Close Reader

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 285

Information | Reference
Copy Selection
Case Title: Select some text within a
JOSE P. DANS, JR., petitioner, vs. paragraph and click here to
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, copy the selected text. Citation
respondent., IMELDA R. included.
MARCOS, petitioner, vs. THE
HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN
(FIRST DIVISION), AND THE
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
504 SUPREME COUR
respondents. REPORTS
ANNOTATED
Citation: 285 SCRA 504

More...
Dans, Jr. vs. People

Search Result
G.R. No. 127073. *Januar
29, 1998.
1. arguendo alleged
disadvantage, the same was not JOSE P. DANS, J
manifest nor gross. 2. 3.
Petitioner Marcos did not enter petitioner, vs. PEOPLE
into the questioned lease THE PHILIPPINE
contracts on behalf of the
Government. 3. 4. The charge of respondent.
conspiracy was not proved hence
no basis for liability. 4. 5.
Conviction was based on G.R. No. 126995. *Januar
weakness of defense evidence 29, 1998.
and not (on) strength of
prosecution’s evidence. 1. J. The
questioned Decision and IMELDA R. MARCO
Resolution are null and void
because the Respondent petitioner, vs. TH
Sandiganbayan (First Division) HONORABLE
acted without jurisdiction in
issuing the questioned Decision
SANDIGANBAYAN (FIR
and Resolution since the records DIVISION), AND TH
clearly show that the Court with PEOPLE OF TH
jurisdiction over these cases is
the Special Division of Five PHILIPPINES, responden
Justices created by Admin.
Order 288-93
Criminal Procedu
Motions; Although a demur
to evidence must be resol
based on the evidence of
prosecution, there is nothing
the rules which would bar
court from taking cognizance
any matter taken up during
trial or which has become p
of the records of the case
Although a demurrer
evidence must be resolved ba
on the evidence of
prosecution, there is nothing
the rules which would bar
court from taking cognizance
any matter taken up during
© Copyright 2020 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights