1- The resolution of the figures reported is inferior; authors need to reproduce the

figures with better resolution.

2- The mathematical symbols are not consistent, e.g., both q and ρ is used for
density, and ϕ and Ф were used for the volume fraction of nanoparticles.
3- Two different figures are named as Figure 3.
4- Sometimes it is pi other times it is п,
5- Regression parameters, R, and R 2 adj should be mentioned.
6- Percentage of experimental uncertainties should be mentioned
7- The formatting of mathematical expressions of pi groups should be corrected.
8- The paper should be edited for archival-English correction.
9- Submit in desired format

1. Please structure paper in:

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Result and Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgment, if any
Funding, if any
Reference

2. Reference is needed in second last para of Introduction

3. Please specify type of thermocouples K or j or any other type

Its K type

4. Temperatures were recorded in every 5 min or 15 s. Pls clarify and correct accordingly in
manuscript.

5. correct the formatting errors such as: kg/m3 and Al2O3

6. Revise all figure captions. Captions always in short and all description must be in text.

7. Correct sentence "The variables like diameter,

temperature, viscosity of the fluid, density of particle and
base fluid, specific heat of particle and that of nanofluid
C pnf  (1  )C fs  C pbf (2) and volume fraction are taken"

8. Correct Equation numbering

9. In conclusion "Specific heat of nanofluids increases with increase in temperature increase

of volume fraction and also increases with size of nanoparticles". Instead of writing general
sentence, quantify it

10. 3. The new developed model gave good result when compared with different nanofluid of
SWCNT, Al2O3,
ZnO, Ethyl Glycol. in What sense?