Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANZJSurg.com
Jeevaka E. Amaranath,* Mahesh Ramanan,† Jessica Reagh,* Eilen Saekang,* Narayan Prasad,*
Raymond Chaseling† and Sannappa Soundappan‡
*Douglas Cohen Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
†Department of Neurosurgery, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia and
‡Douglas Cohen Department of Paediatric Surgery and Trauma, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
approximately 50 000 hospital presentations annually.8 We describe between proportions, and t-test was used without assuming equal
the demographics, causes, radiological findings, treatment, prognos- variances for differences between means.
tic factors and outcomes of TBI at CHW to inform the planning and
delivery of health-care services and public health interventions. We
received approval from the Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network Results
Human Research Ethics Committee prior to commencement of this There were 1489 presentations with head injury meeting the inclu-
study. sion criteria over the 6-year period from 2006 to 2011. The total
number of children was 1441; 1396 with a single presentation, 42
children with two presentations and 3 children with three presenta-
Methods tions. The data collection was complete. Of the presentations, 973
(65%) were male and 516 (35%) female. The mean age overall was
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients aged 0–16 7.0 years, while the mean age for males was 7.9 and females was 5.3
years that were admitted to CHW emergency from January 2006 to (Fig. 1). A total of 28% of presentations were transfers from other
December 2011 with a TBI. Patients who presented to the emer- hospitals. Of the 422 (28%) patients that were transferred, 11% went
gency department or were transferred directly to the intensive care onto have an operation. The highest number of presentations was
unit and had a history of TBI with either symptoms of concussion9 observed in the 0–1 year age group.
and/or positive computed tomography (CT) findings of head injury As demonstrated in Figure 1, there was a strong trend towards
were selected. We took into account that the definition of concussion increased proportion of boys above the age of 5. Of those under the
varies with the age of the child. For infants, subtle symptoms, such age of 5, 54% were boys, compared with 74% among children aged
as listlessness, irritability and change in eating or sleeping patterns,10 5 and above. This difference of 20% (95% CI: 16–25%) in the
were included. Whereas for older children, a wider range of symp- proportion of boys between the two groups was highly statistically
toms, including headache, amnesia, confusion, dizziness, fatigue, significant (χ2 = 67.71, df = 3, P < 0.001).
slurred speech, inattentiveness, sensitivity to light and noise, disor- The distribution of TBI severity is displayed in Table 1. A total of
ders of taste and smell, and co-ordination deficits, were used to 1384 (93%) presentations were classified as mild TBI, 23 (1.5%)
define concussion.11 Patients who had trivial head trauma without moderate and 82 (5.5%) severe. Most presentations (98.7%) resulted
symptoms of concussion and without a CT scan were excluded. in a good recovery (GOS 4 and 5). The mortality rate was 0.87% (13
Positive CT findings included skull fracture, extradural haematoma
(EDH), subdural haematoma (SDH), subarachnoid haematoma, cer-
ebral contusion and brain oedema. We extracted data on the age, 120
gender, mechanism of injury, Glasgow coma score (GCS), CT
findings, surgery and outcome using a computerized hospital 100
medical record database (Cerner Millennium Powerchart Version
2009.06.1.6). We searched the database for TBI cases using Inter- 80
national Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. We
Frequency
it is likely that some patients with mild TBI who were admitted to
the Emergency Department but not the Neurosurgery ward would Fig. 1. Age and gender distribution of all paediatric traumatic brain inju-
ries. ( ) males; ( ) females.
have been discharged with general practitioner follow-up. For these
patients, the outcome was recorded at hospital discharge. GOS 4 and
5 were classified as a good outcome, and GOS 1–3 as poor outcome. Table 1 Distribution of severity of TBI and GOS
We entered data into Microsoft Excel and used the Excel ToolPak
Severity Mild Moderate Severe
for basic data analysis including summary statistics and the genera- GOS GCS 13–15 GCS 9–12 GCS 3–8
tion of tables. We used Statistical Analysis Software 9.1 to generate
1 0 1 12
univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to test the
2 0 0 1
effect of various factors on mortality and GOS. We used odds ratios 3 0 0 4
(OR) as the measure of association between these factors and out- 4 7 2 22
5 1377 20 43
comes for categorical variables. We used P < 0.05 as threshold of
significance and calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the GCS, Glasgow coma score; GOS, Glasgow outcome scale; TBI, traumatic
brain injury.
OR. The chi-squared statistic was calculated to test for differences
Mechanism
Sports/Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 17 (16%)
Fall 0 2 0 3 1 3 6 11 26 (24%)
MVA/MBA 1 9 0 2 1 14 5 20 52 (51%)
Assault 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 9 (8%)
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 (1%)
†Moderate = GCS 9–12 at presentation, severe = GCS 3–8 at presentation. GCS, Glasgow coma score; GOS, Glasgow outcome scale; MBA, motor bike accident;
MVA, motor vehicle accident; TBI, traumatic brain injury.
60
Multiple Lesions
50 8.5%
40 Contusion
Frequency
Not Done
38% 11.8%
Fracture
30 45.1%
Abnormal
37%
20
EDH
Normal 19%
10 25%
SAH
0 SDH 3.9%
<6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 and 11.8%
above
Age (years)
Fig. 3. Findings on computed tomography scanning.
Fig. 2. Age and gender distribution of sporting/recreational injuries. ( )
males; ( ) females.
education-based programmes may reduce the number of admissions The study had some limitations that need to be considered. Firstly,
seen through emergency.17 This can have a positive impact on both this is a hospital-based study and therefore is not representative of
families and hospitals, by reducing the emotional and financial cost the general population. CHW is the largest paediatric trauma centre
of unwanted imaging and the workload on the emergency depart- in the state25 and hence probably receives more paediatric TBI than
ment. the other two paediatric hospitals in the state. However, there is still
The use of CT imaging in TBI raises some issues due to the likely to be a significant number of cases during the study period that
attendant radiation exposure and subsequent risks. The increased would have presented to other hospitals and hence not included in
lifetime risk of developing cancer following radiation exposure is our analysis. For true population estimates, TBI data would also
not insignificant18,19 and needs to factored into any decision-making need to be collected from the other two paediatric hospitals in the
algorithm for the use of CT in children. In our cohort, 62% of state of NSW. Being a retrospective chart review, we were limited to
children had a CT brain, and of those patients, 40% had normal CT the information that was available in the charts, with no scope for
brain findings. Furthermore, the majority of these patients that went collecting additional data. The outcome of some children was
on to have a CT brain had mild head injuries and did not require assessed at the time of discharge rather than at any specific follow-
surgical intervention. There is potential to reduce this radiation up. However, the patients with moderate and severe TBI, who are
exposure with more stringent screening of TBI in the emergency most likely to suffer from adverse sequelae of TBI, are always
department prior to CT scan. However, intracranial injury may occur followed-up in the Neurosurgery outpatients clinic, and these data
with only few or subtle signs,20 and at the very young age, exami- were available for this study. Therefore, we feel it is unlikely that
nation and clinical findings may be hard to elicit. In addition, it can significant follow-up information, in terms of GOS, would have
be argued that a liberal use of CT scanning can prevent morbidity been missed in our study. We were, however, unable to comment on
and mortality caused by unrecognized TBI. The current evidence to long-term neuropsychological and developmental outcomes, which
guide doctors on what constitutes appropriate criteria for obtaining are likely to be of significant importance in paediatric TBI. This
CT scans in children following TBI still remains controversial. represents an opportunity for a prospective, observational study in
However, large multi-centre studies such as those published by the future.
Oman et al.,21 along with others, will lay a foundation of evidence In conclusion, the majority of traumatic brain injuries are mild in
and help devise criteria to guide clinicians to distinguish children nature, with younger children and males at greatest risk. There is
who are low risk for significant TBI and those that are higher risk a low rate of operative intervention12,26 and a high rate of good
requiring CT imaging. outcomes. This study provides a good starting point for the epide-
The analysis of moderate and severe head injuries found that they miology of head injury in NSW and identifies significant opportu-
accounted for only 7% of the total number of head injuries, but as nities that exist for further studies and public health prevention
expected, were associated with all the TBI deaths.22 MVAs were not programmes.
only the most significant factor in the cause for moderate and severe
head injury, but also TBI death. This result is consistent with Acknowledgements
other Australian and international paediatric-based studies on head
trauma.23 It continues to reinforce the need for broadly targeted road We would like to acknowledge Patricia Manglick for her assistance
safety initiatives, but also identifies the vulnerability children have in in data extraction. We would also like to acknowledge Dr Hasantha
and around motor vehicles. The current Australian public policies Gunasekera for his assistance in reviewing the manuscript.
and regulations relating to reduction in speed limits, school zones References
and car child restraints are all important measures to help reduce the
1. Schneier AJ, Shields BJ, Hostetler SG, Xiang H, Smith GA. Incidence of
severity of TBI, but need continuing reinforcement through educa-
pediatric traumatic brain injury and associated hospital resource utiliza-
tion and advertising. Education of young and learner drivers
tion in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 483–92.
should be a priority for governments for the protection of future 2. Lam WH, Mackersie A. Paediatric head injury: incidence, aetiology and
generations. management. Paediatr. Anaesth. 1999; 9: 377–85.
Sports and recreational injuries were another significant group 3. Nolan T, Penny M. Epidemiology of non-intentional injuries in an Aus-
within our cohort. More than a quarter of all head injuries occurred tralian Urban region: results from injury surveillance. J. Paediatr. Child
through sports and recreational injuries. As seen from previous Health 1992; 28: 27–35.
studies, this was predominantly in the adolescent years and domi- 4. Swaminathan A, Levy P, Legome E. Evaluation and management of
nated by males.12,24 In a study by Crowe et al., in Victoria, it was moderate to severe pediatric head trauma. J. Emerg. Med. 2009; 37:
shown that Australian Rules Football had a high rate of TBI for 63–8.
adolescents. Our study was not designed to look at the different 5. Debono P, Agius S, Ansari S. Paediatric head injuries – a review. Adv.
Clin. Neurosci. Rehabil. 2011; 10: 30–5.
injury patterns among the different sports; however, our results rein-
6. NSW Health. Infants and children: Acute management of Head
force that appropriate education and preventative measures need to
Injury. NSW Department of Health, 2010. [Cited 30 Jan 2013.] Available
be implemented to reduce TBI from sports and recreational injuries. from URL: http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2011/pdf/PD2011
These steps, along with parental and adolescent public awareness of _024.pdf
the risks of sports and recreational head injuries, especially in the 7. Premier & Cabinet NSW Government. Demographics. 2011. [Cited 20
teenage years, may help reduce the numbers of TBI in this age Oct 2012.] Available from URL: http://www.westernsydney.nsw.gov.au/
group. about-western-sydney/demographics/
8. National Health Performance Authority. Emergency department ser- 17. Bass JL, Christoffel KK, Widome M et al. Childhood injury prevention
vices. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011. [Cited 20 Apr counseling in primary care settings: a critical review of the literature.
2013.] Available from URL: http://www.myhospitals.gov.au/hospital/ Pediatrics 1993; 92: 544–50.
the-childrens-hospital-at-westmead/services 18. Kleinerman RA. Cancer risks following diagnositic and therapeutic
9. Ropper A, Gorson K. Concussion. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 356: 166–72. radiation exposure in children. Radiology 2006; 36: 121–5.
10. Gerber P, Coffman K. Nonaccidental head injury in infants. Childs Nerv. 19. Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85:
Syst. 2007; 23: 499–507. 47–9.
11. AAP, AAFP. Minor head injuries in children. American Academy 20. Quayle KS, Jaffe DM, Kuppermann N et al. Diagnositc testing for acute
of Paediatrics, 2009. [Cited 26 Aug 2013.] Available from URL: http:// head injury in children: when are head computed tomography and skull
pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/104/6/1407.full.pdf+html radiographs indicated? Pediatrics 1997; 95: 11.
12. Crowe L, Babl F, Anderson V, Catroppa C. The epidemiology of pae- 21. Oman JA, Cooper RJ, Holmes JF et al. Performance of a decision rule to
diatric head injuries: data from a referral centre in Victoria, Australia. J. predict need for computed tomography among children with blunt head
Paediatr. Child Health 2009; 45: 346–50. trauma. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 238–46.
13. Anderson V, Catroppa C, Morse S, Haritrou F, Rosenfeld J. Functional 22. Mitra B, Cameron P, Butt W. Population-based study of paediatric head
plasticity or vunerability after early brain injury? Pediatrics 2005; 116: injury. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2007; 43: 154–9.
1374–82. 23. Berney J, Favier J, Froidevaux A. Paediatric head trauma: influence of
14. Cooksley D. Paediatric Neurotrauma. In: Cameron P JG, Everitt I, ed. age and sex. Childs Nerv. Syst. 1994; 10: 509–16.
Textbook of Paediatric Emergency Medicine. Sydney: Churchill 24. Tate RL, McDonald S, Lulham JM. Incidence of hospital-treated trau-
Livingstone; 2006; 245–255. matic brain injury in an Australian community. Aust. N. Z. J. Public
15. Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head Health 1998; 22: 419–23.
injury: observations on the use of Glasgow Outcome Scale. J. Neurol. 25. ITIM. NSWIoTaIM. The NSW Trauma Registry Profile of Serious to
Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1981; 44: 285–93. Critical Injuries. 2009. [Cited 20 Apr 2013.] Available from URL: http://
16. Reid SR, Roesler MS, Gaichas AM, Tsai AK. The epidemiology of www.itim.nsw.gov.au/wiki/Annual_trauma_registry_reports
paediatric traumatic brain injury in Minnesota. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. 26. Thiessen M, Woolridge D. Pediatric minor closed head injury. Pediatr.
Med. 2001; 155: 784–9. Clin. North Am. 2006; 53: 1–26.