Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Note. This web page is based primarily on ideas contained in John Rawls'
influential book A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, 1971), which
has been discussed by many philosophers and nonphilosophers alike. Its
ideas are often quoted and paraphrased in textbooks for Introduction to
Philosophy, Ethics, and Business Ethics courses. But Rawls has gone
beyond his views of 1971, and philosophy courses are beginning to take
his important later thinking into account. The later ideas of Rawls to some
extent build on the earlier work summarized below. A new webpage has
been developed to accompany the discussion of Rawls' later ideas. See
John Rawls' Mature Theory of Social Justice.
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Rawls' Method
3. Rawls' Two Principles of Justice
4. Beyond Rawls
Introduction
To say that we are behind a Veil of Ignorance is to say we do not know the
following sorts of things: our sex, race, physical handicaps, generation,
social class of our parents, etc. But self-interested rational persons are not
ignorant of (1) the general types of possible situations in which humans can
find themselves; (2) general facts about human psychology and "human
nature".
Self-interested rational persons behind the Veil of Ignorance are given the
task of choosing the principles that shall govern actual world. Rawls
believes that he has set up an inherently fair procedure here. Because of
the fairness of the procedure Rawls has described, he says, the principles
that would be chosen by means of this procedure would be fair principles.
The corollary of this, in rights terms, is that all generations have the same
rights to resources, future as well as present.
1) Principle of Equal Liberty: Each person has an equal right to the most
extensive liberties compatible with similar liberties for all. (Egalitarian.)
(2a) is not egalitarian but makes benefit for some (those with greater
talents, training, etc.) proportionate to their contribution toward benefiting
the least advantaged persons.
What does the Difference Principle mean? It means that society may
undertake projects that require giving some persons more power, income,
status, etc. than others, e.g., paying accountants and upper-level managers
more than assembly-line operatives, provided that the following conditions
are met:
(a) the project will make life better off for the people who are now worst off,
for example, by raising the living standards of everyone in the community
and empowering the least advantaged persons to the extent consistent with
their well-being,
The Difference Principle has elements of other familiar ethical theories. The
"socialist" idea (see Distributive Justice) that responsibilities or burdens
should be distibuted according to ability and benefits according to need is
partly contained within the Difference Principle. We may reasonably
assume that the "least advantaged" have the greatest needs and that those
who receive special powers (hinted at under "social inequalities") also have
special responsibilities or burdens. However, the merit principle that the
use of special skills should be rewarded is also included in the Difference
Principle.
What (2a) does not permit is a change in social and economic institutions
that makes life better for those who are already well off but does nothing for
those who are already disadvantaged, or makes their life worse.
Example: policies that permit nuclear power plants which degrade the
environment for nearby family farmers but provide jobs for already well-paid
professionals who come in from the big cities.
Beyond Rawls
Rawls' theory of justice was set forth in his book A Theory of Justice
( Harvard University Press, 1971). Since then it has been much discussed,
and attempts have been made to improve and clarify it, not least by Rawls
himself. One of those attempts at improvement is that of Martha C.
Nussbaum (Women and Human Development), who has reinterpreted
Rawls' argument from the perspective of Substantial Freedom, an idea she
gets from Amartya Sen.