Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Itb301 PDF
Itb301 PDF
1
1.0 NAFTA PROFILE
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a treaty entered into by the United
States, Canada, and Mexico. That makes NAFTA the world’s largest free trade agreement. It
was signed by President Clinton and implemented in January 1, 1994. The three countries
became the largest free market in the world, the combined economies of the three nations at
that time measured $6 trillion and directly affected more than 365 million people. NAFTA was
created to eliminate tariff barriers to agricultural, manufacturing, and services to remove
investment restrictions; and to protect intellectual property rights. This was to be done while
also addressing environmental and labor concerns. Small businesses were among those that
were expected to benefit the most from the lowering of trade barriers since it would make doing
business in Mexico and Canada less expensive and would reduce the red tape needed to import
or export goods. (Morning, n.d.)
1. United States
2. Canada
3. Mexico
There are some objectives which are followed by NAFTA to reach their goals. Those are
mentioned below:
¨ To eliminate trade barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross – border movement of,
goods and services between the territories of the Parties
¨ To promote conditions of fair competition in the free trade area
¨ To Increase substantially investment opportunities in the territories of the Parties
¨ To provide adequate and effective protection & enforcement of intellectual property
rights in each territory
¨ To create effective procedures for the implementation and application of this
agreement, for its joint administration & for resolution of disputes
2
¨ To establish a framework for further trilateral, regional and multilateral co-operation to
expand and enhance benefits of this agreement NAALC members work together to
protect, enhance and enforce the basic rights of workers.
The NAFTA Secretariat, Canadian Section has one program and one business line. For
financial accountability purposes, the reporting structure is to Parliament through the Minister
of International Trade
Canadian Secretary
Deputy Secretary
3
2.0 ACHIEVEMENTS
NAFTA shows the advantages exchange can bring to all nations. At the point when NAFTA
was executed 10 years prior, it made the world’s biggest unhindered commerce zone, which
presently interfaces 426 million individuals in a region which produces more than $12 trillion
worth of products and ventures. During the previous decade, NAFTA accomplices have been
directing business inside a system that is amazingly open, represented by clear guidelines and
open requirement systems, with the objective of more noteworthy monetary incorporation and
collaboration. (AMADEO, 2020)A few instances of NAFTA's victory:
¨ U.S. exports to Canada and Mexico grew from US$134.3 billion (US$46.5 billion to
Mexico and US$87.8 billion to Canada) to US$250.6 billion (US$105.4 and US$145.3
billion respectively).
¨ Mexican exports to the United States reached over US$138 billion, while Mexican
exports to Canada grew from US$2.7 billion to US$8.7 billion, an increase of almost
227%.
¨ Canada’s exports to its NAFTA partners increased by 104% in value.
¨ Representing a free trade area with about one-third of the world’s total GDP, the
NAFTA economies are significantly larger than that of the European Union. Even with
the addition of ten new members, the EU’s GDP will still be well behind that of the
NAFTA region.
4
¨ The dismantling of trade barriers and opening of markets have led to economic growth
and rising prosperity in the United States, Mexico and Canada.
¨ The total volume of trade among the three NAFTA partners expanded from $289.3
billion in 1993 to $623.1 billion in 2003.
¨ Each day NAFTA countries conduct nearly $1.7 billion in trilateral trade.
All the NAFTA member countries get partners benefits among them.
5
Merchandise exports to the United States expanded by
250% since 1989 and account for 87.2% of Canada’s
total merchandise exports.
¨ CANADA Foreign Direct Investment in the finance and insurance
industry accounted for 36% of Canadian FDI in Mexico
in 2001, while not even registering in 1989.
1. U.S. Jobs Were Lost: According to Economic Policy Instituted they estimated a loss
of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs. Most were in the manufacturing industries in California, New
York, Michigan, and Texas. Though the estimated job gains exceed those lost, certain
industries were particularly impacted, including manufacturing, automotive, textile, computer,
and electrical appliance industries.
3. Mexico's Farmers Were Put Out of Business: According to United States Department
of Agriculture. Mexico lost over 900,000 farming jobs in the first decade of NAFTA. NAFTA
allowed U.S. government-subsidized farm products into Mexico. Local farmers could not
compete with the subsidized prices. It forced unemployed farmers to cross the border illegally
to find work. while dramatically increasing corporate agribusiness' profits, market control and
the monopolization of our farm and food industry. These changes, coupled with the rapid
expansion of publicly financed and often un-regulated corporate factory farms, have put
6
thousands of independent livestock and dairy producers out of business. This situation
confronting independent family farmers is dire.
Bangladesh face a huge loss because of NAFTA. Because NAFTA members are getting more
benefit from this. The results suggest that the total export decline could be about one percent
with the projections for Bangladesh slightly higher (due to the higher-than-average share of
textiles and clothing in Bangladesh's total exports). The study argues that a successful
completion of the Uruguay Round would considerably reduce Bangladesh potential losses
since it would lower the preference margins that NAFTA could provide member countries. The
clothing and textile main item for the concern. Because big number item export from South
Asia. It’s a big disadvantage for Bangladesh.
7
4.2 IMPACT ON BANGLADESH ECONOMY
The model focuses on NAFTA's short-run impact on South Asian trade. This study does not
address dynamic long-run effects, such as changes in terms of trade, investment diversion, and
externalities associated with the growth dividend. The results suggest that the total export
decline could be about 1 percent, with projections for Bangladesh slightly higher (because
textiles and clothing represent a higher-than-average share of Bangladesh's exports). The
authors argue that successful completion of the Uruguay Round would considerably reduce
South Asia's potential losses, as it would lower the preference margins that NAFTA could
provide its member countries. To put the two events in perspective, the authors note that the
trade gains South Asian countries could experience from successful completion of the Uruguay
Round are about 100 times greater than the losses they might incur from NAFTA.
5.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion of our research on NAFTA from its historical beginning to the present, the future
of North America Free Trade Agreement stands at a crossroad. There have been clear benefits
for the U.S., Canada, and Mexico throughout the past 26 years of its existence. From job
growth, foreign investments, and increased trade among the three countries. Research has also
shown that there are disadvantages that have affected possible American jobs and Companies
going abroad for the benefits of lower labor cost and VAT tax. Economist has debated with all
the changes in technology and other factors, such as trading with other foreign countries such
as China. NAFTA has drawn the attention of the United States President Donald Trump, he has
planned to work with Canada, and Mexico renegotiates the free trade agreement. The meetings
are scheduled, and the three countries are all willing to make changes to NAFTA that are
reasonable for all included parts. It is yet to be known the outcome or the possible effects that
their negotiations will have on The North America free trade Agreement and if U.S. will stay
or withdraw. In hopes for growth of the United States economy and jobs for the American
people, NAFTA renegotiations could be just what our country needs. Time will tell.
8
6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Morning, I. T. (n.d.). North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) . Retrieved from Inc.
This Morning: https://www.inc.com/encyclopedia/north-american-free-trade-
agreement-nafta.html
Palma, L. (n.d.). Retrieved from Mexico: The Importance of Minimum Wages in NAFTA
Negotiations: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-
compliance/employment-law/pages/global-nafta-mexico-minimum-wage.aspx
Scott, R. E. (2011). Retrieved from U.S.-Mexico trade and job displacement after NAFTA:
https://www.epi.org/publication/heading_south_u-s-
mexico_trade_and_job_displacement_after_nafta1/
The USTR Archives. (2017, July 4). NAFTA: A Decade of Success. Retrieved from Office of
the united states trade representative: https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-
office/fact-sheets/archives/2004/july/nafta-decade-success
U.S. Department of Transportation . (2002). North American Free Trade Agreement – U.S.
Department of Transportation Regulations . Retrieved from
https://cms8.fmcsa.dot.gov/sites/fmcsa.dot.gov/files/docs/NAFTA_Fact_Sheet_508C
LN.pdf
wikipedia. (n.d.). North American Free Trade Agreement. Retrieved from wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement