Coincidences do not exist.

Babies are the first to discover that nothing happens by

chance. Their passage through different environments, without giving them any
because beforehand, ends up conditioning the brain in formation, impressed by the
changes and from repeated situations happening during the gestation period.

As the stimulus is reproduced in its development, it is possible to store that information,

as a signal related to a past moment, in a situation of continuous recording and
construction of priorities and correlations.

This cycle of recording, abstraction and priorities, once awakened, remains active after
birth and leads us to the possible surreal of dreams, a part of creativity and
imagination.

An hour inside a body and suddenly in the chest. No explanation, once in the crib and
then on the porch. From the breeze on the beach to the perfume of flowers. Tastes to
the sound of the forest and the waves of the sea. All of these are processes that
culminate in brain impressions. Changes.

Who ever dreamed like being in two places at the same time? Or as if we were in the
house of the parents and only one door was enough to give rise to a truly distant
garden? We went to bed and woke up in another setting.

It is as if the impossible were possible. And this (the lack of explanations before the
senses) determines us, stimulating our ability to project and create perspectives as
well.

What about babies who have moved from place to place, but traveling and listening to
the different songs? How could we not remember that we fell asleep and woke up in
other places common or strange during childhood?

How not to "learn" to dream of the impossible?

What is the logic of records moving from one place to another?

And so, day and night, sun and rain, changes condition us without saying much.

Precisely this multiplicity of records has everything to do with our creative process; as
well as Alice in Wonderland long before any other finds.

Now then travel in a hypothetical world. Suppose you had a printed circuit that we can
illustrate how your DNA was initially like a ROM of a computer, that you contained a
permanent sensor memory, programmed to capture things from the external
environment and process them according to your previous configuration perceived and
stored the received message, I say: firstly the data is imprinted on you by your way of
recognizing the meaning, not necessarily by what things are or end up understood.

The abstraction is more or less this, the articulated capture of the sign casting a
representation. So, it's as if you can only store the information if it can get into your
complex of forms. Better, they say that memory is just that ability to formulate
connections, because what we keep are infinite arrangements, frequencies and
combinations.
It, memory, is precisely in the keys that we can form of processed positions and
because of the identity of sequencing reproduced in whole or in part, we are a little
more, always.

By achieving a code capable of being perceived, the system of content organization will
house the object, ie the combinations, in dimensions and priorities, according to an
order of principles determined in a preliminary organization of a system, generating a
representation of general or particular meaning, moved by a plasticity conditioning the
custody, capture and processing of information.

Today there are experiments in the sense that abstraction comprises a set of
technological functions that are innate to the human being, reduced in principles
named according to the individual or collective potential of ordering the information in
the mental or artificial environment.

They are sensory experiences formed of the individual's perception, in the face of
characteristics such as continuity, segregation, similarity, unity, proximity, pregnancy
and closure.

In a larger perspective, the ability to abstract has a clear relation to manipulated

knowledge and the creative process, and as mere enthusiasts we argue that things on
this side tend to be completed in the finer and higher mental processes.

Like dreams, when we are led to believe that they are happening, things tend to
synthesis, to demarcation on a plane far beyond focus and nothing close to a truth
table.

Why, dreams are so true, are not they? And this sensation does not necessarily come
from what we perceive, but it happens precisely because we are "connected" by
issuing sensory signals uninterruptedly, reason why mental selectivity suffers a
"mistake", thus: due to an internal conditioning, agreed by our system, in the mode of
operation.

In an analogy, the flashing of a headlight on the road during daylight and in good
weather was a signal capable of drawing the other driver's attention in the opposite
direction. However, from the moment that all vehicles pass through a headlamp in full
daylight, the opposite effect will certainly happen.

With the situation no longer proving interesting to arouse selective attention, nor trigger
our emitter response system, the signal will tend to lose sensory relevance, proving
unserviceable to stimulate, given its unchanging and natural conditioning to the
scenario.

In this sense, the brain will adapt and interpret that staying connected is being turned
off. For then the same thing that can occur leading us to incredible dreams can happen
before a capacity that can be said innate and common to being the human, the
telepathic potential.

Notwithstanding the locking mechanisms at our disposal, it turns out that, because we
are "connected" all the time as vocationally, we do not realize this as long as they are
conditioned by sensations in the stand mode of operation.

Like other mental faculties, it is possible that we just do not connect without any
apparatus like language or signals because everyone else is emitting telepathic waves,
confusing our perception.

Where is the selectivity at all?

On the other hand, reversing this polar conditioning would have to do with a new
process of dystrophy reversal and skill development according to the stages of
evolution. Why not?

Changing your rhythm and psychic conditioning, which to some extent (but not
necessarily as far as wave interference) can be influenced by the variation of light,
temperature, and tides, would be possible to recognize the presence of telepathic
waves and perhaps with origin of similar wavebands, as well as control the signals
involuntarily emitted by you.

And in spite of the perceived signal, it may be that the representation of the message
supposedly received also has no purpose, nor is it directed to a specific person.

What we do not know is whether the signals are likely to reach several people at the
same time, or even if they are capable of deciphering "conventionally", but it is not to
be ruled out that it is possible to send rhythms or even figures, we seem to have
phonetic transcription.

Perhaps even the representation we make reflects our interior properly, than it really
matters in the meaning emitted in a message from outside, but someone tells me that
the syntonies do not occur by chance: Glory, God is in everything.