Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. J. Saldı́var-Garcı́a,1 H. F. López2
1
Instituto Tecnológico de Saltillo, Saltillo, Coahuila, México
2
University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Abstract: The tribological behavior of two cobalt-base al- ume fractions). Preliminary results indicate that Co-Cr-
loys—an as-cast high-carbon and a wrought low-carbon Co Mo/Co-Cr-Mo alloy pairs both possessing an HCP matrix
alloy—that are used as hip implant materials is examined in microstructure tend to exhibit outstanding wear proper-
this work. This work discusses the experimental results of ties. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res
cobalt– cobalt wear pairs, in wrought and as-cast conditions, 74A: 269 –274, 2005
where the amount of hexagonal phase is systematically
modified through an isothermal aging treatment. Fully
FCC and HCP Co alloys are tested versus alloys with Key words: tribology; wear; Co-base alloys; phase transfor-
various volume fractions of HCP phase (0.05 to 1.0 vol- mations; microstructure
Figure 2. As-cast wear disc microstructures with different amounts of HCP phase. (a) As-cast condition (HCP ⬍ 5%), (b)
water quenching plus aging at 850°C for 15 h, (HCP ⬎ 98%), (c) SEM photomicrograph showing a carbide surrounded by
HCP plates embedded on a FCC matrix.
dered in alloys with HCP crystal structures, their wear volume fractions shown in Figure 5 can be related to
properties are expected to be significantly superior to the intrinsic wear properties of the individual pair
those exhibited by materials possessing BCC or FCC system investigated. This in turn can account for the
structures. In addition, in the case of Co-base alloys exhibited differences between the wear volume losses
the presence of carbides, their mean carbide sizes, and between the FCC (disc)-HCP (pins) pairs and the HCP
carbide volume fractions also contribute to the final (disc)-FCC (pins) pairs.
alloy wear resistance. Hence, the variations in wear The exhibited microstructure also has an effect on
the resultant friction coefficients. In particular, it is
found that the resultant values of friction coefficients
for FCC-FCC wear pairs are the highest among all the
Figure 3. Wear volume losses of Co-Cr-Mo-C alloy as a Figure 4. Wear volume losses in Co-Cr-Mo-C alloy as a
function of sliding distance. Velocity 300 mm/s, contact function of the HCP content in discs and pins. Wear condi-
stress 3.0 MPa, dry air (pin on disc). tions: Sliding distance 28 km, contact stress 3.0 MPa, dry air.
WEAR RESISTANCE OF Co-Cr-Mo-C IMPLANTS 273
TABLE II
Resultant Hardness of Wear Testing Samples After Heat
Treating
As-Cast
Disc ASTM Wrought ASTM F-799
F-75 Pins
Figure 5. Wear volume losses after a sliding distance of 28 Figure 7. Wear debris after a sliding distance of 28 km in
km in Co-Cr-Mo-C alloys as a function of ⌬ hardness be- Co-Cr-Mo-C alloys. Metallic debris (gray flakes), oxide
tween wear components in wear testing pairs (disc on pin). (white particles).
274 SALDÍVAR-GARCÍA AND LÓPEZ
implant devices, Co-base alloys are in wear contact volume losses do not follow a single linear trend with
with UHMWPE. However, under these conditions the hardness differential ⌬HRC. Apparently, the mi-
wear occurs under lubrication, as the implant is ex- crostructural features of the contacting surfaces play
posed to the human fluids and proteins, with the an important role in the tribological response, and
extent of debris being relatively low. However, the HCP wear discs perform better than FCC wear discs.
wear properties of UHMWPE-Co pairs in dry air and Under the wear conditions employed (metal–metal
without lubrication are expected to be drastically dif- pin on disc) the dominant mechanism involved some
ferent.13,18,19 plastic deformation on the contacting surfaces, and it
Wear experiments have been carried out on Co-base included some oxidation of the wear debris.
alloy pins on either FCC or HCP, on UHMWPE Finally, it is suggested that future developments in
disks13,18,19 under tribological conditions (nonlubrica- hip implants should consider prototypes that are fully
tion, speed, stress, etc.) similar to the ones employed metallic with HCP matrix microstructures, as they
in this work. From these tests, it was found that the tend to exhibit very low wear rates on contact.
amount of UHMWPE debris produced was 70 –75
times the volume losses found in Co-base–Co-base
wear pairs for similar test loads and times. Because References
these wear conditions are extremely rigorous, the rel-
atively low wear volume losses exhibited by the HCP- 1. Agrawal CM. Reconstructing the human body using biomate-
rials. JOM 1988;31–35.
HCP pairs is a strong indicator of the potential that
2. Mears DC. Metals in medicine and surgery. Int Metals Rev
this alloy has for the development of high-perfor- 1977;119 –155.
mance hip implants. 3. McKee GK. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1984;181:1966 –1967.
Although the idea of developing metal-on-metal or- 4. Rose RM. Materials for internal prostheses. In: 1974 Yearbook
thopedic prosthesis is not new, the outcome of the of Science and Technology. New York: McGraw Hill; 1974.
5. Salinas A, Lopez HF. The effect of carbon on the mechanical
present work strongly suggests that Co-base alloys
strength of heat treated cast Co27Cr5Mo alloys. In: Proc. Fifth
with HCP matrix microstructures can be ideal candi- Intl. Symp. on Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Mate-
dates for the development of advanced hip implants. rials, TMS/ASM Fall Meeting, Cincinnati, OH; 1996. p 69 –79.
Accordingly, from the amount of wear debris pro- 6. Devine TM, Wulff J. J Biomed Mater Res 1975;9:151–167.
duced in HCP-HCP wear pairs, it is expected that fully 7. Holt RT, Wallace W. Mech Eng Report MS-143. Ottawa: Na-
tional Research Council; 1980.
metallic hip implants with HCP microstructures will
8. Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD, Chan FW, Tanzer M. Trans-
not wear at all within the human fluids as lubrication actions 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials;
is present. Besides, Co-base alloys exhibit excellent 1995. p 47.
corrosion resistance, so wear-corrosion interactions 9. Clarke C, Campbell P, Kossovsky N. Particulate debris from
are expected to be kept to a minimum. medical implants. Mechanisms of formation and biological
consequences. In: K.R. St. John, editor. ASTM STP 1144. Phil-
adelphia: American Society for Testing Materials; 1992. p 7–26.
10. Rajan K. Phase transformations in a wrought Co-Cr-Mo-C
alloy. Metal Trans A 1982;13A:1161–1166.
CONCLUSIONS 11. Cong N, Morphy D. Rajan K. Kinetics of the martensitic FCC-
HCP transformation in Co-Cr-Mo alloy powders. Acta Metal
1984:32;1317–1322.
In this work, metal-on-metal wear tests were carried
12. Buckley DH. Cobalt. 1968;38:20. Cited in Crystal structure. In:
out with the use of the three pins on disc technique. Sarker AD, editor. Wear of metals. New York: Pergamon Press;
The alloys considered were typical Co-Cr-Mo-C in the 1976. p 93–95.
as-cast and wrought conditions, as they are commonly 13. Huang P. Thesis. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin–Mil-
used in the design of hip implants. These alloys were waukee; 1997.
14. Saldı́var-Garcı́a AJ. Thesis. Mexico City: CINVESTAV-IPN,
heat treated to various conditions which included a
Unidad Saltillo; 1998.
fully HCP matrix and a fully FCC matrix. It was found 15. Saldı́var-Garcı́a AJ, Manı́ AM, Salinas-Rodrı́guez A. Metal Ma-
that minimal wear volume losses were achieved in ter Trans A 1999;30:1177–1184.
HCP-HCP pin-on-disc pairs. In contrast, the highest 16. Sage M, Gillaud C. Methode d’analyse quantitative des varités
values of mass losses and greatest friction coefficients allotropiques du cobalt par les rayons X. Rev Metal 1950;47;
139 –145.
corresponded to FCC-FCC pairs. Intermediate values
17. Taylor RNJ, Waterhouse RB. J Mater Sci 1986;21:1900 –1906.
(mm3/km) where found in FCC-HCP pairs for the 18. Huang P, Lopez HF. Mater Sci Tech 1999;15:1324 –1329.
wear conditions used in this work. 19. Saldı́var-Garcı́a AJ. Unpublished research. Milwaukee: Univer-
Moreover, it was found that the exhibited wear sity of Wisconsin—Milwaukee; 2000.