GLOSYLE QUISEL ABELLA MAPE

FOUNDATION OF EDUCATION OCTOBER 6, 2019

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TOPIC PRESENTED

HISTORICAL FOUNDATION EDUCATION

Comparing education in historic societies to education today, historic education in early society formal
education was used to pass on religious and cultural knowledge as well as basic survival skills, until the
medieval period when woman were given opportunities to study in religious institutions, only men were
allowed to attend school. Teachers were almost always religious leaders. Greek and Roman societies
introduce the importance of covering a variety of subject in schools to create well rounded, liberally
educated individuals.

Instructional methods of the past include memorization, drills, recitation, debate , lectures , and textual
analysis which are still used to play. All public schools are secular, but religious private schools are still
common. Education is available to everyone and it is required until at least 16 years old though many
states have been working to raise the legal drop-out. Additionally now more women hold bachelor’s
degree than men. Much of today’s schooling is standards base.

As we got older and our death beds start to get closer, and a whole lot more comfortable looking, the
evolutionary need to pass on our skills and knowledge kicks in. We’re going to be gone, and soon it will
be up to future generations not to recall all of the hard work we put into building a functioning society.
It becomes essential that they are educated so they can fend for themselves when we aren’t there to
protect them, and so they can continue to advance society and impart their wisdom on generation to
come.
CRITIQUE OF THE FOUNDATION OFPSYCHOLOGY

AT first read, one might ask whether a relationship can truly exist between a critical and teaching
standard. On one hand we have philosophical goal of a critical approach to education , social
transformation, where the focus is to empower those whose voices are silenced or marginalized. On the
other hand we have a set of standards designed to guide the expectations and assessment of teachers.

I believed that democracy is a way of life. In a democratic society people should work cooperatively to
solve the problems and schools are responsible for equipping students with the problem-solving ability
Progressivist argue that school are miniature societies and should focus on real-life problem students
face in school or will face in the future. Therefore education should revolve around authentic activity in
social setting and cater to the student need. We hold a critical theory philosophy and hope education
acts as social activist and change agents that have an impact both on their students and society as
whole.
CRITIQUE OF THE FOUNDATION OF PHILOSOPHY

If no one thinks of contesting the general affirmation that theories are mortal and that science
can only advance on its own ruins ,it is not possible to have it representatives ascertain the
death of a present theory. The majority scientists consist of researchers who having neither a
since of life nor the truth, can only work in the shadow of officially recognized principles; we
cannot ask them to recognize a fact that is not given but has to be created. For their historical
role is quite different it consists of the work expansion and explosion it is through them that
the principles spend their vital energy respected instruments of science, they are incapable of
renewing it and renewing themselves. And so they recognize the morality of all theories , even
theirs, but only the moment of death has already arrived still seems incredible to them.

SUBMITTED TO; PROFFESOR; DR. MELECIO ENANOR