Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michael Shur
CIE, ECSE, Physics, and Center for THz Research
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu
Dr. Rumyantsev
Prof.Pala Dr. Knap
Dr. Dyakonova and Dr. Veksler Dr. Kachorovskii
Prof. Dyakonov
Dr. Muraviev Dr. Satou Dr. Levinshtein Dr. Popov THz Center at RPI led by Prof. Zhang
•History
•Applications
•Terahertz Photonics
•Terahertz Electronics
•Plasma wave electronics
•Terahertz properties of grainy multifunctional
materials
•Conclusions and future work
History
•Applications
•Terahertz Electronics
•Terahertz Photonics
•Plasma wave electronics
•Terahertz properties of grainy multifunctional materials
•Conclusions and future work
From http://www.phys.uu.nl/~vgent/astronomia_large.jpg
To Edison bulb
To the To gas lighting 1879
first candle 1772
1,000 BC
To the
first
torch
500,000
Soon to be replaced by LEDs
years ago
Solid State Lighting
From: http://www.advancedphotonix.com/ap_products/images/prods_Terahertz_graphLarge.jpg
•History
•Applications
•Terahertz Photonics Comet Iras-Araki-Alcock. Image is taken at 12 THz
From : www.burbankwire.com/fbi_advisory.shtml
•Started in 1985
•6 antennas of 15 meters
diameter
•Wavelength of 1.3 mm (230
GHz)
•Antennas of the IRAM
interferometer can move on rail
tracks up to a maximum
separation of 408 m in the E-W
direction and 232 m in the N-S
direction
From Pierre ENCRENAZ & Gérard •Resolution of 0.5 arcsecs
BEAUDIN Recent developments in (resolving an apple at a
millimeter and submillimeter waves.
http://gemo.obspm.fr/ArticleLigne/Re distance of 30 km).
centDvlp.html
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 13
CONDOR (1.5 THz heterodyne receiver) at APEX
(Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment) in Chilean Andes
From www.submm.caltech.edu/cso/cso_submm.html
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 15
Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy
(SOFIA). Using CONDOR on SOFIA.
From http://www.etsu.edu/physics/bsmith/variable/sofia.gif
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 16
THz detects cold matter (140 K or less), such as
clouds of gas and dust in our and nearby
galaxies. New stars beginning to form radiate
heat as they contract and are clearly seen in the
THz range. Stars invisible in a dense cloud of
dust appear as very bright stripe in the THz
image because they heat the dust that glows
in far-infrared
[5] http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/ir_tutorial/images/iras_cirrus.jpg
[6] http://www.esa.int/esaSC/Pr_1_2002_s_en.html
From http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/spacecraft/index.html
From: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2004-291
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 22
Development of Ozone Hole
http://science.hq.nasa.gov/missions/satellite_22.htm
From http://www.uml.edu/media/enews/print_1_108961_108961.html
http://www.virtualacquisitionshowcase.com/thumbs/vas_323.jpg
Sun
T= 6500 K
10-9
10-11
Earth
10-13 T=300 K
10-15
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Frequency (THz)
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 30
Maximum emission wavelength and frequency
106
105
Wavelength (nm)
104
1000
10
1
10 50 100 500 1000 5000
Temperature (K)
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 31
Emissivity
j = εσ T 4 http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/images/jul07/images/tray01.jpg
Stefan’s constant
ε is emissivity (1 for black body (i.e. for the Sun))
Passive imaging picks up differences in surface temperature
and emissivity
Δf=10 THz
10.0
8.0
Current [nA]
6.0
metal semicond. Results:
4.0 (air)
2.0
• achieveable resolution: 150 nm
0.0 (with a 100 nm tip)
112.8 150 nm
But:
112.7 • unexpected high image contrast (> 10-3)
THz Signal [nA]
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/images/jul07/images/tray01.jpg
From http://www.scenta.co.uk/_db/_images/terahertz_radiation140.jpg
Image from:http://www.advancedphotonix.com/ap_products/thz_app_packageimage.asp
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 38
THz wireless covert communications
From: http://www.atl.lmco.com/business/ATL7.php
Difficult on Earth (water vapors) – 100’s m max? First generation SYNCOM satellite
Possible in space (NASA image)
3D Graph of
demineralized tooth
From http://www.teraview.co.uk/ab_
imageLibrary.asp?page=3#
From http://www.ist-optimist.org/pdf/network/pres_ecoc2002/TERAVISION_ECOC2002.pdf
http://www.teraview.co.uk/ab_imageLibrary.asp?page=3#
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 42
Avoid Multiple Breast Cancer Surgeries by Terahertz
Imaging
From www.straightfromthedoc.com/50226711/
0.46
0.46
0.32
Transmission
0.44 0.44
0.30
0.42 0.42
0.28
0.40
0.40 CC895 0.26
0.38
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 0.24
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Frequency, cm-1
Frequency, cm-1
Long term reproducibility of transmission Liquid and frozen samples measured
spectra of prostate cancer cells measured at close orientation have a similar pattern.
after storage of the sample in frozen condition
for several weeks.
From T. Globus, D. Theodorescu, H. Frierson , T. Kchromova , D. Woolard, “Terahertz spectroscopic
characterization of cancer cells”, presented at SPIE Conference “Advanced Biomedical and
Clinical Diagnostic Systems III”, San-Jose, January 2005, Proceedings V. 5692-42,
and published in Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging, Vol 6, No7, p 233-240, 2005, by permission
From http://oldwww.com.dtu.dk/research/Nanophotonics/sugarspectrum_small.png
500
400
300
200
100
0
1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2003 2004(est.)
From (data for 1981-2003 are from Y. Chen, H. Liu, M. J. Fitch, R. Osiander, J. B. Spicer, M. Shur, X. -C. Zhang,
THz Diffuse Reflectance Spectra of Selected Explosive and Related Compounds, SPIE, Florida NATO Science, Society,
From www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/11/iraq...
Y. Chen, H. Liu, Haibo; M. J. Fitch, Rosined, J. B. Spicer, M. S. Shur, X. C. Zhang, THz diffuse reflectance spectra of selected explosives
and related compounds, Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging Technology VIII. Edited by Appleby, Roger; Wikner, David A. Proceedings of the
SPIE, Volume 5790, pp. 19-24 (2005)
2008
From http://www.wkrg.com/national/article/suicide_latest_twist_in_7_year_anthrax_saga/16504/
From http://www.rensselaer.edu/~zhangxc/abouthome.htm
From Valerie J. Brown T Rays vs. Terrorists: Widening the Security Spectrum
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 114, Number 9, September 2006
•History
•Applications
•Terahertz Photonics
•Terahertz Electronics
•Plasma wave electronics
•Terahertz properties of grainy multifunctional
materials
•Conclusions and future work
Energy
Distance
R. F. Kazarinov and R. A. Suris Sov. Phys. Semicond. v.5, #4, pp.707-709 (1971)
B. S. Williams, S. Kumar, Q.
Hu, and J. L. Reno,
"Operation of terahertz
quantum-cascade lasers at
164 K in pulsed mode and at
117 K in continuous-wave
mode," Optics Express, 13,
3331-3339 (2005)
3 THz at 164 K
QCL
From http://images.pennnet.com/articles/lfw/thm/th_0607lfwn2.jpg
From B. S. Williams, S.
Kumar, Q. Hu, and J. L.
Reno, "Operation of terahertz
quantum-cascade lasers at
164 K in pulsed mode and at
117 K in continuous-wave
mode," Optics Express, 13,
3331-3339 (2005)
From J. Darmo, V. Tamosiunas, G. Fasching, J. Kroll, K. Underainer, M. Beck, M. Giovannini, and J. Faist,
Optics Express, vol. 12, No. 9, p.1879 (2004)
Courtesy of Professor Underainer
P = αE + βE 2
+ γE 3
+ .
Px = α Exo cos (ω t ) + β E 2
xo
cos (ω t )
2
1 + cos (2 ω t )
cos 2
(ω t ) =
2
DC (i.e. low frequency) component contains
THz frequencies due to
the fs laser pulse waveform
∂j
ETHz =
∂t
2 2
1 q a
PTHz = ΔN 2
6πε o c 3
ΔN number of electrons
q electronic charge Grischkowsky antenna
c speed of light
a acceleration
εo vacuum dielectric permittivity
Femtosecond radiation
Mainstream
From www.brucherseifer.com/html/projects.html
V. Ryzhii, A. Satou, I. Khmyrova, M. Ryzhii, T. Otsuji, and M. Shur, “Analytical and computer models of terahertz HEMT-photomixer,”
SPIE, Conference on Microwave and Terahertz Photonics, Vol. 5466, pp. 210-217, Strasbourg, April 2004
p. 2119
(a) (b)
From http://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/contractor_images/teraview/1s-terraview.jpg
From http://www.advancedphotonix.com/ap_products/terahertz.asp
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 70
Compact THz Photonics System –Mini-Z
Energy (meV)
1 10 100 1000
10000
1000
100 JLab THz JLab FEL
10
1
FEL proof of principle:
Flux (Watts/cm )
-1
0.1
0.01 Table-top sub-ps Neil et al. Phys.
Rev.Letts 84, 662
1E-3
1E-4
lasers (2000)
y n c h ro tr ons
S
1E-5
1E-6
1E-7
1E-8 Courtesy
1E-9
THz proof of principle:
of G.P. Williams
1E-10 Carr, Martin, McKinney, Neil, Jordan & Williams Jefferson Lab
1E-11 Nature 420, 153 (2002)
1E-12
b ar 10
Glo
1 100 1000 10000
-1
Wavenumbers (cm )
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department ofThomas
Energy Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
From http://www.jlab.org/FEL/images/FELdiagram.gif
From D. A. Muller, A sound barrier for silicon? Nature Materials, 4, pp. 645-647 (2005).
After http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2006/05/18/moore__sl_small.jpglsjprm.jpg
•History
•Application examples
•Terahertz Photonics
•Terahertz Electronics
•Plasma wave electronics
•Terahertz properties of grainy multifunctional
materials
•Conclusions and future work
•Sources
– Two terminal devices
• IMPATT
• Gunn
– Transistors
• HEMTs
• HBTs
30
• Heterodimensional Transistors and FinFETs 400
– Plasma Wave Electronics emitters (laboratory stage)
– Graphene THz lasers (proposed by V. Ryzhii)
•Detectors From W.J. Stillman and
M.S. Shur, Closing the Gap:
– Schottky diodes Plasma Wave Electronic
– Pyroelectric detectors Terahertz Detectors,
Journal of Nanoelectronics
– Hot electron bolometers and Optoelectronics, Vol. 2,
– Plasma Wave Detectors Resonant Detectors Number 3, pp. 209-221,
December 2007
• Nonresonant
– Carbon nanotubes (proposed)
(Color online)
Fundamental structure
of the RTD oscillator
. (a) Slot resonator and
RTD, (b) potential
profile and current–
voltage characteristics
of RTD, and (c)
equivalent circuit of
(a).
2,000
Military
1,000
Speed (mph)
700
500 Commercial
300
200 Sound barrier
100
Year
From http://ask.metafilter.com/78227/
From B. E. Foutz, S. K. O'Leary, M. S. Shur, and L. F. Eastman, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7727 (1999)
InN – higher
overshoot at
smaller fields
Monte Carlo
fT (GHz)
140
Oktas et al (1997) Ping et al (1998)
120 Chen et al (1996)
Kumar et al (2002)
Wu et al (2001)
100 Shen et al (2001) vhighest = 1.39 105 m/s
80 Ping et al (1998)
Youn et al (2004)
60
40
vaverage = 1.11 105 m/s
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Inverse effective gate length (1/ m)
From M. S. Shur and R. Gaska, Physics of GaN-based Heterostructure Field Effect Transistors,
2005 IEEE CSICS Technical Digest, Palm Springs, CA, pp. 137-140, ISBN 0-7803-9250-7
RECORD!
FCE
From V. Turin, M. Shur, D. Veksler, International Journal of High
Speed Electronics and Systems, March 2007
After Pala, N. Yang J., Z. Koudymov, A. Hu, X. Deng, J. Gaska, R. Simin, G. Shur, M. S.
Drain-to-Gate Field Engineering for Improved Frequency Response of GaN-based HEMTs, Device Research Conference
2007 65th Annual, 18-20 June 2007, pp. 43-44
63
60
fT, GHz
Lg=0.3 μm
57
no FCE
54
DG-FCE=0.5μm
51 DG-FCE=0.7μm
10 15 20 25 30
Drain bias, V
After Pala, N. Yang J., Z. Koudymov, A. Hu, X. Deng, J. Gaska, R. Simin, G. Shur, M. S.
Drain-to-Gate Field Engineering for Improved Frequency Response of GaN-based HEMTs, Device Research Conference
2007 65th Annual, 18-20 June 2007, pp. 43-44
First evidence:
Rs was 10 ohm-mm!
Contacts were RC type
(Schottky)
S G D
M eta l
A lG a N
L AlGaN
G aN
2DEG GaN
1.6
1.4 15 μm
1.2
RCEq, Ω-mm
1.0
0.8
Measured
0.6 7 μm
0.4 L=3 μm
0.2
0 10 20 30 40
Frequency, GHz
From Simin, G., Yang, Z-J. Shur, M.,, Microwave Symposium, 2007. IEEE/MTT-S
3-8 June 2007 pp. 457-460, ISSN: 0149-645X, ISBN: 1-4244-0688-9
S G D 1
0.9
0.8
RCEff, Ω-mm
20 GHz
AlGaN 0.7
0.4 50
SiC
0.3
0.2 100
0.1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Lext, μm
Self-aligned C3 electrodes written and
deposited simultaneously with gate
From G. Simin, Wide Bandgap Devices with Non-Ohmic Contacts, 210th Electrochemical Society Meeting
2006, Cancun, Mexico October 29-November 3, 2006
SiO 2 (200-300A)
S G D
1500
AlGaN barrier (200 A) Vgs = +9V
+6 V
1000
+3 V
Ids(mA/mm)
GaN channel
0V
-6V
-9V
I-SiC 0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Vds(V)
Si3N4
S Pd/Ag/Au
G D
Pd/Ag/Au
Currents up to 2.5 A/mm AlInGaN
Demonstrated GaN
AlN
Leakage down by 10^6 I-SiC
600 1x10
-4
Drain current, mA/mm
Gate current, A
1x10
300 1x10
-10
MISHFET
ET
200
ET
-12
1x10
T
HF
HF
FE
SH
IS
1x10
O
M
0 1x10
-16
160
150 RF-enhanced
140
fmax, GHz
130
120 Ohmic
110
100
0 2 4 6 8 10
RC, Ω-mm
LG = 0.2 μm; VD = 30 V
4x10 -7
10-2
-3
C, F/cm2
Hg 10
-7
3x10 10-4
-5
10
2
-6
|I|, A/cm
10
-7
2x10 control 10-7
-8
10
HfO2 annealed
10-9
-7
1x10 650C, 30s 10
-10
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
as deposited HfO2 V, V
0
-10 -5 0 5 10 15
V, V
VS1 5 VD1
6
1
5 nm barrier
2DEG
2 3 4
1 – Ohmic contact (low-T annealed);
2 – Field-control electrode isolation;
3 – Gate dielectric (HFO2)
4 – Source and Drain field-control electrodes /RF-enhanced contacts;
5 – 30 nm Gate
6 – Flash-over suppressing encapsulation
From G. Simin, M. Shur, and R. Gaska, presented at LEC-08, U of Delaware, 8/5/08
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 108
Device ADS model: “5-terminal” MOSHFET
P o rt
D
RF-enhanced/field control electrodes
Num = 1
R
C R3
C2 R = ( R c 0 * 1 e - 3 /W G ) O h m
C = 0 .1 p F
R
C R2
C1 R = ( R c 0 * 1 e - 3 /W G ) O h m
C = 0 .1 p F
P o rt
S LE VE L3_MO D _Model
Var
Eqn VAR Num = 3 MO S FE TM1
VAR 1 N MO S = yes C g d o = 1 e -1 4 N le v =
e p s 0 = 8 .8 5 e - 1 2 R G = 0 .1 8 * W G /L G P MO S =no C gbo= G d s n o i= 1
q = 1 .6 e - 1 9 m u = 1 /q /( N S 0 * 1 e 4 ) /R S H G V to = V T C js w = T h e ta = 0
NS 0= 1e13 g c h = 1 /R S H G K p=K P Js = E ta = 1 e - 4
L G = 0 .0 3 u m V T = -4 G am m a= 0 T ox= T O X K appa=
L G e ff= 0 .0 3 u m C O X = 1 e 4 * q * N S 0 /(-V T ) G am m a2= 0 Nss= K appag=
L G S = 0 .0 3 u m T O X = e p s 0 * 1 .5 /C O X Z e ta = N fs = Xm u=
L G D = 0 .0 8 u m K P = m u*C O X P h i= Tpg= 0 R g= R G
W G=15 um R d=R GD X j= R ds =
R S H0= 300 Rs=RGS Ld= 0 A llP a r a m s =
R C O N T 1 is t h e c o n t a c t
R S HG = 300 r e s is t a n c e p e r 1 m C bd= Uo=
R C O N T m m = 0 .3 e - 4 C bs= U c r it =
R C O N T 1 = R C O N T m m *1 e -3 G a t e m e t a l R e s is t a n c e : Is = U exp=
F o r 0 . 2 5 u m t h ic k A u g a t e ,
R C O N T = R C O N T 1 /( W G ) fo r L G = 1 u m a n d W = 1 m m P b= V m a x = 2 .7 e 5
R G S = R S H 0 * L G S /W G + R C O N T R G = 100. C g s o = 1 e -1 4 Xqc =
R G D = R S H 0 * L G D /W G + R C O N T H e n c e : R G = 0 .1 * W G /L G
35 35
HFET 30 HFET
30
5-term 5-term
25 25
MSG/MUG, dB
MOSHFET MOSHFET
20 20
H 21, dB
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
-5 -5
10 100 1000 10 100 1000
Frequency, GHz Frequency, GHz
•History
•Application examples
•Terahertz Photonics
•Terahertz Electronics
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Year
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 116
Waves of electron density (Plasma Waves)
2
4 π e nd
ω = sk , s = , kd <<1
mε
Hokusai Print
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 119
Dispersion of Plasma Waves
3D 2D ungated 2D gated
+ r - r
+ - d
E - + -r + E
+
E
e2 N 3 D e2N2D e2 N 2D d
ωp = ωp = k ωp = k kd<<1
εε 0m 2 εε 0 m εε 0 m
ωp ωp ωp
k k k
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 120
Plasma Wave Instability in Ballistic FET
Boundary conditions
1.5
The source and drain are connected to a current
Dimensionless Increment
1
source and the gate and source are connected to
a voltage source, Ugs. 0.5
s = (eUo/m)1/2
where n is an odd integer for |vo| < s and an even
integer for |vo| > s.
•Emission
Deng et al (2004)
W. Knap et al (2004)
•Photomixer
V. Ryzhii et al (2002)
Otsuji et al (2003)
•Mixer
M. Lee et al (2005)
•For detectors:
–High sensitivity
–Broad spectral range
–Band selectivity and tunability
–Fast temporal response
THz Detectors
THz Detectors THz Generators
THz Generators
and Mixers
and Mixers
50
GaAs GaN
Frequency (THz)
10
5 Plasma modes
Si
1
Transit mode
0.5
FETs Diodes
Vertical diode:
THz L
Source Drain
Gate
Lchannel
2D Channel Lateral diode:
δU~P
W
AlGaN
GaN
ddep
Gated d
Ungated
2D 2D
1/f0 (1/THz)
200
p 1.5
1.0
Gated plasmons 100
0.5
k 0 0.0
0.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
π/(Lsd) π/(2 W) Usd (V)
60-nm
gate
The most efficient THz generation
occurs when BOTH the ungated and
gated plasmons are in resonance
GaAs :
1 THz detection demonstrated R ~ 10 - 103 V/W
n = 2×1011 cm-2 L = 0.2 µm.
Detection 120 GHz - 2.5 THz
GaN :
1 THz detection demonstrated
n = 2 ×1013 cm-2 & L =2 µm
Room temperature generation
(Knap et al Veksler et al (2006)
Si : 120 GHz – 3 THz detection demonstrated
NEP ~ 10-10 W/Hz
2
4π e 2 n2 d 2
ωp = k
1 εm
1) M. Dyakonov and M. S. Shur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2465 (1993)
2) A. El Fatimy, N. Dyakonova, F. Teppe, W. Knap, N. Pala, R. Gaska, Q.
Fareed, X. Hu, D. B. Veksler, S. Rumyantsev, M. S. Shur, D. Seliuta, G. 0
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
Valusis, S. Bollaert, A. Shchepetov, Y. Roelens, C. Gaquiere, D. Theron,
and A. Cappy, Electronics letters, Vol. 42 No. 23, 9 November (2006)
gate voltage (V)
20 Ugs = -100 mV
15 Ugs=-350 mV
15 Ugs = -200 mV
10
10
Ugs = -300 mV
5
5 Ugs = -400 mV
0
0 -4 -3 -2
10 10 10
0 1 2
Drain voltage Uds, V Drain Current Id(A)
Symbols – experiment
U a2
Vresponse =
4(U gs − U th )(1 − jd / jsat )1/ 2
jd << jsat Colored curves - theory
131
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 131
Resonant detection near instability threshold
0.15
Id=8mA Id=22mA
0.10
f = 0.6 THz; T=300 K
δU, mV
( )
Gate voltage Vgs, V
1
2τ eff = 1
2τ − vd
L
F. Teppe, W. Knap, D. Veksler, et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 052107 (2005)
Response, mV
S IFIR-50 FP L (1 THz – 7 THz) Oscilloscope -0.4 Single mode regime
Lens -0.5
0.1
0.0 b) Mode mixing
0.1 -0.1
Response, mV
-0.2
Amplitude (a. u.)
0.0
1 -0.3
-0.1 -0.4
10.00 20.00 30.00
Time, μs -0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Spectrum of laser mode beatings Time, ms
0
From Dmitry Veksler, Andrey Muravjov, William Stillman, Nezih
0 1 2 3 4 Pala, and Michael Shur, Detection and Homodyne Mixing of
Frequency (MHz) Terahertz Gas Laser Radiation by Submicron GaAs/AlGaAs FETs,
in Abstracts of IEEE sensors Conference, Atlanta, GA, October
2007
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 133
Comparison of THz Detection Devices (300 K)
Si MOS
Response
NEP
Detector time 10
-7
10
-10
2
(Hz) 10
-12
-14
10
Not tunable
Microbolometer 10-11 – 10-12 1μs 10
-8
10
-16
0.5
-18
10
NEP, W/Hz
50 60 70 80 90
Not-9 tunable Frequency f, Hz
Pyroelectric 10-7 - 10 1 ms
10
-9 Lg=120nm
200nm 300nm
Schottky Diode 10-9 Not
– 10-11 tunable
< 10 ps
-10
10
Plasma Wave 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
10-6 – 10Tunable
-10 < 10 ps ? Gate voltage Vg, V
Detector
Advantages of Plasma wave detector:
El Fatimy, N. Dyakonova, F. Teppe, W.
•Band selectivity and tunability (resonant detection) Knap,D. B. Veksler, S. Rumyantsev, M.
•Fast temporal response S. Shur, N. Pala, R. Gaska, Q. Fareed, X.
Hu, D. Seliuta, G. Valusis, C. Gaquiere, D.
•Small size (easy to fabricate matrixes/arrays) Theron, and A. Cappy, IElec. Lett. (2006).
•Compatible with VLSI technology Table courtesy of D. Veksler, RPI
•Broad spectral range
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 134
Schottky barrier (SB) + Plasma waves
Depletion
Semiconductor Depletion
Heterodimensional diodes vs. conventional diodes
Smaller series resistance
Smaller capacitance
Hence, a higher operating frequency is expected
2d Plasma in series with the SB
W.C.B. Peatman, T.W. Crowe, and M. Shur, "A Novel Schottky/2-DEG Diode for Millimeter and
Submillimeter Wave Multiplier Applications," IEEE Electron Device Lett., 13, 11 (1992)
135
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 135
Responsivity vs. radiation frequency (zero bias)
Responsivity (arb. units.)
Orthogonal polarizations:
-1 Theory ■ Eω || Channel
10
■ Eω ⊥ Channel
-2
10 0 1
f, TH z
2 3
-3
10
Response (a.u.)
-3
10
-4
10 -4
10
-5
10
136
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 136
Coupling of THz radiation into transistor.
Experiment
Lock-in
Chopper SR8300
λ=184 μm
FIR Laser
Polarizer
Vgs
Veksler, D.B. Muraviev, A.V. Elkhatib, T.A. Salama, K.N. Shur, M.S. , Plasma wave FET for sub-wavelength THz imaging,
International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium December 12-14, 2007 College Park, Maryland, USA
137
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 137
Transistor responsivity pattern exhibits two spots of
138
maximum response with different signs
Source: Terahertz gas laser SIFIR-
Beam profile in 50 at 1.63 THz (184 μm)
the focal spot: δUd, V
1.00
0.75
Inte
1000
nsit
0.50
y (a
0.25 800
400
.u.)
0.00
0
600
-2.9E-5
200
)
μm
Y(
400 400
X
(μm
)
600
Y, μm
0
-100 4.8E-6
S -200 9.7E-6
1.5E-5
-300 1.9E-5
2.4E-5
-400
Fujitsu FHX06X 2.9E-5
-500
GaAs/AlGaAs HEMT -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400
Lg=0.25μm X, μm
W=200μm
Veksler, D.B. Muraviev, A.V. Elkhatib, T.A. Salama, K.N. Shur, M.S. , Plasma wave FET for sub-wavelength THz imaging,
International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium December 12-14, 2007 College Park, Maryland, USA
~
Ua
∂n ∂ (nv)
+ =0
∂t ∂x
en = CU Boundary conditions:
U ω ( 0 ) − jω ( 0 ) Z = U a , U ω ( L ) + jω ( L ) Z = U b .
We see that the response might have different signs
|Ua |2 / |Ub |2
ω0 = (μU g )−1/ 3 (CL* )
depending on the ratio −2 / 3
1 ⎛ ω0 ⎞
3
⎛ | U a |2 | U b |2 ⎞
δV = − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ − ⎟
4U gs − U th ⎝ω ⎠ ⎜ (1 − j / j )1/ 2 (1 − j / j )3 / 2 ⎟
⎝ d sat d sat ⎠
Z ≈ − i ω L*
Veksler, D.B. Muraviev, A.V. Elkhatib, T.A. Salama, K.N. Shur, M.S. , Plasma wave FET for sub-wavelength THz imaging,
International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium December 12-14, 2007 College Park, Maryland, USA
139
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 139
Transistor THz responsivity vs. drain
current and gate voltage
Theory: Experiment:
1/2 3/2
Response=1/(1-Id/Isat) -α/(1-Id/Isat) Vgs=-0.63 V
2 Vgs=-0.45 V
α=0, Isat=5e-2
α=0.2, Isat=1e-2
Vgs=-0.30 V
α=0.7, Isat=5e-3 Vgs=-0.15 V
0.6 Vgs= 0.0 V
Response, a.u.
δUd, mV
0.0
0
-0.6
1 10 jd, ma 1 10
j , ma
d
Veksler, D.B. Muraviev, A.V. Elkhatib, T.A. Salama, K.N. Shur, M.S. , Plasma wave FET for sub-wavelength THz imaging,
International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium December 12-14, 2007 College Park, Maryland, USA
140
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 140
THz Imaging with plasma FET
Shift (μm)
300
300
m)
Y ((μμm)
100
300
Y (μm)
Y
200
80
200
60
200
100
100
40
20
100
00 0
00 100
100 200
200 300
300 400
400 500
500 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0
0
X ((μμm)
X m)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Vgs (V)
X (μm)
Veksler, D.B. Muraviev, A.V. Elkhatib, T.A. Salama, K.N. Shur, M.S. , Plasma wave FET for sub-wavelength THz imaging,
International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium December 12-14, 2007 College Park, Maryland, USA
•Plasmonic responsivity
200
mechanism works as a
Response peak shift (μm)
180
magnifying glass: ~180 μm
160
140 shift from nanometer scale
120 change in the electric field
100 distribution along the channel
80
60 •This dependence could be
40
used as a calibration curve for
20
0
determining the positions of the
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 peak response as function of
Δ L g (nm) bias of FETs of different design
Veksler, D.B. Muraviev, A.V. Elkhatib, T.A. Salama, K.N. Shur, M.S. , Plasma wave FET for sub-wavelength THz imaging,
International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium December 12-14, 2007 College Park, Maryland, USA
143
Michael Shur (shurm@rpi.edu) http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur 143
Interpretation
~
Vs Vd
~
depends on which AC
source is stronger : Vd or Vs
•History
•Application examples
•Terahertz Photonics
•Terahertz Electronics
•Plasma wave electronics
•Terahertz properties of
grainy multifunctional
materials
•Conclusions and future work
From A. Bykhovski, B. Gelmont, M. S. Shur J. App. Phys. Vol. 74 (11), p. 6734-6739 (1993)
1.0
0.8
Transmission
0.6 Transmission
CdS with AlN/ CdS
0.4
0.2
AlN phonon
0.0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
-1
wave numbers (cm )
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 15.00
Grating Gate
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
e2 N 2 D
0.0 ωp = k
1 2 3 4 5 6
Frequency (THz)
7 8
2εε 0 m
Correct frequency ratio
From N. Pala, D. Veksler, A. Muravjov, W. Stillman, R. Gaska, and M. S. Shur, Resonant Detection and Modulation of
Terahertz Radiation by 2DEG Plasmons in GaN Grating-Gate Structures, in Abstracts of IEEE Sensors Conference,
Atlanta, GA, October 2007
From N. Pala, D. Veksler, A. Muravjov, W. Stillman, R. Gaska, and M. S. Shur, Resonant Detection and Modulation of
Terahertz Radiation by 2DEG Plasmons in GaN Grating-Gate Structures, in Abstracts of IEEE Sensors Conference,
Atlanta, GA, October 2007