S. NAME OF THE TITTLT OBJECTIVES RESEARC DIMENS FINDINGS conclusion N AUTHOR OF THE H IONS O PAPER/Y METHOD /VARIAB EAR OF OLOGY LE s THE PAPER 1 Greg Filbeck, An The England- Working Firms are Schweser Analysis importance of based capital able to Study of efficient managem managem reduce Program Working working ent ent financing Thomas M. Capital capital consulting componen costs and Krueger, Manage management firm t increase the University of ment (WCM) is specializin definitions funds Wisconsin-La Results indisputable. g in and available for Crosse Across Working working average expansion by Industrie capital is the capital values for minimizing s difference issues for the entire the amount @2005 between its global 1996 – of funds tied resources in list of 2000 up in current cash or readily clients. Across the assests.in convertible The nearly addition into cash original 1,000 discover that (Current survey firms in these Assets) and reports the measures for organizational several survey, working commitments working cash capital for capital flow from change which cash benchmar operations significantly will soon be ks for , defined wtinin required public as cash industries (Current companie flow from across time. Liabilities). s using operations The data for divided by objective of 1996. sales and working Each referred capital company to as management is ranked “cash is to maintain against its conversio the optimum peers and n balance of also efficiency” each of the against (CCE), working the averages capital entire 9.0 components. field of percent. 1,000 IThe days companie working s. REL capital continues to update (DWC), the defined as original the sum of informati receivable on on an s and annual inventorie basis s less payables divided by daily sales, averages 51.8 days and is very similar to the days that sales are outstandin g (50.6), because the inventory 2 Pedro Juan Effects The corporate This In order Working García‐Teruel, of finance methodol to capital The Pedro working literature has ogy analyze managem research Martínez‐ capital traditionally presents the ent is presented in Solano, manage focused on important effects particularl this paper is ment on the study of benefits. of y to provide SME long-term These working important empirical evidence on profitabil financial include capital in the case the effects ity decisions. the fact manage of small of working @2007 Working that panel ment on and capital capital data the medium- managemen management methodol firm’s sized t on the is important ogy profitab companies profitability because of its assumes ility, the . Most of of a sample effects on the that return these of small and firm’s individual on companies medium‐ profitability s, firms, assets ’ assets sized and risk, and states or (ROA) are in the Spanish consequently countries was form of firms. its value are used as current (Smith, 1980). heteroge the assets. Specifically, neous. depend Also, working Time- ent current capital series and variable liabilities investment cross- . This are one of involves a section variable their main tradeoff data was sources of between studies defined external profitability not as the finance. In and risk. controllin ratio of this g for this earnings context, heteroge , before the neity run interest objective the risk of and tax, of the obtaining to current biased assets. research results. With has been Furtherm regards to provide ore, panel to the empirical data give indepen evidence more dent about the informati variable effects of ve data, s, working more working capital variability capital managem , less manage ent on the collinearit ment profitabilit y among was y of a variables, measur sample of more ed using small and degrees the medium- of number sized firms freedom of days and more account efficiency s receivab le, number of days of inventor y and number of days account s payable. I 3 Carole The Working Responde irms which Working Haworth∗ , focus of capital nts do the capital mgt Paul West working management reported least routine of a head capital routines of a the working large random Nottingham manage large random frequency capital sample of University ment in sample of of use of managem small Business UK small small each of ent companies in School, firms companies in the 11 appear, as the uk is Jubilee @2003 the UK are specified anticipate examined.co Campus, examined. working d, nsiderable Wollaton Considerable capital to have variability in Road, variability in managem less the take up Nottingham the take-up of ent sophisticat of 11 NG8 1BB, UK 11 working routines.1 ed Working Received 16 capital 7 Table 1 financial capital mgt March 2001; management shows skills, routines are accepted 3 routines was over two- higher detected. March 2003 detected. thirds of profitabilit Principal responde y, less components nts interest in analysis and reported growth, cluster that they less analysis used external confirm the routines finance, identification to review fewer of four distinct payment credit ‘types’ of period to purchases, companies creditors shorter with regard to (75%), productio patterns of customer n cycles, working credit risk more capital (71%), customers management. cash paying on budgeting time and (70%), fewer cash customer flow credit problems. periods (70%), doubtful debts (68%), and finance of working capital (68%). Less frequentl y used routines related to stock levels (64%), bad debts (61%), stock reorder levels (60%), stock turnover (59%), and customer discount policy (30%). 4 Nor Edi Azhar Working The paper is The it can be Thus it Binti Capital made with an sample conclude highlights the Mohamad Manage attempt to interval is that importance Department ment: bridge the gap for five– there are of managing of Finance & The in the year significant working Economic, Effect of literature by period relations capital University Market offering from between requirement Tenaga Valuatio empirical 2003 to WCM with s to ensure Nasional n evidence 2007. firm’s an Sultan Haji and about Ratio performan improvemen Ahmad Shah Profitabil working analysis ce as t in firm’s Campus, ity in capital was findings market 26700 Malaysia management chosen as suggested value and profitability Muadzam @2010 and its effect a that, and this Shah, Pahang, to the performa working aspect must Malaysia performance nce capital form part of Tel: 60-9-455- of Malaysian measure componen the 2020-3324 E- listed ment and ts and company's mail: companies indicators performan strategic NorEdi@unite from the since this ce in and n.edu.my perspective of analysis Malaysia operational Noriza Binti market provides disclose thinking in Mohd Saad valuation and methods both order to Department profitability. T for positive operate of Finance & assessing and effectively Economic, the negative and University financial associatio efficiently. Tenaga strengths n Nasional and weakness Sultan Haji es of the Ahmad Shah firms Campus, performa 26700 nce using Muadzam informati Shah, Pahang, on found Malaysia in its Tel: 60-9-455- financial 2020-3336 E- statemen mail: noriza@ ts. uniten.edu.m y 5 Bhaskar Influenc Working The The The paper Bagchi, e of capital principal necessity aims to Department Working management endeavor of firms’ explore the of Commerce, Capital is considered of this working effects of Alipurduar Manage to be a vital paper is capital components College, Dist. ment on issue in to explore alters over of working Jalpaiguri, Pin Profitabil financial the time like capital managemen 736122, ity: A management impact of its internal t like cash West Bengal, Study on decision and it working cash conversion India. Tel: 91- Indian affects both capital generatio cycle 947-707-3143 FMCG liquidity and managem n rate and (CCC), age Compani profitability of ent on thus of inventory es the firm. The corporate FMCG (AI), age of @2012 secondary profitabili firms debtors data for ty of should (AD), age of analysis is Indian sustain a creditors retrieved from FMCG good (AC), debt Prowess firms. To harmoniza to total Database of achieve tion of its assets CMIE for ten this, we assets and (DTA) and year period have liabilities. debt equity from 2000-01 develope The ratio (DER) to 2009-10. d an findings of on profitability Apart from empirical our study of FMCG using framewor results firms.The Pearson’s k which under results of correlation was first fixed our study analysis, panel used by effect also indicate data Shin and estimation the better regression Soenen s explanatory analysis like (1998), demonstr power of pooled OLS Deloof ate that fixed effect model and (2003) DTAit, LSDV fixed and ADit, ACit, model than effect LSDV subseque and AIit that of model are ntly by are employed in Padachi negatively pooled OLS the study. (2006) associated m odel and with firm’s Mathuva profitabilit (2009). y as quantified by ROTAit 6 Jane M. Cote The This teaching Over a This and Claire Merchan note has two prolonged teaching Kamm Latham dising objectives. period, note has Ratio: First, it lengthenin two A explores the g the cash objectives. Compreh limitations of conversio First, it ensive the traditional n cycle explores the Measure measures of cannot be limitations of the of working sustained traditional Working capital without a measures of Capital management negative working Strategy presented in impact on capital @1999 the financial profitabilit managemen ratio analysis y, as t presented component of exemplifie in the a typical d by WT financial accounting Grant. ratio curriculum. The analysis Merchandi component sing Ratio of a typical helps accounting students curriculum. see the Second, it interrelati presents an additional or onship alternative among measure many based on financial early work in variables the finance literature 7 Bana Working In this study, Firms For a Using Abuzayed capital two listed on number robust The paper Talal Abu- manage performance the stock of firms estimation includes a Ghazaleh ment measures are market in the technique conceptual College of and used: one are sample, s this as well as Business, The firms’ accounting required financial study empirical German perform and one to assets, found that analysis, in which data Jordanian ance in market present which profitabilit from a University, emergin measure, profits, if are y is sample of g believing that those mainly affected listed firms Amman, markets: wealth exist, in shares positively for the Jordan the case maximization order to in with the period from of is make other cash 2000 to Jordan shareholders’ their firms, conversio 2008 are @2012 main concern. shares are a n cycle. analyzed to To bring up more significa This examine if more robust attractive. nt part indicates more efficient results, this Contrary of total that more working study used to assets. profitable capital more than one listed That is firms are managemen estimation firms, also the less t improves technique, non-listed reason motivated firms’ including firms why to manage accounting panel data have less return their profitability analysis of an on working and firms’ incentive assets is capital. In value. Cash to not addition, conversion present consider financial cycles as true ed as a markets well as its operation measur failed to components al e of penalize are used as results profitab managers measures of and ility. for working usually When a inefficient capital managemen their firm has working t skills financial mainly capital statemen financial managem ts do not assets ent in reflect on its emerging real balance markets operation sheet, al and its financial operatin activity. g Additional activitie ly, as s will argued by contribu Lazaridis te little and to the Tryfonidis overall (2006), return hiding on profits in assets order to avoid corporate tax is a common tactic for non-listed firms in emerging markets which makes them less of a suitable sample for analysis where one can draw inference, based on financial data, for working capital practices. 8 Padachi DK1 Focus on The objectives The The The The paper * and Carole working are to study survey hypothe findings includes a Howorth2 capital the current instrumen sized (results conceptual 1School of manage practices of t contains relation not as well as Accounting, ment WCM of essentiall ship reported) empirical Finance and practices Mauritian y closed- betwee are in line analysis, in Accounting, among SMEs ended n age of with the which data from a University of Mauritia and to questions business firms’ sample of Technology, n SMEs: examine the focusing and stage listed firms Mauritius La Survey extent to on WCM developm for the Tour Koenig evidence which firms’ enterpris practice ent model period from Pointe aux and and owner- e and s is where 2000 to Sables empirical manager owner- confirm more 2008 are 2School of analysis characteristics manager ed to matured analyzed to Management, @2014 influence the characteri some firms are examine if Bradford adoption of stics and extent. expected more University, WCM their The six to have efficient United routines. approach sub- formalised working Kingdom to WCM samples systems capital Accepted 5 practices. age and managemen May, 2014 A total of categor procedure t improves 145 y K-W s in place firms’ survey tests accounting forms reveale profitability and firms’ were da collected significa value. Cash out of a nt conversion sample of differen cycles as 420 firms, ce in well as its represent the area components ing 20% of are used as of the debtors’ measures of working populatio manage capital n, which ment managemen satisfies and t skills the financin sampling g of criteria working (firms capital. employin g up to 50 employee s). A stratified sampling was used so that each industry group is represent ed. Four questionn aires had to be excluded as they were not properly filled in and many sections were left unanswer ed.
9 Iffet Görkey The Objective of In order According
Kesimli1 impact this study is to to to This study , Suleyman of the reveal the understan Kolmogor found Gokhan global impact of the d the ov- evidence Gunay2 economi recent global impact of Smirnov that the Luleburgaz c crisis economic the GEC Test, data recent crisis Vocational on on the have been affected the School, working crisis, working normally ISE traded Kirklareli capital of triggered in capital distribute companies University, real 2007 and compone d for all on a Turkey sector in unveiled in nts, the 2Faculty of Turkey 2008, on the thirteen periods limited Economics @januar working ratios and for all basis. and y 2011 capital of real specificall the ratios. Therefore, future Administrativ sector in y related Based on research e Sciences, Turkey. Since to paired and study is Trakya it is obvious working samples t- recommend University, that capital test and ed. First, the Turkey ratios would have Mann year 2009 is e-mails: help in such been Whitney to be ifkesimli@gm an analysis, used in u-test, completed. ail.com; s we have this thirteen Another set analyzed the analysis. hypothese of research current assets The s that are should and liabilities list of formed for follow related these the ratios including ratios, based ratios is related post-crisis on financial as with the era at the statements of follows: working moment we Turkish real 1. Current capital of decide this crisis is sector firms, Ratio (CR) real over.s quoted in the 2. sector are Istanbul Stock Liquidity tested and Exchange Ratio (LR) the (ISE). 3. Cash findings Ratio for each (CAR) ratio 4. Inventory -to- Current Assets Ratio (ICAR) 5. Short Term Receivabl es-to- Current Assets Ratio (STRCAR) 6. Current Assets-to- Total Assets Ratio (CATAR)
10 Godfred Net Most of the The The paper
Adjapong Working documented sample provides results also Afrifa1 Capital, empirical for the empirical hold when Canterbury Cash evidence of study is evidence the QRATIO Christ Church Flow and net working drawn and is used as a Business Perform capital (NWC) from assessmen measure of market- School ance of focuses on the SMEs in t of the based Canterbury UK relevance of the UK for relationshi Christ Church @2016 working the p between performanc University capital period NWC and e for quoted North Holmes management from performan SMEs in the Road (WCM) to firm 2004 to ce by sample, Canterbury, performance 2013. taking which UK (Deloof, 2003; Financial cash flow indicate that Faulkender firms such into quoted firms and Wang, as banks considerat can improve 2006; Fazzari and ion. The their and Petersen, insurance study is shareholder 1993). were based on s' value by However, the excluded an observing effect of cash because unbalance the optimal flow on the they have d panel level of working relationship different data of capital between accountin 6,926 investment WCM and firm g SMEs in at which performance requirem the UK performanc is scant. This ents (see, over a e is paper Deloof, ten-year improved examines the 2003; period and taking cash flow Hill et al., (2004- into implications of 2010). 2013). The consideratio the effect of Moreover results n cash flow. NWC on , firm- show that The results performance years NWC garnered of Small and with relationshi from. Medium anomalies p to Enterprises in their performan (SMEs) in the accounts ce is United such as concave, Kingdom (UK). negative however, WCM is values in after important to assets, taking into firms because sales, considerat it involves a current ion the trade-off assets, interactio between risk fixed n and assets effects of performance were the (Deloof, 2003; omitted availability Smith, 1980). (see, Hill of cash et al., flow the 2010). relationshi Also, p becomes firms convex. missing This substanti indicates al amount the of importanc informati e of cash on were flow to excluded. firms’ Finally, all WCM variables policies. were The winsorize results d at 1% highlight (see, the fact Garcia- that in the Teruel event of and cash flow Martinez- unavailabil Solano, ity firms 2007; Hill should et al., strive to 2010). reduce the The final investmen sample of t in SMEs, working which is capital. based on the requirem ents establishe d by the European Commissi on’s recomme ndation 2003/361 /CE of 6rd May, 2003, on the definition of SMEs, therefore consists of an unbalanc ed panel of 6,926 firms for which informati on is available.
11 Geofrey T. THE The purpose The Finally, it
Mills IMPACT of this paper is above would to the OF to continue analysis appear above, one INFLATIO the discussion has that would N ON of the significant corporate expect that CAPITAL role of implicatio financial the degree of leverage BUDGETI inflation in ns for behavior employed NG AND capital corporati is by firms WORKIN budgeting, ons, and influenced increases G and to focus these by during CAPITAL on the implicatio inflation. inflationary @1996 individual ns go Inflation components beyond will cause periods. of the process the the firm to Moreover, to to draw capital reduce its the extent specific budgeting capital that this is conclusions decision. budget, to “unplanned” with respect Certainly attempt to debt, it is to the the reduce net more likely a interaction capital working firm would between the budgeting capital, finance this cost of capital, decision and to debt from shortterm inflation, and itself is alter the rather than the cash flow significant debt/asset long term variables ly ratio using borrowings. within a DCF affected short term As the - IRR by the debt, inflation framework. existence eased, the of firm would find it much inflation easier to and return to a higher morenormal inflationa capital ry structure by expectati replacing ons, and short term debt with of critical retained importan earnings ce is that the capital budgeting decision is not neutral even if prices of output are expected to rise at the same rate as costs and the cost of capital. 12 Sayeda Relations Cash As a The Correlatio Tahmina hip conversion methodol indepen n is used This study is Quayyum between cycle basically ogy to dent to figure an attempt School of Working shows how study the variable out the to Business, Capital long it takes a relationsh s nature of investigate if United Manage firm to ip included relationshi there is any International ment convert between are only p between relationship between University and resource working related variables. working UIU Bhaban, Profitabil inputs into capital to Table 1 of capital House – 80, ity cash managem liquidity Appendix- managemen Road – 8A in flows. This ent and A contains t and Dhanmondi, Context consists of efficiency working the profitability Dhaka – 1209, of three parts, and capital correlatio of Bangladesh Manufac receivables profitabili even n matrix manufacturi Tel: 880-28- turing collection ty, though for the ng 152-218 E- Industrie period, regressio other variables corporations mail: s in payables n analysis factors of cement . For this stq9999@gm Banglade deferral has been are industry. purpose ail.com sh period and used. For believed We can Corporation @2012 inventory the to be see that s enlisted turnover purpose influenti the return with the period. The of al on asset Dhaka theoretical simplicity enough and net Stock importance of and for the profit Exchange the working identifyin profitab margin are has been capital g each ility both selected component variables of the negatively and the over the influence firms. correlated analysis covers a profitability separatel Future with the time period ratio is very y, single researc cash from year clear, that regressio h is conversio 2005 to is, the lesser n has necessa n cycle. 2009 the time a been ry to These firm needs to chosen. determi results are realize cash The ne consistent from its regressio other with the customers n analysis potentia view relative to the considere l that the time it d influenc shorter requires to Profitabili ing the period pay off its ty ratios factors between as as productio dependen indepen n and sale t variable dent of and variable products various s the larger working is the capital firm’s ratios and profitabilit liquidity y, ratios as Lazaridis independ and ent Tryfonidis variables. (2006). Here, cash conversio n cycle is used to measure the performa nce of working capital analysis.
13 ShaistaWasiuz Determi The objective Data are Working This study
zaman nants of of this study is collected capital contribute Multimedia Working to determine from investm s to the University, Capital the factors three ent, scarce but The study Malaysia, Investme influencing a databases pecking growing finds that in shaista@mmu nt: A firm’s ; the order literature times of .edu.my Study of decision with Datastrea theory, on the economic VeeriChettiar Malaysia regards to the m asymme determina expansion, Arumugam n size of its Internatio tric nts of younger and smaller Multimedia PublicLis investment in nal informa working firms with University, ted net operating Database, tion, capital less tangible Malaysia Firms working ISI board managem assets, low @2013 capital. An Emerging charact ent, an leverage, investigation Markets eristics area that high into the Database has not immediate factors and been sales affecting net Research given the growth, high investment in Insight attention operating working Database it needs. cash flows, capital should provided The less volatile integrate the by results revenues individual Compusta would be and low components t, in order helpful to levels of (Hill, Kelly to obtain investors asymmetric &Highfield maximum in information are likely to 2010) number evaluating have the of firms the highest for the working investments analysis. capital in The strategy of operating … annual firms as it reports of may be the able to companie give some s are also indication referred about the to for financial informati wellbeing on on the of the board firm. It is characteri found that stics of different the firms. firm GDP data characteri are stics make obtained it necessary for firms to have different working capital policies which are much more suited to their situation.
14 Sonia BAÑOS- FINANCI Since Smith To In Having As financing
CABALLERO1, NG OF (1980) analyse contrast found that options and Pedro J. WORKIN suggested that the , when there is a methods vary GARCÍA- G working relation firms concave between TERUEL2, CAPITAL capital between finance relation small and Pedro REQUIRE management WCR a high between large firms MARTÍNEZ- MENT, is important financing percent the due to their SOLANO3 FINANCI because of and firm age of variable differences in Department AL its effects on performa their for WCF ownership of FLEXIBILI the nce, we WCR and firm structure Management TY AND profitability, use the with performan ,flexbilty and and Finance, SME risk, and, vari- short- ce for the taxes it is PERFOR consequently, able WCF term period suggested MANCE value of a as a bank 1997 to that further @March firm, the measure debt, 2007 and research 2014 literature on of WCR riskier that the focused on investment in financing. WCR breakpoin quoted working This is financin t of this companies or capital calculated g relation different requirement using the negativ depends financial (WCR) has following ely on firm systems be enjoyed ratio: affects financial conducted. extensive short- firm flexibility, growth. term perform this bank ance section debt/WC because examines R where the whether WCR is negativ these defined e results as current influenc also ,hold assets e of during minus short- the accounts term financial payable. bank crisis A greater debt WCF outweig means hs the riskier positive WCR influenc financing, e. as it measures the percentag e of WCR that is financed with short- term bank debt
15 Robert Alan Working Calculate the Unfortun It is As a On
Hill Capital working ately, importa result, thecontrater Manage capital only nt to recommen y they shold ment operating internal realise dations be viewed @2013 cycle and managem that for asa financing cycle ent has corpora improved potentially from access to te cash methods powerful published this flows of component accounting qualitativ are controlling of affirms data and e ultimate investmen marketing analyse the informati ly the t in strategy inter- on, product debtors which, when relationships leaving of sales invariably skillfully between the external resultin underline utilized can two, users of g in the directly - Define the accounts cash amount of influence dynamics of a with a received credit to demand company’s quantitati , or a be determines a credit-related ve claim to granted working funds system, analysis cash and capital - Appreciate of the from standard requirment the disparities financial debtors. collection amd between the data that Hence, procedure matreialityen theory and the the s but treat hance future practice of company maximis the terms profitability . working chooses ation of of capital to net cash sale as management, provide. inflows given. given our may be normative achieve wealth d maximisationa by ssumption raising We shall begin the by explaining level of the sales relationship but not between necessa working rily capital reducin management g the and financial level of strategy debtors.