Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adjusting for Learners: Pretend this unit has been given to you to teach at the beginning of the year. After
analysing the school and student data/test results (Case Study), you will need to make adjustments for high and low
student needs regarding literacy and numeracy.
Do not rewrite the unit. Do not change the teaching and learning or assessment wording…instead make
adjustments to activities as needed for your learners to succeed in the tasks.
1. Locate the coloured sections. Highlight the activities that you believe require adjusting based upon your student
data. When making adjustments to the unit, do not remove any of the activities.
2. Describe your adjustments in the differentiation section.
3. Write the justification for any adjustments in the justification section. Not everything needs to be modified. Some
activities are already suitable for a range of learners. If this is the case, then please explain this in your justification
too.
4. Use intext referencing of research and learning theories and add the reference list at the end- APA6
Unit outline
Students engage with the idea that both natural processes and humans have an impact on Earth’s surface. Science knowledge helps people understand the
effects of their actions. This unit has local relevance to students as each year Queensland loses tonnes of soil to erosion. Students investigate human activities
and the resulting effects on a local surface. They also identify changes to Earth’s surface that have resulted from natural processes.
Questions that shape the inquiry include:
What is a catchment? Where is our catchment?
How has the surface of our local catchment changed naturally over time?
What are the human activities that impact on the surface of our local catchment?
What are the effects on the surface of our local catchment from these human activities and natural processes?
What solutions could be offered to assist in minimising the effects caused by human activity and natural processes?
How do scientists develop and model solutions?
Earth and space sciences Nature and development of Questioning and predicting Literacy
Earth’s surface changes over science With guidance, identify questions Use appropriate scientific
time as a result of natural Science involves making in familiar contexts that can be language specific to the topic.
processes and human activity predictions and describing investigated scientifically and
(ACSSU075) patterns and relationships predict what might happen based Numeracy
(ACSHE061) on prior knowledge (ACSIS064) Create tables, charts and graphs
Use and influence of science Planning and conducting to display information and find
Science knowledge helps people Suggest ways to plan and patterns.
to understand the effect of their conduct investigations to find ICT capability
actions (ACSHE062) answers to questions
Use a range of digital
(ACSIS065)
technologies to assist with
Safely use appropriate materials, investigating the concepts.
tools or equipment to make and
record observations, using formal Critical and creative thinking
measurements and digital Use thinking skills to
technologies as appropriate complete group activities and
(ACSIS066) open-ended tasks.
Processing and analysing data
Ethical behaviour
and information
Consider how the decisions
Use a range of methods including
of people impact on Earth’s
tables and simple column graphs
surface.
to represent data and to identify
patterns and trends (ACSIS068) Aboriginal and Torres
Compare results with predictions, Strait Islander histories and
suggesting possible reasons for cultures
findings (ACSIS216) Demonstrate alternative ways of
Evaluating knowing and sharing.
Reflect on the investigation; Asia and Australia’s
including whether a test was fair engagement with Asia
Experimental investigation: Model design and demonstration (Multimodal) Formative Assessment: This assessment is not explicit
Students identify a problem to be investigated in their local area by making an in assessment overview. The teacher is checking the
observation. They: progress of students; however, this needs to be
pose a question to investigate the factors that affect Earth’s surface in their addressed in more detail.
local catchment The student folios will be collated throughout the unit for
plan, make predictions, conduct, evaluate and reflect on an investigation that feedback. To cater for the diverse needs of the
answers this question students, the portfolios may enclose different methods
recommend actions to minimise or solve the identified problem that suits learners. Examples of this may be drawings,
design and construct a model to collect data and present their demonstration diagrams with labels, written paragraphs, tables or
to the class, explaining the results and sharing their recommendations. images.
Observations could include:
compacted soil at the local sporting field, BMX track or camp site Summative Assessment: Teacher may pose questions
erosion on local sand dunes where vegetation has been cleared that promote the thought processes of identified
learners. Students may work in a small group with the
clearing of all the trees and grass during the development of a new housing teacher to scaffold what question is appropriate to
estate investigate.
flooding of local farms after harvesting but before the establishment of the
next crop.
Gifted and Talented students may choose to pose more
Suggested conditions:
than one question to investigate.
100–200 words
Assessment Justification (300-400 words) Discuss the three types of assessment and their value/purpose. Discuss any
modifications to summative assessment. Identify a task from above that you would use as the diagnostic assessment and one key
activity for formative assessment. Justify your choices.
In education, there are three types of assessment which are diagnostic, formative and summative assessment. Each of these assessment types have
different values and purpose when used in the classroom. The purpose of diagnostic assessment is to use the information given by student’s responses to
make informed decisions when planning for a unit (Tomlinson, & Moon, 2013). The value that diagnostic assessment gives is information on student’s
prior knowledge and understanding on a learning objective in a planned unit of work (Tomlinson & Moon, 2013). This gives teachers a powerful insight into
students understanding and can adapt learning sequences. Formative assessment is designed not to measure a student’s success, but for using feedback
in guiding students and teachers to improve learning outcomes (Wiggins, 1998). This assessment is valuable for both teachers and students. Teachers
can use formative assessment to identify needs of students and the next stage of learning. Whereas students can use this assessment to be actively
engaged in their own learning and make adjustments to grow their knowledge, understanding and skills (Tomlinson & Moon, 2013). Summative
Assessment is used to assess and measure students’ overall outcomes of a unit. The value of summative assessment is when successful backward
mapping design is used that ensures students develop the content knowledge and provide evidence of success in the unit and curriculum outcomes
(Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).
A task I would use for a diagnostic assessment would be aligned to the ‘engage’ phase of the unit. Students will be asked to discuss in small groups what
they know about the Earth surface. Students will be provided with butcher’s paper to engage in communicating in their individual strategies, for example,
drawings or writing words/sentences. This allows all students to participate and to cater for the diverse needs within the class.
An activity for formative assessment would be student’s folios, which is collated during the unit. Modifications on this assessment will ensure that various
ways to communicate the students thinking will be allowed. This could be drawings, tables, images, diagrams with labels or written.
The summative assessment requires modification to ensure that all students in the year 4 class can participate and achieve the intended learning
outcomes. Teachers may guide lower level students in a group setting to scaffold what question is appropriate to investigate. Additionally, students
identified as gifted and talented may be able to present multiple questions, instead of one, to further extend their learning. To cater to needs, identified
learners may only be required to give one recommendation, instead various recommendations. The presentation of their model demonstration may be
presented as a video, instead of there in the classroom on the day. Changing the word limit to less and supplying an organiser template to help guide
lower levelled literacy learners will be a beneficial modification. For low literacy learners, changing the word limit to less can ensure that all students are
able to complete the assessment. They should also be supplied with an organiser template to help guide their learning.
From this initial learning of what a catchment is, students may be able to connect
their thinking to an understanding of ‘where our catchment’ is. Using this, with
the assistance of locating the local catchment on Google Earth connects
students to real life relevance (ACEL, 2016). Conducting a field experiment of
the local environment reinforces authentic learning experiences, which
students can develop their problem-solving skills and confidence in their own
learning (Nicaise, Gibney & Crane, 2000).
Incorporating numeracy skills in mapping out an area for students to collect the
sample from is a real-world authentic task (Nicaise, Gibney & Crane, 2000).
Using concrete materials to create a 30cm² area creates a hands-on task,
which caters for diverse learners (Goodwin University, 2018). It allows
students to assume the role of a scientist, in collecting and observing the
environment.
Engaging in prior learning of what erosion and weathering is ensures that all
learners can participate in the investigation. Additionally, supplying low-
levelled literacy learners with a glossary page of scientific words with visual
images ensures that they can use the language specific to this unit topic
(Vanier College, 2012). This also supports ESL/D students to be aware of the
targeted scientific vocabulary (NSW Government, 2019).
Incorporating ICT by using iPads to capture the evidence of erosion in the field
Low literacy learners to work with teacher in a guided practice can provide direction
for the responses for the labelled diagram. This support enables learners to
progress, while transitioning to work independently (Duchesne, McMaugh, Bochner
& Krause, 2013). Those identified with difficulties in spelling and writing could use
teacher direction to guide them in labelling their diagram correctly. Teacher should
direct students to class word wall and/or individual glossary to complete diagram.
Extending the learning is important for gifted and talented students. After completing
the labelled diagram, students should write a scientific report to explain their findings
to form a conceptual understanding (Tomlinson & Javius, 2012). ‘Teaching up’ for
gifted and talented students develops the skills of independence, self-direction,
collaboration and production (Tomlinson & Javius, 2012).
Explain
Share ideas and negotiate an understanding of the focus questions raised in
the “explore” phase.
Discuss what happened during the teacher demonstration, why and how it
happened and identify ways it could be fixed.
Discuss the data that has been collected and what it infers about soil and
erosion.
Consider the impact of the actions of people on the surface of the local
catchment. Actions could include sport and recreation, mining, farming and
housing. In groups, students research one of these impacts and share their
findings with the class.
Explore the question: What are the consequences of human actions and
Elaborate
Work on the assessment task where students identify a problem to be
investigated in their local area by making an observation.
Select an area in the local environment which has undergone erosion or other
change.
Create an action plan to manage and minimise the human and natural
impact, e.g. planting native grasses and small shrubs, creating a wind break.
10. Identified students may work
with teacher to scaffold a
Justification: problem to be investigated.
Modifications in this elaborate phase is to ensure that all students can complete Gifted and talented
their summative assessment during class time. Teacher may work with identified students may pose
students to scaffold and guide a problem to be investigated. Teacher may use more than one
Socratic Questioning, to promote independent thinking of students and to give problem to
them ownership of their learning (Intel Corporation, 2007). These questions investigate.
should be about students reasoning or evidence questions such as: What would 11. Lower literacy students work
be an example? Why do you think this? What other information do we need? with teacher to identify an
What lead you to this problem? (Intel Corporation, 2007). area in the local environment.
Class time provided to
Gifted and talented students should have tasks that extend their learning. Giving create model and
high-end learners challenges enables students to access more sophisticated record observation.
learning opportunities (Azzam, 2016). Not limiting the scientific problem to one Can record
can allow gifted and talented students an opportunity to advance their investigation by video.
understanding of the unit and demonstrate various solutions. 12. Action play may be created
using an organiser template
Allowing students an opportunity to work on their model design and investigation supplied.
can have teacher giving feedback to students immediately. Students should be Gifted and talented
able to record their demonstration, instead of presenting the model on the day of students may write
Feedback to students Teachers plan opportunities through the teaching strategies and learning experiences of the unit. Teachers provide ongoing
feedback and encouragement to students on their strengths and areas for improvement. Through particular learning
(Why should teachers experiences students can reflect on and discuss with their teachers and peers what they are able to do well and what they
provide feedback to need to do to improve.
students?) Justification:
Feedback to students not only provides information to the teacher about the student goals, progress and strategies for future
implementation, but it also brings the students attention to something they may not have identified themselves (Fisk, 2019).
Teachers should be providing feedback as research shows that students increase their effort in future tasks, develop
effective learning strategies such as error detection and self-assessment and increase autonomy, ownership and self-
regulation (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL], 2017).
Reflection on the unit At the conclusion of the unit, all teachers who have been involved in planning, teaching, learning and assessment come
plan together to reflect on the successes and challenges of the unit. They come with their personal reflections through answers to
the following questions:
(Why should teachers What worked well in this unit?
reflect on the unit and What was a stumbling block?
lessons?) How would you refine it?
What trends and gaps in learning have you identified?
How will you build on these learning experiences next term and beyond?
ACEL. (2016). Authentic learning: What, why and how? Retrieved from http://www.acel.org.au/acel/ACEL_docs/Publications/e-Teaching/2016/e-
Teaching_2016_10.pdf
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2017). Feedback. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-
source/feedback/aitsl-feedback-factsheet.pdf?sfvrsn=2b2dec3c_4
Azzam, A. (2016). Six strategies for challenging gifted learners. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/education-
update/apr16/vol58/num04/Six-Strategies-for-Challenging-Gifted-Learners.aspx
Brookfield, S. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Department of Education, Tasmania. (2016). Good teaching: Literacy 3-6. Retrieved from
https://publicdocumentcentre.education.tas.gov.au/Documents/Good-Teaching-3-6-Literacy.pdf
Duchesne, S., McMaugh, A., Bochner, S., & Krause, K. L. (2013). Educational psychology: For learning and teaching (4th ed.). South Melbournce. VIC:
Cengage Learning
Fisk, S. (2019). Using and analysing data in Australian schools: Why, how and what. Moorabbin, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education
Goodwin University. (2018). How hands – on learning benefits children of all ages. Retrieved from https://www.goodwin.edu/enews/benefits-of-hands-
on-learning/
Kauchak, D. P., & Eggen, P. D. (1993). Learning and teaching: Research-based methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Levy, E. (2007). Gradual release of responsibility: I do, we do, you do. Retrieved from
https://www.washoeschools.net/cms/lib/NV01912265/Centricity/Domain/257/Certified%20Hiring/GradualReleaseResponsibilityJan08.pdf
Mathew, P., Mathew, P., Peechattu, P, J. (2017). Reflective practices: A means to teacher development. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education
and Communication Technology, 3(1), 126-131. Retrieved from https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/13_APJCECT_Feb_BRR798_EDU-
126-131.pdf
Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., & Crane, M. (2000). Toward an Understanding of Authentic Learning: Student Perceptions of an Authentic Classroom. Journal
of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 79–94. doi:10.1023/A:1009477008671
NSW Government. (2019). English as an additional language or dialect students. Retrieved from https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-and-
learning/student-assessment/smart-teaching-strategies/numeracy/numeracy-overview/eald-students
School Drug Education and Road Aware [SDERA]. (n.d). Teaching and learning strategies. Retrieved from
https://www.sdera.wa.edu.au/media/2134/ccea-section-g-teaching-and-learning-strategies.pdf
Schumm, J. S, Vaughn, S., & Sobol, M, C. (1997). Are they getting it? How to monitor student understanding in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in
School and Clinic, 32(3), 168-171. Retrieved from https://journals-sagepub-com.ezproxy.usc.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1177/105345129703200307
Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. (1992). What is collaborative learning? Retrieved from
https://www.evergreen.edu/sites/default/files/facultydevelopment/docs/WhatisCollaborativeLearning.pdf
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443572.pdf
Tomlinson, C. A., & Javius, E. L. (2012). Teach up for excellence. Educational leadership, 69(5), 28-33. Retrieved from
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb12/vol69/num05/Teach-Up-for-Excellence.aspx
Tomlinson, C., & Moon, T. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD
Vanier College. (2012). Teaching tip: Glossaries? What glossaries? Why glossaries? Where glossaries? Retrieved from
https://www.vaniercollege.qc.ca/pdo/2012/04/teaching-tip-glossaries-what-glossaries-why-glossaries-where-glossaries/
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wise, M., & Cooper, C. (2019). Increasing the value of graphic organisers. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/article/increasing-value-graphic-
organizers