Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Pollution
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: We investigated the levels and distribution patterns of a- and b-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate in air,
Received 23 February 2020 soil, water, and sediment samples collected from the South Korean persistent organic pollutants (POPs)
Received in revised form monitoring networks. In the air samples, the highest concentrations of the total (S3) endosulfan (50.3
12 June 2020
e611 pg/m3, mean: 274 pg/m3) were observed during summer. Spearman analysis revealed a good
Accepted 12 June 2020
correlation between agricultural land area and atmospheric concentrations of S3 endosulfan except
Available online 23 June 2020
during winter. Regardless of the season, the ratio of the two isomers (a/b) was 3.6e4.9 in the air samples,
higher than that observed in technical mixtures (2.0e2.3), possibly due to the higher volatility of a-
Keywords:
Endosulfan
endosulfan, compared to b-endosulfan. Concentrations of S3 endosulfan in the soil samples
OCPs (n.d.13.4 ng/g, mean: 0.8 ng/g) were not significantly different except at some stations adjacent to large
POPs areas of farmland. The average levels of S3 endosulfan in the water and sediment samples were 2.1 ng/L
Multimedia and 0.1 ng/g dw, respectively. In analyzing the four largest rivers, it was observed that a few water
South Korea stations during spring and fall and sediment stations in fall had high concentrations of the two isomers
and endosulfan sulfate, particularly around the Yeoungsan and Nakdong Rivers near large areas of
agricultural land. Endosulfan sulfate was dominant at most water and sediment sampling stations. This
study demonstrates that the endosulfan found in most environmental compartments most probably
derives from agricultural areas despite its ban as a pesticide. On the other hand, given that it was also
detected in industrial and urban areas, in which pesticide application does not occur, it can be conjec-
tured that endosulfan is aerially transported at higher temperatures and continuously circulates within
the environment.
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115035
0269-7491/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2 L. Kim et al. / Environmental Pollution 265 (2020) 115035
monitored endosulfan in various environmental compartments, dichloromethane (DCM, HPLC grade) were purchased from Hon-
including air, biota, sediment, soil, and water. Previous research has eywell Burdick & Jackson, USA. A Barnstead GenPure CAD Plus
shown that it generally enters the environment at locations where water cleanup system (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used to produce
it is directly applied. The OCP levels were higher in semi-enclosed deionized water (18.2 MU,cm at 25 C).
environments such as bays and estuaries in South America
(Girones et al., 2020). In addition, in Huai’an City, China, its levels in 2.2. Sampling
the soil indicated a potential ecological risk (Wang et al., 2012),
while it accounted for the highest concentration of any OCP in the In 2015, multimedia environmental samples were collected
atmosphere in Pakistan, which is the biggest importer of endo- from the national POPs monitoring networks (air: 38 stations; soil:
sulfan (Nasir et al., 2014). Insecticide manufacturing sites in China 61 stations; water and sediment: 36 stations). The sampling was
were also major contamination sources, and ecosystems adjacent conducted based on the “POPs Monitoring Network Installation and
to these production sites have been found to be seriously polluted Operation Plan”, established by the KMOE. The air, soil, and water
with endosulfan (Fang et al., 2016). It also remained one of the and sediment sampling stations are shown in Fig. 1, and the
major OCPs in urban soils in Nepal (Yadav et al., 2016). longitude and latitude of each are listed in Tables S1eS3 in the
Various studies have also reported that endosulfan can often be Supplementary Information. The sampling stations for air and soil
detected far away from where it was originally applied because of samples can be classified into four land-use types: agricultural,
medium- and long-range atmospheric transport on a global scale urban, suburban, and industrial areas. Some urban and industrial
via global distillation due to its high volatility (Weber et al., 2010). stations near extensive agricultural land (i.e., within 5 km) were
Subsequently, endosulfan has been found to accumulate in nearly also considered as agricultural stations.
all environmental media, thousands of kilometers away from areas For the air samples, quartz fiber filters (QFFs, 203 254 mm,
where it was used (Miranda-Filho et al., 2007). For example, Whatman, UK) were baked at 600 C for 5 h to remove any inter-
endosulfan is one of the generally detected organochlorines in the ference. The baked QFFs were wrapped with aluminum foil and
Arctic (Cabrerizo et al., 2019; Weber et al., 2010). Among various stored in a desiccator until sampling. Activated carbon felts (ACFs,
environmental compartments, soil generally acts as both a sec- 84 mm, Sibata, Japan) and polyurethane foam plugs (PUFs, 84 mm
ondary source and a sink for POPs including endosulfan in the diameter 50 mm height, Sibata, Japan) were cleaned with toluene
environment, with increasing volumes of evidence demonstrating using Soxhlet extractors for 16 h. The ACF was also rinsed with
that POPs that have accumulated in the soil can be re-emitted back acetone. Using high-volume air samplers (HVe1000 F, Sibata,
into the atmosphere under the influence of global climate change Japan), a total of 114 samples was collected at 38 sampling stations
(Ma et al., 2011). It has also been reported that soils from arid and at 750 L/min for 72 h during three seasons: winter (January and
semiarid areas of northwest China (Huang et al., 2014) and from February), spring (April and May), and summer (July and August).
India (Chakraborty et al., 2015) act as a secondary source. Under the The samples were collected for three consecutive days in each
brand name Thiolix, endosulfan was used in pest control in South season, and the sampling media were replaced every day to avoid
Korea for various crops, including tobacco, Chinese cabbage, and breakthrough. The total volume of the three-day sample was about
mulberries, for several decades (Kang et al., 2008; Yeo et al., 2003). 3,018 m3, and 130 m3 was used for endosulfan analysis. After
In 2011, its use, manufacture, and import were banned in accor- sampling, the QFF, PUF, and ACF samples were wrapped with
dance with the Agrochemical Control Act. However, it is still found aluminum foil, placed in polyethylene zipper bags, and kept in a
in various environmental media in South Korea, such as the soil freezer at 4 C. Prior to the sample extraction step, the three-day
(Choi et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2013), which may lead to human samples were composited to one sample.
exposure and/or damage to ecosystems via the food chain. Since The water sampling stations are located along four major rivers
2013, endosulfan and other OCPs in air, soil, water, and sediment (the Han, Geum, Yeoungsan, and Nakdong Rivers) and several mi-
have been monitored on a regular basis in national POPs moni- nor rivers in South Korea. Sampling was conducted during spring
toring networks run by the Korean Ministry of Environment (April and May) and fall (October and November). Each water
(KMOE). In particular, there remains concerns that endosulfan, sample (35 L at each station) was collected at 36 sampling stations
obtained through illegal imports or pre-ban purchases, is still being using stainless-steel samplers (1.5 L, DAIHAN-brand®, Korea). The
applied to crops in agricultural areas. Therefore, continuous total number of water samples was 72. Details of the water sam-
monitoring is required to prevent serious contamination. It is also pling process are provided in Jeon et al. (2019). The water samples
important to understand the behavior and fate of endosulfan in were transferred into amber glass bottles (W216950, USA) for
various environmental compartments. storage at 4 C.
This study aimed to (1) investigate the levels and spatial dis- Surface soil samples (depths of 0e10 cm) were collected from
tribution of a- and b-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate in air, five points within a 10 10 m area using pre-cleaned stainless-
surface soil, water, and surface sediment samples collected from steel scoops in spring (April and May) at 61 sampling stations,
across South Korea, and (2) construct profiles of each isomer and thoroughly mixed as a composite sample, and transferred into
their metabolite to understand their behavior and fate within the amber glass bottles. Using a Petite Ponar grab sampler (1728-G40,
environment. Wildlife Supply Co., USA), each sediment sample was obtained in
fall (October and November) at 36 sampling stations. Surface
2. Materials and methods sediment (top 2 cm) was sub-sampled and transferred into amber
glass bottles. After both soil and sediment samples were freeze-
2.1. Chemicals and solvents dried using a vacuum freeze dryer (Biocryos, Korea), they were
passed through a sieve (<2 mm). The amber bottles were then
Standards for a- and b-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate were washed with, in order, acetone, toluene, n-hexane, and DCM before
obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, USA (native stan- storing them at 20 C until sample analysis.
dards: ES-5464-A; surrogate standards: ES-5465-A-5X; internal
standards: EC-5350). Florisil cartridges (Bond Elut Mega BE-Fl, 5 g/ 2.3. Sample pretreatment
20 mL) for cleanup procedures were obtained from Agilent Tech-
nologies, USA. Acetone, n-hexane, toluene (HPLC grade), and The samples for each medium were prepared based on US EPA
L. Kim et al. / Environmental Pollution 265 (2020) 115035 3
Fig. 1. Sampling stations for (a) air (38 stations), (b) soil (61 stations), and (c) water and sediment (36 stations) in the national POPs monitoring networks of South Korea.
Method 1699 (US EPA, 2007) and official Korean methods. The two selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Quantification was performed
endosulfan isomers and their metabolite were extracted from the with labeled internal standards using the isotope dilution method.
air (130 m3), soil (10 g), and sediment (5 g) samples using Soxhlet The information on the monitored fragment ions and the QC limit
extractors for 24 h with 350 mL of DCM. For the water samples (2 L), of measured ion abundance ratios are summarized in Table S4.
the suspended solids were filtrated using glass microfiber filters The recovery rate of each surrogate standard was 51%e112% for
(GF/C, 150 mm, Whatman, UK), and the target analytes from GF/C air (n ¼ 38), 57e102% for soil (n ¼ 61), 57e105% for water (n ¼ 36),
were Soxhlet extracted with DCM. Separatory funnels were used to and 53e107% for sediment (n ¼ 36). Method detection limits
extract the target compounds in the dissolved phase of two sub- (MDLs) were derived from a Student’s t-value of 3.14 (99% confi-
samples (1 L) with 200 mL of DCM. The funnels were shaken us- dence level, n ¼ 7) multiplied by the standard deviation of seven
ing a funnel shaker for 20 min and left until the solvent and water replicates of the spiked blank samples. The MDLs for a- and b-
phase were separated. The organic layer was collected for the endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate were 0.48, 0.58, and 0.25 pg/m3
cleanup process. This liquideliquid extraction process was repeated for the air samples, 2.95, 5.59, and 4.08 pg/g for the soil and sedi-
three times. Extracts from the air, soil, sediment, and water samples ment samples, and 31.6, 30.2, and 43.4 pg/L for the water samples,
were concentrated using rotary evaporators (Hei-VAP Precision, respectively. Laboratory blank samples for each compartment were
Heidolph, Germany). analyzed in the same way as the real samples. No target analyte was
Surrogate standards (ES-5465-A-5X) containing 13C9-a- and b- detected in these blank samples.
endosulfan, and endosulfan sulfate were added to the extracts
before the cleanup procedure. Then, they were cleaned up using
florisil solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges. The SPE cartridge 2.5. Data analysis and collection
was conditioned with n-hexane, and then the target compounds
were eluted with 150 mL of n-hexane. The extracts were concen- A spatial distribution map for the levels of endosulfan found at
trated to 1 mL using a Turbo Vap II (Biotage, Sweden). Finally, the the sampling stations for each compartment was created using
samples were concentrated using a nitrogen evaporator (MG-2200, ArcGIS 10.1 (Esri, USA). Mann-Whitney rank sum tests were per-
Eyela, Japan) then vaporized to 50 mL at room temperature for formed using SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software, USA), and Spearman
instrumental analysis. correlation analysis was carried out using SPSS Statistics 20.0 (IBM,
USA). The area of agricultural land (km2) within the individual sub-
2.4. Instrumental analysis and QA/QC provinces and cities of South Korea was taken from Statistics Korea
(http://kostat.go.kr).
A gas chromatograph (GC; Agilent Technologies 7890 A, USA)
coupled with a high-resolution mass spectrometer (HRMS, Waters
Autospec Premier™, USA) was used for the analysis of endosulfan. 3. Results and discussion
Using electron-impact ionization mode, mass spectra were ob-
tained at 35 eV. Each sample (1 mL) was injected into the GC system 3.1. Endosulfan levels and seasonal variation
in splitless mode at an injection temperature of 280 C. A constant
flow rate was 1.0 mL/min with helium as the carrier gas. Target The total (S3) concentrations of endosulfan (i.e., the sum of the
compounds were separated using a DB-CLP1 column two isomers and their metabolite) in the four environmental
(30 m 0.32 mm i. d. 0.25 mm film thickness, Agilent Technol- compartments are presented in Fig. 2 and summarized in Table S5.
ogies, USA). The initial oven temperature was set at 80 C, raised to The mean concentrations of the endosulfan isomers and endo-
150 C at 20 C/min, then to 235 C at 5 C/min, and finally to 300 C sulfan sulfate in this study were also compared with those reported
at 15 C/min, where it was held for 5 min. All data were obtained in in previous studies from other countries (Tables 1 and 2).
4 L. Kim et al. / Environmental Pollution 265 (2020) 115035
Fig. 2. Spatial distributions of the concentrations of S3 endosulfan in (a) air, (b) soil, (c) water, and (d) sediment samples collected from the national POPs monitoring networks in
2015. The agricultural land area (km2) in individual sub-provinces and cities is presented as the shaded background.
Table 1
Endosulfan concentrations in air and soil samples from selected studies from other countries.
for most cities in India (111 pg/m3) (Devi et al., 2011), and Hor- 3.1.2. Water and sediment
ozgedigi in Izmir, Turkey (112 pg/m3) (Odabasi and Cetin, 2012) and Endosulfan may move beyond the area in which it is used via
higher than that in Camden, Jersey, Delaware Bay, Sandy Hook, and volatilization and atmospheric transport (Rice et al., 1997). It can
Pinelands in New Jersey, USA (51.4 pg/m3) (Gioia et al., 2005). reach the water column through dry/wet deposition, spray drift,
For the soil samples, the concentrations of S3 endosulfan in and soil runoff (Shivaramaiah et al., 2005), after which it can sorb to
spring (Fig. 2b) ranged from undetected (16 of the 61 stations) to benthic sediment, which may eventually become a source of
13.4 ng/g (mean: 0.8 ng/g). Several stations, including S20 (5.4 ng/ redistributed endosulfan in overlying waters. The spatial distribu-
g), S31 (6.2 ng/g), S37 (2.1 ng/g), S47 (13.9 ng/g), and S55 (1.9 ng/g), tion of endosulfan in the four major rivers of South Korea will be
showed higher concentrations of S3 endosulfan than other stations. discussed further in Section 3.3. The mean concentration of S3
S47 is located at the foot of mountains in a broad expanse of endosulfan in the water samples was 2.75 ng/L during spring and
developed farmlands. The mean concentration of S3 endosulfan in 1.78 ng/L during fall (Fig. 2c). The mean concentration in spring was
the soil was not greatly different from that recorded in most cities significantly higher than that in fall (rank sum test, p < 0.05). The
in other countries (0.3e19 ng/g), except Arsi, Ethiopia (44,118 ng/g) much higher concentrations at some stations (W26: 14.0 ng/L;
(Westbom et al., 2008) and Goa, India (111 ng/g) (Chakraborty et al., W17: 11.0 ng/L; W25: 6.67 ng/L; W24: 4.84 ng/L) during spring may
2015). The rather homogeneous spatial distribution of endosulfan result from the frequent use of the insecticide in agricultural areas.
in the soil and the relatively high non-detection rate indicate that For the sediment samples collected in fall, the concentrations of S3
endosulfan does not remain in large quantities in the soil after it has endosulfan ranged from undetected (19 out of 36) to 0.70 ng/g dw
been applied to agricultural land. In support of this, a previous (Fig. 2d). Some stations (SD2: 1.0 ng/g dw, SD9: 0.71 ng/g dw, SD17:
study reported that over 70% of endosulfan sprayed on cotton fields 0.55 ng/g dw, and SD20: 0.38 ng/g dw) showed much higher con-
in Australia was volatilized as mostly a-endosulfan, polluting the centrations than the mean, indicating the significant use of endo-
surrounding environment (Kennedy et al., 2001). One month after sulfan in nearby areas or long-term pollution.
the insecticide was applied (95% to soil and 5% to plants), 25e30% of The mean concentration of S3 endosulfan in the water samples
the total volume had been degraded by soil microorganisms or (2.16 ng/L) was higher than that in Baiertang water column in the
absorbed by plants, 2% was lost in runoff, and 1% remained in the Pearl River Delta region, China (0.26 ng/L) (Luo et al., 2004).
soil. However, it was slightly lower than that in surface water (Xiaohe
and Fenhe Rivers) of Taiyuan city, China (3.89 ng/L) (Zhang et al.,
6 L. Kim et al. / Environmental Pollution 265 (2020) 115035
Table 2
Endosulfan concentrations in water and sediment samples from selected studies in other countries.
China Beijing (Tonghui River) 13.7 67.0 N.D. 80.8 Zhang et al. (2004)
Taiyuan (Xiaohe and Fenhe Rivers) 0.19 0.63 3.07 3.89 Zhang et al. (2013)
Pearl River Delta (Biaertang) 0.75 0.11 0.01 0.86 Luo et al. (2004)
Pearl River Delta (Macao) 3.19 1.46 0.37 5.02
Brazil Northeastern part of Sao Paulo 34.5 19.0 6.0 59.5 Rissato et al. (2006)
Greece Northern (Rivers) 2.0 1.4 14.8 18.1 Golfinopoulos et al. (2003)
Northern (Lakes) 6.3 n.d. 18.5 24.8
Turkey Aegean (Küçük Menderes River) 5 12 70 87 Turgut (2003)
USA Homestead, Everglades, and Biscayne 8.3 13.9 3.3 25.4 Potter et al. (2014)
Pakistan Punjab (Chenab River) 1.8 4.8 3.3 9.9 Eqani et al. (2012)
India Kasargod (stream) 81 123 N.D. 204 Yadav (2004)
Kasargod (pond) 138 416 118 667
Korea Nationwide 0.12 0.06 1.98 2.16 This Study
Sediment (ng/g dw)
China Beijing (Tonghui River) 0.02 0.09 n.d. 0.11 Zhang et al. (2004)
Daya Bay 0.04 0.20 0.64 0.88 Wang et al. (2008)
Taihu Lake 0.15 0.02 0.73 0.90 Zhao et al. (2010)
Taiwan Wu-Shi River Estuary 1.21 0.56 1.50 3.27 Doong et al. (2002)
Singapore Southwestern coast 0.4 0.2 0.6 1.3 Wurl and Obbard (2005)
Northeastern coast 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5
Uganda Lake Victoria 3.7 0.1 2.2 6.0 Wasswa et al. (2011)
Korea Nationwide 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 This study
2013), Macao water column in the Pearl River Delta region, China
(5.02 ng/L) (Luo et al., 2004), and Chenab River across some cities of
Punjab province, Pakistan (9.9 ng/L) (Eqani et al., 2012). It was
much lower than those in rivers flowing through cities: Beijing,
China (80.8 ng/L) (Zhang et al., 2004), Sao Paulo, Brazil (59.5 ng/L)
(Rissato et al., 2006), Homestead, Everglades, and Biscayne in
Florida, USA (25.4 ng/L) (Potter et al., 2014), and Kasargod, India
(204 ng/L for stream and 667 ng/L for pond) (Yadav, 2004) in
Table 2. The mean concentration of S3 endosulfan in the sediment
(0.12 ng/g dw) was not greatly different from that in Tonghui River,
China (0.11 ng/g dw) (Zhang et al., 2004) and lower than those in
most of the places listed in Table 2 (0.5e6.0 ng/g dw).
lower proportion of the technical mixture and the possible con- deposited in the sediment. In sediment, both endosulfan isomers
version of symmetric b-endosulfan to asymmetric a-endosulfan at are also quickly degraded due to microbial activity. A previous
high temperatures in the environment (Schmidt et al., 1997). There study has shown that the two isomers degrade twice as quickly in
are three possible reasons for this. First, a-endosulfan volatilizes to non-sterilized than in sterilized sediment (Jesitha et al., 2015).
a much greater extent from a solid form compared to b-endosulfan,
which has a lower volatility. The vapor pressure of a- and b-
3.3. Variation in endosulfan concentration by land use and between
endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate is 3.0 106, 7.2 107, and
rivers
1.0 1011 mmHg at 25 C, respectively (US EPA, 2013; Rossi, 2002).
Second, b-endosulfan has greater soil enrichment than a-endo-
3.3.1. Air and soil
sulfan due to its higher organic carbon normalized partition coef-
The concentrations of S3 endosulfan in air samples from the four
ficient (KOC; log KOC-a ¼ 3.6, log KOC-b ¼ 4.3 at 25 C) (Jia et al., 2009;
land-use types were not significantly different during winter and
Weber et al., 2010). As in the soil, the greater enrichment of b-
spring (rank sum test, p > 0.05), but the concentrations of S3
endosulfan in sediment and sediment pore water was also
endosulfan in agricultural areas were significantly higher than
observed (Walse et al., 2002). Finally, b-endosulfan (half-life of
those in other areas during summer (rank sum test, p < 0.05)
33e376 days) is known to degrade more slowly than a-endosulfan
(Fig. 4a). High Spearman correlations were also found between
(half-life of 7e75 days) in the soil environment (US EPA, 2002;
agricultural land area and the atmospheric concentration of S3
Weber et al., 2010).
endosulfan in spring (r ¼ 0.478, p < 0.01) and summer (r ¼ 0.487,
p < 0.01) (Table S5), but not in winter, which may be due to the very
low concentrations of endosulfan during this season. On the other
3.2.2. Water and sediment
hand, the mean concentration of S3 endosulfan in the soil samples
During spring, endosulfan sulfate was dominant at many water
from the four land-use types were not significantly different (rank
sampling stations (57e100%, except for W27 and W28), but the two
sum test, p > 0.05) except for some stations in agricultural areas
isomers were also detected (a-endosulfan: 0.0e27.1%; b-endo-
(Fig. 4b) that appear to be directly contaminated by its illegal use.
sulfan: 0.0e15.9%). The mean ratio of a/b-endosulfan (0.6) differed
It should be noted that two endosulfan isomers and endosulfan
from the technical mixtures (2.0e2.3), indicating that a-endosulfan
sulfate were detected in both air and soil samples not only from
is converted more readily to endosulfan sulfate than is b-endo-
agricultural areas, but also from urban, suburban, and industrial
sulfan (Walse et al., 2003). More rapid biological degradation of the
areas, where pesticides are not generally used. In the urban and
endosulfan isomers to endosulfan sulfate may occur in rivers as a
suburban areas, the insecticide can be used to kill insects in gardens
result of microbial activities (Shivaramaiah et al., 2005).
or at graves. However, previous air and soil monitoring results
In the water samples collected during fall, a- and b-endosulfan
demonstrated that endosulfan can be aerially transported from
were rarely detected, and endosulfan sulfate (100%) was dominant
other areas through atmospheric dispersion and subsequent
at most sampling stations except for W17, W23, W25, and W26. All
temperature-induced volatilization (Weber et al., 2010). This
samples are located in the lower-left corner of the ternary plot
interpretation is supported by various studies that have investi-
(Fig. 3). This result is consistent with previous research reporting
gated the theoretical and experimental quantification of interphase
that endosulfan sulfate is the most frequently detected form of
transfer, including airesoil (Fang et al., 2016; Odabasi and Cetin,
endosulfan in river water (Shivaramaiah et al., 2005). Most endo-
2012; Pokhrel et al., 2018), airewater (Weber et al., 2006),
sulfan sulfate, which is metabolized from both isomers in the soil, is
wateresediment (El Nemr et al., 2012), and various biological in-
likely to have entered the river system via runoff, either in solution
terphases (Weber et al., 2010).
with water or carried on other particles. In addition, the two iso-
mers can enter water systems via air deposition and subsequently
be converted into endosulfan sulfate. 3.3.2. Water and sediment
In sediment samples collected during fall, a- (7.6e19.6%) and b- Of the four major rivers in South Korea, Yeongsan River, which
endosulfan (15.6e31.8%) and endosulfan sulfate (48.5e76.7%) were runs through several regions in South Jeolla Province (Fig. 1c), had
all detected at only five sampling stations (SD2, SD9, SD17, SD20, the highest mean concentrations of S3 endosulfan in the water
and SD31) located within 10 km of extensive agricultural land. samples collected during both spring (6.62 ng/L) and fall (3.86 ng/L)
Endosulfan sulfate alone was detected at 12 sampling stations, (Fig. 5a). However, these were not significantly different from the
which is consistent with the results from the water samples other rivers (rank sum test, p > 0.05). The high levels of endosulfan
collected during fall. It is likely that endosulfan sulfate converted in these rivers are possibly due to the illegal application of endo-
from the two isomers in river water or in the soil was directly sulfan to agricultural land in surrounding areas. Historically, many
Fig. 4. Box plots for the concentrations of S3 endosulfan in (a) air and (b) soil samples by land-use type and season.
8 L. Kim et al. / Environmental Pollution 265 (2020) 115035
Fig. 5. Box plots for the concentration of S3 endosulfan in (a) water and (b) sediment samples from major river systems in South Korea.
types of crop, including rice, barley, wheat, cotton, pulses, vegeta- indicating the recent application of this banned pesticide. There-
bles, and fruits, have been established alongside rivers (e.g, fore, it is important to continuously monitor endosulfan in all
Seomjin, Yeongsan, and Tamjin). The Nakdong River, which flows environmental compartments to control its illegal use. It should
from Gangwon Province through Gyeongsang Province to Busan also be noted that the two isomers and their metabolite were
Metropolitan City, making it the longest river in Korea, had the detected at many sampling stations that were distant from possible
second-highest concentrations of S3 endosulfan in spring (3.45 ng/ sources of direct application, possibly due to transport and redis-
L) and fall (2.15 ng/L) (Fig. 5a). The highest concentration of S3 tribution among the compartments. The endosulfan profiles in the
endosulfan (a-endosulfan: 2.29 ng/L; b-endosulfan: 1.65 ng/L; environmental media reflected their physicochemical properties
endosulfan sulfate: 10.1 ng/L) was measured at a station in the and the characteristics of the individual environmental compart-
Yeongsan River in spring, while a station in the Nakdong River had ment. Based on the results of this study, the Korea Environment
the second-highest concentration of S3 endosulfan (a-endosulfan: Corporation has started to monitored endosulfan and other OCPs
0.56 ng/L; b-endosulfan: n. d.; endosulfan sulfate: 10.2 ng/L) in every year. Data from this long-term monitoring project will be
spring. At both stations, the concentration of S3 endosulfan was presented in future research.
dominated by endosulfan sulfate, which was also detected at every
other station in the study, unlike the two isomers. This is possibly CRediT authorship contribution statement
due to its long-term accumulation after being metabolized from a-
and b-endosulfan following the past application of endosulfan in Leesun Kim: Writing - original draft. Jin-Woo Jeon: Writing -
agricultural areas. A recent study reported that endosulfan sulfate original draft, Formal analysis. Ji-Young Son: Formal analysis. Chul-
(22.0e87.8 ng/g) was detected in greenhouse soil, while a- and b- Su Kim: Resources. Jin Ye: Resources. Ho-Joong Kim: Project
endosulfan were not detected (Lim et al., 2016). administration. Chang-Ho Lee: Project administration. Seung-Man
The concentrations of S3 endosulfan in the sediment samples Hwang: Project administration. Sung-Deuk Choi: Supervision,
from the four major rivers in fall were not significantly different Project administration.
(rank sum test, p > 0.05) (Fig. 5b). This may be because pollutants
can accumulate in the sediment without significant movement Declaration of competing interest
over time, unlike the constant movement of pollutants in the water,
meaning that their concentration may differ significantly by region. The authors declare that they have no known competing
In addition, the concentration of pollutants in water is influenced financial interests or personal relationships that could have
by the activity of benthic organisms, and they are adsorbed by appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
sediment or the tissue of fish (Quinete et al., 2013). Endosulfan
sulfate was consistently found in the sediment, while the two
Acknowledgements
isomers were only occasionally detected. In addition, Spearman
analysis revealed a weak correlation between agricultural land area
This work was mainly supported by the Korea Environment
in the sub-provinces and cities and the concentration of S3 endo-
Corporation through the Korean Ministry of Environment as a na-
sulfan (r ¼ 0.311, p < 0.05) in the sediment (Table S6). These results
tional POPs monitoring project. This work was also supported by
indicate that the pesticides sprayed onto agricultural land possibly
the National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1A2B4003229)
contaminated the water through runoff and subsequently trans-
and the Rural Development Administration of the Republic of Korea
ferred into the sediment.
(PJ014297012019).
The results of this study suggest that the endosulfan present in Supplementary data to this article can be found online at
the environmental media primarily originates from agricultural https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115035.
areas despite the ban on its production and use in South Korea. The
concentration of S3 endosulfan in the environment was similar to References
or lower than that reported for other countries. Endosulfan sulfate,
a metabolite of a- and b-endosulfans, was the dominant form of ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2015. Public Health
Statement for Endosulfan.
endosulfan in soil, water, and sediment monitored in this study. Becker, L., Scheringer, M., Schenker, U., Hungerbühler, K., 2011. Assessment of the
However, a- and b-endosulfans were dominant in air samples, environmental persistence and long-range transport of endosulfan. Environ.
L. Kim et al. / Environmental Pollution 265 (2020) 115035 9