Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Martin Ortega Vs Tadena

    Uploaded by

    Juan Dela Cruz
    15 views1 page
    Martin Ortega filed an administrative complaint against Atty. Tadena for grossly immoral conduct and violation of the lawyer's oath. The Supreme Court found Atty. Tadena guilty of grossly immoral conduct for having an illicit relationship with his client and imposing himself on her. The Court disbarred Atty. Tadena from the practice of law and ordered his name stricken off the Roll of Attorneys.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Martin Ortega vs Tadena

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Martin Ortega filed an administrative complaint against Atty. Tadena for grossly immoral conduct and violation of the lawyer's oath. The Supreme Court found Atty. Tadena guilty of grossly immoral conduct for having an illicit relationship with his client and imposing himself on her. The Court disbarred Atty. Tadena from the practice of law and ordered his name stricken off the Roll of Attorneys.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views1 page

    Martin Ortega Vs Tadena

    Uploaded by

    Juan Dela Cruz
    Martin Ortega filed an administrative complaint against Atty. Tadena for grossly immoral conduct and violation of the lawyer's oath. The Supreme Court found Atty. Tadena guilty of grossly immoral conduct for having an illicit relationship with his client and imposing himself on her. The Court disbarred Atty. Tadena from the practice of law and ordered his name stricken off the Roll of Attorneys.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Martin Ortega vs. Atty.

    Tadena

    A.C. No. 12018, 29 January 2020

    You might also like