Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Entrepreneurship
in Asia
Week 5
Starting a Business
FOR THIS WEEK….
- DEFINE WHAT IS A BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
BUSINESS
OWNERSHIP
CAPITAL PERSONAL ASSETS
SHARING OF
SPAN OF CONTROL
INFORMATION
• Main element that determines the type of business one
should venture in.
CAPITAL • Also determines the probability of an individual
obtaining credit or loans from external sources.
OF
BUSINESS
OWNERSHIP
TYPES OF BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
TYPES OF BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
• The simplest business structure with minimal legal requirements under the
Business Registration Act 1956 (Amendment 1978) and the Procedures of
Business Registration 1957.
• Solely owned and operated by one individual, which means it has a single
owner.
• Can have a large number of employees.
• E.g. Restaurants, beauty saloon, mini markets, tailors etc.
• A business owned by at least two or more individuals but not exceeding the
maximum number of 20 persons.
• Owners of the business are called partners.
• Each partners contributes money, labour, or skills, and each shares the profits
and losses.
• 2 types of Partnership:
• General Partnership: all partners have unlimited liabilities for the debt of
business. Manages the company, receives salary and shares.
• Limited Partnership: Does not take an active role and have limited liabilities.
Only be liable to the extent of their contribution (capital).
TYPES OF BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
• A company limited by shares and owned by a group of people with at least
two or more individuals but not exceeding 50 people.
• The shares cannot be sold to the general public.
• “Limited” refers to it has a legal identity to its own that is separated from the
people who own it.
• Even in liquidation, the creditor’s claim are restricted to the asset of the
company.
• The owners of the company are called shareholders.
• The name of the company ends with “Pte Ltd” or “Sdn Bhd”
Interest/
Capital Location
Knowledge
Ability to
determine business Flexibility Cost minimization
direction
Business chance
New lifestyle
when purchasing is
goals
not an option
The Disadvantages of starting a
New Business
Lack of established
Raising capital
customer base
Franchise
Cost of Start-up Venture
Any starting business will need to meet the following cost:
• Licenses and permits required to operate the business
• Working capital
• Insurance
• Stationery
Purchasing an Existing Business
The dispute began in January 2017 when La Kaffa, the Taiwan-based company behind Chatime, terminated Loob
Holding’s contract as the franchise holder for Chatime in Malaysia based on an alleged breach of contract on Loob’s
part. Despite having more than 20 years to go in the contract, La Kaffa alleged that Loob had begun sourcing
unapproved raw material, which violated the terms of the master franchisor contract, prompting the company to act.
Loob accepted the termination, but here’s where things took a remarkable twist: it “rebranded” virtually all Chatime
outlets in Malaysia into its own brand, Tealive, and ran the outlets as usual. Naturally, La Kaffa sued Loob in the
Malaysian courts, seeking an injunction to stop the Tealive outlets from operating.
What Loob Holding CEO Bryan Loo basically did was to set up Tealive as a rival to Chatime, which is against both the
terms of the master franchise agreement as well as the Franchise Act 1998. When La Kaffa brought this case to the High
Court, it sought a mandatory injunction and a prohibitory injunction against Loob Holding.
•The mandatory injunction was for Loob to return all the confidential information and documents related to Chatime back
to La Kaffa.
•The prohibitory injunction was to restrain Loob from continuing its trade as a competitor of La Kaffa for two years, as
agreed in the post-termination terms of the franchise and in accordance with the law.
La Kaffa was successfully granted the mandatory injunction, but failed in obtaining the prohibitory injunction. The judge
said that forcing Tealive to shut down its business would negatively affect the livelihood of over 800 employees of Loob, as
well as the suppliers, landlords, and families of the employees. The judge also believed the damages that Tealive would
have to pay Chatime in compensation would make up for any loss Tealive has inflicted on Chatime’s business.
Thus, at this point of the legal battle, Tealive triumphed over Chatime.
• Discuss the ethical issues pertaining to the Tealive vs
Chatime case
017-662 0085
Contact Hours
8:30 a.m. – 6:30 p.m.