Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The purpose of a position paper is to generate support on an issue. It describes the author’s position on an issue and the
rational for that position and, in the same way that a research paper incorporates supportive evidence, is based on facts that provide
a solid foundation for the author’s argument. It is a critical examination of a position using facts and inductive reasoning, which
addresses both strengths and weaknesses of the author’s opinion.
An author who writes a position paper is making an argument which has to be built upon evidence. The structure used to do
this is very similar to that used when writing a critical essay.
An Introduction, which identifies the issue that will be discussed and states the author’s position on that issue.
The Body of the paper, which contains the central argument and can be further broken up into three unique sections:
Background information
A discussion of both sides of the issue, which addresses and refutes arguments that contradict the author’s position
A Conclusion, restating the key points and, where applicable, suggesting resolutions to the issue.
ARTICLE CRITIQUE
An article critique has four main parts:
1. Introduction
Include an introductory paragraph that includes the following:
2. Summary
After your introduction, discuss the following in your own words:
3. Critique
After summarizing the article, critique the article by doing the following:
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article that you noted while critically
reading the article.
State your informed opinions about the clarity, relevancy, and accuracy of the article,
using specific examples from the article to support your statements.
4. Conclusion
Finally, end your article critique with a conclusion that does the following:
Summarize the key points in the article, as well the key points from your own analysis.
Close with a comment about the significance of the research or a statement of future
research needed in the field.
1. Introduction
In the introduction, you should include some basic facts about the story, including
the title, the author and the story genre. You should also say something about
your opinion of the story, along with your reasons for liking or disliking it.
2. Summary
Briefly summarise the story. Discuss the setting, the main character(s) and the
main events or problems that the characters experience. Do not give the ending
away!
3. Personal reflection
Discuss what you like or dislike about the story. Give reasons to support your
opinion. You may want to compare and contrast the story with other stories you
have read by the same author or in the same genre. You can also compare the
4. Critical analysis
What is the author’s purpose for writing the story? Is the author
successful in achieving this purpose?
What is the setting of the story? Is it appropriate to the genre?
How well are the characters developed? Do they think, feel, speak and
act in a believable way?
How well is the plot structured? Is the action suspenseful enough? Are
the events too predictable?
What is the theme, or the central idea, of the story?
Does the story have a ‘coda’, or a lesson? What is it?
Does the story have a ‘twist’, or an unexpected ending?
Does the author use any literary devices, such as metaphor, simile, or
alliteration?
5. Conclusion
In the conclusion, you should evaluate the story and either recommend it or not
Before you begin writing the review, make sure you read the story closely and take
good notes.
What is an article critique?
An article critique requires you to critically read a piece of research and
identify and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the article.