You are on page 1of 1

9/13/2020 CASE DIGEST TOBI: CASE DIGEST : Lasco Vs UNITED NATIONS REVOLVING FUND FOR NATURAL RESOURCES EXPLORATION…

Higit Pa Gumawa ng Blog Mag-sign in

CASE DIGEST TOBI


Friday, November 15, 2013 Blog Archive

► 2019 (7)
CASE DIGEST : Lasco Vs UNITED NATIONS
► 2017 (29)
REVOLVING FUND FOR NATURAL RESOURCES
► 2016 (6)
EXPLORATION (UNRFNRE)
► 2014 (32)
G.R. Nos. 109095-109107 February 23, 1995 ELDEPIO LASCO, RODOLFO ELISAN,
URBANO BERADOR, FLORENTINO ESTOBIO, MARCELINO MATURAN, FRAEN ▼ 2013 (23)
BALIBAG, CARMELITO GAJOL, DEMOSTHENES MANTO, SATURNINO BACOL, ▼ November (23)
SATURNINO LASCO, RAMON LOYOLA, JOSENIANO B. ESPINA, all represented by CASE DIGEST :
MARIANO R. ESPINA, petitioner, vs. UNITED NATIONS REVOLVING FUND FOR Kuroda vs
NATURAL RESOURCES EXPLORATION (UNRFNRE) represented by its operations Jalandoni
manager, DR. KYRIACOS LOUCA, OSCAR N. ABELLA, LEON G. GONZAGA, JR., MUSIB
CASE DIGEST :
M. BUAT, Commissioners of National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), Fifth Division,
Victoriano Vs
Cagayan de Oro City and IRVING PETILLA, Labor Arbiter of Butuan City, respondents. ELIZALDE
ROPE
Facts: Petitioners were dismissed from their employment with privaterespondent, the United WORKERS'...
Nations Revolving Fund for NaturalResourcesExploration (UNRFNRE), which is a special
CASE DIGEST :
fund and subsidiary organ of theUnited Nations.The UNRFNRE is involved in a joint project
Pamil Vs
of thePhilippineGovernment and the United Nations for exploration work in Dinagat Teleron
Island.Petitioners are thecomplainants for illegal dismissal and damages.Private respondent
alleged that respondent Labor Arbiter had no jurisdiction over its personality since itenjoyed CASE DIGEST :
diplomatic immunity. Bacani Vs
Nacoco
Issue:WON specialized agencies enjoy diplomatic immunity CASE DIGEST :
CABANAS vs
Held:Petition is dismissed. This is not to say that petitioner have no recourse.Section 31 of PILAPIL
the Convention on the Privileges and Immunitiesof the SpecializedAgencies of the United CASE DIGEST :
Nations states that ³each specialized agency shall makea provision for appropriate modes of AGLIPAY VS
settlement of (a) disputes arising out of contracts or other disputes of private character to RUIZ
which thespecialized agencyisa party.´ Private respondent is not engaged in a commercial
CASE DIGEST :
venture in thePhilippines.Its presence is by virtue of a joint project entered into by
Lasco Vs
thePhilippine Government and theUnited Nations for mineral exploration in DinagatIsland UNITED
NATIONS
Posted by Tobi at 11:09 AM REVOLVING
FU...
CASE DIGEST :
No comments: REPUBLIC vs
VILLASOR
CASE DIGEST :
Post a Comment OPOSA vs
FACTORAN

Enter your comment...


CASE DIGEST :
PHARMACEUT
ICAL Vs Duque
CASE DIGEST :
CIty Of
Comment as: Google Accoun Cagayan De
Oro Vs Pryce
Prop...
Publish Preview CASE DIGEST :
ADIONG v.
COMELEC
tobicasdigest2.blogspot.com/2013/11/lasco-vs-unrfnre-gr-nos-109095-109107.html 1/2

You might also like