Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Human Resource Management
Human Resource Management
Institution
Course
Student
Date
strategic to remove a fair number of employees. However, it is hard a blow how this will come to
a number of those employees affected, who try their best to take the company to the top.
Reduction In force process is a skillful step which may affect the lives of a number of people,
this step has to be taken when things get tough. However important this may be, in the short run
a Reduction in workforce may come out affecting in many detrimental ways. Reduction in
workforce may result in the following, some of which may be a step down for valley technology
Inc., whose chain has grown steadily over the last year. These may include, closing a branch or a
department merging a department with another and consolidating job duties, job sharing, cutting
down of employees benefits, reduction in a work week bringing in changes to day to day work
activities according to Rudolf & Mary,16 . As reducing manpower is the criteria most of the
times, some of the functions will be merged to eliminate redundancy. However, when there is the
merging of functions, there would be need for valley technology to let go of some of the
employees. Jan should only consider this if there is no other option other option other than letting
go of staff to meet the financial crunch. However this process may spoil the organizations
reputation, reducing future prospects for good employees wanting to work for Valley
Surname 2
Technology Inc. Owing to the fact that valley based Inc. would be strategically aiming at cost
reduction, as downsizing is mainly reducing the burden on financial, it indirectly affects the
overall bottom line. For instance, if there would be a reduction of manpower, then it would
directly hit the production or services as it would be reduced when compared to the previous.
A reduction in force strategy would be best take for valley Technology Inc. With a proper
a cost-value analysis, the goal of any cost-cutting exercise should be to eliminate any task whose
cost of doing it exceeds the business value it provides (Lawler et al, 2018). However, this
analysis may be difficult as some tasks do not have a direct monetary value. The bottom line for
Jan would be to take time, identify the gaps, plan the cost cuts and the impact they will have, and
only then execute. However risky this operation might be, Jan should consider lying off those
employees whose salaries are too high. Based on performance. With other cost reduction
methods such as early retirement, the main threat imposed to valley technology may be the risk
of losing to skilled and experienced employees, Rudolf & Mary (13). However, a well-planned
lay off scheme can help Jan lay off employees without necessarily affecting the overall work
Seniority selection can be a simple method to implement (Lawler et al, 2018). Jan can
consider the last employees to get hired becoming the first ones to let go. With this consideration
an assumption can be made that, if they were just recently hired they probably haven’t become
organizational assets yet. And it can be well argued the valley technology Inc. was doing fine
before they started working for the organization. Likewise, according to Rudolf & Mary (16), an
employee Status Based Selection can be implemented as a lay off strategy for valley technology.
With this method, more emphasis is put on ensuring security for full time employees.
Surname 3
The rest of the workers, hereby referred to as the Contingent workers at the organization, such as
contractors and/or part time workers, will be laid off, while the permanent workers with full time
Nevertheless, Jan can apply a merit based lay off in helping valley technology cut down
on human resource cost. Being one of the most popular methodologies in choosing which
employees to layoff and for good reason, will It help managers weed out poorly performing
employees, so that organizations don’t lose important company assets that they could potentially
lose using other methods( Lawler et al, 2018). However, there are several factors that must not
go undervalued. First, to be able to carefully execute this method, there will be need to have a
strong performance evaluation system. Many are times performance evaluations aren’t objective,
and are not done on a regular basis. This often leads to a lot of legal liability when managers lack
Jan can employ a number of items in a scorecard to come up with the employees to lay
off. These may include, tenure at the company Employee status, Merit Value of skillset, Potential
for promotion and leadership, or even Threat of competitor poaching Impact of work.
For each of these categories, the manufacturing employees would be ranked on a scale (Lawler et
al, 2018). Those rankings would be inputted into the weighted formula, and then the Human
resource Manager Can executive could lay off employees with the worst score. This can also act
as a vital evidence in case of any case that may await valley technology following employee’s
From the two methods used to communicate to employees laid off, the reasons for lay off
and remedies to help the affected have been brought out clearly. Valley technology Inc. CEO
shows sympathy to the affected and offers to provide assistance with job search, including
conducting workshops to enhance their résumé, interviewing and job search skills. The kind of
appreciation is also recommendable. The Vice President, Tape Storage Unit also exhibits similar
approach towards making sure that employee’s reasons for lay off are clearly spelt. “It is also
very difficult for the individuals whose jobs are affected. Human Resources will be working with
those affected employees to get as many as possible redeployed to other positions at VTI.”
Surname 5
Works Cited
Rudolp, Sanchez & Mary Bielenberg-Sanchez. Valley Technology Inc.-case study, Employee &
Accessed 02/02/2018.