You are on page 1of 2

Salgado v.

Anson
G.R. No. 204494
July 27, 2016
J. Reyes

SUBJECT MATTER:
Include the topic under which the case appears in the syllabus.

DOCTRINE(S) AND APPLICABLE CONCEPT(S):


Only for digests for PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS.
Ex. Doctrine of Estoppel - DEFINITION
Legal Standing (Concept) - DEFINITION

LEGAL BASIS AND APPLICABLE CONCEPT(S):


Only for digests for CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Please outline the articles (esp. In the constitution) and relevant statues to
the case.
Ex. Article 1 Section 2 - WHY?
Sovereignty (Concept) - DEFINITION

INDEX:
Only for digests for LEGAL METHODS.

ACTION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT:


Ex. PETITION to review the decision of the Executive Assistant to the President.
Petitioner(s):
Parties
Respondent(
s):

SUMMARY:
Summarize the case in not more than 5 to 10 sentences.

ANTECEDENT FACTS:
● Include who are the characters in the case, what happened, and procedural history

ISSUE(S) AND HOLDING(S):


1. WON x or x -- NO
2. WON x or x -- YES

RATIO:
1. Ratio for Issue 1
○ Sub point for ratio for Issue 1
2. Ratio for Issue 2
○ Sub point for ratio for Issue 2

DISPOSITIVE:
Ex. IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the petition is DISMISSED for lack of merit. No costs. SO ORDERED.

MAIN DISSENTING OPINION:


Only for digests for CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1
● Name of Justice
○ Reason(s) for opinion
C2023(YOUR SURNAME) - SUBJECT, PROF.’S SURNAME
SAVE DIGESTS WITH FILE NAME:
SUBJECT - Petitioner vs. Respondent (G.R. No. xxxxxx)
LAW 100 - Tanada vs. Tuvera (G.R. 63915)

C2023(YOUR SURNAME) - SUBJECT, PROF.’S SURNAME

You might also like