Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 1 of 12

Exhibit C
 Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 2 of 12

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

NEW YORK COUNTY

JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY (U.S.A.); JOHN HANCOCK LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.) SEPARATE Index No.: 650195/2012
ACCOUNT 6A; JOHN HANCOCK LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.) SEPARATE
ACCOUNT 131; JOHN HANCOCK FUNDS II;
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE INSURANCE
TRUST; JOHN HANCOCK SOVEREIGN BOND
FUND; JOHN HANCOCK BOND TRUST;
JOHN HANCOCK STRATEGIC SERIES; and
JOHN HANCOCK INCOME SECURITIES STIPULATION FOR ACCEPTANCE
TRUST, OF SERVICE AND SCHEDULING

Plaintiffs,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; JPMORGAN

CHASE BANK N.A.; J.P. MORGAN
MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP.; J.P.
MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC. f/k/a J.P.
MORGAN SECURITIES INC.; J.P. MORGAN
ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION I; EMC
MORTGAGE LLC f/k/a EMC MORTGAGE
CORPORATION; BEAR STEARNS AND CO.
INC.; BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED
SECURITIES I LLC; STRUCTURED ASSET
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC.; WAMU
ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.; WASHINGTON
MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.;
WAMU CAPITAL CORP.; LONG BEACH
SECURITIES CORP.; BANC OF AMERICA
SECURITIES LLC; CSE MORTGAGE, LLC;
DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.; JOHN
BARREN; DAVID BECK; SARA BONESTEEL;
DOMENIC A. BORRIELLO; RICHARD
CAREAGA; JEROME A. CIPPONERI;
CHRISTINE E. COLE; CRAIG S. DAVIS; ART
DEN-HEYER; MARANGAL I. DOMINGO;
DAVID M. DUZYK; KATHERINE
GARNIEWSKI; TROY A. GOTSCHALL;
PATRICIA A. JEHLE; JULIANA C. JOHNSON;
ROLLAND JURGENS; JOSEPH T.
 Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 3 of 12

JURKOWSKI JR.; MICHAEL D. KATZ;

WILLIAM A. KING; MARC R. KITTNER;
MICHAEL J. KULA; THOMAS G. LEHMANN;
STEPHEN LOBO; RICHARD D. LODGE; KIM
LUTTHANS; MARC K. MALONE; THOMAS F.
MARANO; JEFFREY MAYER; EDWIN F.
MCMICHAEL; SAMUEL L. MOLINARO JR.;
MICHAEL B. NIERENBERG; DIANE NOVAK;
MICHAEL L. PARKER; MATTHEW E.
PERKINS; LOUIS SCHIOPPO, JR.; JEFFREY A.
SORENSEN; JEFFREY L. VERSCHLEISER;
THOMAS L. WIND; DAVID H. ZIELKE;
GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.
A.K.A. RBS GREENWICH CAPITAL;
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., UBS SECURITIES
LLC F.K.A. UBS WARBURG LLC.; BRIAN
BERNARD; MEGAN M. DAVIDSON; ERIC
FERREN; STEPHEN FORTUNATO; and
DONALD WILHELM,

Defendants.

It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED, as of March 23, 2012, by and between the

parties hereto through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows:

1. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is authorized to accept, and does hereby accept, service

of the summons and complaint in this action, effective March 23, 2012, on behalf of defendants

JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition

Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Acceptance Corporation I, Chase Home

Finance LLC, Chase Mortgage Finance Corporation, EMC Mortgage LLC, Bear Stearns & Co.

Inc., Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II

Inc., WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp., Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., WaMu

Capital Corp., Long Beach Securities Corp.; and effective March 30, 2012 on behalf of John

Barren, David Beck, Dominic A. Boriello, Richard Careaga, Jerome A. Cipponeri, Christine

Cole, Craig S. Davis, Art Den-Heyer, Marangal I. Domingo, David M. Duzyk, Katherine

-2-
 Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 4 of 12

Garniewski, Troy A. Gotschall, Patricia A. Jehle, Juliana C. Johnson, Rolland Jurgens, Joseph T.

Jurkowski, Jr., Michael D. Katz, William A. King, Michael J. Kula, Thomas G. Lehmann,

Stephen Lobo, Richard D. Lodge, Kim Lutthans, Marc K. Malone, Edwin F. McMichael, Diane

Novak, Michael L. Parker, Matthew E. Perkins, Louis Schioppo, Jr., Jeffrey A. Sorensen,

Thomas L. Wind, David H. Zielke, Brian Bernard, Megan M. Davidson, Eric Ferren, Stephen

Fortunato, and Donald Wilhelm, without prejudice to any rights or defenses available to these

defendants, including but not limited to jurisdictional defenses.

2. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP is authorized to accept, and does hereby

accept, service of the summons and complaint in this action, effective March 23, 2012, on behalf

of defendants Banc of America Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch & Co., without prejudice to

any rights or defenses available to these defendants, including but not limited to jurisdictional

defenses.

3. Allen & Overy LLP is authorized to accept, and does hereby accept, service of the

summons and complaint in this action, effective March 30, 2012, on behalf of defendant Samuel

L. Molinaro, Jr., without prejudice to any rights or defenses available to Mr. Molinaro, including

but not limited to jurisdictional defenses.

4. Greenberg Traurig, LLP is authorized to accept, and does hereby accept, service

of the summons and complaint in this action, effective March 30, 2012, on behalf of defendant

Jeffrey Mayer, without prejudice to any rights or defenses available to Mr. Mayer, including but

not limited to jurisdictional defenses.

5. Morrison & Foerster LLP is authorized to accept, and does hereby accept, service

of the summons and complaint in this action, effective March 30, 2012, on behalf of defendants

Sara Bonesteel, Marc R. Kittner, Thomas F. Marano and Michael B. Nierenberg, without

-3-
 Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 5 of 12

prejudice to any rights or defenses available to these defendants, including but not limited to

jurisdictional defenses.

6. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP is authorized to accept, and does hereby

accept, service of the summons and complaint in this action, effective March 30, 2012, on behalf

of defendant Jeffrey L. Verschleiser, without prejudice to any rights or defenses available to Mr.

Verschleiser, including but not limited to jurisdictional defenses.

7. Subject to paragraph 8, the time for all defendants to answer, move, or otherwise

respond to the Complaint is extended to May 8, 2012. In the event that any defendant moves to

dismiss the Complaint, answering papers shall be served on or before July 9, 2012, and reply

papers shall be served on or before August 8, 2012.

8. If the Complaint is removed to federal court, the parties shall meet and confer

regarding the submission to the federal court of a proposed schedule (a) for briefing any motion

to remand and (b) for all defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in

the event that remand is denied. If the Complaint is remanded to this Court, the time for all

defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be sixty (60) days from

the decision ordering remand; and in the event that any defendant moves to dismiss the

Complaint in this Court, answering papers shall be served on or before sixty (60) days after the

motion to dismiss is filed, and reply papers shall be served on or before thirty (30) days

thereafter.

-4-
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-03184-RJS Document 1-3 Filed 04/23/12 Page 12 of 12