The document discusses trade allocation practices at a firm. It summarizes that the firm did not have objective measures for allocating trades, allocated trades arbitrarily, and favored some clients over others by allocating profitable trades to boost the performance of fee-based accounts. The appropriate actions are for firms to obtain advance client interest in new issues, allocate new shares by client rather than portfolio manager, and treat all clients fairly.
The document discusses trade allocation practices at a firm. It summarizes that the firm did not have objective measures for allocating trades, allocated trades arbitrarily, and favored some clients over others by allocating profitable trades to boost the performance of fee-based accounts. The appropriate actions are for firms to obtain advance client interest in new issues, allocate new shares by client rather than portfolio manager, and treat all clients fairly.
The document discusses trade allocation practices at a firm. It summarizes that the firm did not have objective measures for allocating trades, allocated trades arbitrarily, and favored some clients over others by allocating profitable trades to boost the performance of fee-based accounts. The appropriate actions are for firms to obtain advance client interest in new issues, allocate new shares by client rather than portfolio manager, and treat all clients fairly.
Learning Outcome Statements • LOSs Covered • 4a, 4b • LOSs Not Covered • None Issues • Firm did not prescribe any objective measures • Firm allocated trades ad hoc • Firm based compensation arrangements in favor of performance-based fee accounts • Firm used profitable equity trades to boost performance of performance-based accounts • Firm favored some clients Appropriate Actions • Firms should obtain advance indications of client’s interest for new issues • Allocate new shares by client rather than by portfolio manager • Treat clients fairly