Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
The candidate interview is a vital component of the hiring process. To hire the most
qualified candidates, human resource professionals and hiring managers must be
well informed on how to conduct interviews effectively. There are different
interviewing methods, both structured and unstructured. Most widely used types of
interviewing—telephone pre-screen, direct one-on-one and panel interviews—and
explains the objectives and techniques of behavioural, competency-based and
situational approaches to interviewing.
Employers must be aware of federal and state prohibitions on asking certain types of
questions during employment interviews. There are some basic guidelines for
interviewers to follow to avoid claims of discrimination or bias in hiring, and it lists
examples of questions not to ask job applicants.
With careful preparation, HR professionals and hiring managers can make the most
of employment interviews and obtain the information they need. Preparatory steps
include selecting a method of interviewing, drafting useful questions, phrasing
questions properly and sharpening one's listening skills.
Business Case
Moreover, to the extent that the interview process leads to the hiring of the most
suitable candidate, it can help contain the organization's long-term turnover costs.
Applicants also benefit from an effective interview, as it enables them to determine if
their employment needs and interests would likely be met.
Types of Interviewing
In implementing an accurate and fair selection method, the employer can select from
a variety of interviewing techniques. The choice depends on considerations such as
the nature of the position being filled, the industry, the corporate culture and the type
of information the employer seeks to gain from the applicant.
Interviewing techniques can be either STRUCTURED OR UNSTRUCTURED. The
main purpose of structured interviewing is to pinpoint job skills that are essential to
the position. The interviewer asks a specific set of questions of all applicants for the
particular position. This straightforward approach makes it easier for the interviewer
to evaluate and compare applicants fairly. Some interviewers ask the questions in a
predetermined order, while others may not adhere to a strict order but still make
certain that they have addressed all the planned questions.
STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
A structured interview is when all questions are prepared in advance. This is in contrast to
an unstructured interview, in which there is no specific set of predetermined questions, and
the interviewer is able to change the questions at any time and ask follow-up questions to
the interviewee's responses.
UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
In an unstructured interview, the interviewer does not have a strict agenda but rather
allows the applicant to set the pace of the interview. Questions tend to be open-
ended, which can enable the candidate to disclose more than he or she might if
asked closed-ended questions requiring only a brief answer. In addition, questions in
an unstructured interview can be tailored according to an applicant's skills and
experience levels. However, the absence of structure may make it difficult to
compare and rank applicants because they are not asked the same set of questions.
The most widely used types of interviewing are:
Behavioural and competency-based interviews are both aimed to discover how the
interviewee performed in specific situations. The logic is based on the principle that
past performance predicts future behaviour; that how the applicant behaved
in the past indicates how he or she will behave in the future.
The behavioural approach uses a traditional technique (past performance predicts
future behaviour) for assessing a candidate's suitability for a position. The purpose is
to review the candidate's experience, personal attributes and job-related skills.
Instead of asking how the applicant would handle a hypothetical situation, the
interviewer asks the applicant how he or she handled a particular situation in the
past. Behavioural and competency-based interview questions tend to be pointed,
probing and specific.
Describe a time when you were faced with a stressful situation that
demonstrated your skills to neutralize the stressful situation.
Give me a specific example of a time when you used good judgment and logic in
solving a problem.
Give me an example of a time when you set a goal and were able to achieve it
Give me a specific example of a time when you had to conform to a policy with
which you did not agree
If answers seem to be thin on detail, the interviewer can ask follow-up questions
SITUATIONAL APPROACH
The situational approach is an interview technique that gives the candidate a
hypothetical scenario or event and focuses on his or her past experiences,
behaviours, knowledge, skills and abilities by asking the candidate to provide specific
examples of how the candidate would respond given the situation described. This
type of interview reveals how an applicant thinks and how he or she would react in a
particular situation.
You learn that a former co-worker at your last company is applying for an
accounting position with your company. You have heard that this person was
terminated after admitting to embezzling funds from the company but that no
criminal charge was made. You are not in HR. What, if anything, would you do?
You are applying for a customer service position in a cable television company.
If a technician visits a home to make a repair and afterward you receive a call
from the customer telling you that the technician left muddy footprints on her
new carpeting, how would you respond?
GROUP INTERVIEWS
There are two types of group interviews—a candidate group and a panel group. In a
candidate group interview, a candidate is in a room with other job applicants who
may be applying for the same position. Each candidate listens to information about
the company and the position and may be asked to answer questions or participate
in group exercises. Candidate group interviews are less common than panel group
interviews.
The panel should include no more than four or five people; a larger panel could be
intimidating and unwieldy. One interviewer should serve as the leader, and other
participants should serve in support roles. While all the interviewers need to be
involved throughout the interview, the difference in the two roles needs to be very
clear.
Interviewers must know how to extract desired information from job candidates. It
doesn't require a sophisticated technique, but it does require more than just asking
candidates if they possess the required skills and attributes. The most recent
thinking on how to conduct job interviews recommends that employers ask
applicants about specific incidents in the workplace. Therefore, questions should be
designed to show how the candidate has displayed the required skills in specific
situations during his or her career. Responses to such questions can provide
enhanced glimpses into applicants' actual experiences.
FRAMING THE QUESTIONS
For both the employer and the candidate to get the most out of an interview, it is
essential to carefully consider the type of questions to ask. Despite the importance of
preparing questions in advance, the employer should not go into an interview with a
list of ideal answers in mind. It is unlikely that any applicant would come close to
providing such answers. A better approach is to keep in mind ideal characteristics
that a successful candidate would possess.
Questioning should extract information that will shed light on a candidate's ability to
perform the job effectively. Many experts say it is best to ask open-ended questions
("Tell me about your relationship with your previous manager; how could it have
been improved?") rather than closed-ended questions requiring only brief specific
responses ("How many people reported to you?").
Closed-ended job interview questions can enable the employer to receive direct
responses and specific information from the candidate, and they can help the
interviewer control the direction of the interview. But such questions can have
drawbacks:
LEGAL ISSUES
Choosing an interview approach and shaping the questions ahead of time, the
interviewer should become familiar with the types of questions and statements that
must be avoided in any interview.
For example, interviewers should not make statements that could be construed as
creating a contract of employment. When describing the job, it is best to avoid using
terms such as "permanent," "career job opportunity," or "long term."
Interviewers should also avoid making excessive assurances about job security or
statements suggesting that employment would last as long as the employee
performed well in the position.
Provisions of various laws affect the types of questions that organizations may ask
an applicant during an employment interview.
For example in US, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination
based on race, sex, color, national origin and religion. The Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967 prohibits questions about a person's age. The wide-ranging
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) protects qualified individuals with
disabilities from discrimination in employment. The Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 prohibits employers from collecting and using genetic
information. The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures of 1978,
though not in and of themselves legislation or law, have been given deference by the
courts in litigation concerning employment issues.
Questions relating either directly or indirectly to age, sex, race, color, national origin,
religion, genetics or disabilities should be avoided entirely. If information needed
about an applicant might fall into any of those categories, the interviewer should
make sure that the question relates to a bona fide occupational qualification or is
required by federal or state law to be asked.
Employers should also be aware of some of the specific prohibitions contained in the
ADA. Employers may never ask if an applicant has a disability. They may ask only if
there is anything that precludes the applicant from performing—with or without a
reasonable accommodation—the essential functions of the position for which he or
she is applying.
It is important for interviewers to be familiar with the employment laws of the state in
which they are operating and to be well versed in the state legal provisions
regulating the types of questions permissible in an employment interview.
Even if a particular question is not barred under federal or state law, it should be
omitted it if it is not essential. Asking irrelevant questions may offend an applicant or
damage the organization's reputation. Following are examples of questions not to be
asked during an employment interview:
In addition, the interviewer should not ask questions about arrests that did not result
in a conviction.
Before commencing with prepared questions, the interviewer could ease tensions by
encouraging the applicant to talk about a particular interest perhaps something on
the person's resume. At this point the interviewer might also want to recap the
position and what it entails. This can help the applicant answer questions more
knowledgeably and consider again whether he or she is genuinely interested in the
job.
Effective listening is challenging, partly because people are often more focused
on what they're saying than on what they're hearing.
Minimize internal and external distractions; focus only on what the applicant is
saying
Listen to the full answer before asking the next question
Clarify the candidate's answers if necessary and ask if more information is
needed. Occasionally it may be useful for interviewers to restate an
applicant's reply in their own words.
Watch the interviewee's facial expressions and body language.
ENCOURAGING COMMUNICATION
To gain as much information as possible from an applicant, the interviewer should
create an atmosphere that promotes communication. Following are suggestions for
building rapport and fostering discussion:
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS
Asking follow-up questions—also called probing—can be necessary when the
interviewer does not fully understand a response, when answers are vague or
ambiguous, or when the interviewer require more specific information from the
applicant.
Probing questions inviting more detail often begin with "what" or "how." Questions
inviting personal reflection often begin with "do you" or "are you." Questions
beginning with "why" may put the respondent on the defensive or result in little useful
information and require additional probing.
It is helpful to be familiar with some techniques of probing. Here are a few examples:
REFLECTION QUESTIONS
Reflection questions are designed to help the interviewer achieve a deeper
understanding of the applicant's responses. Such questions rarely evoke
defensiveness; applicants want the interviewer to understand their responses.
Reflection questions might begin with phrases such as:
Over-preparedness
The overly prepared applicant can be a puzzle for hiring managers who are trying to
determine if the applicant would be a good fit for the position and the organization.
Job seekers can learn from books, magazine articles and websites not only what
questions to expect but also what answers to give to those questions.
Do some research to determine if the questions you are asking are on popular
interview preparation websites? If they are, but the interviewer still feel it is
important to ask those questions, he or she can consider how to push
applicants beyond their prepared responses.
Ask follow up-questions. Keep asking questions until the applicant gives a
response that sounds genuine and thoughtful rather than studied and coached.
Going off the track and asking irrelevant questions, trying to generate questions
that can lead to detracting rehearsed responses.
Consider that the rehearsed responses may be legitimate and informative. The
fact that an applicant has prepared a response does not necessarily mean that
the applicant is being insincere or untruthful.
TAKING NOTES
There are various schools of thought on note taking during employment interviews.
Some experts say it distracts the interviewer; others say that notes should be made
both during and after the interview for documentation purposes. While there seems
to be no consensus on this topic, many experts do advise employers to avoid the
practice of writing notes directly on applications or resumes because they might be
used later on in any documentation process
Notes about an applicant's skills or experience that are related to the job in question
can be recorded on a separate interview evaluation sheet to accomplish the goal of
accurately recording information from an interview. However, notes should never be
made about the physical characteristics or appearance of an applicant or any other
area of potential legal liability. Note taking should not include commentary about the
applicant's qualifications and skills relative to the position.
FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEWS
Organizations often bring certain applicants back for second or even third interviews
for a number of reasons. Sometimes the employer may want to confirm that an
applicant is the ideal candidate for the position, or the employer may be trying to
decide between two or more qualified applicants.
During the follow-up interview phase, the interviewer should have specific goals in
mind and may want to invite other staff members to take part in the interview.
The follow-up interview is usually the final step before extending an offer of
employment to a candidate. If the candidate passes the last phase, the employer will
then extend an offer orally and in writing.
COMMUNICATING WITH CANDIDATES NOT SELECTED
Following up with candidates that are not selected for a position, particularly those
who were interviewed is a professional courtesy that should not be ignored:
providing those candidates with a respectful rejection letter can maintain goodwill
and increase the likelihood a candidate will consider future job openings with the
organisation.