities in and around
Moscow seeking to address the development of rocketry and spaceflight. There
were certainly many publications by Konstantin Ziolkovsky, and others, in circu
lation in Moscow by the mid-! 920s. In part, in 1926, Zarzar wrote:
... There is a good deal of interest in the so-called "theory of zones, 11 which is
considered quite controversial.4 This theory involves the fact that the atmos
phere is divided into two concentric layers, ofwhich the lower is subject to na
tional control, and the second, which is international, so that the upper zone of
air travel is free. We will not attempt to define the altitude at which the interna
tional zone begins but do not wish to come into collision with the intrinsic
negative view on this theory. We only point out that the "theory ofzones" is not
so 11 stupid" as would appear at first glance.
What are the interests of the governments far flight over their territories?
These include the fact that from aircraft one can make military reconnaissance
of a foreign country, can throw out various objects (such as ordinary hand lug
gage with contraband goods which "drops" from an aircraft, or a military
"trunk" as an aerial bomb) and also the fact that an airplane, far various reasons,
must land in territories of another country where there is no law on this.
But if craft appear which are powerful enough to fly at tremendous altitudes,
at improbable speeds, how can we exclude their flying over fareign countries?
Is_ it possible that in such cases unlimited sovereignty would remain an academic
problem and that the proponents will be barricaded in their camps and also us
que ad coelum? Can it even be that during flight over a !ayer of air surrounding
Earth (regions that will later become a reality) this will also be included in the
theory of exclusive sovereignty by the proponents? We propase that in the fu
ture, along with the principle of unlimited sovereignty far air space, there will
also be a viable principie, faund as the basis far the "theory of zones," far cases
of the so-called "high-altitude" flights and interplanetary communi-cations. In
truth, in the latter case, one could talk about "interplanetary transport law!" But
when speaking about high-altitude flights, it is necessary to pause to discuss the
theoretical possibility of using the "theory of zones,1' which cau lead to thought
ful limitation of sovereignty.... 5
Zarzar could clearly agree with Laude's earlier observation that air law and
space law apply to different physical regimes and must be different in substance.
In Laude's words, "A new law will govern new jurídica! relations."7 Judging from
his discussion of the zone theory, Zarzar clearly contemplated a regime of non
sovereignty, or at least modified sovereignty beyond the airspace.
Zarzar made another observation compatible with Laude's 1910 views, i.e., the
law to regulate use of radio is an importan! adjunct of flight and should be sepa
rate from air law, but must be addressed. Zarzar wrote:
In the final portion of his paper, Zarzar returns to and restates his primary
!heme: "Questions of intemational public air law, thus, are solved by conventions
in accordance with the principie of complete sovereignty of nations over their air
space."9 The question which Zarzar explicitly raises, and declines to discuss:
"We will not attempt to define the altitude at which the international zone begins,"
was to become a question of central focus for later commentators.10 Once it was
understood that the airspace and outer space were legally separable and physically
separable operational environrnents, it was clear that the legal regimes to apply to
these two operational areas should be substantially different. Both Laude (1910)
and Zarzar (1926) recognized the basic differences and explicitly declared the
need for separate legal approaches to regulate uses of airspace and outer space.
14 Mandl, V., Das Weltraum-Recht: Ein Problem der Raunifahrt, Mannheim, Berlin,
Leipzig: J.Bensheimer, 1932, 48 pp.
15 See Winter, F. H., Prelude lo the Space Age, The Rocket Societies: 1924-1940, Smith
sonian lnstitution Press, Wash., DC, 1983, p. 35.
16 Ley, W., ROCKETS: The Future of Trove/ Beyond the Stratosphere, The Viking
Press, New York, 1 944.
17 Ley, W., Rockets, Missiles, and Men in Space (rev. ed.) Signe! Books of the New
American Library, [ne,, New York, 1969 (paperbound) p. 547.
6 Origins ofSpace Law and the lnternationa/ Institute oJSpace Law
It should be kept in mind that Willy Ley was neither a lawyer nor a student of
law. Ley apparently did recall that Mandl's monograph was in two parts, dealing
with the present (Part 1) and the future (Par! 2), but it is not justified to say that
Mandl "tried chiefly to show that existing legislation ...covered most of the fore
seeable legal problems."
It is clearly not the case that Mandl "used the very strictly codified German
law as the means of presenting his case, beca use, as one can see upon reading the
11
18 The material in this section is drawn from Kopal, V., "Vladimir Mandl: Founding
Writer on Space Law," in Durant and James (Eds.) First Steps Toward Space 87-90,
Smithsonian lnstitution Press, Washington, DC, 1974. [Edited and included herein by
permission ofVladimir Kopal, the author.]
Background and the !nternational Astronautical Federation 7
Simultaneously, Mandl studied legal problems of aviation, which was de
veloping rapidly in the years following the first world war. His enthusiasm for
aviation was so great that he became a pilot. The result of Mandl's intensive
work in this field was his study on air law, 19 the first systematic treatise on this
new subject written in Czechoslovakia. Following an historical introduction, the
author dealt with Czechoslovakian air regulations. The second part considered
general problems of air law, such as liability arising from international air trans
port contracts, contlicts of aviation law, customs, and insurance against damage
caused by aircraft. The final chapter dealt with air warfare.
Dr. Mandl submitted his book on air law as his advanced work in residence,
hoping to gain a professorship at the Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engi
neering, Czech Technical University of Prague. Documents deposited in the
Archives ofthe University of Prague demonstrate that Mandl fulfilled admirably
ali the conditions required and that his scholarly work and knowledge were
highly respected by the Accreditation Commission.20 On 20 September 1932
the Czechoslovak Minister of Education confirmed the decision of the Board of
Professors of the Faculty concerning the granting of venia docendi to Dr. Vla
dimír Mandl for the subject, Law oflndustrial Enterprises.21
Although appointed for a different course, air law remained his concern, as
witnessed by his study of the Paris Convention on the Regu\ation of Aerial
Navigation and by the substantial article on parachutes, which he published in
1935 in France.22 Beginning with the academic year, 1933-34, the course given
by Prof. Vladimir Mandl on industrial law appears in the university curriculum,
as it did in the year 1938-39. As is known, German troops occupied the whole
of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, and in autumn of that year the Nazis closed
ali Czech universities. That also meant the end of Mandl's university teaching.
His keen interest in aeronautics led Vladimir Mand1 to think about the more
advanced means of space transport. While the pioneers of astronautics tested
their modest rockets, Mandl thought of them as instruments of navigation in
space, which would some <lay require new rules of law--space law. lt was in
this new field that he was able to apply creatively his broad knowledge, which
went well beyond the usual limits of legal scholarship and which made it possi-
Of interest to both students and practitioners of modem space law, the thought
processes, rationalizations, and the associations of ideas used and displayed by
Mandl throughout his study suggest approaches that may prove helpful, not only
in formulating and arguing research work, but also in formulating and arguing
approaches to real-world problem solving.
During the early 1930s aeronauts were exploring the upper limits of the navi
gable atmosphere using high altitude or "stratospheric" balloons, free flying ob
jects which, once launched, moved with prevailing winds aloft. A nurnber of he-
26 Jdem, p. 48. In the 1930s Mandl was also interested in sorne more general problems
of economics, science and philosophy. He explained his economic views in the follow
ing studies: Technokracie, hospodársky systém budoucnosti? [Technocracy--Economic
System of the Future?] (Prague, 1934); Prirodovedni národohospodárská teorie [Scien
tific Economic Theory] (Prague, 1936); Stát a védecká organizace práce [State and Sci
entific Management] (Pilsen, 1937).