Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jretconser

Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between

pure click and click-and-brick retailers
Elissar Toufaily 1, Nizar Souiden 2, Riadh Ladhari n
Faculty of Business Administration, Laval University, Quebec, Canada G1V 0A6

art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t

Article history: This paper examines the effects of security/privacy and social presence of retailers on consumer's e-trust
Received 9 November 2012 in two different contexts: pure click and click and brick retailers. It explores how e-trust affects consumer
Received in revised form attitudes toward websites and WOM. A conceptual model is tested using Structural Equation Modeling,
31 March 2013
on a random sample of 989 French customers. Results suggest that perceived website social presence and
Accepted 12 May 2013
perceived security/privacy exert strong and positive impacts on website credibility and benevolence,
which in turn directly influence website attitudes and indirectly influence word-of-mouth. One major
Keywords: difference between pure click and click-and-brick retailers is that the role of social presence in
Online customer trust developing online benevolence is more important in the case of pure click retailers. The study concludes
Retailer multichannel
with managerial implications that may be useful in retail marketing.
Website security/privacy
& 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Website social presence
Benevolence
Credibility

1. Introduction
The notion of trust has been widely studied in its different
approaches (interpersonal trust, organizational trust, trust towards
the brand, etc.) and in different areas such as psychology, manage-
ment, finance or marketing (Grabner-Kräuter and Kaluscha, 2003).
Also, academics have highlighted the importance of trust in
e-commerce relationships (e.g. Gefen, 2000; Pavlou, 2003).
According to Gefen and Straub (2004), trust is emphasized more
in an e-commerce context than in a traditional one because
e-vendors' unethical behaviors carry a high risk (Gefen and
Straub, 2003; Gefen and Straub, 2004; Palvia, 2009) and some-
times consumers perceive a degree of social complexity in online
transactions. Indeed, higher e-trust levels may lead to a higher
e-loyalty toward a website and more online shopping intentions
(Cyr et al., 2007; Doong et al., 2011; Flaviàn and Guinalìu, 2006) as
well as increased intentions to participate in exchange relation-
ships with online retailers (Palvia, 2009).
Online trust is defined as the conviction that allows consumers
to willingly become exposed to web retailers after having taken
the retailers' characteristics into consideration (Pavlou, 2003). The
importance of trust is further emphasized in an online transaction
n
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 418 656 2131x7940; fax: +1 418 656 2624.
E-mail addresses: elissar.toufaily@fsa.ulaval.ca (E. Toufaily),
nizar.souiden@fsa.ulaval.ca (N. Souiden), riadh.ladhari@fsa.ulaval.ca (R. Ladhari).
1
Tel.: +1 418 656 2131x3513; fax: +1 418 656 2624.
2
Tel.: +1 418 656 2131x5321; fax: +1 418 656 2624.
context (Pavlou and Fygenson, 2006) and is a critical condition for
the success of an online business (Keen et al., 2000).
Because websites act as the store frontage for online retailers
and are considered the essential link with customers (Chen and
Dibb, 2010), the present study examines the role of website
features in the development of online customer trust. A customer's
interaction with a store is, to some extent, similar to his or her
interaction with a website, and consumers develop perceptions of
trust in a website based on their interactions with the site (Bart
et al., 2005). Thus, the study explores the impact of two principal
features of a website, notably its perceived security/privacy and its
perceived social presence, on online trust. Second, this research
explores the impact of online trust on (1) consumers' attitudes
toward the retailer's website and (2) their website recommenda-
tion or word of mouth.
To further enhance our understanding of online trust, this
study also attempts to compare two different types of retailers:
click-and-brick and pure click retailers. Most previous studies on
the type/mode of retailing have focused on the implications of
each retailing channel on the firm's performances. For instance,
Berstein et al. (2008) and Ko and Roztocki (2009) examine how the
financial performance of the firm is influenced by the retailing
model (i.e., offline, online or a mix of both). Generally, no
agreement among researchers is reached since some argue that
click-and-brick lead to higher financial performances, where
others, find no evidence of such an advantage. Similarly, other
researchers (e.g., Yao et al., 2009) attempt to examine the impact
of the retailing mode (offline or online) on the firm's inventory

0969-6989/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001

Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
2 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎
management and the implications of managing the e-channel by
the manufacturer or by a third party. In this present study,
however, the focus is on the consumer side. In particular, we
attempt to investigate the moderating role of the retailer type (i.e.
pure click versus click and brick) on the relationships between
website features and trust. Although research on multichannel has
attracted more attention lately, we believe that there are still gaps
to be filled, especially on the role of social presence within the
multichannel context.
In fact, research is sparse on the moderating effect of the mode
of retailing on the relationships between online trust, on one hand,
and security/privacy and social presence, on the other hand.
Interaction with retail salesperson in stores contributes to building
trust. However, in an online environment, the interaction is
limited to the website functionalities (Gefen and Straub, 2003).
An effective web platform should offer the same characteristics
that a customer service representative would offer, allowing the
customer to, psychologically and socially, feel the presence of
the company's representative. Social presence is manifested when
the medium is perceived to be warm, or conveying a feeling of
human contact, sociability and sensitivity (Cyr et al., 2007).
Keeling et al. (2010) argue that, compared to offline shopping,
Internet shopping provides little opportunity for exchanges and
lacks many of the trust-building guaranties. Moreover, uncertainty
about the outcome (transaction performance) is lower for click-
and-brick retailers than for pure click ones. This led customers to
seriously consider website's security features and privacy state-
ments. Therefore, comparing the two types of retailing in terms of
consumers' perceptions of social presence and security/privacy
and the impact of these variables on consumers' e-trust would
provide managers with useful insights on how to build relation-
ships with customers in the pure online and in the online/offline
environments. This paper contributes to the current knowledge, by
testing whether social presence and security/privacy manifest
different roles in these two different modes of retailing (click
versus click-and-brick).
The remainder of the manuscript is organized as follows: The
first section reviews the role and the dimensions of the trust
construct, discusses the antecedents (social presence and security/
privacy) and consequences (website attitude and recommenda-
tion/WOM) of website trust and addresses the distinction between
“click” and “brick and click” e-retailers. In the same section, the
conceptual model and the hypothesized relationships are also
presented. The second section describes the methodology used to
test the hypothesized relationships. Finally the results are pre-
sented followed by a discussion of the findings and managerial
implications.
2. Literature review
2.1. Role and dimensions of online trust
Since trust is crucial for social and business relationships (Wu
and Tsang, 2008), researchers as well as managers recognize it as a
key ingredient for the success of business transactions. Grabner-
Kräuter and Faullant (2008) state that whether transactions are
conducted in offline or online contexts, trust is always a central
factor to any economic decision. The importance of trust, however,
is further emphasized in an online transaction context (Harridge-
March, 2006) and is a critical condition for the success of an online
business (Keen et al., 2000). Online shopping is more prone to
uncertainty and risks than traditional shopping (Lee and Turban,
2001) and, therefore, the importance of trust in online shopping
cannot be underestimated. Although technological advances have
improved security levels; trust in trading partners is still a major
Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
obstacle in online businesses (Ratnasingham, 1998). Yousafzai
et al. (2005) confirm this view and state that the lack of consumer
trust in the attributes of an online service provider and in the
overall online environment is a broad hurdle for the increase of e-
services (e.g. e-banking). Flaviàn and Guinalìu (2006) state that,
because (i) there is no physical interaction with an online vendor,
(ii) payment is made prior to the delivery of the purchased good or
service, (iii) the received product/service may not be the one that
was ordered, (iv) registering complaints to companies that have no
physical presence is difficult, and (v) reports of hacker attacks are
increasing, consumers may be reluctant to use online transactions.
Yao et al. (2009) add that one of the major reasons of lack of
success for early e-business attempts was the failure of order
fulfillment. Thus, owing to the inherent uncertainty of web-based
services and the nature of the relationships that consumers have
with services providers (i.e., distant and impersonal interactions),
online consumer trust is a critical issue to explore in detail
(Reichheld and Schefter, 2000).
Trust has been conceptualized by previous research in a variety
of ways, both theoretically and operationally (Gefen et al., 2003),
and researchers have long acknowledged the confusion in the field
(e.g. McKnight et al., 2002). According to Rousseau et al. (1998),
“trust is a psychological state comprising the intention to accept
vulnerability based on positive expectations of the intentions or
behaviors of another”. Trust implies a party's willingness to accept
vulnerability but with an expectation or confidence that it can rely
on the other party (Moorman et al., 1992; Morgan and Hunt, 1994).
For the purpose of this study, we focus on online trust. Unlike
offline trust, the object of online trust is the Website, the Internet,
or the technology (Bart et al., 2005). Thus, according to Bart et al.
(2005: 134), “online trust includes consumer perceptions of how
the site would deliver on expectations, how believable the site's
information is, and how much confidence the site commands”.
In term of measures, trust is most commonly studied as a
global, multidimensional construct—encompassing perceptions of
the provider in terms of competence (e.g., perceived skill and
expertise), benevolence, and integrity (e.g. Lewis and Weigert,
1985; Mayer et al., 1995; Moorman et al., 1993; Rempel et al.,
1985). Some authors treat trust as a bi-dimensional construct and
distinguish between credibility and benevolence (Doney and
Cannon, 1997; Ganesan, 1994; McAllister, 1995). This study retains
the same two dimensions proposed by Ganesan and Hess, 1997:
Credibility-based trust and benevolence-based trust. Credibility
perceptions revolve around one's beliefs about the honesty,
dependability and integrity of the other party (Ganesan, 1994).
Benevolence is the belief that the trustee wishes the trustor well,
aside from an egocentric profit motive (Mayer et al., 1995). Walsh
et al. (2010) stipulate that the separation of trust into benevolence
and competence provides a better understanding of its role in
service relationships.
2.1.1. Credibility based trust
According to Ganesan (1994), credibility depends on the
buyer's belief that the supplier has the required expertise to carry
out his role effectively, with competence and reliability. Online
shoppers consider the online retailer as honest and conducting
business according to an acceptable set of principles (Flaviàn and
Guinalìu (2006). Perceived credibility is impersonal and more
related to one's judgment on the security and privacy character-
istics of online retailers. Fassnacht and Köse (2007) state that in
order to gain consumers' trust, online service retailers should not
only design better websites, secure transactions, and protect
consumers’ personal data, but they should also convey the image
of a fair and reliable exchange partner (e.g., communication should
be targeted and credible in order to reduce consumer resistance).
 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎
An online retailer must honor several forms of commitments in
order to increase its online credibility. The risk increases the need
for credibility-based trust in an online context. The virtuality of
products and the unfamiliarity with certain retailers raise the
question of commitment regarding the offer (e.g. actual delivery of
the product, the correspondence of the product to the description).
Protection from fraud and privacy violation is at the forefront of
concerns of the retailer, along with the respect of the information
disclosed by the consumer (personal and financial data) (Bart
et al., 2005). Perception of investment from the retailer and
customer satisfaction with previous outcomes are also a pragmatic
description of perceived retailer credibility (Ganesan, 1994).
2.1.2. Benevolence based trust
Benevolence is defined as the customer’s belief that the
company is interested in his or her welfare (Flaviàn and
Guinalìu, 2006), does not intend to show opportunistic behavior
(Larzelere and Huston, 1980) and is looking for mutual benefit
(Doney and Cannon, 1997). Ganesan (1994) describes benevolence
as one’s perception of the other party being motivated to protect
the best interests of the focal party when new conditions arise for
which no prior commitments were made. Benevolence includes
qualities, intentions, and characteristics attributed to the partner
rather than his specific behaviors (Rempel et al., 1985). Retailers,
who are not only interested in their own outcomes and benefits
but also in those of their customers, tend to be more trusted than
those who are solely interested in their own welfare (Ganesan,
1994). It is important to note that consumers can still develop
benevolence-based trust while their objective credibility (cred-
ibility-based trust) is not fully reached (i.e., less than perfect).
Benevolence applies in the context of repeated buyer–seller
relationships and requires familiarity and prior interaction
between partners (Wang et al., 2003). Hess (1995) shows that
altruism, or the perception that the brand has the consumer’s best
interests at heart, explain the greatest proportion (40%) of variance
in trust. The traditional acceptance of benevolence refers to
supplier acting on the basis of intentions and attentions that are
beneficial to the buyer himself. However, it is difficult for a
customer to conceive that an Internet retailer shows interest for
him in general. In this research, the general conception of
benevolence has been specified as the resolution of problems,
following the conceptualization and measurement of online ben-
evolence described by Gupta et al. (2009).
2.2. Antecedents of online credibility and online benevolence
There is a significant body of related prior research (e.g.
Belanger et al., 2002; Shankar et al., 2002; Yoon, 2002) providing
conceptual and empirical frameworks of antecedents and conse-
quences of online trust from multiple stakeholder perspectives.
According to Johnson (2007), studies distinguish four sets of
online trust antecedents. The first set relates to branding (e.g. Bart
et al., 2005; McKnight et al., 2002), the second set to privacy and
security issues (e.g. Balasubramanian et al., 2003; Gefen et al.,
2003; Pavlou and Gefen, 2004; Yousafzai et al., 2005), the third set
to consumers’ propensity to trust (e.g. McKnight et al., 2002;
Pavlou and Gefen, 2004), and the fourth set to website perfor-
mance (e.g. Bart et al., 2005; McKnight et al., 2002).
Taking some seminal work on trust into consideration, the
present study investigates two principal website features: secur-
ity/privacy and social presence, as essential conditions for the
development of online trust. We have mainly focused on these two
website features due to their potential managerial implications for
retailers. In addition, the principal purpose of this study is to test a
Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
3
parsimonious model of online trust in two different contexts: the
pure click retailers and the click-and-brick ones.
The choice of these features is based on the fact that secure
payments and data privacy on the website are still imperative
concerns for the development of electronic transactions. Even after
two decades of development of this type of transactions, many
customers still seem reluctant to use it. In fact, some websites,
such as transaction-oriented ones, and those with high involve-
ment, entail greater financial risk than other categories of websites
(Bart et al., 2005).
Also, since every relationship has a social dimension, if not
emotional (Luo, 2002), social presence feature of the website has
been chosen in order to investigate its impact on online trust.
According to the theory of social response, people tend to react to
computer technology as though it is a social entity (Nass and Moon,
2000; Reeves and Nass, 1996; Nass et al., 1995). People are more likely
to love technology and computers when they are matched with their
personality (Luo, 2002). Whenever computer technology exhibits
human-like behaviors, such as taking turns in conversation, and
reciprocal responding, the user is more apt to personify the technology
(Holzwarth et al., 2006; Nass et al., 1995). These emotional and social
factors are important determinants for improving customer satisfac-
tion and their commitment to the online company (Bauer et al., 2002).
Company-customer communication in online environment is mainly
text-based, more impersonal, anonymous, automated, and generally
lack face-to-face interactions (Keeling et al., 2010; Gupta et al., 2009).
Therefore, testing the impact of perceived social presence on online
trust in two different types of retailers seems relevant and offers some
insights into the differences of social presence across website types.
2.2.1. Security/privacy
Security/privacy is among the more challenging issues in online
services and the development of e-commerce (Aladwani, 2001;
Chen and Dibb, 2010; Dong-Her et al., 2004). Many studies on
website usage safety and consumer security and privacy protec-
tion have been published (e.g., Chen and Dibb, 2010; Miyazaki and
Krishnamurthy, 2002). Flaviàn and Guinalìu (2006: 604) define
perceived security as “the subjective probability with which
consumers believe that their personal information (private and
monetary) will not be viewed, stored, and manipulated during
transit and storage by inappropriate parties in a manner consistent
with their confident expectations.” Security issues in e-commerce
are related to the abilities of e-merchants to protect their online
transaction systems (Angriawan and Thakur, 2008). Consumers
consider security as an important factor when purchasing goods or
services on the Internet (Belanger et al., 2002). For this reason,
seals of approval, which are perceived as indicators of security by
consumers, have been adopted by many websites and have been
reported to have positive effects on trustworthiness (Bart et al.,
2005). According to Angriawan and Thakur (2008), system secur-
ity perception is a crucial component of online trust.
Privacy, however, is generally defined as the individual’s ability to
control the terms by which his personal information is acquired and
used (Galanxhi-Janaqi and Fui-Hoon Nah, 2004). According to Flaviàn
and Guinalìu (2006), the close relationship between the concepts of
privacy and security exists at three different levels: the consumer level
(there is a close relationship between the two concepts in the minds of
consumers); the company level (companies tend to handle both
concepts jointly); and the public level (the public, including govern-
ment and legislation, views both concepts as closely related). Chen and
Dibb (2010) find that security and privacy assurances, as well as
product information quality, are among the significant website-related
antecedents of online trust. Flaviàn and Guinalìu (2006) confirm that
trust in the Internet is chiefly influenced by the security consumers
perceive with respect to the use of their private data. Thus, online
4 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎
consumer trust may increase by reducing perceived environmental
risks or by improving security (Warrington et al., 2000). Chen and
Dibb (2010) further specify that for users who are unfamiliar with a
website, usability and product information are important factors
affecting trust. However, for those familiar with a website, security
and privacy assurances play the major role in influencing their trust.
Thus, based on these arguments, we propose the following
hypotheses
H1a. Consumers’ perception of website security/privacy has a
positive impact on their perception of the website’s benevolence.
H1b. Consumers’ perception of website security/privacy has a
positive impact on their perception of the website’s credibility.
2.2.2. Social presence
Social presence is “the extent to which a medium allows users to
experience others as being psychologically present” (Gefen and Straub,
2003: 11). Kumar and Benbasat (2002) argue that specific commu-
nication characteristics of website interfaces will invoke feelings of a
social presence, the feeling that the interaction involves real people.
Several website attributes encourage social presence, including rich
text content, pictures, human audio, avatars, virtual communities,
personalized greeting, intelligent agent, videos and message board
(Holzwarth et al., 2006, Cyr et al., 2007; Gefen and Straub, 2004;
Hassanein and Head, 2007). Burke (2002) stipulate that the same
variables that operationalize social ties on traditional commercial
channels, such as human contacts, advice and service, form the same
expectations of the user on a commercial Website. Many studies have
focused on the impact of social presence on the effectiveness of the
website in terms of attractiveness, retention, persuasion and trust (e.g.
Cassell et al., 2000; Cyr et al., 2007; Hassanein et al., 2009), or in terms
of attitude, purchase intention or satisfaction (Holzwarth et al., 2006).
Literature has showed that the use of an interactive animated
character or avatar, playing the social role of an online salesperson,
provides a source of social presence and increases customer trust
(Keeling and McGoldrick, 2008; Keeling et al., 2010). Cyr et al. (2007)
and Wang et al. (2007) have also highlighted a positive link between
the presence of social cues on a website and the perception of hedonic
aspects of the browsing experience.
In this paper, to operationalize social presence, we will focus on the
concept of social presence that refers, according to Gefen and Straub
(2004) and Cyr et al. (2007), to the impression of “being with others”,
“the impression of human contact, sociability, warmth”, to share an
interaction with other entities, to contact them through an online
medium, the Internet. Because human interactions often increase
customer confidence and build trust in offline retailing (Nass and
Moon, 2000), the perception of social presence on a commercial
website influences customer judgments of trustworthiness. The inter-
face social cues replace the trust- building role of the salesperson
(Keeling et al., 2010; Shankar et al., 2002).
Thus, we propose the following hypotheses
H2a. Consumers’ perception of a website’s social presence has a
positive impact on their perception of the website’s benevolence.
H2b. Consumers’ perception of a website’s social presence has a
positive impact on their perception of the website’s credibility.
2.3. Consequences of e-trust
With respect to the role of the two components of trust
(benevolence and credibility), few studies focused on their indivi-
dual impacts. The existing studies report that benevolence posi-
tively stimulates consumers’ emotional commitment toward the
service provider (e.g. Walsh et al., 2010). Other studies argue that
Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
credibility has a positive effect on consumer behavioral intentions
to use online services (Wang et al., 2003). In the present study, we
aim to test the effect of these two components of trust on Website
attitude and Word-of-mouth (WOM).
2.3.1. Website attitude
Attitudes are defined as learned predisposition to respond to an
object, person, issue, or behavior in a favorable or unfavorable way
(Rosenberg, 1960; Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975). Attitudes are ten-
dencies to respond in a particular way, signaling their relationship
with consumer behavior.
The literature suggests that trust and consumer attitudes toward a
website are closely interrelated. Trust (considered as a belief) can
indirectly mediate behaviors through attitudes toward the website
(Chen and Dibb, 2010). This is consistent with both the Theory of
Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1985) and the Theory of Reasoned Action
(Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975), suggesting that beliefs influence attitudes,
which in turn affect behavioral intentions.
Several studies demonstrate the direct influence of trust on
consumer attitudes toward a website and the consequent impact
on behavioral intentions. For instance, Kim et al. (2009) show that
perceived online trust in a website influences consumers’ overall
attitudes toward the use of the website. Since attitude is devel-
oped as people making judgments based on trusting beliefs and
perceptions and because benevolence and credibility are major
components of trust, this study hypothesizes that benevolence and
credibility play a major role in predicting consumer attitudes
toward a retailer’s website. Thus:
H3a. Perceived benevolence exerts a positive impact on attitude
toward a retailer’s website.
H3b. Perceived credibility exerts a positive impact on attitude
toward a retailer’s website.
2.3.2. Word-of-mouth
Word-of-mouth (WOM) is defined by Westbrook (1987: 261) as
“all informal communications directed to other consumers about
the ownership, usage or characteristics of particular goods and
services or their sellers”. Word-of-mouth is important because
consumers prefer to rely on informal and personal communication
sources instead of formal and commercial sources such as adver-
tising (Bansal and Voyer, 2000).
WOM communications can occur face to face, by phone, email,
mailing list, or any other means of communication (Silverman, 2001).
In addition, there are personal and impersonal sources of recommen-
dations that have to be considered. Friends, family, and acquaintances
are personal sources of recommendations recognized as WOM vehi-
cles (Brown and Reingen, 1987; Duhan et al., 1997).
Effectiveness of word-of-mouth has been demonstrated by
several studies to be based on the overwhelming influence that
it has on consumer behavior (Goyette et al., 2010). Researchers
have shown that WOM is strongly and positively related with
customers’ levels of trust (Bergeron et al., 2003), perceived value
(Hartline and Jones, 1996), satisfaction (Athanassopoulos et al.,
2001), service quality (Parasuraman et al., 1988), and customers’
intention to purchase (Crocker, 1986).
In this study, we believe that a favorable attitude toward a
website would lead to favorable WOM about it. As previously
mentioned, most behavioral models trace links from attitude,
through intention, to actual behavior, implying that behavioral
intentions must be understood to predict behavior from attitudes
(Kim and Hunter, 1993). These evidences demonstrate the impor-
tance of consumer attitude in understanding consumer’s word-of-
mouth intention. Therefore, we hypothesize that
 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎
Fig. 1. Conceptual Framework.
H4. Consumers’ website attitude has a significant impact on
their WOM.
2.4. Pure click versus click-and-brick retailers
Online channels are considered as a complement to the offline
ones and a booster of the existing customer relationships (Shankar
et al., 2003). Despite the growing interest in online businesses, several
studies attempted to investigate whether it pays off to go online and
whether online channels have some implications for consumers
(Bernstein et al., 2008). Ko and Roztocki (2009) find that firms using
click-and-brick channels have higher profitability (i.e., financial per-
formance) than brick-and-mortar or pure click companies, and that
pure click firms have higher overall costs. However, Bernstein et al.
(2008) report that click-and-brick model does not necessarily result in
profit increase for the firm. They add that click-and-brick model is
merely a strategic need since most of the benefits are passed along to
consumers who find it more convenient and cheaper (e.g. online
prices are generally lower) to shop from their homes or away from
physical retailers. Hitt and Brynjolfsson (1996) state that information
technology has mainly improved productivity and created value for
consumers and that no evidence was found that these benefits yield
higher business profitability.
Although there is no agreement among researchers that a
multichannel model would improve the firm’s performance, the
impact of such strategy on consumers is likely to be significant.
According to Frazier and Shervani (1992), a multichannel (e.g.,
online and offline) retailer increases the variety of services avail-
able to consumers. Wallace et al. (2004) suggest that with more
services and points of interaction, consumers have more oppor-
tunity to engage with a company, increasing their satisfaction,
trust and company loyalty. Thus, a multichannel company would
increase the opportunity to provide positive customer experiences
because of its varied services and contacts. Wind and Mahajan
(2002) confirm this view by stating that a multichannel company
offers more options and services to clients than a single channel
one. In addition, different customer channels (e.g., search online
and buy offline, or search offline and buy online) improve
satisfaction and increase loyalty (Shankar et al., 2003).
Steinfield et al. (2002) cite four advantages of click-and-brick
retailers over pure click. These are: (1) lower costs due to harmoniza-
tion between physical and virtual channels; (2) improved trust due to
a physical presence in the markets they serve; (3) differentiation
through value-added services; and (4) geographic and product market
extension beyond their traditional physical outlets. Among the few
studies comparing pure click and click-and-brick retailers, Merrilees
and Fry (2003) report that the relationship between interactivity and
Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
5
online trust is similar between both types of retailers. But several
differences may exist between pure click and click-and-brick retailers
due to a retailer’s features (brand image, physical extended presence,
offline trust, etc.). According to Cyr et al. (2007), consumers are likely
to use their experience with click-and-brick retailer physical channels
to infer the characteristics and feature of its online operations
Because of the non-physical presence of the company, we
anticipate that the impact of perceived security/privacy and per-
ceived social presence on benevolence and credibility will be more
important in the case of pure click retailers than for click-and-brick
retailers. This is probably because consumers have less “tangible”
information about pure click retailers than click-and-brick ones. In
the case of click-and brick, the physical (offline) presence of the
retailer may enhance the customer online trust (Stewart, 2003) and
consumers may use their offline experience with the retailer’
physical store to build trust toward the same retailer online
operations (Kuan and Bock, 2007). Moreover, the uncertainty about
the outcome (performance of the transaction) is lower for click-
and-brick retailers than pure click ones. Customers are expected to
consider more seriously the website security features and privacy
statements in the case of pure click retailers. Also, due to the lack of
physical presence of pure click retailers, their online social presence
appears to be an essential element in boosting consumers’ website
trust. Therefore, we propose that the role of perceived security/
privacy and perceived social presence in developing consumer
website trust is more vital in the case of a pure click retailer.
By investigating the moderating role of pure click and click-and
brick contexts in the relationships between (i) perceived security/
privacy and benevolence, (ii) perceived security/privacy and cred-
ibility, (iii) perceived social presence and benevolence, and (iv)
perceived social presence and credibility, we can better under-
stand these relationships. Thus, we postulate:
H5a. Perceived security/privacy has less significant effect on
benevolence for click-and-brick retailers compared to pure click
retailers.
H5b. Perceived security/privacy has less significant effect on
credibility for click-and-brick retailers compared to pure click
retailers.
H6a. Perceived social presence has less significant effect on
benevolence for click-and-brick retailers compared to pure click
retailers.
H6b. Perceived social presence has less significant effect on
credibility for click-and-brick retailers compared to pure click
retailers.
6 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎

Table 1
Measurement scales.

Constructs and indicators Cronbach's St. Composite Convergence

alpha loading reliability index

α λ ρ AVEa

Security/Privacy
I am reassured by the payment security on this website 0.89 0.85 0.89 0.73
I believe that my personal and financial data are well-protected on this website 0.86
I believe that this website guarantees the privacy of my transactions 0.86

Social presence
I feel a sense of human contact on this website 0.94 0.92 0.96 0.84
I feel a sense of sociability on this website 0.91
I feel a sense of human warmth on this website 0.92

Credibility
I believe this website is an expert in his field 0.92 0.89 0.90 0.70
I can count on this website to complete my transactions in the promised time delay 0.81
I know what to expect from this website 0.77
This website respects its engagements in terms of rates and prices posted 0.89
I believe the promised service or the product delivered corresponds to the description presented on 0.82
the website

Benevolence
I think this website will be prepared to solve my problems 0.91 0.90 0.89 0.76
In case of problems, I think it is easy to lodge a complaint on this website 0.86
In case of problems, I think this website would make all the necessary efforts to solve them 0.88

Website's attitude
My overall opinion on this website is very favorable 0.94 0.94 0.88
This website leaves a very good impression to its visitors 0.94

a
Average Variance Extracted (AVE) for each construct (Fornell and Larcker, 1981).

Fig. 1 shows the theoretical framework of our research, illus-
trating the proposed relationships/hypotheses:
3. Methodology
3.1. Procedure and sample
An online survey was administered to respondents with online
purchase experience (e.g., books, CDs, DVDs, etc.). Data were gathered
by Easy Panel, an online French company specializing in online
marketing research. Easy Panel has an online Access Panel of approxi-
mately 120,000 Internet users, with a response rate of 20 to 30%.
According to Comley (2007), online panels are increasingly being used
as a mode of data collection for market research.
A sample of respondents, drawn randomly from the company’s
online panel, was invited by e-mail to participate in the 15-min
survey. The sample included consumers who made a purchase
from one of five online vendors in the past six months: Pricemin-
ister, La redoute, Amazon, FNAC and C-Discount. A total of 1152
consumers answered the survey, and 163 questionnaires were
eliminated from the analysis due to missing data. Therefore 989
questionnaires constituted the final sample for analysis. The
sample consisted of 51% of men and 49% of women. Respondents’
age varied between 18 and 83 years with an average age of 40
years. Of the sample, 69.6% were living with a partner or a spouse.
More than a half of respondents (52%) were employees in public or
private institutions and 22% were merchants or entrepreneurs.
3.2. Measurement
Measures were adopted or derived from previous studies on
online shopping for consistency. The dimensions of trust, cred-
ibility and benevolence, were measured by six and four items
respectively. All items measuring trust components were derived
from Hess (1995), Gefen and Straub (2004) and Gurviez and
Korchia (2002). Three items were used to measure security/
privacy and were adapted from Loiacono et al. (2007) and
McKnight et al. (2002). A three-item scale based on Cyr et al.
(2007) was used to assess perceived social presence. Finally, two
items for website attitude were adapted from Rose and Straub
(2001) and a single item was used to measure word-of-mouth (“I
would highly recommend this website to my friends and
family”).
A 10-point scale format ranging from (1) “strongly disagree” to
(10) “strongly agree” was used for all measures to maximize
respondent specificity. Some researchers (e.g. Nunnally, 1978)
claim that a ten point scale is intuitive to respondents because of
the familiarity they have with this rating system and is a
standard that is being adopted by many of the world’s leading
companies.
4. Analysis and results
4.1. Preliminary analysis
In order to assess the dimensionality of each construct scale
and its reliability, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using the
principal components method and Varimax Rotation, coupled
with reliability analysis, were performed on the list of 19 items
measuring all the constructs. Items with factor loadings less than
the absolute value of 0.50 on all factors were eliminated (Hair
et al., 2010). The internal consistency of the measures was tested
by calculating Cronbach’s alpha for each construct, where an alpha
value of 0.7 or above was considered satisfactory (Hair et al., 2010;
Nunnally, 1978).
The EFA results led to the elimination of two items, leaving a
final pool of 17 items. To confirm these preliminary results and test
the measurement model, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was
conducted using AMOS 17.0 and the maximum likelihood
estimation.

Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎ 7

4.2. Measurement model
Confirmatory factor analysis was first conducted to assess the
adequacy of the measurement model. The value of χ2 is 399.997
with 105 degrees of freedom. The Normed-fit index (NFI¼0.98)
and the Comparative-fit-index (CFI¼0.98) are above the recom-
mended cutoff of 0.95 (Bentler, 2005), which reflects a good fit of
the model to empirical data. Finally, the root mean square error of
approximation (RMSEA ¼ 0.053) is smaller than the cutoff value of
0.08 (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988; Hu and Bentler, 1999). The fit indexes
of the measurement model are all satisfactory, indicating that the
fit of the empirical data to the hypothesized model is adequate.
Table 1 shows that the values of Cronbach’s alpha (α) and the
composite reliability (ρ) vary between 0.89 and 0.96, and are
greater than 0.70, the value recommended by Nunnally (1978) and
Fornell and Larcker (1981).
Following Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) approach, convergent
validity was assessed. The factors loadings (λ) are all above 0.70
and the convergence AVE index (average variance extracted) is
higher than 0.50, the cutoff value, meeting the authors’ recom-
mendations. These results support the convergent validity of each
of the constructs involved in the research model of this study.
The discriminant validity is assessed by comparing the squared
correlations between each pair of constructs with the indicator of
average variance extracted (AVE) of each construct (Fornell and
Larcker, 1981). Table 2 shows that the squared correlation between
each two constructs combination is less than the average variance
extracted by the constructs, supporting the discriminant validity.
4.3. Structural model and hypotheses testing
The hypothesized relationships in the proposed research model
were simultaneously tested via path analysis, and Fig. 2 shows the
Table 2
Discriminant validity—inter-correlation matrix.a
1 2 3 4 5 6
results. The structural model fits the data adequately: χ2 ¼607.28,
df¼112, NFI ¼0.96, CFI ¼0.97, and RMSEA ¼ 0.067.
Results show that consumer perceptions of a website’s secur-
ity/privacy has a significant and positive impact on their percep-
tion of a website’s benevolence (ß ¼0.61, t¼ 21.60), and their
perception of a website’s credibility (ß ¼0.86, t¼ 27.96). Thus,
Hypotheses H1.a and H1.b are supported. The perception of a
website’s social presence was also found to have a significant
and positive impact on consumer perceptions of a website’s
benevolence (ß ¼0.40, t¼ 16.10), and credibility (ß ¼0.10, t¼4.3).
Thus, Hypotheses H2.a and H2.b are validated. It should be noted
that security/privacy and social presence together explain 75% of
the total variance of a website’s credibility and 53% of its
benevolence.
Hypotheses H3.a and H3.b are also supported since the results
indicate that the credibility of a website (ß ¼0.56, t ¼15.81) and its
benevolence (ß ¼0.33, t ¼9.63) exert a significant and positive
effect on overall attitude toward the website. The two dimensions
of online trust explain 42% of the total variance of attitude toward
a website, confirming that beliefs affect the attitude toward an
object (i.e., the website, in this study) (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975).
Finally, attitude toward a website has a strong positive and
significant impact on word-of-mouth (ß ¼0.93, t ¼55.68), explain-
ing alone 86% of the variance of WOM. H4 is supported.
Based on the recommendations of Baron and Kenny (1986) and
Zhao et al. (2010), an alternative structural model, adding the
direct effect of benevolence and credibility on WOM, was tested to
investigate whether or not website attitude plays a full or a partial
mediation role. The results showed that the model fit well the data
(χ2 ¼ 604.59/df¼110, NFI ¼0.96, CFI ¼0.97, RMSEA ¼0.067), how-
ever WOM is not directly influenced by benevolence (ß ¼−0.046,
t¼−1.76) and credibility (ß ¼0.031, t ¼1.06). Thus, website attitude
plays a full mediation role between online trust (i.e., benevolence
and credibility) and WOM. The results support the rejection of the
alternative model and suggest that online benevolence and online
credibility have an indirect effect on WOM through website
attitude, supporting the conceptualization of our model.

1. Security/privacy 0.73
2. Social presence 0.21 0.84 4.4. Moderation effect of the retailer’s type
3. Credibility 0.69 0.18 0.69
4. Benevolence 0.56 0.45 0.60 0.77 Before testing the remaining hypotheses, splitting the data into
5. Website attitude 0.49 0.37 0.62 0.59 0.88 two groups (i.e., pure click and click-and brick) was necessary.
6. Word of mouth 0.42 0.20 0.55 0.49 0.74 0.90
Table 3 presents the descriptive statistics of each of the constructs
a
Average variance extracted on the diagonal and squared correlations between as well as t-tests analysis between pure click retailers and click
constructs off diagonal. and-brick ones.

Fig. 2. Results of the causal model.

Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
8 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎

To test Hypotheses H5.a, H5.b, H6.a and H6.b, it was essential to
establish the cross validity of the proposed model between the
pure click and the click-and-brick contexts. In addition to fit
indices (χ2/df, RMSEA, NFI, and CFI), the sequential chi-squared
difference tests (SCDT) was used to compare successively con-
strained models in the assessment (Anderson and Gerbing, 1988).
First, the model was estimated independently for each data set
(pure click and then click-and-brick). The results showed that the
model fit the data well for each of the two groups (see Table 4).
Second, configural invariance among the two groups was assessed.
The results showed that the reported fit indices of χ2/df, RMSEA,
NFI and CFI fulfill the respective benchmarks (Bagozzi and Yi,
1988). Following this, the metric invariance was verified. The
results indicated that full metric invariance was not well estab-
lished. Indeed, the model was found to be more appropriate when
one item (social presence 3) of the latent variable social presence
was allowed to vary for the two groups. After releasing it and re-
evaluating the model, the results yielded satisfactory test statistics
with χ2/df of 3.64, NFI of 0.958, CFI of 0.964, RMSEA of 0.052, and a
SCDT of 0.097 (40.05). Thus, the partial metric invariance was
achieved for the model.
Next, the structural invariance of the model across the two sets
of data was tested. Though the results showed adequate test
statistics, the SCDT was not above 0.05, indicating that the
constrained model did not fit as well as the partial measurement
model. In order to identify which of the paths caused the
structural difference, the structural invariance of each individual
structural path was assessed (Chun and Davies, 2006). This test
recommended that releasing the path from social presence to
benevolence could enhance the model fit. This was done and the
fit reevaluated. The result is an adequate fit on all indices and the
SCDT was 0.18. Thus, the structure of the final model was partially
invariant across the two data sets.
A look at the regression coefficients (see Table 5) confirmed that
the impacts of perceived security/privacy on benevolence (b¼0.742,
t¼ 22.460) and credibility (b¼0.866, t¼26.143) do not vary across
the two types of retailers (i.e., pure click and click-and-brick).
Therefore, H5.a and H5.b are rejected. Similarly, no difference was
found in the effect of perceived social presence on credibility
(b¼0.068, t¼3.992) between pure click and click-and-brick retai-
lers. Thus, Hypothesis H6.b is also rejected. However, perceived
social presence was found to have less impact on benevolence in
the click-and-brick context (b¼0.308; t¼ 11.089) than in the pure
click context (b¼ 0.387, t¼ 13.669), indicating that H6.a is accepted.
5. Discussion
This study highlights the importance of nurturing consumer
trust in the context of e-commerce. The results show that
Table 3
T-test comparison between pure click and click-and-brick.
perceived website social presence and perceived security/privacy
exert significant and positive impacts on two separate dimensions
of e-trust, credibility and benevolence, which in turn directly
influence website attitudes and indirectly (via website attitudes)
influence WOM. The results of this study confirm previous
established findings of Johnson (2007) that, because consumers
are concerned with possible violation of their security/privacy
when making online transactions, firms should reassure online
users of a secure Internet environment. Also, the study supports
Chen and Dibb’s (2010) finding that the features of a website (e.g.,
usability, security and privacy assurances and product information
quality) have a significant and positive impact on user online trust.
Our results also emphasize the importance of social presence for
building online trust. The use of social cues on a website provides a
source of lively social presence and increases customer trust (Wood
et al., 2005; Keeling and McGoldrick, 2008; Hess et al., 2009). Keeling
et al. (2010), and Gefen and Straub (2004) as well as Cyr et al. (2007)
show that perceived social presence of a website increases custo-
mers’ online trust. Because of the impersonal nature of electronic
shopping and the lack of human interaction and sociability, online
shopping experiences tend to be more neutral, anonymous and
detached from emotions. To approximate face-to-face interaction
and address this lack of personal contact, companies must embed
their websites with cues that reflect a social and personal presence.
Indeed, the higher the perception of social cues and social presence
on a website, the higher the level of trust for the website. Although
many researchers have tried to build online consumer trust by
displaying a sense of social presence (e.g., Hess et al., 2009; Keeling
et al., 2010), very few have done so while taking into account each
dimension of trust separately. The present study, however, shows
that perceived social presence has more impact on benevolence
(ß¼0.40) than on credibility (ß¼ 0.10), indicating that the more
customers perceive a website as warm, sociable and personal, the
more they feel that, in case of problems, the company behind the
website will make all necessary efforts to resolve the problems,
increasing the perceived benevolence.
As previous research reports (e.g. Chen and Dibb, 2010; Kim et al.,
2009), the current study also demonstrates that perceived online
benevolence and perceived online credibility are positively associated
with attitude toward a website. Website attitude is also found to
affect customer WOM. Both online benevolence and online cred-
ibility influence WOM via website attitude. This implies that custo-
mers who believe that the online retailer is sincere, honest, keeps its
promises, and considers the welfare of customers, will have a
favorable attitude toward the website of this retailer and conse-
quently the intention to recommend it to friends and family.
The results of the multi-group analysis show that the major
difference between pure click and click-and-brick retailers is the
role of social presence in developing online benevolence. It seems
that a perceived higher level of social presence enhances more
benevolence in the case of pure virtual retailers versus retailers
with a virtual and physical presence. This result supports the
importance of social cues in the context of online environments.

Construct Type of presence N Mean (s) t (sig. 2-tailed)

Security/privacy Click 600 7.52 (1.6) −1.82 (0.07)n 6. Managerial implications

Click and brick 389 7.72 (1.7)
Social presence Click 600 5.62 (2.1) −1.01 (0.31) A firm’s success in online businesses depends largely on how it
Click and brick 389 5.79 (2.0)
develops and reinforces e-consumer trust. Despite the growth of
Credibility Click 600 7.62 (1.6) −1.32 (0.18)
Click and brick 389 7.77 (1.7) the Internet during the last 15 years and its widespread use in
Benevolence Click 600 6.68 (2.0) −3.52 (0.00)nn e-retailing, this study shows that perceptions of security/privacy
Click and brick 389 7.13 (1.8) still have a significant impact on e-trust. Security/privacy is an
Website attitude Click 600 7.22 (1.7) −0.81 (0.42) important issue for both pure click and click-and-brick companies.
Click and brick 389 7.32 (1.7)
Managers in the retail industry can assure customers of
n
Sig at 10%. security and privacy by providing a privacy statement and infor-
nn
Sig at 5%. mation about the security of the shopping process. Online retailers

Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎ 9

Table 4
Results for the cross-group analysis: pure click versus click and brick.

Chi2 df Chi2/df RMSEA GFI NFI TLI CFI Diff chi2 Action

Click 473.336 112 4.226 0.073 0.915 0.954 0.957 0.964

Click and brick 362.300 112 3.235 0.076 0.902 0.948 0.956 0.964
Configural invariance 835.667 224 3.731 0.053 0.910 0.952 0.956 0.964
Full metric invariance 855.383 235 3.640 0.052 0.908 0.951 0.958 0.964 0.049 Free item social presence 3
Partial metric invariance 851.745 234 3.640 0.052 0.908 0.951 0.958 0.964 0.097
Full structural invariance 877.815 241 3.642 0.052 0.904 0.949 0.958 0.963 0.05 Free social presence on benevolence
Partial structural invariance 872.827 240 3.637 0.052 0.904 0.950 0.958 0.963 0.18

Table 5 explained by the physical social presence of the former. To

Regression results for the cross-group analysis: pure click versus click and brick. improve online trust, click-and-brick retailers can take advantage
of their physical presence (i.e., physical channel) by offering online
Click Click-and-brick
consumers the possibility to pick up and pay for online purchases
b t p b t p in stores. Customers can also be provided with the option of
reserving the product online, going to a physical store to try the
Social presence-Benevolence 0.387 13.669 *** 0.308 11.089 ***
product, and then determining whether or not to complete the
Social presence-Credibility 0.068 3.992 *** 0.068 3.992 ***
Security-Credibility 0.886 26.143 *** 0.886 26.143 ***
online transaction at the physical store. Multichannel retailers
Security-Benevolence 0.742 22.460 *** 0.742 22.460 *** should also focus on developing cross-channel customer services
Benevolence-Attitude 0.287 9.892 *** 0.287 9.892 *** designed to increase customers’ online trust.
Credibility-Attitude 0.579 15.975 *** 0.579 15.975 *** With respect to the impact of security/privacy on benevolence
and on credibility, the present study did not find a difference
* Significant at p level o 0.001.
between pure click and click-and-brick retailers. This implies that,
from the customer’s perspective, security/privacy has the same
should always post their privacy policies on their websites to importance in building online trust for both types of retailers.
demonstrate their vigilance in preventing manipulation of private
information and online fraud. They can thus improve perceived
credibility and benevolence as well as customers' willingness to 7. Conclusion and limitations
share personal information. The use of methods such as digital
signatures, encryption mechanisms, and authorization function- This study argues that perceived website social presence and
ality could relieve customer security concerns regarding online security/privacy both have a strong impact on e-trust, which in
transactions. turn directly influences website attitudes and indirectly (via
The results of the present study are, we believe, valuable for website attitudes) WOM. Based on a panel of 989 French Internet
virtual retailers. Indeed, to replace face-to-face interactions, which shoppers from five e-retailers, the study confirms the model’s
are almost absent in the virtual environment, pure online busi- hypothesized relationships in two business contexts: pure click
nesses should focus on improving their social presence on the and click-and-brick retailers.
Web by humanizing and infusing social cues through the Web The study finds that one of the principal differences between
interface. Certain features may increase the social presence of the pure click and click-and-brick retailers is the role of social
website and should be incorporated when designing websites for presence in developing e-trust since a perceived higher level of
pure click retailers. A human audio and video, virtual commu- social presence enhances e-trust in the case of pure click retailers.
nities, chat requests with sales representative, rich text content Social presence, however, has less impact on e-trust in the case of
and pictures, all may result in an increased perceived benevolence click-and-brick retailers, who should take advantage of their
and credibility of the e-vendor, thus enhancing favorable attitudes offline social presence. This conclusion agrees with Stewart's
and WOM. This can help bring the virtual interaction closer to the (2003) that retailers' offline presence could simulate online trust.
face-to-face communication found in traditional shopping envir- Kuan and Bock (2007) also suggest that offline trust has a positive
onments, leading to a better online experience and, ultimately, impact on online trust.
greater online trust. The present study has some limitations. First, it examines well-
To increase customers trust and electronic WOM, online retailers known pure click and click-and-brick retailers. The role of social
should focus on building a responsive personal Web presence. For presence might be better examined if lesser known retailers were also
instance, having an intelligent interface can make online shoppers included. Second, this study does not consider familiarity with a
feel they are ‘virtually’ assisted by the retailer and may increase website or the number of previous online purchases from these
their trust. Keeling et al. (2010) propose to integrate an interactive websites. Future researchers should consider these two variables as
animated character or avatar on the website playing the social role possible moderators of the relationships between the constructs in the
of an online sales assistant to provide a potent source of social model. Also, additional consequences (e.g., loyalty and repeat pur-
presence and hence enhance customer online trust. chase) of e-trust could be added to the model for a richer under-
Online retailers should also build credibility and benevolence standing of online consumer behaviors. In terms of measurement,
around their websites to enhance WOM and customers' positive future studies should consider website attitude as a multidimensional
recommendations. Customers' intentions to talk favorably about a construct which encompasses cognitive, affective and conative dimen-
website are affected directly by their website attitude and indir- sions. Thus, future research are needed to test the influence of online
ectly by their beliefs regarding the credibility and benevolence of trust on each of these website’s attitude dimensions.
the retailer. Further studies should also focus on respondents' background
Social presence seems to have less importance in the case of factors, such as purchase behavior in click and click-and-brick
click-and-brick retailers compared to pure click retailers, partially stores. Finally, customer relationship with retailers (frequency of

Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
10 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎
contact and purchases) could be used as a moderator variable to
better understand the development of online trust.
Last but not least, click and click-and-brick classification is
limited considering the multichannel nature of today’s firm
channel mix strategy such as telephone call centers, catalogs and
different forms of online shopping such as mobile and tablet
shopping, and social media applications. Future studies should
consider these diverse options to capture the variation in online
customer trust among these different channels.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the generous participation of Chris-
tian Barbaray, CEO of INIT Marketing, and his consulting company
http://www.init-marketing.fr/ in gathering the data from French
consumers.
References
Angriawan, Arifin, Thakur, Ramendra, 2008. A parsimonious model of the ante-
cedents and consequence of online trust: an uncertainty perspective. Journal of
Internet Commerce 7 (1), 74–94.
Ajzen, I., 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Julius,
K., Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, p. 11.
Aladwani, A.M., 2001. Online banking: a field study of drivers, development
challenges, and expectations. International Journal of Information Management
21 (3), 213–225.
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: a
review and recommended two stage approach. Psychological Bulletin 27 (1),
5–24.
Athanassopoulos, A., Gounaris, S., Stathakopoulos, V., 2001. Behavioural responses
to customer satisfaction: an empirical study. European Journal of Marketing 35
(5/6), 687–707.
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of
the Academy of Marketing Science 16, 74–94.
Balasubramanian, S., Konana, P., Menon, N.M., 2003. Customer satisfaction in virtual
environments: A study of online investing. Management Science 49, 871–889.
Bansal, H.S., Voyer, P.A., 2000. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase
decision context. Journal of Service Research 3 (2), 166–177.
Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considera-
tions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–1182.
Bart, I.Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., Urban, G., 2005. Are the drivers and role of online
trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory
empirical study. Journal of Marketing 69 (4), 133–152.
Bauer, H.H., Grether, M., Leach, M., 2002. Customer relations through the Internet.
Journal of Relationship Marketing 1, 39–55.
Belanger, F., Hiller, J.S., Smith, W.J., 2002. Trustworthiness in electronic commerce:
The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. Journal of Strategic Information
Systems 11, 245–270.
Bentler, P.M., 2005. Latent growth curves. In: Werner, J. (Ed.), Zeitreihenanalysen.
Logos, Berlin, pp. 13–36.
Bergeron, J., Ricard, L., Perrien, J., 2003. Les determinants de la fidélité des clients
commerciaux dans l'industrie bancaire canadienne. Canadian Journal of Admin-
istrative Sciences 20 (2), 107–120.
Bernstein, F., Song, J.-S., Zheng, X., 2008. Bricks-and-mortar vs. clicks-and-mortar:
an equilibrium analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 187 (3),
671–690.
Brown, J.J., Reingen, P.H., 1987. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior.
Journal of Consumer Research 14 (3), 350–362.
Burke, R.R., 2002. Technology and the customer interface: what consumers want in
the physical and virtual store. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30
(4), 411–432.
Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Campbell, L., Vilhjálmsson, H., Yan, H., 2000. Human
conversation as a system framework: Designing embodied conversational
agents. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (Eds.), Embodied
conversational agents (pp. 29-63). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chen, J., Dibb, S., 2010. Consumer trust in the online retail context: Exploring the
antecedents and consequences. Psychology and Marketing 27 (4), 323–346.
Chun, R., Davies, G., 2006. The influence of corporate character on customers and
employees: exploring similarities and differences. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science 34 (2), 138–146.
Comley, P., 2007. Online market research. In: ESOMAR (Ed.), Market Research
Handbook. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 401–420.
Crocker, K.E., 1986. The influence of the amount and type of information on
individuals' perception of legal services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science 14 (4), 18–27.
Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M., Ivanov, A., 2007. The role of social presence in
establishing loyalty in e-service environments. Interacting with Computers 29
(1), 43–56.
Doney, P.M., Cannon, J.P., 1997. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–
seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 61, 35–51.
Dong-Her, S., Hsiu-Sen, C., Chun-Yuan, C., Lin, B., 2004. Internet security: Malicious
e-mails detection and protection. Industrial Management & Data Systems 104
(7), 613–623.
Doong, H.S., Wang, H.C., Foxall, G.R., 2011. An investigation of consumers' webstore
shopping: a view of click-and-mortar company. International Journal of
Information Management 31 (3), 210–216.
Duhan, D.F., Johnson, S.D., Wilcox, J.B., Harrell, G.D., 1997. Influences on consumer
use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science 25 (4), 283–295.
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduc-
tion to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Flaviàn, C., Guinalìu, M., 2006. Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy
policy: three basic elements of loyalty to a web site. Industrial Management
and Data Systems 106 (5), 601–620.
Fassnacht, M., Köse, I., 2007. Consequences of web-based service quality: Uncovering a
multi-faceted chain of effects. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21 (3), 35–54.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unob-
servable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18,
39–50.
Frazier, G.L., Shervani., T.A., 1992. Multiple channels of distribution and their impact
on retailing. In: Peterson, R.A. (Ed.), The Future of U.S. Retailing: An Agenda for
the 21st Century. Quorum Books, New York, pp. 217–238.
Galanxhi-Janaqi, H., Fui-Hoon Nah, F., 2004. U-commerce: emerging trends and
research issues. Industrial Management & Data Systems 104 (8/9), 744–755.
Ganesan, S., 1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer–seller relation-
ship. Journal of Marketing 58 (2), 1–19.
Ganesan, S, Hess, R.L., 1997. Dimensions and levels of trust: Implications for
commitment to a relationship. Marketing Letters 8 (4), 439–448.
Gefen, D., 2000. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. The International
Journal of Management Science 28 (6), 725–737.
Gefen, D, Straub, D.W., 2003. Managing user trust in B2C e-services. e-Service
Journal 2 (2), 7–24.
Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., 2004. Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the
importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services.
Omega 32 (6), 407–424.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an
integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27 (1), 51–90.
Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., Marticotte, F., 2010. E-WOM scale: Word of mouth
measurement scale for e-services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative
Science 27, 5–23.
Grabner-Kräuter, S., Kaluscha, E.A., 2003. Empirical studies in online trust: A review
and critical assessment. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 58
(6), 783–812.
Grabner-Kräuter, S., Faullant, R., 2008. Consumer acceptance of internet banking:
The influence of internet trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing 26 (7),
483–504.
Gupta, P., Yadav, M.S., Varadarajan, R., 2009. A process view of trust development in
the electronic marketplace. Journal of Retailing 85 (2), 159–176.
Gurviez, P., Korchia, M., 2002. Proposition d’une échelle de mesure multidimen-
sionnelle de la confiance dans la marque. Recherche et Applications en
Marketing 17 (3), 41–62.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A
Global Perspective. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hartline, M.D., Jones, K.C., 1996. Employee performance cues in a hotel service
environment: influence on perceived service quality, value and word-of-mouth
intentions. Journal of Business Research 35, 207–215.
Harridge-March, S., 2006. Can the building of trust overcome consumer perceived
risk online. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 24 (7), 746–761.
Hassanein, K., Head, M., 2007. The impact of infusing social presence in the web
interface: an investigation across different products. International Journal of
Electronic Commerce 10 (2), 31–55.
Hassanein, K., Head, M., Ju, C., 2009. A cross-cultural comparison of the impact of
social presence on website trust, usefulness and enjoyment. International
Journal of Electronic Business 7 (6), 625–641.
Hess J., 1995. Construction and Assessment of a Scale to Measure Consumer Trust.
In: Stern B.B., Zinkhan G.M. (Eds.). AMA Educators' Conference, Enhancing
Knowledge Development in Marketing, vol. 6, pp. 20–25.
Hess, T., Fuller, M., Campbell, D., 2009. Designing interfaces with social presence:
Using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents.
Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (12), 889–919.
Hitt, L.M., Brynjolfsson, E., 1996. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer
surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS
Quarterly, 121–142.
Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., Neumann, M.M., 2006. The influence of avatars on
online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing 70 (4), 19–36.
Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation
Modeling 6, 1–55.
Johnson, D.S., 2007. Achieving customer value from electronic channels through
identity commitment, calculative commitment, and trust in technology. Journal
of Interactive Marketing 21 (4), 2–22.
 E. Toufaily et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎
Keen, P., Balance, C., Chan, S., Schrump, S., 2000. Electronic Commerce Relation-
ships: Trust by Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Kim, H.B., Kim, T., Shin, S.W., 2009. Modeling roles of subjective norms and eTrust
in customers' acceptance of airline B2C eCommerce websites. Tourism Manage-
ment 30, 266–277.
Kim, M., Hunter, J., 1993. Attitude-behavior relations: A meta-analysis of attitudinal
relevance and topic. Journal of Communication 43, 101–142.
Ko, M., Roztocki, N., 2009. Investigating the impact of firm strategy—click-and-
brick, brick-and-mortar, and pure-click—on financial performance. Journal of
Information Technology Theory and Application 10 (2), 4–18.
Kuan, H.H., Bock, G.W., 2007. Trust transference in brick and click retailers: an
investigation of the before-online-visit phase. Information & Management 44
(2), 175–187.
Kumar, N., Benbasat, I., 2002. Para-social presence and communication capabilities
of a Web site: a theoretical perspective. e-Service Journal 1 (3), 5–24.
Keeling, K.A., McGoldrick, P.J., Beatty, S.F., 2010. Avatars as salespeople: commu-
nication style, trust, and intentions. Journal of Business Research 63, 793–800.
Keeling, K., McGoldrick, P., 2008. Relationship with a byte? Attractions, interaction
and intention for Avatar use a retail website. Advances in Consumer Research
35, 84–89.
Larzelere, R., Huston, T., 1980. The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding
interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family
42 (3), 595–604.
Lee, M.K.O., Turban, E., 2001. A trust model for consumer internet shopping.
International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6 (1), 75–91.
Lewis, J.D., Weigert, A., 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63, 967–985.
Loiacono, E.T., Watson, R.T., Goodhue, D.L., 2007. WebQual: An instrument for
consumer evaluation of web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce
11 (3), 51–87.
Luo, X., 2002. Trust production and privacy concerns on the Internet. a framework
based on relationship marketing and social exchange theory. Industrial Market-
ing Management 31, 111–118.
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, D.F., 1995. An integrative model of organiza-
tional trust. Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 709–734.
McAllister, J.D., 1995. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for inter-
personal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal 38
(1), 24–59.
McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.C., 2002. The impact of initial consumer
trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. Journal
of Strategic Information Systems 11 (3), 297–323.
Merrilees, B., Fry, M.L., 2003. E-trust: the influence of perceived interactivity on e-
retailing users. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 21 (2), 123–128.
Miyazaki, A.D., Krishnamurthy, S., 2002. Internet seals of approval: Effects on online
privacy policies and consumer perceptions. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 36,
28–49.
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., Deshpande, R., 1992. Relationships between providers
and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between
organizations. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 314–328.
Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., Zaltman, G., 1993. Factors affecting trust in market
research relationships. Journal of Marketing 57, 81–102.
Morgan, RM., Hunt, S.D., 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship
marketing. Journal of Marketing 58, 20–38.
Nass, C., Moon, Y., 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to compu-
ters. Journal of Social 56 (1), 81–103.
Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B.J., Reeves, B., Dryer, D.C., 1995. Can computer personal-
ities be human personalities? International Journal of Human–Computer
Studies 43, 223–239.
Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., 1988. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale
for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64
(1), 12–40.
Palvia, P., 2009. The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: A unified
model. Information & Management 46 (4), 213–220.
Pavlou, P.A., 2003. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust
and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of
Electronic Commerce 7 (3), 101–134.
Please cite this article as: Toufaily, E., et al., Consumer trust toward retail websites: Comparison between pure click and click-and-
brick retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001i
11
Pavlou, P.A., Fygenson, M., 2006. Understanding and predicting electronic com-
merce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly
30 (1), 115–143.
Pavlou, P.A., Gefen, D., 2004. Building effective online marketplaces with
institution-based trust. Information Systems Research 15, 37–59.
Ratnasingham, P., 1998. The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet
Research 18 (4), 313–321.
Reeves, B., Nass, C.I., 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers,
Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University
Press, Stanford, CA.
Reichheld, F.F., Schefter, P., 2000. E-loyalty: Your secret weapon on the web.
Harvard Business Review 78 (4), 105–115.
Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G., Zanna, M.P., 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology 49, 95–112.
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, M., Burt, R., Camerer, C., 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-
discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 23 (3), 393–404.
Rose, G., Straub, D., 2001. The effect of download time on consumer attitude toward
the e-service retailer. e-Service Journal 1 (1), 55–76.
Rosenberg, M.H., 1960. Attitude Organization and Change. Yale University Press,
New Haven.
Shankar, V., Urban, G.L., Sultan, F., 2002. Online trust: a stakeholder perspective,
concepts, implications and future directions. Journal of Strategic Information
Systems 11, 325–344.
Shankar, V., Smith, A.K., Rangaswamy, A., 2003. The relationship between customer
satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International
Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (2), 153–175.
Silverman, G., 2001. The power of word of mouth. Direct Marketing 64 (5), 47.
Steinfield, C., Bouwman, H., Adelaar, T., 2002. The dynamics of click and mortar
e-commerce: Opportunities and management strategies. International Journal
of Electronic Commerce 7 (1), 93–119.
Stewart, K.J., 2003. Trust transfer on the world wide web. Organization Science 14
(1), 5–17.
Wallace, D.W., Giese, J.L., Johnson, J.L., 2004. Customer retailer loyalty in the context
of multiple channel strategies. Journal of Retailing 80 (4), 249–263.
Walsh, G., Hennig-Thurau, T., Sassenberg, K., Bornemann, D., 2010. Does relation-
ship quality matter in e-services? A comparison of online and offline retailing.
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 17 (2), 130–142.
Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H., Tang, T.I., 2003. Determinants of user acceptance
of Internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service
Industry Management 14 (5), 501–519.
Wang, L., Baker, J., Wagner, J., Wakefield, K., 2007. Can a retail web site be social?
Journal of Marketing 71, 143–157.
Warrington, T.B., Abgrab, N.J., Caldwell, H.M., 2000. Building trust to develop
competitive advantage in e-business relationships. Competitiveness Review 10
(2), 160–168.
Westbrook, R.A., 1987. Product/consumption-based affective responses and post-
purchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research 24 (3), 258–270.
Wind, Y., Mahajan, V., 2002. Convergence marketing. Journal of Interactive Market-
ing 16 (2), 64–79.
Wood, N., Solomon, M., Englis, B., 2005. Personalization of online avatars: is the
messenger as important as the message? International Journal of Internet
Marketing and Advertising 2 (1/2), 143–161.
Wu, J.J., Tsang, A.S.L., 2008. Factors affecting members’ trust and behavior intention
in virtual communities. Behavior and Information Technology 27 (2), 115–125.
Yao, D.Q., Yue, X., Mukhopadhyay, S., Wang, Z., 2009. Strategic inventory develop-
ment for retail and e-tail stores. Omega 37, 646–658.
Yoon, S.J., 2002. The antecedents and consequences of trust in on-line purchase
decisions. Journal of Interactive Marketing 12 (2), 47–63.
Yousafzai, S.Y., Pallister, J.G., Foxall, G.R., 2005. Strategies for building and commu-
nicating trust in electronic banking: A field experiment. Psychology and
Marketing 22 (2), 181–202.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J.G., Chen, Q., 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and
truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37, 197–206.