Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wejdan Alqahtani
ENG 1201
Introduction
The song ‘Imagine’ written and performed by John Lennon and Yoko Ono has become one of
the most important works of socially conscious music and art to have been produced in the 20th
century. The song encapsulates messages unaffected by time such as peace, social harmony,
cooperation, tolerance, unity in diversity and so on. The song itself can be applied to all these
various themes due to its highly universal nature. In this paper, we will be looking at two versions
of the music video produced for the song - one originally by Lennon and another from UNICEF
which was produced in 2016. Both versions have similar characteristics in terms of the central
themes present and the rhetorical appeals int eh sense that they both seek to appeal to our collective
social consciousness by using the factor of ‘ethos’. However, there are also several ways in which
they differ, which is what we will be exploring in this paper. The original version of ‘Imagine’ by
John Lennon primarily employs themes of peace and cooperation in the social context of the
Vietnam war and doing away with war and large scale violence by demonstrating for peace in the
masses. The social context of this song has changed over the years in the UNICEF version in which
the performance appeals to social problems in the 21st century such as discrimination, diversity,
inclusivity and social equality while retaining the main idea from Lennon’s version.
There are only two human subjects depicted in this music video, performers John Lennon and
Yoko Ono. The music video’s central theme is world peace, harmonious co-existence in society,
and doing away with war. The primary reasoning behind these themes is our strive for world peace
and social equality. The music video features the performers in a plain white room with a plain
white grand piano being used, which is symbolic of peace. Yoko Ono is seen to be opening the
curtains in the space to expose more of the room to sunlight, which signifies a transitionary phase in
society from social unrest to a state of peace and harmony and that this process must be brought
about with social cooperation and collaboration. The audience for this video was primarily anti-
establishment, anti-war activists and younger generations belonging to lower and middle class
Analysis
The visuals of the music video are made to go along with the highly insightful subject matter
of the song that prompts the viewer to pay attention to both the words being sung and the message
being conveyed by using the music video as a performance art piece, something that had been
previously observed in the works of Yoko Ono. The gradual fading in of light into the room by
opening the curtains present are symbolic of how we must, through collective action and unity,
battle violence and come together to demonstrate our support for peace. This kind of symbolism is
typical of instances of ‘pathos’ being used which invokes the emotional aspect of the viewer. The
white coloured theme is also a rhetorical statement on peace, which is extremely important in the
music video. These factors perfectly encapsulate the context of the song and the music video which
are highly exclusive to the Vietnam war era when violence was at a high and how various groups of
The subjects depicted in this video are primarily celebrities from different parts of the world,
from different backgrounds and cultures. The music video features prominent icons of pop culture
from different nationalities and identities, which is primarily a reference to the increasingly diverse
world that we find ourselves in today. The central theme of the music video remains diversity and
Analysis/Relationship
Similar to John Lennon’s music video, this video employs themes of social urgency and seeks
to appeal to the viewers using ‘pathos’. The central theme is leaning towards racial and cultural
equality, embracing diversity, and calling for unity. Though the primary message has remained
same from the original video, this version is centred more towards diversity and inclusivity than
anti-war sentiments or discussions of peace against violence. By having people from different
backgrounds, the music video hints at the importance of coming together to foster an inclusive,
healthy environment that is equitable for all. The primary difference between Lennons’ original and
this version is that the context of the song and the message has changed. They both have to do with
coming together for social betterment, but are different in the means of coming together, and the
cause for coming together. While Lennon’s version tackles peace and cooperation to tackle
violence, this version tackles discrimination and cooperation to create inclusiveness. The audience
is similar to Lennon’s original music video - general and broad and does not appeal to any
Conclusion
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alqahtani 4
The original version of ‘Imagine’ by John Lennon primarily employs themes of peace and
cooperation in the social context of the Vietnam war and doing away with war and large scale
violence by demonstrating for peace in the masses. The social context of this song has changed over
the years in the UNICEF version in which the performance appeals to social problems in the 21st
century such as discrimination, diversity, inclusivity and social equality while retaining the main
idea from Lennon’s version. The central theme of both the music video remains the same, but the
newer version is more in tune with the issues facing the world today. The factor of context therefore
becomes extremely important in this case. Despite the dissimilarities, both the music video resonate
Works Cited
ANALYZING VISUAL TEXTS Alqahtani 5
Garofalo, I. " Imagine": An anthem for peace and solidarity, 1971-2018. MS thesis. 2018.
Lennon, John. "Imagine - John Lennon & The Plastic Ono Band (w the Flux ..." N.p., 1971. Web.
Nichols, David. "Review of John Lennon: Imagine." History Australia 6.2 (2009): 50-1.