This table compares adverse events between a catheter group (n=102) and a gauze group (n=102) for postpartum hemorrhage treatment. The catheter group had slightly higher rates of inadvertent catheter damage (2.0% vs 0%) and displacement into the vagina (1.0% vs 0%), while the gauze group only had a single case of difficulty removing gauze (0% vs 1.0%). No cases of uterine perforation or rupture occurred in either group.
This table compares adverse events between a catheter group (n=102) and a gauze group (n=102) for postpartum hemorrhage treatment. The catheter group had slightly higher rates of inadvertent catheter damage (2.0% vs 0%) and displacement into the vagina (1.0% vs 0%), while the gauze group only had a single case of difficulty removing gauze (0% vs 1.0%). No cases of uterine perforation or rupture occurred in either group.
This table compares adverse events between a catheter group (n=102) and a gauze group (n=102) for postpartum hemorrhage treatment. The catheter group had slightly higher rates of inadvertent catheter damage (2.0% vs 0%) and displacement into the vagina (1.0% vs 0%), while the gauze group only had a single case of difficulty removing gauze (0% vs 1.0%). No cases of uterine perforation or rupture occurred in either group.