Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Substrate
Next
Deciding SN1/SN2/E1/E2 (2) – The Nucleophile/Base
Having gone through the SN1, the SN2, the E1, and the E2 reactions in turn, we can now say the following:
A wide variety of nucleophiles/bases can be used to perform substitution and elimination reactions.
We also have to gauge the importance of factors such as the leaving group and temperature.
This is a lot of different factors to think about. Let’s look at some examples of situations you might
encounter:
This is often one of the most difficult parts of organic chemistry for new students: how to weigh multiple
(and often contradictory) factors? How do we know which factor is most important? Do we pay attention to
the base, substrate, temperature, solvent? How do we go about sorting through a problem like this?
In this post and the next few, we’ll walk through one way of thinking about how to evaluate whether a
reaction will proceed through SN1/SN2/E1/E2. It’s not 100% foolproof*, but it’s a decent enough
framework for our purposes. Think of it as a set of 80/20 guidelines. I call it this:
2. The nucleophile/base
3. The solvent
4. The temperature
It’s also an approach where I tend to (at least in the beginning) ruling things out rather than ruling things
“in”. In other words, seek to decide what options are not possible, rather than decide which are possible. It’s
a subtle distinction, but a valuable one. Once you’ve crossed certain reactions off the list, you can then start
asking yourself which reactions would be most consistent with the reaction conditions.
Remember: this is the “Quick N’ Dirty” guide! There will be some exceptions! (more on those at the
bottom)
Before getting specific with each of those 4 questions, let’s start with the most important question you can
ask in any situation like the ones above.
The most important step in evaluating any reaction is first to ask yourself “what type of functional group(s)
are present in this molecule? This is because the type of functional group will dictate the type of
reaction(s) that can occur. Note that in the questions above, all of the starting materials are alkyl
halides or alcohols. Substitution/elimination reactions are possible for these substrates; many other reaction
types (addition, for example) are not.
Given what we know about SN1, SN2, E1, and E2 reactions, we can say the following:
The “big barrier” to the SN2 reaction is steric hindrance. The rate of SN2 reactions goes primary >
secondary > tertiary
The “big barrier” to the SN1 and E1 reactions is carbocation stability. The rate of SN1 and E1
reactions proceeds in the order tertiary > secondary > primary.
The E2 reaction has no “big barrier”, per se (although later we will have to worry about the
stereochemistry)
So how can we apply what we know about each of these reactions to simplify our decision?
NOTES: One final word of warning on the substrate: SN1/SN2/E1/E2 reactions tend not to occur on
alkenyl or alkynyl halides. So if you see one of the substrates below, it is highly likely that no reaction
will occur.
Why are alkenyl and alkynyl halides so bad? Well, the SN1, SN2, and E1 mechanisms all involve
considerable build-up of positive charge on the carbon bearing the leaving group, and the stability of sp2 and
sp hybridized carbocations is much lower than that for sp3 hybridized carbocations [for the same reason that
sp and sp2 anions are more stable than sp3 carbanions!].
E2 reactions are also more difficult due to the stronger C-H bonds of alkenes. [We’ll see later that there is
one example of an E2 that can occur on alkenyl halides, but the point remains that they are very rare!]
* One question that comes up a lot is this: are there exceptions? Keeping in mind the two themes of “steric
hindrance” and “carbocation stability”, there are edge cases where we can have a particularly sterically
hindered primary alkyl halide, or a particularly stable primary carbocation.
For instance, the alkyl halide below (“neopentyl bromide”) is indeed primary, but is so crowded on the
carbon adjacent to the primary alkyl halide that it is essentially inert in SN2 reactions. On the SN1/E1 side,
the allyl halide below, while primary, can undergo SN1/E1 reactions because the resulting carbocation is
stabilized through resonance. As long as you keep in mind the “big barriers” for each reaction, you should
be fine.
Next
Deciding SN1/SN2/E1/E2 (3) – The Solvent
Last time I talked about the process of deciding if a reaction goes through SN1, SN2, E1, or E2 as asking a
series of questions. I call it The Quick N’ Dirty Guide To SN1/SN2/E1/E2. This is the second instalment.
After Determining Whether Your Substrate Is
Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, or Methyl, Examine
The Nucleophile/Base
Once we’ve looked at a reaction and recognized that it has the potential for proceeding through
SN1/SN2/E1/E2 – that is, is it an alkyl halide, alkyl sulfonate (abbreviated as OTs or OMs) or alcohol – and
asked whether the carbon attached to the leaving group is primary, secondary, or tertiary, we next can look
at the reagent for the reaction.
In substitution reactions, a nucleophile forms a new bond to carbon, and a bond between the carbon and
the leaving group is broken. In elimination reactions, a base forms a new bond with a proton from the
carbon, the C-H bond breaks, a C-C π bond forms, and a bond between carbon and leaving group is broken.
There’s a lot of confusion from students on this point. “How do I know what’s a nucleophile and what’s a
base?”.
It’s a relationship, in other words. For instance, when I’m interacting with my wife, I’m interacting with her
as a husband. When I’m talking to my mom, I’m interacting with her as a son. I’m the same person, but
depending on whom I’m interacting with, our relationship has different names.
Anyway. All this is prelude to making the key determination for today, which is:
2. Reactions where neutral bases/nucleophiles are involved tend to go through carbocations (i.e. they tend to be
SN1/E1).
Again: Quick N’ Dirty is an 80/20 set of principles. There are exceptions!!! But this framework will help us in most
situations.
Neutral bases/nucleophiles tend to be weaker than negatively charged bases/nucleophiles. In order for them
to participate in substitution or elimination reactions, generally the leaving group must depart first, giving a
carbocation.
Quick N’ Dirty Rule #4: If you don’t see a charged species present, you’re likely looking at a reaction that
will go through a carbocation (i.e. an SN1 or E1).
One special case worth noting is if you see a strong acid such as H2SO4 or HCl with an alcohol as a substrate.
Unless you’re looking at a primary alcohol (where carbocations are very unstable) the reactions in these
cases will almost always proceed through carbocations.
It’s not uncommon to see a neutral nucleophile in the presence of a charged one (see example 2, below). In
that case it’s likely acting as the solvent. We’ll talk about solvents next.
Here’s a chart where we evaluate this second question for deciding if a reaction is SN1, SN2, E1, or E2
(below).
What’s the biggest weakness of the Quick N’ Dirty approach? It’s an oversimplification. To conclude that a
reaction “proceeds SN2” or “proceeds E2” might give the impression that it gives 100% SN2 or 100% E2,
and that is surely not the case! Often, these reactions compete with each other, and can therefore
give mixtures products. When I say “SN2” , for instance, I mean mostly SN2. There are likely other
products in there.
The key lesson here is to understand the concepts – “what conditions favor each reaction?” and then to be
able to apply the rules you know about each reaction to draw the proper product.
Some charged nucleophiles are actually poor bases. Here’s a good rule of thumb: if the conjugate acid of the
base/nucleophile is less than 12, an E2 reaction will be extremely unlikely. So if you see a nucleophile like
NaCl, NaBr, KCN, and so on, it will favor SN2 over E2.
(This is a more rigorous way of saying that weak bases don’t perform E2 reactions).
In contrast, the bulky base below (tert-butoxide ion) is a strong base but a poor nucleophile due to its great
steric hindrance, so an E2 reaction is much more likely than SN2.
One class of neutral nucleophiles/bases that readily perform E2 reactions (and SN2) are amines. For
example, the tertiary alkyl halide below will undergo elimination through E2 here, although the Quick N’
Dirty rules call for SN1/E1. Amines are generally not the most useful nucleophiles for doing SN2 however
because they lead to over-alkylation and ammonium salt formation. [See: Alkylation of Amines (Sucks!)]
Finally, there are also neutral species which are good nucleophiles (and poor bases) such as PPh3, below.
It’s also possible to use charged nucleophiles in SN1 reactions under certain conditions. If you have, for
instance a tertiary alkyl halide in the presence of a high concentration of a good nucleophile (but weak base)
such as those above, the carbocation that forms can be intercepted by that nucleophile. For example:
Here, the good nucleophile (cyanide ion), if present in large excess, can overpower the weak nucleophile
(solvent). Of course the ultimate arbiter of such statements are actual experiments.
Next
Deciding SN1/SN2/E1/E2 (4) – The Temperature
The Quick N’ Dirty Guide To SN1/SN2/E1/E2 Reactions, Part 3: The Role of Solvent
Let’s continue with our Quick N Dirty guide to SN1/SN2/E1/E2 – a quick walkthrough of thinking through
this reaction decision.
Recall that there are two important types of solvents to consider: polar protic solvents and polar
aprotic solvents. [See: All About Solvents]
Polar protic solvents are capable of hydrogen bonding. Recall that hydrogen bonding occurs where we have
a highly electronegative atom such as O or N directly bonded to hydrogen:
Quick N’ Dirty Tip: Solvents with OH or NH groups
are polar protic solvents
Hydrogen bonding is directly responsible for the high boiling points of solvents such as water and ethanol;
the partial positive charges on hydrogen are attracted to the partial negative charges on the electronegative
atoms. This is also why water is such an excellent solvent for charged species such as halide ions;
hydrogen bonding solvents surround negatively charged ions like a jacket.
Quick N’ Dirty Rule #5: Polar protic solvents tend to favor elimination (E2) over substitution (SN2).
Polar aprotic solvents tend to favor substitution (SN2) relative to elimination (E2)
Let’s go back to the examples we were looking at in the first two posts.
Practically, you’ll only need to consider the solvent in an SN1/SN2/E1/E2 decision when you’ve already analyzed
the substrate and the nucleophile/base.
This is usually the case when you have a secondary alkyl halide with a strongly basic nucleophile such as
NaOCH3 or NaOH.
That’s especially the case in example #2, where we really can’t make the call as to whether it’s SN2 or E2 until we’ve
looked at the solvent. The fact that we are using a polar protic solvent (EtOH) is the crucial piece of information that
clinches the reaction as E2.
In the last post in this series we’ll look at the impact of temperature on these reactions.
Next
Wrapup: The Quick N’ Dirty Guide To SN1/SN2/E1/E2
The Quick N’ Dirty Guide To Determining SN1/SN2/E1/E2, Part 4 : The Role of Temperature
In previous installations of the Quick N’ Dirty Guide, we’ve examined the substrate, the base/nucleophile,
and the solvent. Today, we’ll address the final variable to consider: the temperature.
If you’ve been following so far, you may have noticed that by this point we should be able to differentiate
all cases where SN2 is favored over E2 (and vice versa) but are still left with this dilemma: when a
carbocation is formed, how do we determine whether SN1 or E1 products are favored?
Loss of bromide ion from the substrate leads to the formation of a tertiary carbocation [stable, hence no
rearrangement]. At low temperatures, the SN1 pathway (above) will dominate: attack at the carbocation by
CH3OH, followed by loss of proton to give the ether. The bottom pathway – removal of hydrogen from the
carbon adjacent to the carbocation – will be minor at low temperature [note the formation of the more
substituted alkene here – Zaitsev’s rule in action]. As temperature is increased, the amount of elimination
relative to substitution should gradually increase.
(Note: before applying these reaction patterns to the substrate, make sure to examine the carbocation that is
formed. If a more stable carbocation can be formed through a hydride or alkyl shift, do this rearrangement
first!)
The third case – addition of H2SO4 to a tertiary alcohol – is a case where a carbocation is formed in the
absence of a good nucleophile [the negatively charged oxygen on the conjugate base, [HSO4(-)] is stabilized
through resonance, reducing its reactivity]. The fact that heat is being applied helps to tip the balance even
further toward E1 being dominant over SN1.
In the fourth example we have a tertiary halide [which will form a stable carbocation] in a polar protic
solvent [will help to stabilize the intermediate carbocation] and heat is not indicated. Therefore using Quick
N’ Dirty Rule #6, we can say that SN1 products will dominate. [E1 products will form as well, but they will
not be the major products].
This is truly a Quick N’ Dirty rule. It is not applied evenly and there are plenty of exceptions. Your mileage
will vary widely. I wish I had a hard, concrete example to show you that clearly demonstrates the
relationship between increased heat and a greater proportion of elimination (E1) versus substitution (SN1)
products. Sadly, I cannot find a good example at this time. So a hand-wavy “elimination increases as heat is
applied” will have to do for now.*
In the next post we’ll summarize all the Quick N’ Dirty Rules for determining whether a reaction goes
SN1/SN2/E1/E2.
Notes
* I am annoyed by the lack of hard data available when making pronouncements about the SN1/SN2/E1/E2
decision. Wohler’s quote about the “monstrous and boundless thicket… into which one may well dread to
enter” seems appropriate here. I would love to see the control experiments with various substrates run under
identical sets of conditions that clearly delineate the impact of each variable. I have not seen this. Any
undergraduate labs out there with a desire for performing this valuable public service?
A final note/editorial.
The post above is not so much about understanding some facet of organic chemistry as it is about how
to answer some arbitrary question from a textbook or exam. For the purpose of understanding organic
chemistry, it’s enough to know that heat favors elimination reactions. For the purpose of knowing how to
answer a particular kind of question on an exam, it will of course depend on the examiner. There are wide
variations. However, I will share with you one common observation that I’ve seen in 2.5 years of seeing
exams from all over the country.
First, background. In the laboratory, it is extremely common to heat reactions to get them to go at a
reasonable speed, such as in this example [from March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry 5th ed; Cooper, K.A.
et. al. J. Chem. Soc. 1948, 2038:]
However, on an exam, instructors – for various reasons, including a well-intentioned desire not to
overwhelm the student – will often omit some of the data. For exam purposes, if the above reaction were
written as a question it will often look like this:
Note how “heat” has been omitted, which is in accord with the principle of least effort. The expected
answer in this instance would be t-BuOH, the product of an SN1 reaction. Depending on the question
wording, some instructors will also insist that the E1 product be drawn as well.
Here’s the observation I see in many (but certainly not all) courses. If the word “heat” is written in the
exam question, it is often a clue from the instructor that an elimination is to take place. In the
following reaction, for example, the question would point to elimination (2-methyl propene) being the major
product.
If you are a student and your goal is to answer a particular type of question on an exam correctly, I advise
you to double check this issue with your instructor and get their answer on it. There is tremendous
inconsistency in this practice nationwide.
Next
Alkyl Halide Reaction Map And Summary
The previous several posts dealt with an approach to solving substitution and elimination problems that can
only be described as a Quick N’ Dirty Guide to SN1/SN2/E1/E2. The basic premise is this: given 15-20
minutes to describe the basic principles by which one could figure out if a given reaction goes down one of
these pathways, these are, in my opinion, the key factors to consider.
Quick N’ Dirty rules, by their nature, do not cover exceptions. To learn about some of the exceptions, I
advise you to go back and read the individual posts [One Two Three Four].
Even further back, I urge you to understand the key concepts behind each reaction, such
as nucleophilicity, leaving group ability, carbocation stability, and the mechanism of each of these reactions.
[SN1] [SN2] [E1] [E2]
Finally, I will preface this by saying that the best way to learn and understand how these reactions work is to
do a lot of practice problems and pay particular attention to situations where you get the wrong answer –
they are instructive.
Here goes:
Quick N’ Dirty Rule #2: If tertiary, the reaction cannot be S N2. [Because tertiary alkyl halides are too
hindered for the SN2. Depending on the type of nucleophile/base, it will either proceed with concerted elimination
[E2] or through carbocation formation [SN1/E1]
Quick N’ Dirty Rule #4: If a charged species is not present, the reaction is likely to be SN1/E1. [so if the
only reagent is, say, H2O or CH3OH you are likely looking at carbocation formation resulting in an SN1/E1
reaction.]