Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 . ALLEG IANCE T O T HE ST AT E
The principal is based on the notion that you cannot offend the very thing that you swore to uphold.
It is expected of each practitioner to show respect to the legal order.
Oath by practitioner “I will be faithful to the Republic of South Africa
Attorney must be citizen of RSA
Non-citizen must have permanent residence
Can be linked to the duty to sustain and honour the profession
Must become a SA citizen within 6 years of admission, or an extended period, if the court so
allows – if not, struck off the role or suspended from practice
T HE G ENERALLY UNLAWF UL
Avoid unlawful and criminal conduct in practice and personal life
this may result in suspension or removal from the roll
Examples are: Contravention of the Insolvency Act, unlawful dealing in diamonds and corruption.
Avoid assisting client – to break the law
explain the possible consequences and advise against it
assisting/facilitating unlawful conduct constitutes unprofessional conduct.
“In determining his fees and seeking to charge either his client or any other person who may become
liable to pay them, the practitioner must be at pains to avoid what is manifestly excessive, for to charge
seriously in excess of what is reasonable is to overreach the payer, and the fact that the charges may be
subject to taxation or assessment if the person liable so chooses in no way excuses the attempt at
deliberate overcharge. To overreach the payer becomes most serious of all if he is ignorant or
unsophisticated and the attorney seeks and secures his agreement to a fee which is thus excessive.”
S2(2) states “any fees referred to in subsection (1)(b) which are higher than the normal fees of the legal
practitioner concerned (hereinafter referred to as the success fee), shall not exceed such normal fees by
more than 100%: provided that, in the case of claims sounding in money, the total of any such success
fee payable by the client to the legal practitioner, shall not exceed 25% of the total amount awarded or
any amount obtained by the client in consequence of the proceedings concerned, which amount shall
not, for purposes of calculating such excess, include any cost.
Free State Agriculture and Ecotourism (Pty) Ltd v Mthembu & Mahomed 2002 (5) SA 343 (O)
“The quantum of the retainer is a shocking disgrace to the attorney’s profession. It is nothing but an
alarming overreaching in our law. When an attorney undertakes to do work in that capacity, he prima
facie undertakes to do so for the legitimate fees that he can charge and it is unprofessional, unworthy
and dishonourable conduct on his part to charge a client exorbitant and extortionate fee….’Overreach’
may be taken as conveying the extraction by the attorney from his client, by the taking by the former of
undue advantage in any form of the latter of a fee which is unconscionable, excessive and extortionate.
The word ‘overreach’ is defined, insofar as it is relevant to this matter, as ‘circumvent, outwit, cheat in
dealing’ or ‘to outwit or get the better of’. See Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Tobias and
Another 1991 (1) SA 430 (C) at 435B. However, if I were called upon to decide whether the conduct in
charging this retaining fee was unconscionable, I would most decidedly have done so, having regard to
the nature of the retainer which involves no work of whatsoever nature having been performed by
respondent.”
1 0 .Conduct ex tr a pr ofessional; life consiste ntly with canons of good citiz e nship
Term “fit and proper” – relates to “morals”, “values” and “integrity”
“Fit and proper” means fit and proper in every respect and not only honesty and reliability. An
attorney’s avowed intention of contravening the law in future, does not square with the
requirement.
Apply to person –allowed to practice
Prince v President, Cape Law Society & Others 2000(3) SA 845 (SCA)
▪ Botha and Others v Law Society, Northern Provinces 2009 (3) SA 329 (SCA)
Kaplan v Incorporated Law Society Transvaal 1981 (2) SA 762 (T)
Jasat v Natal Law Society 2000 (3) SA 44 (SCA)
PRINCE v PRESIDENT, CAPE LAW SOCIETY, AND OTHERS 2002 (2) SA 794 (CC)
A person having two previous convictions for the possession of cannabis declared his intention of
continuing to break the law due to his religious beliefs.
Jasat v Natal Law Society 2000 (3) SA 44 (SCA).
An attorney convicted of a criminal offence, and who during the course of the tr ial not only
committed perjury in raising a false alibi, but also suborned another to do so to support his alibi.
PRINCE v PRESIDENT, CAPE LAW SOCIETY, AND OTHERS 2002 (2) SA 794 (CC).
Where a person having two previous convictions for the possession of cannabis declared his intention
of continuing to break the law due to his religious beliefs, the court held that he was not a fit and
proper person to be admitted as an attorney. As long as the prohibition of the use or possession of
cannabis remained on the statute book the applicant would constantly be breaking the law and that
this would bring the profession into disrepute.
In this regard, Prince was not seen as fit and proper and could not be admitted as an attorney.
Jasat v Natal Law Society 2000 (3) SA 44 (SCA).
An attorney convicted of a criminal offence, and who during the course of the trial not only committed
perjury in raising a false alibi, but also suborned another to do so to support his alibi and who
persisted in lies for four years during the appeals process was found unfit to practise as such conduct
constituted a protracted attempt to deceive the courts.
Those doing the 5-year articles no right of appearance, without LLB Degree
Right of Appearance High Court
o an attorney must apply to the registrar of the High Court where he or she was admitted as an
attorney for a prescribed certificate to the effect that the applicant has the right to appear in the
High Court, the SCA or the Constitutional Court.
o the registrar will then issue the certificate, which will state that such a person has been practising
for a continuous period of not less than three years and is possession of an LLB degree and has
not been struck off the roll or suspended from practice.
T er mination of mandate
This is referring to the termination of mandate by the client.
The client has the right to terminate his or her mandate at any stage if he or she feels that the attorney
on record is not providing the service that he or she would have expected.
On the other hand, the attorney may retain any papers or pleadings in which he has lien for cost until
the costs are paid or secured.
The attorney also has the duty to assist his successor (the new instructing attorney) with all the proper
information.
By attor ney
An attorney has the right to withdraw from a matter
Lewis gives as an example a number of reasons as to when there is good cause for an attorney to
withdraw:
improper conduct on the part of the client
Example: when you are on record with a client and the client then does something else
which is unlawful.
In that way the clients conduct would be improper and you as the attorney has the right
to withdraw from representing the client if the attorney finds that his own personality
clashes with that of the client
When the attorney finds that his own personality clashes with that of the client.
You are trying to establish a working relationship with the client, but the client is difficult
and does not want to listen to what you have to say, then you have the right to withdraw
as an attorney.
where the client does not accept his attorneys advice and persists in pursuing or defending an
action when his attorney most strongly advises settlement
The failure to provide funds to enable the attorney to continue will also justify his terminating
the relationship.
If the client is not by the means to pay for what you have done so far, or you can see
that the client will not be able to pay you even after the matter has been finalized
If a practitioner wishes to withdraw from a matter, such information must be
communicated with the client timeously to enable the client to find another legal
representative.
Refer r al Rule
In the past Advocates could not accept instructions directly from clients without the intervention of
an attorney
The aforesaid has now changed in terms of Section 34 of the Legal Practice Act
S34(2)(a)(i) – an advocate may render legal services upon a brief from an attorney; or
S34(2)(a)(ii) – upon a request directly from member of public or from a justice Centre
(Also see provision 38 of Code of Conduct)
MISCONDUCT
Misconduct on the part of any attorney will include a breach of the Act, or of the code or of the
rules or compliance thereof
Note Lewis -Golden rule
Touting common form of misconduct
Law Society of Cape of Good hope v Berrange 2005 (5) SA C.
Respondents paid estate agents to refer conveyancing work
• Taking into account these factors, he will then be able to calculate a reasonable fee for the client.
• Counsel shall not when calculating a fee, inflate the amount because client is able to pay
generously
• Counsel may, in calculating a fee, on the grounds of a client9s lack of means to pay fees, charge
an amount less or not charge at all
• Upon acceptance of a brief, counsel must provide details of counsel9s estimation of the fees to be
charged
• And upon completion of the work performed by counsel, counsel must provide the instructing
attorney with details of how the fee charged was calculated.
• It is also very important for counsel not to inflate his fee when it comes to a client that can pay
generously (a wealthy client)
• Counsel may, however, in calculating a fee, on the grounds of a client9s lack of means to pay
fees, charge an amount less or not charge at all (Pro Bono)
• Upon acceptance of a brief, counsel must provide details of an estimation of the fees to be
charged
• And upon the completion of the work performed by counsel, counsel must provide the instructing
attorney with details of how the free charged was calculated
• Details of how free charge was calculated:
o He must send a statement of an account setting out all the work he has done and how much
he had charged for taking on the work.
P r ofessional etiquette
Legal practitioners shall upon a first appearance before a judicial officer, introduce themselves in
chambers to the judicial officer;
If you know that it is going to be the first time you are going to appear before a specific
magistrate, you need to ask the clerk of the court, before the court starts, to take you to the
presiding officers to introduce yourself.
At the trial court roll call, in the motion courts and in the divorce courts, legal practitioners shall
seat themselves from the front row with regard to seniority;
Seniority means the date of admission (from the date that you were admitted)
Legal practitioners shall deal with the judicial officer, court staff and all other persons in court in a
civil manner and with respect;
The same respect you give to a presiding officer is the same respect you must give to all other
court staff members.
Shall on completion of his or her matter, remain in the court room until the legal practitioner in the
next matter has risen or if he or she is the last practitioner in court, until the court has risen;
However, once you are done with your matter you may ask the presiding officer whether you
may be excused and then leave the court.
Shall not approach the judicial officer in the absence of the opposing practitioner unless expressly
agreed by opposing practitioner
If you have a question in the matter that you would like to discuss with the presiding officer,
you cannot go to the presiding officer without the opposing practitioner.
You either need consent from the opposing practitioner or both of you need to go to the
presiding officer together
Shall not, after a hearing and awaiting judgment, place before, or send to a judicial officer any
further material of whatever nature, except by agreement amongst representatives of all parties
Seniority in the profession is determined by criteria other than age
Eg. Junior attorney will travel to offices of senior attorney for conferences / meetings
Addressing the presiding officer in High Court: My Lord / My lady
Regional /District Court: Your Worship
• Robing takes place outside court room – dark clothes to be worn when appearing
• In the past Advocates only robed for High Court but not lower courts – attorneys for all courts; this
has since changed.
• A practical vocational training contract, may with the consent of the principal and the candidate
attorney concerned be ceded to any other principal willing to accept such cession.
o In this instance we can look at an example where a CA has signed a contract of 2 years with
a specific firm but after the 1St year, the CA finds other employment and would like to cede his
or her articles with their current principle
o If the principle so consents, the CA may then continue his articles with a new principle and
only complete what is left to serve under his contract
o So if he or she has already served 1 year of articles with their current principle and then has
consent to seed his or her articles then he or she has to complete 1 year of their articles with
their new principal instead of starting all over again for the duration of 2 years.
This duty is limited and the demand for free legal services extends beyond the State s constitutional
obligations.
Therefore, all role-players in the legal profession have a duty towards the poor not only the State.
o Practitioners
Whether it is legal aid or private attorney.
o Universities
Who have a law clinic who also provide free legal services to communities
o Law students
Where they take on projects such as street law where they go to communities and
educate them about the law
It does not only rely on the state to provide these services
All the role players in the legal profession must come together and assist when it comes to access to
justice.
LEG AL AID
The State fulfils its obligations towards the poor through Legal Aid South Africa
Legal Aid South Africa has justice centres all over the country and still make use of the Judicare systems
(whereby they allocate work to private practitioners at a legal aid tariff)
But they have since moved from the Judicare model to the Justice Centre model
o Judicare System – This is where they allocate work to private practitioners at a legal aid tariff
o Justice Centre Model – That is where salary practitioners are employed on a full-time basis at
legal aid
Legal Aid work should be done in the same manner as PRO bono work.
o Namely with a sense of self-sacrifice and not primarily with the view of financial gain
ALL CLIENTS SHOULD BE TREATED WITH RESPECT IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THEY ARE PAYING
OR NOT