Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Registration
Upon the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law, all persons covered
by the said law are given 180 days to submit a SWORN STATEMENT directly to the
assessor’s office
Who are the persons covered? These persons are the landowners in general, they are
classified by CARL into three:
1. Natural Persons – it is one who has its own legal personality, that is an individual
human being;
2. Juridical Persons - is a non-human legal entity, in other words any organization
that is not a single natural person but is authorized by law with duties and rights
and is recognized as a legal person and as having a distinct identity.
3. Government entities – any governmental body having jurisdiction over any matter
contemplated by the CARL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the SWORN STATEMENTS that are to be submitted by the persons covered, they are
required to indicate the following information:
1. The description and area of their subject property;
2. The average gross income of their property in a period of 3 years;
3. The names of all the tenants and farmworkers that work in their properties;
4. The classification of crops planted or sowed in their respective properties
and the area covered by each crop as of June 1, 1987;
5. The terms of mortgages, lease, and management contracts subsisting
within their properties as of June 1, 1987, and
6. Lastly, the latest declared market value of the subject lands as determined
by their respective city or provincial assessors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 15. Registration of Beneficiaries
I.The process of registering the beneficiaries, under this section, the Department of Agrarian
Reform in coordination with the Barangay Agrarian Reform Committee of BARC as organized
by CARL, shall register the agricultural lessees who are qualified to become beneficiaries of the
program:
II. This procedure requires that the copy of the registry or list of all potential CARP
beneficiaries in the barangay shall be posted in the following places:
1. In Barangay halls;
2. Schools; or
3. Other public buildings in the barangay – which must be open to inspection
by the general public at all reasonable hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER V
Land Acquisition
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 16. Procedure for Acquisition and Distribution of Private Lands (as amended by Section
6, R.A. 9700)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the DAR identifies the subject land, landowner and beneficiary, the department will then
notify the landowner about compulsory acquisition and price offer through: 1). personal notice
or by registered mail; and 2) by posting the said notice in a conspicuous place in barangay hall
and municipal hall where land is located so that the notice will be easily seen by the landowner
as well as the beneficiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now we go to the possible scenarios in regard to either the landowner accepts or rejects the
offered price by the Department of Agrarian Reform:
a. If the landowner accepts the offer, the Land Bank will then pay the
landowner within 30 days from execution and the delivery of Deed of
Transfer;
b. If the landowner rejects the offer – the DAR will then commence a
summary proceeding with the landowner to determine the proper and
adjusted just compensation offer –
In the case of (Mateo vs DAR, G.R. No. 186339) this is when the petitioners
rejected the offer made by the Land Bank of the Philippines and DAR but
before the institution of the summary proceedings in determining the
adjusted compensation, the petitioners filed a civil action against the LBP
and the department for the proper payment of just compensation. The action
was raffled to a Special Agrarian Court or SAC that fixed the amount of the
just compensation of the petitioners and ordering the LBP to pay the said
fee. However, the CA reversed the decision made by SAC as it was
supposed to be the DAR Adjudication Board (DARAB) who must have
heard the case in determining the right compensation since it has the quasi-
judicial authority to make a preliminary determination of just compensation
of lands acquired under R.A. No. 6657. The CA further averred that the filing
of the petitioners of the civil action was premature, thus failing to exhaust
the prescribed administrative remedy and, in the process, preventing the
DARAB from complying with [the] said administrative process which is
mandatory.
When the case reached the SC, the Court held that the CA erred in ordering
the dismissal of the Mateos' complaint before the SAC. The doctrine of
exhaustion of administrative remedies finds no application in the instant
case where the DAR took no initiative and inordinately delayed the conduct
of summary administrative proceedings, and where during the pendency of
the case before the SAC, the DARAB rendered decisions affirming the
LBP's prior valuations of the subject property. Thus, it resulted to the civil
action made by the petitioners. Hence, the Court remanded the case back
to the trial court for the final determination of the just compensation.
Moving forward, the taking of immediate possession of land by the DAR can only be concluded
if, 1) the landowner receives corresponding payment or 2) when the landowner does not respond
to notice of acquisition.
Next, to this process, a request will be sent by DAR to Register of Deeds to issue Transfer
Certificate of Title to Republic of Philippines.
II. What are the kinds of notices required for validity of implementation addressed to the
landowner:
B. Notice of Acquisition
Again, pursuant to this section which laid out the notice of acquisition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. What is the reason for construing the provisions of this act? The land acquisition under
agrarian reform law is an extraordinary method of expropriation. It should be strictly construed
against the department and all of its agencies and liberally construed in favor of property owners.
B. Failure of DAR or any of its agencies to comply with proper procedure for expropriation
is a violation of constitutional due process and in effect arbitrary, capricious, whimsical and
tainted with grave abuse of discretion, such as no notice of coverage issued. Section 1 of the
Bill of Rights under Article 3 of the Constitution proscribes that, “No person shall be deprived of
life, liberty, or property without due process of law…” the deprivation of such is again, a
constitutional violation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Lastly in discussing this section, when does the title or ownership of the land be
transferred to the State, a question of the government’s power of eminent domain?
1. It is only when there is full payment of just compensation by DAR to the
landowners;
If there is yet no final determination of just compensation and full payment to the land owner, the
title and ownership remains to the latter.
A deposited offered price by DAR does not automatically warrant the cancellation of the
landowner’s title.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------