RAPPLER USES COOKIES TO CUSTOMIZE USER EXPERIENCE

By continued use, you agree to our privacy policy and accept our use of such cookies.

I ACCEPT

Court of Appeals to SEC: Give Rappler corrective period

J U LY 2 7, 2 0 1 8
LIAN BUAN

NATION

INFO

 (5th UPDATE) CA denies Rappler's petition for review, but reminds the SEC that in the
 past it had 'pursued a policy that the revocation of theAre you an
certi entrepreneur
cate or aspiring
of registration to be
should
be one?
the last resort'
resort
We'd like to know how we can help
you!

ADVERTISEMENT Take the survey

— X
should be the last resort
resort," the CA said. (READ: Business as usual for Rappler, CA urges review of
shutdown order)

ADVERTISEMENT

The Court reminded the SEC that in 2015, the SEC en banc relaxed its policy against "delinquent
corporations."

The SEC earlier revoked Rappler's license to operate, but the dispositive portion of the Court's
decision does not mention a directive on whether Rappler should cease to operate.

Instead, the CA remanded the case or gave it back to the SEC to assess the legal impact
of Omidyar donating its $1.5-million worth of PDRs to 14 of Rappler’s Filipino managers.

“The Securities and Exchange Commission is hereby directed to conduct an evaluation of the legal
effect of the alleged supervening donation made by Omidyar Network of all its Philippine
Depositary Receipts to the Staff of Rappler Inc. Accordingly, the case is hereby remanded to the
Securities and Exchange Commission for this purpose,” the CA said. (READ: FAQs: Rappler SEC
case)

Francis Lim, lawyer for Rappler, said: “We have not yet received a copy of the decision but we will
surely not take the decision sitting down and will take all legal actions necessary to have the issue
nally resolved by the Supreme Court. Having said that, I’m glad that the Court of Appeals has
ordered the SEC to conduct further proceedings to determine the legal effect of the donation of
the PDRs to the Filipino staff of Rappler. What this means is that the SEC decision cannot be
enforced or implemented until the issue is nally decided. Meanwhile, it’s business as usual for
Rappler.”

Are you an entrepreneur or aspiring to

Some foreign control be one?
We'd like to know how we can help
you!saying that the Philippine
The SEC revoked Rappler’s license to operate in January 2018,
Depositary Receipts (PDR) sold by Rappler to Omidyar gave the foreign entity control of the
Take the survey
company. Under the Constitution, media companies should have zero foreign control. (READ:
— X
Timeline: The case of Rappler's SEC registration)
The clause states that Rappler must have a “prior good faith discussion” with Omidyar rst before
the company can modify its articles of incorporation in a way that it “prejudices the rights in
relation to the Omidyar PDRs.”

A PDR is a nancial instrument that corporations resort to, to secure foreign investments without
violating the nationality restrictions prescribed by the Constitution.

In denying Rappler's petition for review, the CA said that: “Under a ‘zero’ foreign control standard,
it would appear that this is tantamount to some foreign control."

Rappler told the CA that under the SEC’s own rules, control is de ned as something exercised only
by the Board of Directors who have the power to vote. Omidyar, Rappler said, cannot vote and
therefore does not have control.

“It does not matter whether the approval from Omidyar is required only when the actions taken
by Rappler will prejudice the rights of Omidyar, because Rappler Holdings Corp (RHC) will still
nonetheless be required to secure the approval of at least 2/3 of the PDR Holders before Rappler
can carry out or implement any action which has the effect of altering, modifying or otherwise
changing Rappler’s Articles of Incorporation or By-laws or take any other action where such
alteration, modi cation, change or action will prejudice the rights in relation to the Omidyar PDR,”
said the CA.

The CA added: “While the Omidyar PDR states that the right to vote on the Rappler shares is
retained by RHC, said right to vote is being shared with or exercised jointly by RHC, as the owner
of the shares, and Omidyar, through Clause 12.2.2. Thus, under a ‘zero’ foreign control standard, it
would appear that this is tantamount to some foreign control.” 

The decision was penned by Associate Justice Rafael Antonio Santos, with concurrences from
Associate Justices Apolinario Bruselas, and Germando Francisco Legaspi.

Due process

Rappler said in its petition that the SEC violated its right to due process when it skipped several
steps in its own procedure, and issued the decision after asking only an explanation from Rappler.
According to the SEC’s procedures, the party can le a motion for reconsideration.

The CA said it agrees that the SEC did not follow its own rules, but said “the same does not, by
itself, amount to a violation of procedural due process.”

“Due process in administrative proceedings cannot be fullyAre you anwith

equated entrepreneur or aspiring
due process in its to
strict
be one?
judicial sense, for in the former a formal or trial-type hearing is not always necessary, and
We'd like to know how we can help
technical rules of procedure are not strictyly applied,” said the CA. 
you!

Take the survey

— X
How did this story make you feel?

INSPIRED HAPPY AMUSED NEUTRAL ANNOYED SAD ANGRY AFRAID

Rappler has decried all moves as blatant harrassment and an attempt to silence a free press.

The CA said: "Preliminarily, this Court notes that the exercise of press freedom is not an issue in
this case. Rather, the issue involves the exercise of regulatory powers by the SEC over domestic
corporations duly registered with it."

Presidential Spokesman Harry Roque said the CA was "correct to revoke Rappler's registration
based on its previous investigation."

He acknowledged the other part of the decision remanding the case to the SEC for a
reinvestigation.

"We are con dent that the SEC will be able to resolve the case with the same competence and
objectivity as before," he said in a statement Friday.

The CA decision came out one year after Duterte's 2017 State of the Nation Address, when he rst
publicly accused Rappler of being American-owned.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently investigating Rappler for two complaints led by the
government, one for cyberlibel, and another for tax evasion.

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) is looking into alleged violation of the anti-dummy
law. – Rappler.com

Did you see something broken?

This is older content that has been transitioned to our new look. In this transition some of our content might
not look right. We are working hard to x everything but if something doesn’t look right let us know

Are you an entrepreneur or aspiring to

REPORT A PROBLEM ON THIS PAGE
be one?
We'd like to know how we can help
you!

ADVERTISEMENT Take the survey

— X
 

Lian Buan
@LIANBUAN

Lian Buan covers justice and corruption for Rappler. She is interested in decisions, pleadings, audits, contracts, and other
documents that establish a trail. If you have leads, email lian.buan@rappler.com or tweet @lianbuan.

MORE FROM LIAN BUAN

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

Fearless reporting delivered to you

ENTER EMAIL ADDRESS... *

FOLLOW US    Are you an entrepreneur or aspiring to

be one?
We'd like to know how we can help
JOIN RAPPLER+ KNOW MORE HERE you!

CROWDFUNDING Take the survey

FOUNDING BOARD — X
2017 - 2018 BOARD

THE TEAM

CONTACT US

PRIVACY STATEMENT

TERMS OF USE

COMMENT MODERATION POLICY

Are you an entrepreneur or aspiring to

be one?
We'd like to know how we can help
you!

Take the survey

— X
 Court of Appeals to SEC: Give Rappler corrective period

MANILA, Phillippines (5th UPDATE) – The Court of Appeals (CA) upheld the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) ndings that Rappler's agreement with a foreign investor constitutes
"some foreign control" contrary to the Constitution, but said Rappler must be given "reasonable
time" to correct the disputed parts of the deal.

“The Court notes that, in cases where the articles of incorporation or any amendment thereto is
found by the SEC to be non-compliant with the requirements of the Corporation Code, under
Section 17 of the Corporation Code, the SEC is mandated to give incorporators a reasonable time
within which to correct or modify the objectionable portions of their articles of incorporation or
amendment thereof," the CA said in a 72-page decision promulgated Thursday, July 26.

The CA agreed with Rappler's argument that Omidyar's earlier waiver of its Philippine Depositary
Receipts (PDRs) and then its donation of the PDR's to Rappler managers "show the intention to
comply in good faith with the regulations of the SEC." (ReadAre
Rappler's statement: Court
you an entrepreneur of Appeals
or aspiring to
says license revocation is wrong) be one?
We'd like to know how we can help
The CA even noted that the SEC allowed other corporationsyou!
like ABS-CBN, GMA, and Globe to
issue PDRs.
Take the survey

— X
"The SEC, in the past, had pursued a policy that the revocation of the certi cate of registration