English Proficiency Institutional Test (EPIT)

English proficiency institutional test

Exam details

Student Anak Agung Oka Parama Budita Gocara SH MH PN

Prabumulih

Exam date 14 Jul 20

School name LIA 32

Exam results

Total score (pt)

Skill level (CEFR)
483
Independent User (B1)
317-670

Listening Comprehension 50pt (33-68), CEFR: B1

Description

When you listen to short dialogues, you can:

• understand common vocabulary items
• understand the meaning of some less common vocabulary items
• understand some common idioms and everyday expressions
• understand questions which are in the form of statements or indirect questions if they are
repeated
• understand common functions, e.g., invitations, suggestions, etc.
• understand what the speaker is referring to when a pronoun or possessive adjective is
used, e.g., ‘their’, ‘these’, ‘its’
Structure and Written Expression 43pt (33-68), CEFR: A2

Description

You can usually:

• use and understand the most often used tenses of common verbs
• use a singular or plural noun correctly as the subject of a sentence in very simple
sentences
• use linking verbs, especially ‘be’, to connect subjects with nouns or adjectives
• recognize that some common verbs require nouns as objects
• use simple comparatives and superlatives correctly
• join clauses with common conjunctions such as ‘and’, ‘but’, ‘because’

Reading Comprehension 52pt (29-67), CEFR: B1

Description

You can usually:

• understand descriptions of relatively simple processes
• understand a narrative in an academic text with clear signposting
• understand common vocabulary
• recognize when information is repeated in a different way
• follow comparisons and contrasts in a sentence where the information is connected with
conjunctions such as ‘and’, ‘but’, ‘because’
• understand the connection between sentences in paragraphs when common vocabulary
items are used

Innovapress has copyrights for English Proficiency Institutional Test and cannot be
redistributed without permission. This report is based on your overall result compared with
Common Eurppean Framework of Reference for Language (CEFR) scale.