Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/coastaleng
Abstract
In this study, a simple and explicit solution to the wave dispersion equation is derived based on Guo’s logarithmic matching.
The proposed solution has a maximum relative error of 0.75% for any water depth that is sufficient for practical calculation. It
can also be considered the first approximation for an iteration method if more accuracy is required. It may be useful under
practical conditions or for inclusion in wave computer models. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Linear wave theory; Dispersion equation; Wave number; Wave length; Wave celerity
0378-3839/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 3 8 3 9 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 3 9 - X
72 J. Guo / Coastal Engineering 45 (2002) 71–74
pffiffiffiffiffi
where x ¼ rh= gh and d1 = 0.6, d2 = 0.35, d3 = 0.1608
465608, d4 = 0.0632098765, d5 = 0.0217540484, and
d6 = 0.0065407983. The weakness of this approxima-
tion is that it is cumbersome and not easy to use by a
hand calculator.
In this note, one will show that applying the
logarithmic matching proposed by Guo (2002), one
can get a simple and explicit solution to the dispersion
equation.
2. Logarithmic matching
y ¼ K1 lnx þ C1 ð5Þ
for xbx0, and 3. Solution of the dispersion equation
y ¼ K2 lnx þ C2 ð6Þ Before applying the logarithmic matching to the
for xHx0. In the two equations above, x is an dispersion Eq. (1), one needs to write it in a dimen-
independent variable, y is a dependent variable, K1 sionless form, i.e.,
and K2 are two slopes based on a logarithmic scale,
hr 2
shown in Fig. 1, C1 and C2 are two intercepts, and x0 pffiffiffiffiffi ¼ khtanhkh ð10Þ
gh
is the location of the cross-point of the two asymp-
totes. For simplicity, one can assume that
Two matching models were proposed below. pffiffiffiffiffi
Model I (Guo, 2000) is x ¼ hr= gh and y ¼ kh ð11Þ
" b #
K2 K1 x Then Eq. (10) becomes
y ¼ K1 lnx þ ln 1 þ þ C1 ð7Þ
b x0
x2 ¼ ytanhy: ð12Þ
and Model II (Guo, in press) is For shallow water, y ! 0, one then has
( " #) y¼x ð13Þ
K1 K2 x b
y ¼ K2 lnx þ ln 1 exp þ C2
b x0 which can be rewritten as
ð8Þ lny ¼ lnx ð14Þ
J. Guo / Coastal Engineering 45 (2002) 71–74 73
Comparison of the above equation with Eq. (5) yields A numerical estimation of the above equation gives
that that
K1 ¼ 1 and C1 ¼ 0: ð15Þ b ¼ 2:4908 ð25Þ
For deep water, i.e., y ! l, Eq. (12) reduces to For simplicity, one can also find the value of b using
2 the collocation method at x = x0 = 1, i.e., the residual is
y¼x ð16Þ
made equal to 0 at x = 1.
which can be rewritten as 1 1
R jx¼1 ¼ 1 ð1 e1 Þ b tanh½ð1 e1 Þ b ¼ 0 ð26Þ
lny ¼ 2lnx ð17Þ
which gives that
Comparison of the above equation with Eq. (6) leads
b ¼ 2:5194 ð27Þ
to
K2 ¼ 2 and C2 ¼ 0: ð18Þ One can see that the two methods give the more or
According to Eq. (9), the cross-point of the two less same result. Eq. (25) is recommended in this note.
asymptotes occurs at Fig. 2 shows an excellent agreement between Eq.
(21) where b = 2.4901 and a numerical solution. The
C1 C2 numerical solution is obtained as follows: Giving a
x0 ¼ exp ¼ 1: ð19Þ
K2 K1 value of y in Eq. (12), calculate the value of x. If one
Eqs. (13) and (16) are actually the dimensionless defines the relative error as
form of Eqs (2) and (3). ycalculated ynumerical
Err ¼ 100% ð28Þ
With K1, K2, C1, C2, and x0 available, two compo- ynumerical
site solutions may be constructed by Eqs. (7) and (8),
respectively. Since Eq. (12) is characterized by an Eq. (21) has an accuracy of 0.75% over 0 V x V l, as
exponential function, one then choose Model II for shown in Fig. 3. One can see that Eq. (21) is sufficient
this study. According to Eq. (8), one has for engineering calculations. In particular, it may be
useful under practical conditions or for inclusion in
1 b
lny ¼ 2lnx lnð1 ex Þ ð20Þ wave computer models.
b In addition, if more accuracy is required, Eq. (21)
which can be rewritten as can be considered the first approximation for an
b 1
y ¼ x 2 ð1 ex Þ b ð21Þ
Acknowledgements