Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Departments of Oral M edicine and Radiology, and Public Health Dentistry, People s Dental Academy, Peoples
Group, Bhanpur, Bhopal−462037 (M .P), India
Correspondence to :
Shivakumar.G.C. Oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is a prevalent premalignant condition
E-mail: shiva21375@yahoo.in of the oral cavity, with insidious onset. Diagnosis of this condition is
based on variable clinical features,including mucosal blanching,burn-
ing sensation, hardening of the mucosa and presence of characteristic
fibrous bands that are associated with graduallyincreasing inabilityto
Keywords : open the mouth. Various researchers in the field of dentistry have
oral submucous fibrosis, staging, categorized different stages of OSF.This paper is intended to incorpo-
blanching, fibrous bands rate all the stages of OSF defined in the literature to date.
Oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is an insidious Wahi et al. (7) classified OSF into three clinical
chronic condition that can affect any part of the oral groups on the basis of clinical features,severity and
cavity and sometimes even the pharynx. Although extent of involvement.
occasionally preceded by and/or associated with Group I : Usually there are no symptoms referable to
vesicle formation, OSF is always associated with mucosal involvement.The lesions affect one or other
juxta-epithelial inflammatory reaction followed by commonly involved anatomical sites, are focal in
fibro-elastic changes to the lamina propria with character, show pallor or whitish coloration, wrin-
epithelial atrophy leading to stiffness of the mucosa kling of mucosa and minimal induration.
and causing trismus and inability to eat (1). This Group II : Cases might present symptoms of soreness
condition occurs predominantly among Indians and of the mucosa or increased sensitivity to chilli. The
South-east Asians (2). Shrusrutha in ancient medi- lesions are diffuse, white, extensive and indurated,
cine described a condition similar to OSF as vidari , involving one or more anatomical sites.
under the umbrella of mouth and throat diseases (3). Group III : Symptoms are mainly due to restricted
In 1952,Schwartz (4)described a condition ofthe oral mobility such as trismus, stretching at the angles of
mucosa as atrophia idiopathica mucosa oris , with the mouth and altered pronunciation. Firm mucosal
the term OSF coined by Joshi in 1953 (5). Consump- bands can be palpated, and the surface might be
tion of chilli, nutritional deficiencies, chewing of fissured or ulcerated.
arecanut, genetic susceptibilities, altered salivary Ahuja and Agrawal (8) classified submucous fi-
constituents, autoimmunity and collagen disorders brosis clinically based on the extent and type of
have been suggested as potential contributors to the fibrosis.
pathogenesis of this condition (6). The sites most Class I : Localized fibrous bands in the cheek extend-
frequently affected by OSF in the oral cavity are the ing from the superior to inferior vestibular fornix on
buccal mucosa,and retromolar area,followed by the one or both sides.In order of frequency,these bands
soft palate, palatal fauces, uvula, tongue and labial are usually located on the lips,in the premolar region
mucosa. Depending on maximal interincisal mouth and in the second molar region.
opening, symptoms, and palpable fibrous bands, Class II : Generalized diffuse hardening of subepith-
many authors have divided OSF into different clini- elial tissues.This hardening usuallyextends from the
cal stages. cheek and hard palate to the soft palate, uvula and
Int J Oral-M ed Sci 10(3):216-219, 2011
W.B.Saunders Company, 1983, pp109. 10.Gupta DS, Gupta MK, Golhar BL : Oral submucous
3. Gupta SC,Yadav YC : M isi an aetiological factor in fibrosis - clinical study and management by physiofi-
oral submucosal fibrosis. Ind J Otolaryngol, 30: 5-6, brolysis (MWD). JIDA, 52: 375-378, 1980.
1978. 11.Mathur RM, Jha T : Normal oral flexibility a guide-
4. Schwartz J : Atrophia idiopathica mucosa oris. line for SMF cases. JIDA, 64: 139 -143, 1993.
Demonstrated at the 11th Int Dental Congress: Lon- 12.Khanna JN, Andrade NN : Oral submucous fibrosis:
don ; 1952. A new concept in surgical management.Report of 100
5. Joshi SG : Fibrosis of the palate and pillars. Indian J cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 24: 433-439, 1995.
Otolaryngol, 4: 1, 1953. 13.Haider SM, Merchant AR, Fikree FF, Rahban MH :
6. M urti PR, Bhonsle RB, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Pind- Clinical and functional staging of oral submucous
borg JJ,Fali SM : Etiology of oral submucous fibrosis fibrosis. Brit J Oral Maxilofac Surg, 38: 12-15, 2000.
with special reference to the role of arecanut chewing. 14.Aziz SR : Oral submucous fibrosis; case report and
J Oral Pathol M ed, 24: 145-152, 1995. review of diagnosis and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac
7. Wahi PN, Kapur VL, Luthra UK, Srivastva MC : Surg, 66: 2386-2389, 2008.
Submucous fibrosis of the oral cavity: 1- Clinical 15.Kerr AR,Warnakulasuriya S,Mighell AJ,Dietrich T,
features. Bulletin of WHO, 35: 789 -792, 1966. Nasser M,Rimal J,Jalil A,Bornstein MM,Nagao T,
8. Ahuja SS, Agrawal GD : Submucous fibrosis of the Fortune F, Hazarey VH, Reichart PA, Silverman S,
oral mucosa. J Oral M ed, 26: 35-36, 1971. Johnson NW : A systematic review of medical inter-
9. Bhatt AP, Dholakia HM .: M ast cell density in oral ventions for oral submucous fibrosis and future
submucous fibrosis,Journal of Indian Dental Associa- research opportunities. Oral Dis, 17: 42-57, 2011.
tion, 49 : 187-191, 1977.