Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
J. Appl. Cryst. (1999). 32, 1006±1009
In this manner, a linear density gradient was formed; for each checked by determining the density of deionized water ( =
volume of iodobenzene added to the ¯ask, twice this volume of 0.9971 g mlÿ1 at 298 K). Droplets (most dense ®rst, least dense
the ethylbenzene/iodobenzene mixture was delivered to the last) were added to the top of the gradient (one side only, to
cylinder. Gradient formation was complete when both syringes minimize the likelihood of a crystal hitting a droplet later)
were emptied. Care should be taken to stop before air is using a ®ne ¯ame-drawn Pasteur pipette: the droplet is
pushed to the bottom of the gradient; air bubbles rising partially squeezed out of the capillary under the surface of the
through the gradient lead to undesirable mixing. At this point, ethylbenzene and is then dislodged from the end of the
the double-ended needle was slowly withdrawn from the capillary by lifting the capillary out of the gradient. The
graduated cylinder. If desired, a slightly larger amount of droplets fell to their equilibrium position within 30 s. This
iodobenzene and air (e.g. 16 ml) can be used, to provide a position was read to the nearest 0.05 ml (avoid parallax
`cushion' at the bottom of the gradient. Furthermore, the errors). It was important to read the equilibrium position
organic solvents can be varied to obtain gradients that cover immediately, because an upward drift of some of the droplets
different density ranges (e.g. appropriate mixtures of ethyl- was noticeable after 5±10 min. This drift, which was progres-
benzene and iodobenzene can be combined to form shallow sively larger at greater depths in the gradient, appeared to be
gradients for very accurate crystal density measurements). due to the absorption of water from the iodobenzene (the
Gradients prepared in this manner at both 277 K and room droplets which were highest in the gradient, in the ethylben-
temperature were stable for at least 24 h, allowing them to be zene-rich phase, did not drift at all). Recalibration after several
prepared in advance. Occasionally, the gradients became hazy hours revealed that the gradient itself was perfectly stable: the
in the centre, apparently due to the lower solubility of water in original positions of all the droplets were reproducible to
the ethylbenzene/iodobenzene mixture. This haziness within 0.0±0.2 ml.
appeared not to affect the crystal density measurements, but
could be avoided by using dry iodobenzene and water-satu- 2.3. Crystal preparation
rated ethylbenzene. The glass plate of a stereo microscope (Nikon SMZ-U) was
This method of preparing the density gradient overcomes wrapped tightly with Dura-Seal (Diversi®ed Biotech, DS4-
two dif®culties: (i) standard (open to air) gradient makers 500), a compliant ®lm of polyethylene. This ®lm is transparent
cannot be used, because of the great difference in density and solvent-resistant, and it can be stretched and rubbed to
between ethylbenzene and iodobenzene, which leads to irre- remove wrinkles and air pockets. The crystal, which had been
gular and overly rapid entry of iodobenzene into the mixing previously equilibrated in the desired mother liquor, was
chamber of the gradient former; (ii) the apparatus is resistant deposited onto the Dura-Seal using a 1 mm glass capillary
to organic solvents, unlike standard gradient makers (Charles Supper Co.) attached to a 1 ml syringe. (Alternatively,
constructed of various plastics. a cryocrystallography loop can be used.) While observing the
crystal through the microscope, excess mother liquor was
2.2. Density-gradient calibration carefully removed from the crystal by using paper wicks and a
The gradient was calibrated with small droplets (diameter ®nely drawn glass capillary. The dry crystal was immediately
0.5 mm) of H2O and aqueous salt solutions (e.g. CsCl) of ¯ooded with several drops (100 ml) of water-saturated
known density. Densities were determined gravimetrically in ethylbenzene.
5 ml `Class A' volumetric ¯asks; weights were corrected for
buoyancy. The ¯ask-®lling and weighing procedure was 2.4. Crystal transfer to the density gradient
The crystal was picked up from the ethylbenzene pool by
applying gentle suction (pipette or 1 ml syringe) to a 200 ml
plastic pipette tip (with its end cut off to provide a 1 mm
opening). Also, it was helpful to bend the pipette tip in the
middle by about 90 . (A glass capillary was less useful.) The
crystal in ethylbenzene was placed into the top of the density
gradient. Release of suction and a gentle shake were usually
suf®cient to release the crystal. The crystal fell rapidly (usually
15±30 s) to its equilibrium point in the gradient, which was
read immediately to the nearest 0.05 ml. Even very small
crystals (0.2 mm diameter) could be easily observed as they fell
through the gradient.
3. Example 1: lysozyme
Tetragonal crystals of hen egg white lysozyme (Sigma L-6876)
were grown in hanging drops at 293 K by mixing 5 ml of lyso-
zyme (80 mg mlÿ1 in 40 mM NaOAc, pH 4.7) with 5 ml of well
solution [0.8±1.2 M NaCl, 40 mM NaOAc, pH 4.3±4.8
(Alderton & Fevold, 1946)]. All harvest buffers used below
Fig. 1. The density-gradient apparatus. A: Magnetic stirrer. B:
Erlenmeyer ¯ask charged with ethylbenzene and a stirring bar. C:
contained 40 mM NaOAc, pH 4.7, and varying amounts of
Septum. D: Double-ended needles connected with polyethylene NaCl and/or CsCl. Crystals (0.2±1.5 mm diameter) were
tubing. E: Graduated cylinder. F, G: Syringes charged with harvested (1 M NaCl) and then transferred, in a nine-well
iodobenzene and air. H: Wooden block or equivalent. depression plate, through solutions of increasing NaCl
1008 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
concentration (0.25 M steps, 2±5 min each) to 2 M NaCl. Some Table 1. Density of hen egg white lysozyme crystals as a function
crystals were left to soak in either the 1 M NaCl or the 2 M of mother-liquor density
NaCl harvest buffers. The rest were transferred to 2 M CsCl, by
Mother-liquor Mother-liquor Crystal density
sequential passage through 0.5 M CsCl/1.5 M NaCl, 1 M CsCl/ composition² density (g mlÿ1)³ (g mlÿ1)§
1 M NaCl, and 1.5 M CsCl/0.5 M NaCl. Finally, the crystals
were transferred to various CsCl solutions (2.5 M to saturated, Saturated CsCl 1.8985 1.5354
in 0.5 M steps). Crystals were allowed to equilibrate for 6.0 M CsCl 1.7812 1.4844
5.5 M CsCl 1.7194 1.4844
between 30 min and several hours, either in the depression 4.5 M CsCl 1.5907 1.4319
wells (sealed with a cover slip) or in small ¯at-bottomed vials 3.5 M CsCl 1.4623 1.3704
containing 150 ml of the appropriate buffer. The densities of 2.5 M CsCl 1.3297 1.3839
the NaCl and CsCl harvest buffers were determined as 2.0 M NaCl 1.0721 1.2399
described above. 1.0 M NaCl 1.0369 1.2354
The equilibrated lysozyme crystals were dried and trans- 1.0 M NaCl 1.0369 1.2369
ferred to an ethylbenzene/iodobenzene density gradient ² Indicated molarity of CsCl or NaCl, plus 40 mM NaOAc, pH
(calibrated with the NaCl and CsCl harvest buffers) as 4.7. ³ Determined gravimetrically. § Position in the density
described above. The positions of the standards in the gradient gradient was converted to density by calculation from a linear
(range 8.95±22.25 ml, which encompassed the observed crystal regression of gradient position versus density of seven standard
positions) were linearly related to the densities of the stan- solutions of known (gravimetrically determined) density.
dards (range 1.5907±1.1949 g mlÿ1; correlation coef®cient
0.991). Crystal density was determined from the position of the
crystal in the gradient by back-calculation using this linear
relationship. The crystals had densities ranging from 1.2354 to 2.0 M NaHEPES, pH 7.5, and 1.5 volumes of H2O. Crystals
1.5354 g mlÿ1 (Table 1). were then transferred to six harvest buffers of varying density
Following the formalism of Colman & Matthews (1971), the prepared from 3.5 M Cs2SO4, 1.8 M Na3citrate, 3.0 M
crystal density (Dc) is the sum of three component densities, K3citrate, and H2O (Table 2). Crystals were allowed to equi-
namely, the protein density (Dp), the density of the tightly librate in these harvest buffers at 277 K for 18 h.
bound water (Dw), and that of the freely exchangeable solvent The equilibrated apo (1±43)A-I crystals were dried and
(Ds), taken in proportion to the fractional volume of each transferred to an ethylbenzene/iodobenzene density gradient
component. This relationship is expressed by at 277 K, as described above. The positions of the standards in
the gradient (range 4.45±25.30 ml, which encompassed the
Dc Dp
Vp =V Dw
Vw =V Ds
Vs =V;
1 observed crystal positions) were linearly related to their
densities (range 1.7488±1.0000 g mlÿ1; correlation coef®cient
where V is the unit-cell volume. Therefore, as the solvent 0.998). Crystal density was determined from the position of the
(mother liquor) density Ds is varied, the apparent crystal crystal in the gradient by back-calculation using this linear
density Dc varies as a linear function of Ds with slope Vs=V, relationship. The crystals had densities ranging from 1.2513 to
assuming that the other parameters are unaffected by changes 1.6816 g mlÿ1 (Table 2).
in mother-liquor composition. Vs, Vp, Vw and n, the number of The apo (1±43)A-I crystal density was linearly related to
protein molecules in the asymmetric unit of the crystal, can the mother-liquor density (Table 2): Dc = 0.333 + 0.749Ds
then be derived from the slope and intercept values, Avoga- (correlation coef®cient 0.941). Combining this result with the
dro's number, the unit-cell volume and symmetry, and the unit-cell volume (2 177 495 A Ê 3) and symmetry (primitive
protein molecular weight and partial speci®c volume (Colman orthorhombic), protein molecular weight (23 264 Da), and
& Matthews, 1971). The lysozyme crystal density was linearly protein partial speci®c volume [0.725 ml gÿ1 (Brouillette,
related to the mother-liquor density (Table 1): Dc = 0.882 + 1996)], yielded Vp=V = 22%, Vw=V = 3%, Vs=V = 75% and n =
0.345Ds (correlation coef®cient 0.977). Combining this result 4.24. The high exchangeable solvent volume fraction of 75%
with the unit-cell volume and symmetry [space group P43212; a turned out to be completely consistent with the apo (1±
Ê ; V = 237 133 A
= 79.1, c = 37.9 A Ê 3 (Blake et al., 1965)], protein 43)A-I crystal structure when it was solved (four molecules in
molecular weight (14 313 Da) and protein partial speci®c the asymmetric unit, n = 4), in which extremely large connected
volume [0.703 ml gÿ1 (Squire & Himmel, 1979)], yielded Vp=V solvent channels run throughout the crystal (Borhani et al.,
= 54%, Vw=V = 12%, Vs=V = 34% and n = 0.96. These 1997).
experimental values compare very favourably with those The self-rotation function (SRF) of the apo (1±43)A-I
calculated from the known crystal structure [101 bound water crystals exhibited a strong noncrystallographic dyad in the ab
molecules (Protein Data Bank entry 6lyz; Diamond, 1974): plane, as well as two rather weak peaks that, when combined
Vp=V = 56%, Vw=V = 10%, Vs=V = 34% and n = 1]. with the dyad, were indicative of noncrystallographic 222
pseudosymmetry (Borhani et al., 1997). Although the SRF
result by itself was not suf®ciently clear to de®ne unambigu-
4. Example 2: apo D(1±43)A-I ously the contents of the asymmetric unit, the interpretation of
Large bipyramidal crystals of apo (1±43)A-I were grown in this result was bolstered by the crystal density results. Taken
hanging drops at 277 K from 5 ml of apo (1±43)A-I together, these results suggested strongly that the apo
(19.7 mg mlÿ1) mixed with 5 ml of well solution (1.2 M Na3- (1±43)A-I crystals had four molecules in the asymmetric
citrate, 100 mM NaHEPES, pH 7.5). These crystals belong to unit. This con®dent knowledge of the molecular contents of
Ê . The
space group P212121; a = 97.47, b = 113.87, c = 196.19 A the apo (1±43)A-I crystals proved to be very helpful in the
crystals were harvested into an arti®cial mother liquor correct interpretation of the experimental electron density
consisting of 8 volumes of 1.8 M Na3citrate, 0.5 volumes of maps.
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 1009
Table 2. Density of apo (1±43)A-I crystals as a function of lower quality of these data compared to the lysozyme data.
mother-liquor density Third, the crystal may not have been dried completely, or may
have adhering salt crystals. This problem was not encountered
Mother-liquor Mother-liquor Crystal density
composition² density (g mlÿ1)³ (g mlÿ1)§ with apo (1±43)A-I, but it was noticed with lysozyme. We
found that ¯ooding the crystals with ethylbenzene immediately
Cs:Na, 2:1 1.7488 1.6816 upon mother-liquor removal was the best way to minimize this
Cs:Na, 1:1 1.6347 1.5327
problem. Saturated and near-saturated CsCl solutions were
Cs:Na, 1:2 1.5211 1.4419
Cs:Na, 1:5 1.4009 1.4220 used with lysozyme, because of its low solvent content, and
K:H2O, 2:1 1.3630 1.3112 evaporation of these solutions was rapid at room temperature.
K:H2O, 1:2 1.1929 1.2513 For these reasons, the lysozyme test crystals were actually
more dif®cult to handle than our apo (1±43)A-I crystals!
² Stock solutions: Cs: 3.5 M Cs2SO4; Na: 1.8 M Na3citrate; K: 3.0 M Therefore, we recommend proceeding to a crystal of interest
K3citrate. ³ Determined gravimetrically. § Position in the density
after a test run with lysozyme if calibration of the gradient
gradient was converted to density by calculation from a linear
regression of gradient position versus density of 17 standard solutions indicates that a suitable linear gradient can be formed, even if
of known (gravimetrically determined) density. the lysozyme results prove less than satisfactory.