Project Closure Document

Project: Name identifying the project.

Code: Code identifying the project.
Project Funder: Name of the body funding the project.
Implementing body Organization entrusted with carrying out the project.
Project Manager: Name of individual responsible for managing the project.
Start date: Date of the Start of the Project

Project Description:
Give a brief description of the project. This information may be taken from the Project Constitution Document.

Project Objectives Success Criterion

Scope
List describing the objectives set for Specific, measurable criteria
realizing project benefits. determining the success of the
project.

Time
List describing the goals for completing Specific dates that must be met in
the project on time. order to determine the success of the
schedule.

Cost
List describing the project's budgetary Specific cost ranges defining
targets. budgetary success.
Quality
List describing the quality criterion for Specific measures to be met by the
the project. project and by the product for them to
be considered successful.

Other
Objectives of any other type suitable for Measurable, specific and relevant
the project. results defining the success of the
project.

Benefits and/or Impacts of the Project on:

 Infrastructure. Description of the benefits or impacts that the project has had on the comm

Economic Growth Description of the benefits or impacts that the project has had on the comm
growth.

Social Development Description of the benefits or impacts that the project has had on the comm
development.

Information on Contracts
General description referring to the conclusion of contracts.

Name and signature of the Project

Leader
 osure Document
ect.

the project.
th carrying out the project.
sible for managing the project.
Finish Date: Date of the Conclusion of the Project

n from the Project Constitution Document.

Results Variance

Lists and/or describes the Explains any variance in the scope.

evidence with which the
success criterion has
been complied.

Identifies the final date Explains any variance in the project's

for delivery of the schedule or duration.
product/service.

Final project costs. Explain any variance in the cost.

Verification and Explain any variance in the quality.

validation of the quality
criteria compared with
the information on
acceptance of the
product/service.

Evidence that the Explains any other variance in relation to

objectives have been the objectives.
met.
or impacts that the project has had on the community/country's infrastructure.

or impacts that the project has had on the community/country's economic

or impacts that the project has had on the community/country's social

Name and signature of the Sponsor

 Project Closure Document
Project: Educational Support
Code: HT2011-12
Project Funder: Inter-American Development Bank
Implementing body: Ministry of Economy and Finance
Project Manager: Erika Estrada
Start date: 6/1/2011

Project Description:
The aim of this project is to ensure a well administered, publicly financed education system for all children, free from
providing high-quality educational services, in addition to a series of social services, over a two-year period. This US$3
stage in responding to the short-term needs for reconfiguring the education system and lays the foundations for long
educational reform.

Project Objectives Success Criterion

Scope
Providing high-quality infrastructure to 30 schools constructed, fitted out and
30 schools. with maintenance contracts.

Improving the quality of education 80% of the teachers passed the

through the training of 300 primary teaching evaluation exam.
school teachers and the provision of
school equipment to 9,000 students.

Implementing an effective support and 80% of the population have heard the
acceptance campaign for the project. messages on the radio.

Time
Handing over the 30 schools, Handing over the constructed schools
constructed, fitted out and ready for by 16 June 2013
operation in accordance with the
schedule.

Training 300 teachers prior to the start of 300 teachers trained before 30 April
the school cycle. 2013.
Disseminating the project support and End of campaign 8 April 2013.
acceptance campaign before the schools
came into operation.
Cost
Complying fully with the budget assigned Complying with the assigned budget
to the project. of US$30 million, with a variance of no
greater than 10% of the project.

Quality
Verifying the success of the project Satisfactory results in at least 25 of the
through evaluations and audits. 30 schools commissioned.

Other

Benefits and/or Impacts of the Project on:

Infrastructure. The project provided 30 schools, fitted out with furniture, computers, a kit
infrastructure of this type offers the means required to promote the social
the country. Moreover, these actions succeed in restoring the educational
earthquake that shook the country a number of years back.

Economic Growth In the long-term, the improved quality of educational services will offer sig
benefits in the country's economic setting. For individuals, it will generally
and employment. For society, it will entail greater economic growth, increa
competitiveness.

Social Development Providing high-quality education will be a mainstay in the fight against pov
currently being waged in the country.

Information on Contracts
* The contracts established with the companies entrusted with the architecture, construction and supervision of the
satisfactorily.

Name and Signature of the Project

Manager
osure Document

ent Bank
inance

Finish Date: 6/30/2013

nced education system for all children, free from school fees and devoted to
social services, over a two-year period. This US$30 million project is the first
ucation system and lays the foundations for long-term support for the

Results Variance

30 schools constructed The target set for schools constructed

and fitted out, all with and fitted out was met fully.
their respective
maintenance contracts.

278 teachers passed the The success criteria was exceeded by

teaching evaluation 12% thanks to the good work of the
exam; i.e. 92% of the 300 trainers and the commitment shown by
teachers trained. the teachers

75% of the population The target set was not met, owing to the
heard the radio spots. fact that the media mix was not
appropriate at the start of the project.

The handing over of The schools were handed over 3 days

schools took place on 19 after the set date, owing to certain
June 2013. logistical issues. Nonetheless, this was
not a significant variation, and it is
therefore considered to be within the
success criterion..

300 teachers trained by The objective was met prior to the

22 April 2013. scheduled date.
The campaign was The campaign launch was completed on
concluded on 8 April time.
2013.
 The final cost of the The cost of the project was US$1.5
project was US$31.5 greater than the figure planned; i.e., 5%
million. above the baseline. This was due to the
increase in construction material prices.

The evaluations and Work is underway on improving the

audits reflect satisfactory results in the 3 schools with
results in 27 out of the 30 unsatisfactory operational results.
schools commissioned.

hools, fitted out with furniture, computers, a kitchen and a library. Investing in
offers the means required to promote the social and economic development of
ese actions succeed in restoring the educational structure lost as a result of the
country a number of years back.

oved quality of educational services will offer significant individual and social
conomic setting. For individuals, it will generally mean higher levels of income
ety, it will entail greater economic growth, increased productivity and

cation will be a mainstay in the fight against poverty and under-development

he country.

rchitecture, construction and supervision of the 30 schools were concluded

Name and signature of the Sponsor