Professional Documents
Culture Documents
191–202
New Dutch of ce buildings are built under strict energy ef cient legislation and
are well equipped with insulation, condensing boilers, heat recovery systems, and
so on. Despite this, many buildings do not have good energy ef ciency and also
do not meet comfort requirements. This has led to a large number of complaints.
The problem seems to be that ‘common’ energy control strategies (heating/ coo-
ling curves) are often used, most of the curves were based on buildings with
low levels of building shell heating resistance, no additional insulation and single
glazing. When these control strategies are used in modern of ce buildings, too
much energy is used due to a mismatch between heating and cooling demands.
Energy savings of up to 35% can be realized without signi cant nancial invest-
ments by devoting extra attention to the settings of the heating/ cooling curve in
the central air handling units (AHUs) of HVAC systems without loss of comfort.
In most cases the number of complaints will also be reduced. The design method
can be used in both new and existing buildings. The rst part of this paper
presents a brief description of the method used to realize this energy saving. The
brief description is followed with a practical example of this method. The intention
is that the approach will generate a building-speci c heating/cooling curve based
on an energetic optimum between the demand for heating and cooling in the
zones. The input data used to generate the function cover the characteristics of
the building, the organization, and the HVAC equipment.
Figure 1 The control strategy determines the supply air temperature as a response to the dynamic behaviour of the
building (data points per hour)
In the Dutch mild climate the need for space demand pro le. The demand for heating and
heating is reduced due to insulation and air- cooling at the same time occur 40% of the time.
tightness, but on the other hand, the need for The control strategy determines how the
room cooling is increased. During normal winter HVAC installation responds to these con icting
conditions or during summer conditions there energy demands. In the majority of the buildings
seems to be no problem, there is a full load con- there will be a contradictory heating and cooling
dition. But, with moderate temperatures there is supply at the same time, which will lead to
a part load condition and a need for cooling and excessive energy consumption. The development
heating at the same time. Figure 2 shows a typi- of control strategies has stood still. The most
cal ‘modern’ building heating and cooling commonly used control strategies were
Figure 2 Building related heating and cooling demand pro le over the period of a year (data points per hour)
PA Elkhuizen et al. 193
2.2 Who can use the calculation method? the type of HVAC system; and 3) the building
Customers for whom the design method is user.
developed, are: 1) designers; 2) installers; 3)
building managers; and 4) TAB (testing, Sample building
adjusting and balancing) companies. The method This example relates to a recently completed
will be available as a computer application in of ce building (year of construction: 1998).
VABI building simulation tool VA 114. A representative ground plan and the façade
view are shown in Figure 7.
Step 1: Collect all necessary data
Step 1 is based on the collection of the neces- Building
sary ‘Project’ data which are relevant for the · R value building : 2.5 [m2 · K/W]
determination of the Energetically Optimized shell
Heating/Cooling Curve. The ‘project’ parameters/ · Window percentage : 40%
data are related to 1) the building properties; 2) exterior (north and
PA Elkhuizen et al. 195
Figure 7 The ground plan and the façade of the selected building
the outside air temperature. The determination outcome of Step 3 is: (3a.1) the calculated value
of the heating/cooling demand of the building is of the turn-over temperature (free temperature)
a complex analysis and is based on the use of of the building. The turn-over temperature is the
building simulation programs. Because not temperature where no heating or cooling is
everybody is able to work with sophisticated required (3a.2) the transition range and (3a.3) the
building simulation programs, a simpli ed sensitivity of the heating and cooling demand in
method has been developed to solve this prob- relation to the outside air temperature.
lem.
3a) Determine the turnover (free) temperature
Figure 8 shows a typical building heating and
and transition range
cooling demand pro le. The demand for heating
3a1) Turnover (free) temperature
and cooling at the same time occur 40% of the
In general, when the outside temperature is
time.
equal to the ‘turn over temperature’ (Figure 9),
Step 3: Determine the basic shape of the new no heating or cooling demand exists within the
curve building. This is also called ‘free temperature’
Step 3 is a very important step. In a new of the building. That means, no heating or coo-
design, the designer has to make his principle ling is supplied to the ventilation air.
choice for the type of HVAC system and how
3a2) Transition range
the required capacity is split over the air and
The transition range (Figure 9) can be de ned
water supply.
as the temperature interval for the outside tem-
The basic shape of the Energetically Optim-
perature in which either heating or cooling
ized Heating/Cooling Curve is determined and
demand may exist. No heating or cooling is
is thus a description of the heating and cooling
therefore added to the supply air.
production of the HVAC system. This will be
done on the outcome of the calculated heating 3b) Determine your principal choice of HVAC
and cooling demand as calculated in Step 2. The installation
Figure 8 Heating and cooling demands over a year (data points per hour)
PA Elkhuizen et al. 197
thermal load and equal to the thermal load as 3.2 Improved comfort
speci ed in the operational requirements (= 50 The comfort improvement is shown in Figure
W/m2 NE) is occupying the same sample build- 18 by comparing the occurring room tempera-
ing, the energy saving is even higher (36% for tures in the ‘case’ building to the temperatures
heating and 19% for cooling). speci ed for the standard heating and cooling
PA Elkhuizen et al. 201
4 Conclusions
heating load required re-tuning of the project and ISSO chaired the scienti c steering
heating/cooling curve; group committee. We would like to acknowl-
· The energy saving potential of optimal heat- edge the members of the ISSO steering group
ing curves presents an expected energy saving committee for their timely, insightful and con-
of 5–35% in relation with common heating structive criticism during the execution of the
curves. work.