Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Isabel Anzola M.D, Patricia C. Gomez M.D & Guillermo E. Umpierrez M.D
To cite this article: Isabel Anzola M.D, Patricia C. Gomez M.D & Guillermo E. Umpierrez M.D
(2016): Management of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state in adults,
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism, DOI: 10.1586/17446651.2016.1145049
Download by: [Umeå University Library] Date: 05 February 2016, At: 19:08
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1586/17446651.2016.1145049
Management of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state in adults
Authors:
Institution:
1
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Emory University,
Atlanta, GA
Correspondence:
1
Abstract:
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome (HHS) are two acute
complications of diabetes associated with high mortality rate if not efficiently and effectively
treated. Both entities are characterized by insulinopenia, hyperglycemia and dehydration. DKA
and HHS are two serious complications of diabetes associated with significant mortality and a high
healthcare costs. The overall DKA mortality in the US is less than 1%, but a rate higher than 5% is
reported in the elderly and in patients with concomitant life-threatening illnesses. Mortality in
patients with HHS is reported between 5% and 16%, which is about 10 times higher than the
mortality in patients with DKA. Objectives of management include restoration circulatory volume
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
Key Words: ketoacidosis, hyperglycemia hyperosmolar state, diabetic ketoacidosis, hospital, inpatient
care
2
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS) are two serious
complications of diabetes that require prompt recognition, diagnosis and treatment. DKA is common
with approximately 145,000 cases per year in the United States.1 The rate of hospital admissions
for HHS is lower, accounting for less than 1% of all diabetes-related admissions. DKA occurs most
commonly in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and HHS occurs in older
patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although most patients with DKA have autoimmune T1D;
patients with T2D are also at risk during the catabolic stress of acute illness such as trauma,
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
dehydration 3. Clinically, they differ by the presence of increased ketones bodies and severity of
DKA and HHS are two serious complications of diabetes associated with significant
mortality and a high healthcare costs. DKA is the leading cause of mortality in children and young
adults with T1D, accounting for approximately 50% of deaths in children and young adults with
diabetes 5. The overall DKA mortality in the US is less than 1%, but a rate higher than 5% is
reported in the elderly and in patients with concomitant life-threatening illnesses (2-4). Similar
mortality rates have been reported in European countries, but the reported mortality continues to be
6,7
higher than 10% in Indonesia and sub-Saharan African countries . HHS occurs most commonly
in older patients with T2D with an intercurrent illness such as infection, surgery or ischemic
events, and is associated with higher mortality rate than DKA. Mortality in patients with HHS is
reported between 5 and 16% (2; 5-7), which is about 10 times higher than the mortality in patients
with DKA (2; 5-7). The prognosis and outcome of patients with HHS is determined by the severity
3
Treatment of DKA utilizes a large number of resources and represents a substantial
economic burden. In the US, it is estimated that DKA episodes represent more than $1 of every $4
spent on direct medical care for adult patients with type 1 diabetes and $1 of every $2 in those
patients experiencing multiple episodes 11. Based on an annual average of 135,000 hospitalizations
for DKA in the U.S., with an average cost of $17,500 per patient, the annual hospital cost for
absolute or relative insulin deficiency, impaired insulin action, and increased concentration of
counterregulatory hormones (glucagon, catecholamines, cortisol, and growth hormone) 3,4 (Figure
1). Hyperglycemia results from increased hepatic glucose production and reduced glucose uptake
in peripheral tissues 12. Increased hepatic glucose production results from increased generation of
gluconeogenic substrates (alanine, lactate and glycerol) 3 and increased activition of gluconeogenic
carboxylase) 12,13. In addition, hyperglycemia above the renal threshold of ~ 10 mmol/L or 180
mg/dL causes osmotic diuresis, dehydration, and decreased glomerular filtration rate; the latter
Severe insulin deficiency is associated with increased activity of the hormone sensitive
lipase in adipose tissue, which results in breakdown of triglyceride into glycerol and high
circulating levels of free fatty acids 12. In the liver, free fatty acids are oxidized to ketone bodies, a
hepatic levels of malonyl coenzyme A (CoA), the first rate-limiting enzyme in the novo fatty acid
synthesis. Malonyl CoA, inhibits the enzyme carnitine palmitoyl-transferase I (CPT I), modulates
4
movement of free fatty acid into the hepatic mitochondria where fatty acid oxidation takes place 15.
The increased fatty acyl CoA and CPT-I activity in DKA lead to increased production of ketone
bodies (acetoacetate [AcAc], and β- hydroxybutyrate [BOHB]). High ketone levels are strong acids
prevent lipolysis and ketogenesis. Patients with HHS have been shown to have higher insulin
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
concentration, reduced concentration of FFA, cortisol, growth hormone and glucagon than patients
Table 2 depicts the most common precipitating cause of DKA reported in different
epidemiological studies worldwide (Table 2). In the United States and Western countries, the most
common precipitating cause were poor adherence to therapy (insulin omission), infection and
newly diagnosed diabetes. In contrast, in third-world countries, infections and access of care were
DKA is the initial presentation of diabetes in ~20% of adult patients and in ~30 to 40% of
children with T1D.10,17 In patients with a known history of diabetes, precipitating factors for DKA
include infections, intercurrent illnesses, psychological stress and poor compliance with therapy.
Poor adherence to insulin treatment is the most common precipitating cause of DKA in young
10,18
patients with T1D and in inner city populations in the United States . In other countries,
infections are the most common precipitating factor, occurring in 30-50% of cases (Table 2). Risk
factors for DKA are previous episodes of ketoacidosis, poor metabolic control, limited access to
medical services and socioeconomic factors. Psychological factors, including depression and
5
eating disorders are reported in up to 20% of recurrent episodes of ketoacidosis in young patients
18-20
.
and atypical antipsychotic agents may also precipitate the development of DKA 3,18. Recently, the
sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a new class of oral antidiabetic agents that
in the kidney have been reported to be associated with the development of DKA in patients with
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
21,22
T1D and T2D . The underlying mechanisms are not known, but most patients receiving
SGLT2-inhibitors require reduction in insulin dose to avoid hypoglycemia, and the lower insulin
dose may be insufficient to suppress lipolysis and ketogenesis. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors are
23
expressed in pancreatic alpha-cells and may promote glucagon secretion . Furthermore,
SGLT transporters have been shown to reduce urinary excretion of ketone bodies, which might
HHS is the initial manifestation of diabetes in 7-17% of patients 3,4. Infection is the major
precipitating factor occurring in 30-60% of HHS patients, with urinary tract infections and
pneumonia being the most common infections. Similar than DKA, intercurrent illnesses such as
cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, trauma, surgery and drugs (glucocorticoids, diazoxide,
The diagnosis of DKA or HHS should be suspected in every ill patient with significant
hyperglycemia. Patients with DKA usually presents with a few days of polyuria, polydipsia, and
weight loss. Nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain are present in 40 – 75% of cases of DKA 25.
6
Physical examination reveals signs of dehydration, changes in mental status, hypothermia acetone-
odoured breath and labored Kussmaul respiration, particularly in patients with severe metabolic
acidosis. As outlined in Table 1, DKA consists of the triad of hyperglycemia, hyperketonemia and
metabolic acidosis and level of sensorium. The key diagnostic criterion is the elevation of serum
ketone bodies concentration. Although the majority of patients with DKA present with a blood
glucose level greater than 300 mg/dL, some patients can present with mild elevations in glucose
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
levels after receiving insulin injections, reduction of food intake, pregnancy, and patients with
impaired gluconeogenesis such as in patients with alcohol abuse or liver failure. Normoglycemia
DKA has also been reported in patients treated with SGLT2-inhibitors. Therefore, the level of
blood glucose should not be viewed as a primary factor in determining the diagnosis or severity of
DKA.
The diagnostic criteria for HHS include a plasma glucose greater than 600 mg/dL, a
effective serum osmolality greater than 320 mOsm/kg, and the absence of significant metabolic
acidosis and ketonemia 9. Although by definition, patients with HHS have a serum pH greater than
7.3, a serum bicarbonate greater than 18 mEq/L, and negative ketone bodies in urine and plasma,
between 30% to 50% of patients with HHS have an increased anion gap metabolic acidosis as the
Confirmation of increased ketone bodies production, the key diagnostic feature of DKA is
plasma or urine, but does not recognize the presence of -hydroxybutyrate, which is the main
ketoacid in DKA 26. Therefore, the nitroprusside reaction may underestimate the level of ketosis.
7
Direct measurement of -hydroxybutyrate by the laboratory or by point-of-care meter is preferred
Management
There is considerable individual variability in the presentation of patients with DKA and HHS.
The clinical presentation may range from mild hyperglycemia and acidosis to severe
patient. Figure 2 shows the recommended algorithm suggested by the recent position statement
from the American Diabetes Association for treatment of DKA and HHS 9. Objectives of
hyperglycemia, correction of electrolyte imbalance and increased ketogenesis. Most patients with
DKA can be safely managed in observational and step-down units, without requiring admission in
an intensive care unit (ICU). The mortality rate, length of hospital stay, or time to resolve
ketoacidosis are similar between patients treated in ICU and non-ICU setting 27,28. Thus, only
patients with severe DKA, severe alteration of mental status, or those with a critical illness as
precipitating cause (i.e., myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis) require treatment
in the ICU. In contrast, due to the higher mortality, the presence of comorbid conditions and
altered mental status, most patients with HHS are treated in the ICU.
Fluid Therapy
The estimated water deficit in DKA is ~ 100 ml/kg of body weight 3 and between 100 and 200
ml/kg in HHS 4,20. The water deficit can be estimated using the following equation: water deficit =
8
therapy restoring intravascular volume and renal perfusion and reducing the level of counter-
regulatory hormones and hyperglycemia. Isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) infused at a rate of 500-1000
mL/h is recommended during the first 2-4 hours in order to restore normal blood pressure and
tissue perfusion. This is followed by the infusion of normal saline at 250 -500 mL/h or 0.45%
saline depending upon the serum sodium concentration and state of hydration 3. Subsequent choice
and rate of fluid replacement depends on hemodynamics, the state of hydration, serum electrolyte
levels, and urinary output 3. In general, 0.45% NaCl infused at 250-500ml/hr is appropriate if the
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
corrected serum sodium is normal or elevated; 0.9% NaCl at a similar rate is appropriate if
corrected serum sodium is low 3. Corrected sodium is calculated with the formula: measured
sodium + (((Serum glucose - 100)/100) x 1.6). Once the plasma glucose is ~250 mg/dL, 5–10%
dextrose should be added to replacement fluids to allow continued insulin administration until
The administration of large amounts of chloride-rich intravenous solutions (such as normal saline)
Therefore, when plasma glucose is ~250 mg/dL, 5–10% dextrose is added to intravenous fluids in
order to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia during insulin infusion until ketoacidosis resolves 9.
Insulin Therapy
glucose concentration and suppress lipolysis and ketogenesis 31. There is evidence that low-dose
insulin infusion, given by intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) routes, is
safe and effective in correcting DKA. In critically ill and mentally obtunded patients, continuous
9
intravenously infusion is the treatment of choice. Most treatment algorithms recommend the
infusion of an IV bolus dose of 0.1 unit/kg followed by continuous IV infusion of 0.1 unit/kg per
hour (5-10 unit/h) 9. The initial bolus of insulin is not necessary if the hourly insulin infusion rate is
given at 0.14 U/kg body weight (e.g., 10 U/h in a 70-kg patient). When plasma glucose reaches
~200 mg/dL, the insulin rate should be decreased to 0.05 unit/kg per hour and the intravenous fluids
changed to dextrose containing solutions. In DKA, the rate of insulin should be adjusted to maintain
blood glucose between 150 and 200 mg/dL until DKA is resolved. Similarly, in patients with
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
HHS, treatment should be adjusted to maintain a plasma glucose concentration ~ 200 mg/dL until
Several studies have shown that patient with uncomplicated mild to moderate DKA, the use
of subcutaneous lispro 32-34 or insulin aspart 35 given every 1 to 2 hours is as effective as the use of
IV regular insulin in the ICU (Table 3). After an initial bolus SC dose of 0.2 to 0.3 U/kg, the
administration of lispro or aspart, given in doses of 0.1 unit/kg every hour or 0.2 unit/kg every two
hours results in a similar decline in glucose concentration as the IV route. When, glucose levels
reach ~250 mg/dl, SC insulin dose is reduced by half and continue at the same interval until
resolution of DKA. This is done with the caveat that adequate personnel are available for frequent
measuring of blood glucose by finger-stick testing every 1 - 2 hours and frequent monitoring of
electrolytes and venous pH (every 4-6 hours) with adequate administration of hydrating fluid. In
the above-mentioned studies, the incidence of hypoglycemia was the same as with the intravenous
insulin protocol in the ICU. The use of rapid-acting insulin analogs is not recommended for
Potassium
10
Patients with DKA and HHS have total-body potassium deficit of ~ 3-5 mmol/kg. Despite
the total body deficit, the admission serum potassium is frequently normal or high due to the shift
from the intracellular to the extracellular space due to hypertonicity, insulin deficiency and
acidosis. During treatment, insulin therapy result in lower serum potassium levels due to increased
carefully monitored during the therapy. In patients with normal or high serum concentration, the
administration of potassium should be initiated when the serum concentration is below 5.0 mEq/L
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
to maintain a serum potassium levels within the normal range of 4 to 5 mEq/L 9. The
administration of 20 – 40 mmol of potassium per litter is usually necessary for most patients.
Exception to this recommendation includes patients with acute renal failure and low urine output
or with end-stage renal disease; in this case, potassium should be repleted only if low and
monitored carefully. In addition, patients with an initial serum potassium lower than 3.3 mmol/l,
potassium replacement should begin at a rate of 10 - 20 mmol per hour, and insulin therapy should
be delayed until serum potassium is > 3.3 mmol/l. In such patients, insulin administration may
precipitate profound hypokalemia, which can induce life-threatening arrhythmias and respiratory
muscle weakness 9.
Bicarbonate
vasodilatation and coma. The results of 9 studies evaluating the effect of alkalinization on a total
of 434 patients with DKA reported that bicarbonate therapy offers no advantage in improving
cardiac and neurologic functions or in the rate of recovery of hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis.
Moreover, bicarbonate therapy may increase the risk of hypokalemia, tissue oxygen uptake, and
cerebral edema 9. Despite that lack of evidence in support of the use of bicarbonate in DKA,
11
clinical guidelines recommend the administration of 50–100 mmol of sodium bicarbonate given as
isotonic solution (in 200 ml of water) in patients with venous pH <6.9. Patients with DKA with
Phosphate
Depletion of total body intracellular phosphate is universally present in patients with DKA. Severe
paralysis; however, several studies have failed to show any beneficial effect of phosphate
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
phosphate concentration lower than 1.0-1.5 mg/dL, careful phosphate replacement may be
indicated in patients with cardiac dysfunction, anemia, respiratory depression, and in those with
crises in adult patients proposed a single treatment algorithm for treating DKA and HHS. Low-
dose insulin infusion protocols for treating DKA appear to be effective; however, the mortality rate
is about ten times higher in HHS patients than in DKA patients 10,38. Despite the poor outcome, no
prospective, randomized studies have determined best treatment strategies in patients with HHS.
Thus, prospective studies are needed to determine effective and safe insulin and hydration
strategies, as well as to determine glucose targets during IV insulin infusion and during the
12
Criteria for resolution of DKA include the following a blood glucose lower than 250 mg/dL; a
serum bicarbonate level equal to or greater than 18 mmol/l, and a venous or arterial pH greater
than 7.3 3,9. The resolution of HHS is indicated when effective serum osmolality is lower than 310
mOsm/kg, blood glucose is ≤ 250 mg/dL and a gradual recovery to mental alertness 3,9.
It is important to recognize that the half-life of intravenous regular insulin is very short (less
than 10 minutes); therefore, if low-dose insulin infusion is interrupted suddenly, patients may be at
intravenous infusion of insulin be continued for 2 to 4 hours after subcutaneous insulin is started. It
has been suggested that the administration of SC insulin early in the course of treatment (4 to 6 hours after
initiation of insulin infusion) facilitates treatment and prevent rebound hyperglycemia after discontinuation
Clinical guidelines recommend transition from IV to SC insulin therapy once the patient is
alert and able to take food by mouth. Patients with previously known diabetes who were treated
with SC insulin previous to admission can resume their previous insulin regimen. Newly diagnosed
patients or insulin-naïve adult patients can be started at a daily total dose of 0.5 to 0.7 U/kg/d 9. The
mixed insulin regimen with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and regular insulin twice daily or
However, recent randomized studies have reported that the use of human insulin (NPH/regular
insulin) is associated with two-to three-fold increase in the frequency of hypoglycemic events
compared to the use of basal bolus regimen with insulin analogs 40. The short duration of action
and the undesirable peak activity at 4–6 h after injection of NPH insulin explain the higher rate of
hypoglycemic events. A recent randomized study reported that during the transition to SC insulin,
13
there were no differences in mean daily glucose levels, but 41% patients treated with NPH and
regular insulin had higher rate of hypoglycemia compared to 15% of patients treated with glargine
With improved outpatient treatment and follow-up programs and better adherence to self-
care, about 50 to 75% of DKA admissions could be avoided. The frequency of hospitalizations for
DKA has been reduced following diabetes education programs, improved follow-up care, and
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
access to medical advice. Many patients with recurrent DKA are unaware of sick-day management
or the consequences of skipping or discontinuing insulin therapy 41. It has been shown that frequent
visits to diabetes centers can improve glycemic control and reduce the frequency of emergency
admissions for DKA 42,43. Sick day rule education is of great importance in the management of
patients with diabetes, in particular in patients with history of DKA. Patients should be instructed
on how to adjust insulin dosage during illness emphasizing that insulin should never be
discontinued, how to contact with healthcare providers, as well as adequate fluid intake 3. In
addition, diabetes education and sick-day management should be reviewed periodically in patients
with T1D. Recent studies have reported that multidisciplinary diabetes teams addressing barriers to
communication, access to care, and medical adherence on the family, school, and health-care
levels could reduce the number of admission with DKA. Despite the expense of providing such an
intensive intervention, the multidisciplinary intervention incurred less cost to the health-care
system because of the decreased number of DKA admissions. In addition, patients with T1D
should be instructed on the use of home blood ketone monitoring during illness and persistent
Expert Commentary
14
The prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state continue increase
and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Programs to enhance treatment
adherence are needed to prevent these important acute complications of diabetes.
Key Issues
15
Financial and competing interests disclosure
G.E. Umpierrez is supported in part by research grants from the American Diabetes Association
(1-14-LLY-36), PHS grant UL1 RR025008 from the Clinical Translational Science Award
Program (M01 RR-00039), National Institute of Health, National Center for Research Resources
and has received unrestricted research support for inpatient studies (to Emory University) from
Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck and has received consulting fees and/or honoraria
for membership in advisory boards from Novo Nordisk, Glytec, Sanofi, Merck, and Boehringer
Ingelheim. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any
organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
16
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (*) or of considerable interest (**) to
readers.
*1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services:
Diabetes Data & Trends. Crude and Age-Adjusted Hospital Discharge Rates for Diabetic
Ketoacidosis as First-Listed Diagnosis per 1,000 Diabetic Population, United States, 1988–
2009. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/dkafirst/. Accessed 1/2013.
2. Davis SN, Umpierrez GE. Diabetic ketoacidosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus--pathophysiology and
clinical presentation. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3(11):730-731.
3. Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Murphy MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemic crises in patients
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
17
18. Randall L, Begovic J, Hudson M, et al. Recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in inner-city minority
patients: behavioral, socioeconomic, and psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1891-
1896.
19. Barnard KD, Skinner TC, Peveler R. The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 1
diabetes: systematic literature review. Diabet Med. 2006;23(4):445-448.
20. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert C, Goguen J, Gilbert J.
Hyperglycemic emergencies in adults. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37 Suppl 1:S72-76.
21. Peters AL, Buschur EO, Buse JB, Cohan P, Diner JC, Hirsch IB. Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A
Potential Complication of Treatment With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition. Diabetes
Care. 2015;38(9):1687-1693.
22. Taylor SI, Blau JE, Rother KI. Perspective: SGLT2 inhibitors may predispose to ketoacidosis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 2015:jc20151884.
23. Ferrannini E, Muscelli E, Frascerra S, et al. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2
inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(2):499-508.
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
24. Peters AL, Buschur EO, Buse JB, Cohan P, Diner JC, Hirsch IB. Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A
Potential Complication of Treatment With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition. Diabetes
Care. 2015.
25. Umpierrez G, Freire AX. Abdominal pain in patients with hyperglycemic crises. J Crit Care.
2002;17(1):63-67.
26. Stephens JM, Sulway MJ, Watkins PJ. Relationship of blood acetoacetate and 3-hydroxybutyrate in
diabetes. Diabetes. 1971;20(7):485-489.
27. Freire AX, Umpierrez GE, Afessa B, Latif KA, Bridges L, Kitabchi AE. Predictors of intensive care unit
and hospital length of stay in diabetic ketoacidosis. J Crit Care. 2002;17(4):207-211.
28. Umpierrez GE, Kitabchi AE. Diabetic ketoacidosis: risk factors and management strategies. Treat
Endocrinol. 2003;2(2):95-108.
29. Adrogue HJ, Wilson H, Boyd AE, 3rd, Suki WN, Eknoyan G. Plasma acid-base patterns in diabetic
ketoacidosis. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(26):1603-1610.
30. Oh MS, Carroll HJ, Uribarri J. Mechanism of normochloremic and hyperchloremic acidosis in
diabetic ketoacidosis. Nephron. 1990;54(1):1-6.
31. Luzi L, Barrett EJ, Groop LC, Ferrannini E, DeFronzo RA. Metabolic effects of low-dose insulin
therapy on glucose metabolism in diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes. 1988;37(11):1470-1477.
32. Umpierrez GE, Latif K, Stoever J, et al. Efficacy of subcutaneous insulin lispro versus continuous
intravenous regular insulin for the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. Am J Med.
2004;117(5):291-296.
33. Ersoz HO, Ukinc K, Kose M, et al. Subcutaneous lispro and intravenous regular insulin treatments
are equally effective and safe for the treatment of mild and moderate diabetic ketoacidosis in
adult patients. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60(4):429-433.
34. Karoli R, Fatima J, Salman T, Sandhu S, Shankar R. Managing diabetic ketoacidosis in non-intensive
care unit setting: Role of insulin analogs. Indian J Pharmacol. 2011;43(4):398-401.
**35. Umpierrez GE, Cuervo R, Karabell A, Latif K, Freire AX, Kitabchi AE. Treatment of diabetic
ketoacidosis with subcutaneous insulin aspart. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(8):1873-1878.
Treatment of DKA with subcutaneous aspart insulin versus intravenous insulin infusion with regular insulin
36. Zipf WB, Bacon GE, Spencer ML, Kelch RP, Hopwood NJ, Hawker CD. Hypocalcemia,
hypomagnesemia, and transient hypoparathyroidism during therapy with potassium phosphate in
diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes Care. 1979;2(3):265-268.
37. Winter RJ, Harris CJ, Phillips LS, Green OC. Diabetic ketoacidosis. Induction of hypocalcemia and
hypomagnesemia by phosphate therapy. Am J Med. 1979;67(5):897-900.
18
38. Fadini GP, de Kreutzenberg SV, Rigato M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of the hyperglycemic
hyperosmolar non-ketotic syndrome in a cohort of 51 consecutive cases at a single center.
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2011;94(2):172-179.
39. Hsia E, Seggelke S, Gibbs J, et al. Subcutaneous administration of glargine to diabetic patients
receiving insulin infusion prevents rebound hyperglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2012;97(9):3132-3137.
40. Umpierrez GE, Jones S, Smiley D, et al. Insulin analogs versus human insulin in the treatment of
patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1164-
1169.
41. Laffel L. Sick-day management in type 1 diabetes. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North
America. 2000;29(4):707-723.
42. Jefferies CA, Nakhla M, Derraik JG, Gunn AJ, Daneman D, Cutfield WS. Preventing Diabetic
Ketoacidosis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62(4):857-871.
43. Vanelli M, Chiari G, Ghizzoni L, Costi G, Giacalone T, Chiarelli F. Effectiveness of a prevention
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
program for diabetic ketoacidosis in children. An 8-year study in schools and private practices.
Diabetes Care. 1999;22(1):7-9.
44. Thuzar M, Malabu UH, Tisdell B, Sangla KS. Use of a standardised diabetic ketoacidosis
management protocol improved clinical outcomes. Diabetes research and clinical practice.
2014;104(1):e8-e11.
45. Weinert LS, Scheffel RS, Severo MD, et al. Precipitating factors of diabetic ketoacidosis at a public
hospital in a middle-income country. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2012;96(1):29-34.
46. Tan H, Zhou Y, Yu Y. Characteristics of diabetic ketoacidosis in Chinese adults and adolescents -- a
teaching hospital-based analysis. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2012;97(2):306-312.
47. Suwarto S, Sutrisna B, Waspadji S, Pohan HT. Predictors of five days mortality in diabetic
ketoacidosis patients: a prospective cohort study. Acta Med Indones. 2014;46(1):18-23.
48. Barski L, Nevzorov R, Rabaev E, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis: clinical characteristics, precipitating
factors and outcomes of care. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012;14(5):299-303.
49. Ko SH, Lee WY, Lee JH, et al. Clinical characteristics of diabetic ketoacidosis in Korea over the past
two decades. Diabet Med. 2005;22(4):466-469.
50. Edo AE. Clinical profile and outcomes of adult patients with hyperglycemic emergencies managed
at a tertiary care hospital in Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2012;53(3):121-125.
51. Guisado-Vasco P, Cano-Megias M, Carrasco-de la Fuente M, Corres-Gonzalez J, Matei AM,
Gonzalez-Albarran O. Clinical features, mortality, hospital admission, and length of stay of a cohort
of adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis attending the emergency room of a tertiary hospital in
Spain. Endocrinol Nutr. 2015;62(6):277-284.
52. Alourfi Z, Homsi H. Precipitating factors, outcomes, and recurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis at a
university hospital in Damascus. Avicenna J Med. 2015;5(1):11-15.
53. Lin SF, Lin JD, Huang YY. Diabetic ketoacidosis: comparisons of patient characteristics, clinical
presentations and outcomes today and 20 years ago. Chang Gung Med J. 2005;28(1):24-30.
54. Della Manna T, Steinmetz L, Campos PR, et al. Subcutaneous use of a fast-acting insulin analog: an
alternative treatment for pediatric patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes Care.
2005;28(8):1856-1861.
19
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
20
Table 1. Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State (HHS). Data taken from [9].
DKA HHS
_____________________________________
Mild Moderate Severe
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Plasma glucose, mg/dL* > 250 > 250 > 250 > 600
Urine/blood ketones, mmol/L†: Measurement of aceto-acetate (nitroprusside reaction) and β-Hydroxybutyrate by laboratory or point
of care meters. Coexistence of DKA and HHS is reported in up to 30% of cases
21
Table 2 Precipitating causes in patients with DKA
Australia Brazil China Indonesia Israel Korea Nigeria Spain Syria Taiwan USA
44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 18
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
of diabetes, %
adherence, %
22
Table 3. Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis with Subcutaneous Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs
Insulin formulation Lispro Regular Lispro Regular Lispro Regular Aspart Regular Lispro Regular
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
Number of patients 20 20 10 10 25 25 15 15 30 30
down down
BMI 26 27 NR NR 25 24 28 27 NR NR
DM duration, years 7 7 5 7 7 6 NR NR NR NR
Admission pH 7.17 7.19 7.18 7.16 7.16 7.18 7.15 7.11 7.17 7.18
Admission BG,
674 611 556 650 650 679 774 720 443 443
mg/dL
Time to resolution,
10 11 13.2 12 12 11 10.4 11 <12 h <6 h
hrs
23
Hosp. length of stay,
4 ±2 4 ±1 NR NR 6.0 ±1.2 6.6 ±1.5 3.7±4 4.5±3 3.7±4 4.5±3
days
Hypoglycemia
1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 4 6
events, n
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; Hrs: hours, NR: not reported; ICU: intensive care unit
24
Downloaded by [Umeå University Library] at 19:08 05 February 2016
25
PROTOCOL FOR MANAGEMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH DKA and HHS
* Regular insulin is the preferred insulin formulation for continuous intravenous insulin infusion (IV). 26
** Rapid-acting insulin analogs (lispro, aspart) are the preferred insulin formulation during subcutaneous (SC)
insulin therapy