Professional Documents
Culture Documents
01 Taguilaso, BMS. Evaluating Research Materials
01 Taguilaso, BMS. Evaluating Research Materials
1. Authority
The qualification of the author
and the publisher. They must be
Criteria for Evaluating Internet sites:
credible and reliable and
reputable. 1. Authority
The qualification of the author.
What are his/her credentials, Identify who is the author and/or
degree, specialization, sponsor-publisher?
background in field, relevant Is the author credentialed and the
experience? Is he/her affiliated sponsor-publisher reputable--can you
with a university, scholarly contact the author by phone, mail or
society, professional association, email to check if they exist and is really
government agency, etc. credible.
Is there an affiliation with an
institution, scholarly society,
2. Quality/Objectivity
professional association, commercial
What is the purpose of the article or
enterprise? Is the research material
book?
References:
2. Quality/ Objectivity
Check the domain name of the URL (if Online:
not .edu or .gov, beware)—some .orgs
and .coms are OK. Types of sources. (n.d.). Retrieved from
What is the purpose of the web page— https://library.ryerson.ca/guides/rusearch/ module
why was it written and for whom two/types-of-sources-2/
(audience)?
Is the content clear and objective and Types of sources. (n.d.). Retrieved from
the language unbiased--much of the ps://my.enmu.edu/web/golden- library/resources/
information available on the Internet critically-evaluating-research-material
consists of unsubstantiated opinion
and outright falsehoods intended to Types of sources. (n.d.). Retrieved from
sell, entertain, persuade, or convert https://study.com/academy/lesson/tips-for-locating-
you. research-materials.html
Does the source contain references
and a bibliography or works cited
section? Check if the included links are
broken or liable. Look for links to
additional sites for further Book:
exploration--are they relevant to the
topic. Alcantara, R., Espina, F., (2003). Technical writing for
Is the time frame and subject coverage filipino students. Makati City: Katha publishing Co., Inc.
clearly apparent when was it
written/published/last updated--is the
information current, outdated, etc.
Authority
-The qualification and credibility of the author
and the publisher
-Reputable publisher
Quality/ Objectivity
- Is the content clear and objective and the
language unbiased
- Is the time frame and subject coverage clearly
apparent when was it written/published/last
updated--is the information current, outdated,
etc.
Appropriateness
- Does the material enhance or support your
research
- Is the material scholarly and peer-
reviewed? The credibility and reliability of a
research material is vital.
- Is the material current or timely for your
topic--does it fall within a required date
range?