01-12-2016

WORKSHOP ON
Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES Design of Bridge Across River Kali
IRC:112
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges

Design of Bridge Across River Kali
P.G.Venkatram
Chief Executive
L&T Infrastructure Engineering Ltd.
A Graduate in Civil Engineering from Indian Institute of
Technology, Madras and a Post Graduate from Carnegie
Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.

Add
Has more than 30 Years experience in Design of various
types of Bridges from Beam & slabs to Box girders,
Location of
Photograph Segmental constructed Bridges, Arch Bridges, Balanced
Cantilever Bridges, Steel Trusses, Steel Bow String Girders,
the Bridge
Extradosed and Cable Stayed Bridges.

Member of IRC Code committees and currently heading a

330+ design group based in Chennai, Hyderabad, Mumbai
and Delhi

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Existing Bridge

Span Configuration 28 + 61 + 122 x 4 +61 + 28

Proposed Configuration 89+ 122 x 4 + 89

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Soil profiles and Scour Depths

Features of the Bridge

Ø Continuous from Abutment to Abutment

Ø Superstructure Integral with
substructure at Piers P2, P3 & P4
Ø Superstructure resting on Bearings at P1
& P5
Ø Deck Designed for both 2 lane with
Footpath operation and 3 lanes without
Footpath Operation

1
 01-12-2016

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Geotechnical Evaluation carried out Analysis conditions

1. Scour Depth estimations 1. Soil Structure Interactions with Bilinear

2. Pile Fixity Computations in Rock springs
3. Soil response to lateral loads in Non scour 2. Scour and Non scour conditions analysed
conditions 3. Full stage construction analysis carried out
4. Derivation of P-y curves for piles to 4. Fatigue check not carried out, but
establish the soil spring characteristics compliance to prevailing standards
ensured.

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Durability Condition

1. Exposure criteria adopted – Severe as per

table 14.1 of IRC 112 for superstructure
2. High Humidity RH > 80% Stability checks
3. No risk of carbonation exposure
4. Reduced risk of airborne Chloride
exposure due to High Humidity
5. Foundations checked for Extreme
exposure conditions

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Modeling

Construction Stage Stability checks at P1 & P5

2
 01-12-2016

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Model for Analsis

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Longitudinal Design – SLS Checks

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

3
 01-12-2016

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Ø The stress check has been done for both construction stages and for
SLS load combinations.
Ø Maximum compressive stress of 13.9 MPa, in SLS-RC-LL-A-1 (Rare)
combination, is less than 24 MPa (0.48fck) as per Cl.12.2.1 (1) of
IRC: 112-2011.
Ø Maximum compressive stress of 12.5 MPa, in SLS-QC-1 (Quasi-
Permanent) Combination, is less than 18 MPa (0.36fck) as per
Cl.12.2.1 (2) of IRC: 112-2011. Longitudinal Design – ULS Checks
Ø Maximum tensile stress is 2.72 MPa in SLS-RC-LL-A-7 (Rare)
combination, is less than fctm, (3.5 MPa for M50) Mean axial tensile
strength of concrete. Hence the crosssection is un-cracked as per Cl
12.1 (2) of IRC 112-2011.
Ø There is no tensile stress in both top and bottom fibre under Quasi-
Permanent combination. Hence decompression limit check is
ensured as per Table 12.1, Note 3 of IRC 112-2011 for severe
exposure.

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Ø Ultimate Flexural Capacities have been checks as

defined for Prestressed Concrete .
Ø Design for Shear and Torsion in all the walls of
the Box carried out as per the Provisions of
Transverse Design
designs for sections with shear reinforcement.
Ø Combination of the design requirements for
Shear in the web with that for Transverse
bending to arrive at the total reinforcement
requirements in the webs.

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Design of Piers

The designs carried for 4 zones based on

section variations

4
 01-12-2016

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Design of Foundations

Design Checks based on Interaction Diagram for Biaxial Bending of Piers

Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges Case Study 2- Design of Integral Bridges
Design of Bridge Across River Kali Design of Bridge Across River Kali
WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI WORKSHOP ON CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112 – 2011, ORGANISED BY ING-IABSE, 18-19 NOV 2016, MUMBAI

Piles Checked for SLS and ULS conditions in all

combinations
Ø In SLS checks, checks carried out for stress
limitations, Crack width compliance
Ø In ULS for Flexural capacity
Thank You